The Bioactive Wound Care market can be segmented on the basis of the different modes of interaction and by region. The different interaction modes include First-Line Interactive Dressing, consisting of Semi-Permeable Films, Foams, Alginates and others, and Second-Line Interactive Dressing which involves Honey, Hydrofiber, Silicone and Silver. By region, the market can be classified into North America, Europe, APAC and RoW regions.
North America accounts for the maximum revenue share in the fiscal year ended 2015, followed by Europe and Asia-pacific regions and will continue to be the leading region in Bioactive Wound Care market during the forecast period till 2020. This can be attributed to the higher incidence of chronic and acute wounds as well as the various government healthcare reimbursement policies which further aid in such treatments. Increasing geriatric population in countries such as U.S. and Canada is also one of the major driving factors behind the growth of Bioactive Wound Care market across these regions. The market will slowly expand in Middle East owing to increasing disposable income and effective price control regulations. The primary beneficiary of bioactive wound dressings are the people affected with diabetes, venous leg ulcers and burns. First-Line Interactive Dressing mode of interaction is the most prominent because this treatment process is affordable and treats a varied range of wounds, whereas the Second-Line Interactive Dressing mode is expensive and has specific dressings for specific kind of wounds. The increasing use of stem cells and growth factors will help in further diversification of the market.
The bioactive wound care market is projected to serve a large customer base composed of different population group based on disease and age. The lack of mandatory clinical trials has pushed the market back. The firms existing in the market need to conduct more clinical trials in Europe and Asia for stronger penetration and drive the market towards positive growth.
Major players profiled in the report include:
Smith & Nephew,
The methodology for estimating the Bioactive Wound Care market involved the study of utilization of the various bioactive dressing products supply and demand ratio across the various chronic diseases. The segmentations have been mapped to understand various market dynamics. Simultaneously, the companies involved at raw material, manufacturing, integration and distribution level were also studied from the perspective of their product portfolio, geographical presence, annual turnover and other parameters to substantiate the estimations. All these estimations were further validated via a thorough primary research with industry expert.
Please Note: The report is to be delivered in 1-2 working days after an order is placed.
2. Executive Summary
3. Bioactive Wound Care Market - Market Landscape
3.1. Market Share Analysis
3.2. Comparative Analysis
3.2.1. Product Benchmarking
3.2.2. End User Profiling
3.2.3. Patent Analysis
3.2.4. Top 5 Financials Analysis
4. Bioactive Wound Care Market - Market Forces
4.1. Market Drivers
4.1.1. Rise In Geriatric Population
4.1.2. High Incidence Of Chronic & Acute Wounds
4.2. Market Constraints
4.2.1. Lack Of Clinical Trials Have Dampened The Growth Of The Market
4.2.1. Poor Reimbursement Policy In Europe
4.3. Market Challenges
4.3.1. High Treatment Cost
4.3.2. Slow Adoption Rate In Asia & Europe
4.4. Attractiveness Of The Industry
4.4.1. Power Of Suppliers
4.4.2. Power Of Customers
4.4.3. Threat Of New Entrants
4.4.4. Threat Of Substitution
4.4.5. Threat Of Competition
5. Bioactive Wound Care Market – Strategic Analysis
5.1. Value Chain Analysis
5.2. Pricing Analysis
5.3. Opportunity Analysis
5.4. Product / Market Life Cycle Analysis
6. Bioactive Wound Care Market – By Mode Of Interaction
6.1. First-Line Interactive Dressing
6.1.1. Semi-Permeable Films
6.2. Second-Line Interactive Dressing
7. Global Bioactive Wound Care Market - Geographic Analysis
7.2. North America
8. Market Entropy
8.1. New Product Launches
8.2. M&As, Collaborations, Jvs And Partnerships
9. Company Profiles (Overview, Financials, Swot Analysis – Top 5 Companies, Developments, Product Portfolio)
9.1. Smith & Nephew Plc.
9.2. 3m Corporation
9.3. Coloplast As
9.4. Convatec , Inc.
9.5. Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp.
9.6. Acelity L.P., Inc.
9.7. Molnlycke Healthcare Group
9.8. Covalon Technologies Ltd.
9.9. Organogenesis Inc.
9.10. Paul Hartmann Ag
9.11. Hollister Wound Care Inc.
9.12. Derma Sciences Inc.
9.13. Human Biosciences Inc.
9.14. B Braun Melsungen Ag
9.15. Dermarite Industries Llc
9.16. Medline Industries Inc.
*More Than 40 Companies Are Profiled In This Research Report, Complete List Available On Request*
"*Financials Would Be Provided On A Best Efforts Basis For Private Companies"
10.3. Research Methodology
10.5. Compilation Of Expert Insights