Technology Investment Priorities in Australian Mining, 2016

  • ID: 3618376
  • Report
  • Region: Australia
  • 69 pages
  • GlobalData
1 of 5

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Aibotix
  • CADS Survey
  • CRCMining
  • GE Mining
  • Joy Global
  • Maptek
  • MORE
Technology Investment Priorities in Australian Mining, 2016

Summary

Overall trends in the data revealed:

- The primary technologies expected to see the greatest increases in penetration over the next two years are UAVs/drones, followed by remote control/machine automation, and real-time video training.
- 80% of mines have already invested in collision avoidance, scheduling and shift optimization, tire monitoring, predictive maintenance, fleet management and environmental monitoring technologies.
- UAVs/drones have the least penetration of the technologies with only 40% currently invested. This was followed by real time video training with 42% of mines invested.
- The greatest increase in penetration over the last two years has been in collision avoidance technologies, with expectations in the 2014 survey far exceeded. Fleet management, tire monitoring and fatigue management technologies were other fields that also exceeded investment expectations from the previous survey in 2014.
- Markets expected to have the greatest increases in technology penetration over the next 2 years are expected in Queensland and within the coal and precious metals sectors.
- Companies with revenues below US$1 billion are planning more investments over the next two years than all other companies.
- Vulcan is the most used software, nominated by 33% of the mines This was followed by Surpac with 16% and Xpac with 10%.

Scope

- The report is based on responses from a survey of 100 senior decision makers at operating Australian mines, responsible for the purchase of equipment for plant and mine operations, along with consumables and services. The mines are located across eight different states and territories, with Western Australia, Queensland and New South Wales accounting for 88% of the mines. This included four main commodity groups and a range of surface and underground mining operations.

Reasons to buy

- Understand which technologies have and are attracting the most investment, and how this varies by commodity group, mine type, global company revenue and Australian state.
- Target the segments with the greatest opportunity for technology products and services.
- Segment the market according to those fully invested, and those planning to make new investments into each technology.
READ MORE
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
2 of 5

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Aibotix
  • CADS Survey
  • CRCMining
  • GE Mining
  • Joy Global
  • Maptek
  • MORE
1 Executive Summary

2 Technology Investment Trends in Australian Mines

2.1 Technology Investment Comparison and Trends

2.2 Scheduling and Shift Optimization (Including Haulage and Dynamic Dispatching)

2.2.1 Mine type

2.2.2 Commodity group

2.2.3 State

2.2.4 Mine size

2.2.5 Company revenue

2.2.6 Raw data table

2.3 Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring

2.3.1 Mine type

2.3.2 Commodity group

2.3.3 State

2.3.4 Mine size

2.3.5 Company revenue

2.3.6 Raw data table

2.4 Tire Monitoring

2.4.1 Mine type

2.4.2 Commodity group

2.4.3 State

2.4.4 Mine size

2.4.5 Company revenue

2.4.6 Raw data table

2.5 Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management

2.5.1 Mine type

2.5.2 Commodity group

2.5.3 State

2.5.4 Mine size

2.5.5 Company revenue

2.5.6 Raw data table

2.6 Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection

2.6.1 Mine type

2.6.2 Commodity group

2.6.3 State

2.6.4 Mine size

2.6.5 Company revenue

2.6.6 Raw data table

2.7 Fatigue Management

2.7.1 Mine type

2.7.2 Commodity group

2.7.3 State

2.7.4 Mine size

2.7.5 Company revenue

2.7.6 Raw data table

2.8 Real-Time Video Training

2.8.1 Mine type

2.8.2 Commodity group

2.8.3 State

2.8.4 Mine size

2.8.5 Company revenue

2.8.6 Raw data table

2.9 Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation

2.9.1 Mine type

2.9.2 Commodity group

2.9.3 State

2.9.4 Mine size

2.9.5 Company revenue

2.9.6 Raw data table

2.10 UAVs/Drones

2.10.1 Mine type

2.10.2 Commodity group

2.10.3 State

2.10.4 Mine size

2.10.5 Company revenue

2.10.6 Raw data table

2.11 Predictive Maintenance

2.11.1 Mine type

2.11.2 Commodity group

2.11.3 State

2.11.4 Mine size

2.11.5 Company revenue

2.11.6 Raw data table

2.12 Energy Management and Optimization

2.12.1 Mine type

2.12.2 Commodity group

2.12.3 State

2.12.4 Mine size

2.12.5 Company revenue

2.12.6 Raw data table

3 Preferences for Software Platforms

3.1 Top Software by Commodity Group

4 Priorities For Future Technology Investments

4.1 Priorities for technology investments by commodity group

4.2 Priorities for technology investments by state

5 Summary

6 Appendix I

6.1 Selected Data Tables

7 Appendix II

7.1 Survey Background

7.2 Analysis of the Survey Sample

8 Appendix III

8.1 What is this report about?

8.2 Methodology

8.3 Definitions

8.4 Contact the Author

8.5 About the Author

8.6 Disclaimer

1.1 List of Tables

Table 1: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Segment (%), Q4 2015

Table 2: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 3: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 4: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 5: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 6: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 7: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 8: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 9: UAVs and Drones Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 10: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 11: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions Raw Data (%), Q4 2015

Table 12: Top Software Platforms in Use in Different Departments (%), Q4 2015

Table 13: Priorities for Technology Investments by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Table 14: Priorities for Priorities for Technology Investments by State (%), Q4 2015

1.2 List of Figures

Figure 1: Investment Trends and Intentions in a Range of Technologies for the Next Two Years (%), Q4 2015

Figure 2: Trends in Penetration of Key Technologies (%), 2014 - 2016

Figure 3: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 4: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Commodity (%), Q4 2015

Figure 5: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 6: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 7: Scheduling and Shift Optimization Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 8: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 9: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Figure 10: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 11: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 12: Fleet Management and Vehicle Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 13: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 14: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Figure 15: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 16: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 17: Tire Monitoring Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 18: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 19: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Figure 20: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 21: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 22: Environmental Monitoring and Emissions Management Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 23: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 24: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Figure 25: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 26: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 27: Collision Avoidance and Proximity Detection Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 28: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 29: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Figure 30: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 31: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 32: Fatigue Management Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 33: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by Mine Type, Q4 2015

Figure 34: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group, Q4 2015

Figure 35: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 36: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 37: Real-Time Video Training Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 38: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 39: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Figure 40: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 41: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 42: Remote Control Equipment and Machine Automation Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 43: UAVs/ Drones Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 44: UAVs/ Drones Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Figure 45: UAVs/ Drones Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 46: UAVs/ Drones Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 47: UAVs/ Drones Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 48: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by Mine Type, Q4 2015

Figure 49: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Figure 50: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 51: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 52: Predictive Maintenance Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 53: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 54: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by Commodity Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 55: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 56: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by Mine Size (%), Q4 2015

Figure 57: Energy Management and Optimization Investments and Intentions by Company Revenue (%), Q4 2015

Figure 58: Top Software Platforms in Use in Different Mine Site Departments (%), Q4 2015

Figure 59: Top Software Platforms in Use Across Different Commodities (%), Q4 2015

Figure 60: Priorities for Technology Investments (%), Q4 2015

Figure 61: Priorities for Technology Investments by Commodity Group (%), Q4 2015

Figure 62: Priorities for Technology Investments by State (%), Q4 2015

Figure 63: Survey Respondents by State and Territory (%), Q4 2015

Figure 64: Survey Respondents by Mine Type (%), Q4 2015

Figure 65: Survey Respondents by Commodity (%), Q4
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
3 of 5

Loading
LOADING...

4 of 5
  • Wenco International Mining Systems
  • Caterpillar
  • Leica Jigsaw
  • Modular Mining
  • GE Mining
  • Hexagon Mining
  • Becker Electronics
  • Komatsu
  • Joy Global
  • Advanced Mining Technologies
  • CRCMining
  • CR Kennedy & Co
  • Aibotix
  • CADS Survey
  • Argyle
  • FLIR Systems
  • Geovia
  • Maptek
  • Datamine
  • RungePincockMinarco
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
5 of 5
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Adroll
adroll