US Market Report for Spinous Process Fixation 2017 - MedCore

  • ID: 4240673
  • Report
  • Region: United States
  • 450 pages
  • iData Research
1 of 4

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Aesculap
  • Bacterin
  • GS Medical
  • Karl Storz
  • NuVasive
  • Richard Wolf
  • MORE
General Report Contents
- Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
- Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
- Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
- Section on recent mergers & acquisitions

This market maintained growth over the previous year, though as predicted, the ASP continues to be negatively affected by the global prevalence of medical cutbacks and growing competition in the market. However, due to the recent introduction of spinous process fixation devices, this market has been able to evade the effects the economy has had on the spinal implant market at a macro level. It is expected that the market will continue growing strongly over the forecast period.

Spinous process fixation devices are viewed as alternatives to pedicle screws. The minimally invasive nature of these devices will be a strong contributing factor to the growth of this market as these devices have resulted in positive clinical outcomes as compared to traditional pedicle screws. A major advantage to the use of spinous process fixation devices is that the implantation of the device does not preclude the use of pedicle screws or interbody devices at a later date.

Reimbursement for spinous process fixation devices was similar to that for pedicle screws. Starting in 2011, however, some insurance companies required more paperwork for approval. As of 2016, many insurance companies still labelled spinous process fixation as an investigational procedure. Their policies specifically state that there is a lack of evidence on the efficacy of interspinous fixation devices, both for use in combination with interbody fusion and for use as a stand-alone procedure. Approximately half of the U.S. population will not be reimbursed if they elect to have the procedure. Many insurance companies have stopped reimbursement for spinous process fixation procedures, which in turn has caused manufacturers to invest in clinical studies with the goal of eventual insurance approval. Until then, market growth will be greatly impacted; the double-digit growth experienced recently will quickly dwindle to single-digit growth until the insurance decision is reversed.
READ MORE
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
2 of 4

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Aesculap
  • Bacterin
  • GS Medical
  • Karl Storz
  • NuVasive
  • Richard Wolf
  • MORE
Executive Summary
U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview
Competitive Analysis
Market Trends
Market Developments
Procedure Numbers
Procedure Codes Investigated
Markets Included
Key Report Updates
Version History

1. Research Methodology
1.1 Research Scope
1.2 9-Step Methodology
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

2. Disease Overview
2.1 Introduction
2.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
2.1.1.1 Disc Herniation
2.1.1.2 Stenosis
2.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis
2.1.1.4 Arthritis
2.1.2 Spinal Deformities
2.1.2.1 Scoliosis
2.1.2.2 Kyphosis And Lordosis
2.1.3 Trauma And Tumor
2.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
2.1.4.1 Osteoporosis
2.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures

3. Product Assessment
3.1 Product Portfolios
3.1.1 Spinous Process Fixation
3.1 FDA Recalls
3.1.1 Alphatec Spine
3.1.2 Depuy Synthes
3.1.3 Medtronic
3.1.4 Orthofix
3.1.5 Stryker
3.1.6 Zimmer Biomet
3.2 Clinical Trials
3.2.1 Depuy Synthes
3.2.2 Globus Medical
3.2.3 K2M
3.2.4 Medtronic
3.2.5 Stryker
3.2.6 Zimmer Biomet

4. Spinous Process Fixation Market
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Market Analysis And Forecast
4.3 Drivers And Limiters
4.3.1 Market Drivers
4.3.2 Market Limiters
4.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Abbreviations
Appendix: Company Press Releases

List Of Charts

Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market By Segment, U.S., 2013 - 2023
Chart 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Overview, U.S., 2013 & 2023
Chart 4 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2013 - 2023
Chart 4 2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2016

List Of Figures

Figure 1 1 Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking By Segment, U.S., 2016 (1 Of 2)
Figure 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking By Segment, U.S., 2016 (2 Of 2)
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched In This Report, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting The Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market By Segment, U.S. (1 Of 2)
Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting The Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market By Segment, U.S. (2 Of 2)
Figure 1 6: Recent Events In The Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, U.S., 2015 - 2017
Figure 1 7: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures Covered, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 8: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2016 (1 Of 2)
Figure 1 9: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2016 (2 Of 2)
Figure 1 10: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 11: Key Report Updates
Figure 1 12: Version History
Figure 3 1: Spinous Process Fixation Devices By Company
Figure 3 2: Class 2 Device Recall Alphatec Spine
Figure 3 3: Class 2 Device Recall Depuy Synthes
Figure 3 4: Class 2 Device Recall Depuy Synthes
Figure 3 5: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 6: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 7: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 8: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 9: Class 2 Device Recall Orthofix
Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Orthofix
Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall Orthofix
Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Orthofix
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet
Figure 3 16: An Acdf Multi-Center Study Using Vivigen Cellular Bone Matrix
Figure 3 17: A Retrospective Study Using Caliber® Tlif Expandable Spacer In The Treatment Of Ddd: 2 Year Follow-Up.
Figure 3 18: Comparing Pedicle Screw Systems For The Treatment Of Adolescent Paediatric Spine Deformity
Figure 3 19: A Prospective, 5-Year Global Study On Mast™
Figure 3 20: Spinal Cord Stimulation To Treat Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation (Scs-Paf)
Figure 3 21: Olif25™ /Olif51™ Study
Figure 3 22: Acculif® Prospective Patient Outcomes Study (Apropos)
Figure 3 23: Post-Market Surveillance Study Of The Tm Ardis Interbody Fusion System
Figure 4 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2013 - 2023
Figure 4 2: Drivers And Limiters, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2016
Figure 4 3: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2016
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
3 of 4

Loading
LOADING...

4 of 4
  • Aesculap
  • Alphatec Spine
  • Amedica
  • Aurora Spine
  • Bacterin
  • Baxano Surgical
  • DePuy Synthes
  • GS Medical
  • Globus Medical
  • Interventional Spine
  • Joimax
  • K2M
  • Karl Storz
  • Life Spine
  • Medtronic
  • NuVasive
  • Nutech
  • Orthofix
  • OsteoMed
  • Paradigm Spine
  • RTI Surgical
  • Richard Wolf
  • SI-BONE
  • Spineology
  • Stryker
  • VG Innovations
  • Xtant
  • Zimmer Biomet
  • Zyga Technology
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
5 of 4
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Adroll
adroll