US Market Overview for Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants 2017 - MedView

  • ID: 4240697
  • Report
  • Region: United States
  • 462 pages
  • iData Research
1 of 4

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Aesculap
  • Bacterin
  • GS Medical
  • Karl Storz
  • NuVasive
  • Richard Wolf
  • MORE
General Report Contents
- Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
- Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
- Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
- Section on recent mergers & acquisitions

The spinal implant market is considered by many to be the most exciting and controversial segment of the orthopedics industry. This market has traditionally been a segment of the orthopedics market, but due to rapid growth and a large market size, many manufacturers view spine as a key business division separate from traditional orthopedics.

Historically, the majority of spinal implants were implanted in open surgical procedures through large incisions. However, open surgery can cause considerable tissue damage and lead to a large number of complications. Minimally invasive techniques, which require only small puncture wounds, have been developed for the implantation of a number of spinal implant types. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) methods are frequently used for implanting traditional spinal implant devices, such as interbody devices and pedicle screws. However, new technologies such as facet fixation and spinous process fixation have also been developed using MIS techniques.

For the purposes of this report, the U.S. minimally invasive spinal implant market is segmented into spinous process fixation, facet fixation, MIS interbody fusion, MIS pedicle screws and MIS sacroiliac joint fusion.

Rapid growth is expected in all segments of the U.S. minimally invasive spinal implant market as a result of the physiological and surgical advantages of MIS procedures over open procedures.

One of the key drivers for the MIS spinal device market is the increase in the target population, which is composed of aging baby boomers. The majority of procedures are performed on those individuals in the final third and quarter of their lifespan, usually over the age of 60. This age group is the fastest growing demographic cohort in the United States. The biggest limiting factor for the MIS spinal device market is the complexity of the procedures and the skill required to master them. In particular, percutaneous techniques, and, to a lesser extent, retractor techniques, are considered by many to be considerably more difficult to master than traditional open surgical methods. Older generations of doctors and surgeons are especially reluctant to switch to MIS, as it takes a considerable time investment to master the procedure. The MIS interbody market continues to see a shift toward OLIF and LLIF devices and away from MIPLIF and MITLIF devices. The oblique and lateral lumbar approaches are expected to see more growth than their posterior and transforaminal lumbar counterparts, although positive growth is expected across segments.
READ MORE
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
2 of 4

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Aesculap
  • Bacterin
  • GS Medical
  • Karl Storz
  • NuVasive
  • Richard Wolf
  • MORE
Executive Summary
U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview
Competitive Analysis
Market Trends
Market Developments
Procedure Numbers
Procedure Codes Investigated
Markets Included
Key Report Updates
Version History

1. Research Methodology
1.1 Research Scope
1.2 9-Step Methodology
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

2. Disease Overview
2.1 Introduction
2.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
2.1.1.1 Disc Herniation
2.1.1.2 Stenosis
2.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis
2.1.1.4 Arthritis
2.1.2 Spinal Deformities
2.1.2.1 Scoliosis
2.1.2.2 Kyphosis And Lordosis
2.1.3 Trauma And Tumor
2.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
2.1.4.1 Osteoporosis
2.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures

3. U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
3.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
3.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws
3.1.2.1 Percutaneous Mis Systems
3.1.2.2 Retractor-Based Mis Systems
3.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation
3.1.4 Facet Fixation
3.1.5 Mis Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
3.1.6 Mis Spine Endoscopes
3.2 Market Overview
3.3 Trend Analysis By Segment
3.4 Drivers And Limiters
3.4.1 Market Drivers
3.4.2 Market Limiters
3.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
3.6 Company Profiles
3.6.1 Alphatec Spine
3.6.2 Depuy Synthes
3.6.3 Globus Medical
3.6.4 K2M
3.6.5 Medtronic
3.6.6 Orthofix
3.6.7 Stryker
3.6.8 Zimmer Biomet
Abbreviations
Appendix: Company Press Releases

List Of Charts

Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market By Segment, U.S., 2013 - 2023
Chart 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Overview, U.S., 2013 & 2023
Chart 3 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market By Segment, U.S., 2013 - 2023
Chart 3 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2016
Chart 3 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Breakdown, U.S., 2023
Chart 3 4: Growth Rates By Segment, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2013 - 2023
Chart 3 5: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2016

List Of Figures

Figure 1 1 Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking By Segment, U.S., 2016 (1 Of 2)
Figure 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking By Segment, U.S., 2016 (2 Of 2)
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched In This Report, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting The Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market By Segment, U.S. (1 Of 2)
Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting The Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market By Segment, U.S. (2 Of 2)
Figure 1 6: Recent Events In The Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, U.S., 2015 - 2017
Figure 1 7: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures Covered, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 8: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2016 (1 Of 2)
Figure 1 9: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2016 (2 Of 2)
Figure 1 10: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 11: Key Report Updates
Figure 1 12: Version History
Figure 3 1: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2013 - 2023 (Us$M)
Figure 3 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market By Segment, U.S., 2013 - 2023 (Us$M)
Figure 3 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Growth By Segment, U.S., 2013 - 2023
Figure 3 4: Drivers And Limiters, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2016
Figure 3 5: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2016 (1 Of 2)
Figure 3 6: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2016 (2 Of 2)
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
3 of 4

Loading
LOADING...

4 of 4
  • Aesculap
  • Alphatec Spine
  • Amedica
  • Aurora Spine
  • Bacterin
  • Baxano Surgical
  • DePuy Synthes
  • GS Medical
  • Globus Medical
  • Interventional Spine
  • Joimax
  • K2M
  • Karl Storz
  • Life Spine
  • Medtronic
  • NuVasive
  • Nutech
  • Orthofix
  • OsteoMed
  • Paradigm Spine
  • RTI Surgical
  • Richard Wolf
  • SI-BONE
  • Spineology
  • Stryker
  • VG Innovations
  • Xtant
  • Zimmer Biomet
  • Zyga Technology
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
5 of 4
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Adroll
adroll