Frontier Pharma: Transplantation Therapeutics - A Highly Innovative Pipeline with a Range of Adaptive and Innate Immune-Targeting Programs Focusing on Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Kidney Transplantation - Product Image

Frontier Pharma: Transplantation Therapeutics - A Highly Innovative Pipeline with a Range of Adaptive and Innate Immune-Targeting Programs Focusing on Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Kidney Transplantation

  • ID: 4446696
  • Report
  • Region: Global
  • 72 Pages
  • GBI Research
1 of 4

Summary

In 2015, more than of 125,000 transplantations were performed worldwide, an increase of over 5.5% from 2014, with around 33,000 of these occurring in the EU and a further 32,000 in the US. Approximately 60% of these were kidney transplants, with liver, heart, lung, pancreas and small bowel transplantations accounting for the other most common procedures.

Generally, there are a modest number of safe pharmacological treatment options for acute rejections, but long-term treatment options remain unsatisfactory. The risk of infection limits the effectiveness of these therapies, and improvements to their efficacy are needed regardless. Specific transplantation tolerance, in which alloreactive T cells are inactivated while the broader immune response is left intact, removing the need for broad immunosuppressant therapies, can be considered as an end-goal for clinical transplantation.

Compared with the overall immunology pipeline, in which there are over 1,900 products, the transplantation pipeline is small, with only about 244 products. However, of the 145 products in the transplantation pipeline with a disclosed molecular target, there are 65 first-in-class products, acting on a total of 63 first-in-class targets. First-in-class products account for 44% of transplantation pipeline products with a disclosed molecular target.

Of the 65 first-in-class pipeline products in development for transplantation and GVHD, those which emerged as being the most promising based on underlying scientific data included cell surface antigens such as CD40 and 47, and chemokines such as CXCR1 and 2. Many of these have yielded promising Preclinical data, although the availability of published clinical data is limited. Nonetheless, many drugs have reached a late stage of development, such as Dompe Farmaceutica’s reparixin, and appear poised to be valuable additions to the relatively stagnant range of treatments for the prevention of transplant rejection, and if successful will be able to drive higher long-term post-transplant survival rates.

The report "Frontier Pharma: Transplantation Therapeutics - A Highly Innovative Pipeline with a Range of Adaptive and Innate Immune-Targeting Programs Focusing on Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Kidney Transplantation" helps to identify innovative pipeline programs across a therapy area, with a focus on indications with high R&D activity and strong innovation, as well as a competitive commercial landscape and high levels of deal activity. Monitoring innovative new product developments is becoming an increasingly vital part of competitive intelligence for all market participants, and increasingly important for companies seeking strategic partnerships or looking to acquire technologies, products or other companies.

Scope

  • There is a need for therapies that can achieve graft-specific immunosuppression, without having a general effect on the wider immune system. Which therapies and technologies currently in development are most likely to achieve this?
  • There are 63 distinct first-in-class molecular targets in development for transplantation. Which of these hold the strongest potential in the clinic, and which are closest to reaching the market?
  • How effective are current therapies for these indications, and how have they been able to improve the general prognosis in recent decades?
  • Which molecule types and molecular targets are most prominent across transplantation therapy?
  • Which specific types of transplantation are being most heavily studied across the pharmaceutical pipeline?

Reasons to buy

  • Appreciate the current clinical and commercial landscapes by considering disease symptoms, pathogenesis, etiology, co-morbidities and complications, epidemiology, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment options for transplantation rejection.
  • Identify leading products and key unmet needs within the market.
  • Recognize trends in pipeline innovation by analyzing therapies by stage of development, molecule type and molecular target.
  • Assess the therapeutic potential of first-in-class targets. Using a proprietary molecular target matrix assessment, first-in-class targets in the pipeline have been assessed and ranked according to clinical potential.
  • Consider first-in-class pipeline products with no prior involvement in licensing and co-development deals, which may represent potential investment opportunities.
READ MORE
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
2 of 4

1 Table of Contents

2 Executive Summary
2.1 Strong Unmet need for Prevention of Chronic Rejection
2.2 Moderately-Sized by Highly Innovative Pipeline
2.3 Chemokines and Immune Surface Antigens Appear to Hold Promise as Novel Targets

3 The Case for Innovation
3.1 Growing Opportunities for Biologic Products
3.2 Diversification of Molecular Targets
3.3 Innovative First-in-Class Product Developments Remain Attractive
3.4 Regulatory and Reimbursement Policy Shifts Favor First-in-Class Product Innovation
3.5 Sustained Innovation
3.6 Research Report Guidance

4 Clinical and Commercial Landscape
4.1 Disease Overview
4.2 Symptoms
4.2.1 Transplant Rejection
4.2.2 Graft-Versus-Host Disease
4.3 Diagnosis
4.4 Etiology and Pathophysiology
4.4.1 Major Histocompatibility Complex
4.4.2 Allogeneic Immune Response
4.4.3 Innate Immunity
4.4.4 The Role of Cytokines
4.4.5 Types of Rejection
4.5 Epidemiology and Prognosis
4.5.1 Transplant Rejection
4.5.2 Graft-Versus-Host Disease
4.6 Treatment Options
4.6.1 Antibody Therapies
4.6.2 Calcineurin Inhibitors
4.6.3 Anti-Proliferative Agents
4.6.4 mTOR Inhibitors
4.6.5 Corticosteroids
4.7 Overview of Marketed Products
4.8 Current Unmet Needs

5 Assessment of Pipeline Product Innovation
5.1 Pipeline by Stage of Development, Molecule Type and Molecular Target
5.2 First-in-Class Programs Targeting Novel Molecular Targets

6 Transplant Rejection Signaling Network, Disease Causation and Innovation Alignment
6.1 Complexity of Signaling Networks
6.2 Signaling Pathways and First-in-Class Molecular Target Integration
6.3 First-in-Class Matrix Assessment

7 First-in-Class Target and Pipeline Program Evaluation
7.1 Pipeline Programs Targeting C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 1 and C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2
7.2 Pipeline Programs Targeting Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 5
7.3 Pipeline Programs Targeting Stimulator of Interferon Genes Protein
7.4 Pipeline Programs Targeting Leukocyte Surface Antigen CD47
7.5 Pipeline Programs Targeting Tyrosine Protein Kinase SYK
7.6 Pipeline Programs Targeting Potassium Voltage Gated Channel Subfamily A Member 3

8 Strategic Consolidations
8.1 Industry-Wide First-in-Class Deals
8.2 Licensing Deals
8.2.1 Deals by Region, Year and Value
8.2.2 Deals by Stage of Development and Value
8.2.3 Deals by Molecule Type, Molecular Target and Value
8.2.4 List of Deals with Disclosed Deal Values
8.3 Co-development Deals
8.3.1 Deals by Region, Year and Value
8.3.2 Deals by Stage of Development and Value
8.3.3 Deals by Molecule Type, Molecular Target and Value
8.3.4 List of Deals with Disclosed Deal Values
8.4 List of First-in-Class Pipeline Products with and without Prior Deal Involvement

9 Appendix
9.1 Abbreviations
9.2 Disease List
9.3 References
9.4 Research Methodology
9.4.1 Data integrity
9.4.2 Innovative and meaningful analytical techniques and frameworks
9.4.3 Evidence based analysis and insight
9.5 Secondary Research
9.5.1 Market Analysis
9.5.2 Pipeline Analysis
9.5.3 Licensing and Co-development Deals
9.6 Contact 
9.7 Disclaimer

List of Tables
Table 1: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Organ-Specific Symptoms of Transplant Rejection, 2017
Table 2: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Organ-Specific Symptoms of Acute GVHD, 2017
Table 3: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Organ-Specific Symptoms of Acute GVHD, 2017
Table 4: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Key Features of C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 1, 2017
Table 5: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Key Features of C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2, 2017
Table 6: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Programs Targeting C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 1 and C-X-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2, 2017
Table 7: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Key Features of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 5, 2017
Table 8: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Programs Targeting Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 5, 2017
Table 9: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Key Features of Stimulator of Interferon Genes Protein, 2017
Table 10: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Programs Targeting Stimulator of Interferon Genes Protein, 2017
Table 11: Transplantation Therapeutics Global, Key Features of Leukocyte Surface Antigen CD47, 2017
Table 12: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Programs Targeting Leukocyte Surface Antigen CD47, 2017
Table 13: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Key Features of Tyrosine Protein Kinase SYK, 2017
Table 14: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Programs Targeting Tyrosine Protein Kinase SYK, 2017
Table 15: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Key Features of Potassium Voltage Gated Channel Subfamily A Member 3, 2017
Table 16: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Programs Targeting Potassium Voltage Gated Channel Subfamily A Member 3, 2017

List of Figures
Figure 1: Transplantation Therapeutics, US, Innovation Trends in Product Approvals, 1987-2014
Figure 2: Transplantation Therapeutics, US, Sales Performance of First-in-Class and Non-First-in-Class Products Post Marketing Approval, 2006-2013
Figure 3: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Overview of Marketed Products, 2017
Figure 4: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Overall Pharmaceutical Industry Pipeline by Therapy Area, 2017
Figure 5: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline by Stage of Development and Molecule Type, 2017
Figure 6: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Key Indications by Stage of Development and Molecule Type, 2017
Figure 7: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline by Molecular Target, 2017
Figure 8: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Key Indications by Molecular Target, 2017
Figure 9: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Distribution of Pipeline First-in-Class and Non-First-in-Class Products by Stage of Development and Molecular Target, 2017
Figure 10: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Percentage Distribution of First-in-Class and Non-First-in-Class Pipeline Products with a Disclosed Target by Stage of Development (%), 2017
Figure 11: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Percentage Distribution of First-in-Class and Non-First-in-Class Pipeline Products by Molecular Target (%), 2017
Figure 12: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Ratio of First-in-Class Products to First-in-Class Targets by Stage of Development, 2017
Figure 13: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Ratio of First-in-Class Products to First-in-Class Targets by Molecular Target, 2017
Figure 14: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Products, 2017 (Part 1)
Figure 15: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Products, 2017 (Part 2)
Figure 16: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Products, 2017 (Part 3)
Figure 17: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Products, 2017 (Part 4)
Figure 18: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Pipeline Products, 2017 (Part 5)
Figure 19: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, First-in-Class Matrix Assessment, 2017
Figure 20: Pharmaceutical Industry, Global, Licensing Deals by Stage of Development, 2006-2015
Figure 21: Pharmaceutical Industry, Global, Industry-Wide Licensing Deals by Deal Value, Upfront Payment Value, Stage of Development and First-in-Class Status ($m), 2006-2015
Figure 22: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Licensing Deals by Region, Value and Year, 2006-2017
Figure 23: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Licensing Deals by Stage of Development, Deal Value and Upfront Payment Value, 2006-2017
Figure 24: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Number and Aggregate Deal Value of Licensing Deals by Molecule Type and Molecular Target, 2006-2017
Figure 25: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Licensing Deals with Disclosed Deal Values, 2006-2017
Figure 26: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Co-development Deals by Region, Value and Year, 2006-2017
Figure 27: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Co-development Deals by Stage of Development, Deal Value and Upfront Payment Value, 2006-2017
Figure 28: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Number and Aggregate Deal Value of Co-development Deals by Molecule Type and Molecular Target, 2006-2017
Figure 29: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, Co-development Deals with Disclosed Deal Values, 2006-2017
Figure 30: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, First-in-class Programs in Active Development Without Recorded Prior Deal Involvement, 2017 (Part 1)
Figure 31: Transplantation Therapeutics, Global, First-in-class Programs in Active Development Without Recorded Prior Deal Involvement, 2017 (Part 2)

Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
3 of 4

Loading
LOADING...

4 of 4
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Adroll
adroll