For years, the goal of project intake was to select the best projects. It makes sense and most people take it on faith without argument.
But if you end up with too many projects, it’s a bad strategy.
Don’t be afraid to say NO or NOT YET if you don’t have the capacity to deliver. People might give you a hard time in the near term, but you’re not helping by saying YES to things you can’t deliver.
This research is designed for:
- PMO Directors who have trouble with project throughput
- CIOs who want to improve IT’s responsive-ness to changing needs of the business
- CIOs who want to maximize the overall business value of IT’s project portfolio
- Align project intake and prioritization with resource capacity and strategic objectives
- Balance proactive and reactive demand
- Reduce portfolio waste on low-value projects
- Manage project delivery expectations and satisfaction of business stakeholders
- Get optimized project intake processes off the ground with low-cost, high-impact tools and templates
The methodology for optimizing project intake delivers extraordinary value, fast. In the first step of the blueprint, you will prototype a set of scorecard criteria for determining project value.
The Project Value Scorecard Development Tool is designed to help you develop the project valuation scheme iteratively. Download the pre-filled tool with content that represents a common case, and then, customize it with your data.
The practical, tactical research is accompanied by a suite of tools and templates to accelerate your process optimization efforts.
An effective tabletop exercise can be used to evaluate the following:
- Project Value Scorecard Development Tool (.xlsx)
- PPM Assessment Report (Diagnostics)
- Standard Operating Procedure Template (.docx)
- Project Request Forms (.docx)
- Project Classification Matrix (.xlsx)
- Benefits Commitment Form (.xlsx)
- Proposed Project Technology Assessment Tool (.xlsx)
- Business Case Templates (.docx)
- Intake and Prioritization Tool (.xlsx)
- Process Pilot Plan Template (.docx)
- Impact Assessment and Communication Planning Tool (.xlsx)
In addition to industry-leading frameworks, our best-practice approach is enhanced by the insights and guidance from our analysts, industry experts, and our clients. Our peer network of over 33,000 happy clients proves the effectiveness of our research. Our team conducts 1,000+ hours of primary and secondary research to ensure that our approach is enhanced by best practices.
In the past 12 months, clients have reported an average measured value of $44,700 from undertaking a guided implementation of this research.
- As a portfolio manager, you do not have the authority to decline or defer new projects - but you also lack the capacity to realistically say yes to more project work.
- Stakeholders have unrealistic expectations of what IT can deliver. Too many projects are approved, and it may be unclear why their project is delayed or in a state of suspended animation.
- The cycle of competition is making it increasingly difficult to follow a longer-term strategy during project intake, making it unproductive to approve projects for any horizon longer than one to two years.
- As project portfolios become more aligned to “transformative” projects, resourcing for smaller, department-level projects becomes increasingly opaque.
- Establish an effective scorecard to create transparency into IT’s capacity and processes. This will help set realistic expectations for stakeholders, eliminate “squeaky wheel” prioritization, and give primacy to the highest value requests.
- Build a centralized process that funnels requests into a single intake channel to eliminate confusion and doubt for stakeholders and staff while also reducing off-the-grid initiatives.
- Clearly define a series of project approval steps, and communicate requirements for passing them.
- Developing practices that incorporate the constraint of resource capacity to cap the amount of project approvals to that which is realistic will help improve the throughput of projects through the portfolio.