International Survey of Research University Faculty: Satisfaction with Library & Other University Data Curation Services  - Product Image

International Survey of Research University Faculty: Satisfaction with Library & Other University Data Curation Services

  • ID: 4464005
  • Report
  • 113 pages
  • Primary Research Group
1 of 5

This report, based on responses from 104 faculty from research universities in the USA, Canada, the UK, Australia, and New Zealand, presents faculty evaluations of data archiving, curation and management services from leading research universities.

The study focuses on faculty from data intensive fields such as medicine, chemistry, biology, physics, astronomy, statistics and mathematics, engineering, economics and finance, sociology and political science and other data-intensive fields.

The 183-page report presents detailed faculty satisfaction evaluations with many specific data-oriented products and services, including: metadata for data archiving, data repositories, data repository capabilities in following researcher instructions, help in finding datasets, preserving datasets, publicizing the availability of datasets, helping scholars re-utilize data from past studies, quality of data manipulation software, help in data cleaning and many other areas of data management.  Scholars also cite the libraries and universities that they most admire for their data management services.

Data in the report is broken out by many personal and institutional criteria including: age, gender, tenure status, teaching load, subject specialty and academic title of the survey participant, and country of origin, public/private status, and world university ranking of the university affiliated with the survey participant, among other variables. 

Just a few of the report’s many findings

  • 63% of those sampled believed that their university maintained a digital data repository.
  • Concerning library services for the archiving and preserving of data sets, in the overall sample, 11% were Quite Satisfied, 17.5% Satisfied, 16.5% Somewhat Satisfied, and 13% Dissatisfied; 43% did not respond.
  • The proportion of faculty reporting that their university maintains a database or directory listing available datasets is inversely related to the annual tuition of the institution: lowest, 58% of respondents, vs. highest, 42%.
  • The overall level of satisfaction with academic library patron support for documenting of data collection history and methods, was highest from faculty in Australia/New Zealand, with over 60% satisfied or very satisfied.
READ MORE
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
2 of 5

INTERNATIONAL SURVEY OF RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FACULTY: DATA  MANAGEMENT AND ARCHIVING NEEDS   

THE QUESTIONNAIRE   
Characteristics of the Sample   

SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS   
Areas of Compliance for Which Data Restrictions Are Imposed   
Impact of Journal Publisher Requirements on Work   
Impact of Funding Sources on Work   
Impact of Academic Department/University on Work   
Impact of Research Partners in Other Institutions on Work   
Impact of Regulatory Legal Requirements on Work   
Impact of Privacy/Other Research Subject Requirements on Work   
Percent of Research Projects Requiring a Third-Party Data Service   
Opinion on Data Sharing Among Scholars   
Interaction with Data for Grant Proposals   
Interaction with Data for Scientific or Technical Papers   
Interaction with Data for Data Repositories   
Need for Better Data Tools/Services for Scientific/Technical Papers   
Need for Better Data Tools/Services for Data Repositories   
Supervisor of Data Archiving from Studies or Experiments   

List of Tables

Table 1.1 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons   
Table 1.2 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by country   
Table 1.3 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 1.4 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 1.5 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 1.6 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by enrollment   
Table 1.7 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 1.8 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 1.9 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by tenure status   
Table 1.10 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 1.11 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 1.12 As a researcher have you ever had to impose data access restrictions for any of the following reasons Broken out by academic field of the survey participant   
Table 2 Which of the following have data presentation, management or archiving requirements that have impacted your work? (choose all that apply)   
Table 2.1.1 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   
Table 2.1.2 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by country   
Table 2.1.3 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 2.1.4 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 2.1.5 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 2.1.6 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by enrollment   
Table 2.1.7 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 2.1.8 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 2.1.9 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by tenure status   
Table 2.1.10 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 2.1.11 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 2.1.12 Have Journal Publishers data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by academic field   
Table 2.2.1 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   
Table 2.2.2 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work? Broken out by country   
Table 2.2.3 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 2.2.4 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 2.2.5 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 2.2.6 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by enrollment   
Table 2.2.7 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 2.2.8 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 2.2.9 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 2.2.10 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 2.2.11 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 2.2.12 Have Funding Sources data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work? Broken out by academic field   
Table 2.3.1 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   
Table 2.3.2 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by country   
Table 2.3.3 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 2.3.4 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 2.3.5 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 2.3.6 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by enrollment   
Table 2.3.7 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 2.3.8 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 2.3.9 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by tenure status   
Table 2.3.10 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 2.3.11 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 2.3.12 Have your Academic Department or University data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?  Broken out by academic field   
Table 2.4.1 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   
Table 2.4.2 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by country   
Table 2.4.3 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 2.4.4 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 2.4.5 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 2.4.6 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by enrollment   
Table 2.4.7 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 2.4.8 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 2.4.9 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by tenure status   
Table 2.4.10 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 2.4.11 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 2.4.12 Have Research Partners in Other Institutions data presentation, management or archiving requirements impacted your work?   Broken out by academic field   
Table 2.5.1 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?   
Table 2.5.2 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by country   
Table 2.5.3 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 2.5.4 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 2.5.5 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 2.5.6 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 2.5.7 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 2.5.8 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 2.5.9 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 2.5.10 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 2.5.11 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 2.5.12 Have Regulatory Legal Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by academic field   
Table 2.6.1 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?   
Table 2.6.2 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?  Broken out by country   
Table 2.6.3 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?   Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 2.6.4 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?   Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 2.6.5 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?  Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 2.6.6 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?  Broken out by enrollment   
Table 2.6.7 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?  Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 2.6.8 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 2.6.9 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 2.6.10 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?  Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 2.6.11 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?  Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 2.6.12 Have Privacy or other Research Subject Requirements for data presentation, management or archiving impacted your work?  Broken out by academic field   
Table 3.1 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service?   
Table 3.2 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by country   
Table 3.3 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 3.4 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 3.5 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 3.6 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 3.7 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 3.8 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 3.9 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 3.10 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 3.11 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
able 3.12 In about what percentage of your research projects over the past two years have funding sources required you to deposit data with a third-party data service? Broken out by academic field   
Table 4.1 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions?   
Table 4.2 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by country   
Table 4.3 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 4.4 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 4.5 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 4.6 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 4.7 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 4.8 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 4.9 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 4.10 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 4.11 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 4.12 Which phrase best describes your attitude towards the data sharing among scholars now encouraged and in some cases required by major funding institutions? Broken out by academic field   
Table 5 For which of the following purposes do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data? (check all that apply)   
Table 5.1.1 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals?   
Table 5.1.2 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by country   
Table 5.1.3 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 5.1.4 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 5.1.5 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 5.1.6 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 5.1.7 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 5.1.8 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 5.1.9 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 5.1.10 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 5.1.11 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 5.1.12 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Grant Proposals? Broken out by academic field   
Table 5.2.1 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Scientific or Technical Papers?   
Table 5.2.2 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by country   
Table 5.2.3 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 5.2.4 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 5.2.5 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for  Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 5.2.6 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 5.2.7 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 5.2.8 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 5.2.9 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 5.2.10 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for  Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 5.2.11 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for  Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 5.2.12 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for  Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by academic field   
Table 5.3.1 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects?   
Table 5.3.2 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by country   
Table 5.3.3 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 5.3.4 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 5.3.5 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 5.3.6 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 5.3.7 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 5.3.8 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 5.3.9 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 5.3.10 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 5.3.11 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 5.3.12 Do you routinely collect, archive, manage or manipulate data for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by academic field   
Table 6 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for each of the following purposes?   
Table 6.1.1 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals?   
Table 6.1.2 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by country   
Table 6.1.3 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 6.1.4 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 6.1.5 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 6.1.6 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 6.1.7 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 6.1.8 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 6.1.9 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 6.1.10 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 6.1.11 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 6.1.12 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Grant Proposals? Broken out by academic field   
Table 6.2.1 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers?   
Table 6.2.2 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by country   
Table 6.2.3 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 6.2.4 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 6.2.5 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 6.2.6 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 6.2.7 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 6.2.8 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 6.2.9 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 6.2.10 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 6.2.11 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 6.2.12 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Scientific or Technical Papers? Broken out by academic field   
Table 6.3.1 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects?   
Table 6.3.2 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by country   
Table 6.3.3 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 6.3.4 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 6.3.5 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 6.3.6 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 6.3.7 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 6.3.8 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 6.3.9 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 6.3.10 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 6.3.11 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 6.3.12 How pressing is your need for better data management tools and services for Data Repositories that may be used for Multiple Projects? Broken out by academic field   
Table 7.1 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by?   
Table 7.2 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by country   
UK/Ireland   
Table 7.3 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by annual tuition, $   
Table 7.4 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out for public and private universities   
Table 7.5 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by gender of survey participant   
Table 7.6 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by enrollment   
Table 7.7 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by age of survey participant   
Table 7.8 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by political views of the survey participant   
Table 7.9 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by tenure status   
Table 7.10 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by past year teaching load of the survey participant   
Table 7.11 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by academic title or role of the survey participant   
Table 7.12 Currently, the archiving of data from studies or experiments that you are involved in is handled predominantly by? Broken out by academic field   
If you use data repositories in your field, either as a research source or as a repository for your own research data, or both, please list a few of the ones you have found the most useful. Broken out by academic field   

Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
3 of 5

Loading
LOADING...

4 of 5
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Brown University
  • Bucknell University
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Columbia University
  • Drexel University
  • Emory University
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Imperial College London
  • James Cook University
  • Lehigh University
  • Massey University
  • Monash University
  • New York Institute of Technology
  • Penn State University
  • Queen Mary University of Londo
  • Rice University
  • Rutgers University
  • Saint Louis University
  • Sao Paulo University
  • Staffordshire University
  • Swinburne University of Technology
  • The University of Tasmania
  • The University of Western Australia
  • University of Leeds
  • University College Dublin
  • University of Alberta
  • University of California Davis
  • University of California Santa Barbara
  • University of Chicago
  • University of Florida
  • University of Michigan
  • University of Michigan - Dearborn
  • University of Michigan School of Public Health
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • University of Utah
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Washington University in St. Louis
  • Yale University
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
5 of 5
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Adroll
adroll