Argentina Market Report Suite for Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants 2018 - MedSuite

  • ID: 4482819
  • Report
  • Region: Argentina
  • 570 pages
  • iData Research
1 of 4

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • DePuy Synthes
  • Globus Medical
  • Medtronic
  • NuVasive
  • Spineart
  • Zimmer Biomet
  • MORE
The spinal implant market is considered by many to be the most exciting and controversial segment of the orthopedics industry. This market has traditionally been a segment of the orthopedics market, but due to rapid growth and a large market size, many manufacturers view spine as a key business division separate from traditional orthopedics.

Historically, the majority of spinal implants were implanted in open surgical procedures through large incisions. However, open surgery can cause considerable tissue damage and lead to a large number of complications. Minimally invasive techniques, which require only small puncture wounds, have been developed for the implantation of a number of spinal implant types. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) methods are frequently used for implanting traditional spinal implant devices, such as interbody devices and pedicle screws. However, new technologies such as facet fixation and spinous process fixation have also been developed using MIS techniques.

For the purposes of this report, the Argentinean minimally invasive spinal implant market is segmented into MIS interbody fusion, MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, facet fixation and MIS sacroiliac joint fusion.
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
2 of 4

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • DePuy Synthes
  • Globus Medical
  • Medtronic
  • NuVasive
  • Spineart
  • Zimmer Biomet
  • MORE
I
LIST OF FIGURES XVII
LIST OF CHARTS XXI
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ARGENTINA MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET OVERVIEW
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
MARKET TRENDS
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
MARKETS INCLUDED
KEY REPORT UPDATES
VERSION HISTORY

1. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecasts and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring

2. DISEASE OVERVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
2.1.1.1 Disc Herniation
2.1.1.2 Stenosis
2.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis
2.1.1.4 Arthritis
2.1.2 Spinal Deformities
2.1.2.1 Scoliosis
2.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis
2.1.3 Trauma and Tumor
2.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
2.1.4.1 Osteoporosis
2.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures

3. PRODUCT ASSESSMENT
3.1 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
3.1.1 Cervical Fixation
3.1.1.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation
3.1.1.1.1 Constrained
3.1.1.1.2 Semi-Constrained
3.1.1.1.3 Dynamic
3.1.1.1.4 Bioresorbable
3.1.1.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation
3.1.2 Thoracolumbar Fixation
3.1.2.1 Traditional Systems
3.1.2.2 Minimally Invasive Systems
3.1.3 Interbody Devices
3.1.3.1 Approaches
3.1.3.1.1 ALIF
3.1.3.1.2 PLIF
3.1.3.1.3 TLIF
3.1.3.1.4 Minimally Invasive PLIF
3.1.3.1.5 Minimally Invasive TLIF
3.1.3.1.6 LLIF
3.1.3.1.7 OLIF
3.1.3.1.8 Cervical
3.1.3.1.9 VBR/Corpectomy
3.1.3.2 Materials
3.1.3.2.1 Metal
3.1.3.2.2 PEEK
3.1.3.2.3 Machined Bone Allograft
3.1.4 Motion Preservation Devices
3.1.4.1.1 Artificial Discs
3.1.4.1.2 Dynamic Stabilization
3.1.4.1.3 Nucleus Replacement
3.1.4.1.4 Facet Arthroplasty
3.1.5 Spinous Process Fixation
3.1.6 Facet Fixation
3.1.7 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
3.1.8 Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices
3.1.8.1.1 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty
3.1.8.1.2 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Including Kyphoplasty
3.1.9 Spine Endoscopes
3.1.10 Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices
3.1 FDA RECALLS
3.1.1 Alphatec Spine
3.1.2 DePuy Synthes
3.1.3 Medtronic
3.1.4 Orthofix
3.1.5 Stryker
3.1.6 Zimmer Biomet
3.2 CLINICAL TRIALS
3.2.1 DePuy Synthes
3.2.2 Globus Medical
3.2.3 K2M
3.2.4 Medtronic
3.2.5 Stryker
3.2.6 Zimmer Biomet

4. ARGENTINA MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET OVERVIEW
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
4.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws
4.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
4.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
4.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation
4.1.4 Facet Fixation
4.1.5 MIS Spine Endoscopes
4.2 CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE
4.3 MARKET OVERVIEW
4.4 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT
4.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
4.5.1 Market Drivers
4.5.2 Market Limiters
4.6 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

5. PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 PROCEDURE NUMBERS
5.2.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Procedures
5.2.1.1 MIPLIF Procedures
5.2.1.2 MITLIF Procedures
5.2.1.3 LLIF Procedures
5.2.1.4 OLIF Procedures
5.2.2 Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.2.1 Retractor Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.2.2 Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures
5.2.3 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures
5.2.4 Facet Fixation Procedures
5.2.5 Spinal Endoscope Procedures

6. MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET
6.1 INTRODUCTION
6.1.1 Approach Types
6.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion
6.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
6.3.1 Total Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market
6.3.2 MIPLIF Market
6.3.3 MITLIF Market
6.3.4 LLIF Market
6.3.5 OLIF Market
6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
6.4.1 Market Drivers
6.4.2 Market Limiters
6.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

7. MINIMALLY INVASIVE PEDICLE SCREW MARKET
7.1 INTRODUCTION
7.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
7.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
7.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
7.3.1 Total Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market
7.3.2 Retractor Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market
7.3.3 Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market
7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
7.4.1 Market Drivers
7.4.2 Market Limiters
7.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

8. SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET
8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
8.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
8.3.1 Market Drivers
8.3.2 Market Limiters
8.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

9. FACET FIXATION MARKET
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
9.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
9.3.1 Market Drivers
9.3.2 Market Limiters
9.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

10. SPINE ENDOSCOPE MARKET
10.1 INTRODUCTION
10.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
10.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
10.3.1 Spine Endoscope Market
10.3.2 Spine Endoscope Instrumentation Market
10.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
10.4.1 Market Drivers
10.4.2 Market Limiters
10.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

11. MINIMALLY INVASIVE INSTRUMENTATION MARKET
11.1 INTRODUCTION
11.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
11.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
11.3.1 Market Drivers
11.3.2 Market Limiters
11.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS

ABBREVIATIONS

APPENDIX: COMPANY PRESS RELEASES

List of Charts
Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Overview, Argentina, 2017 & 2024
Chart 4 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 4 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Breakdown, Argentina, 2017
Chart 4 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Breakdown, Argentina, 2024
Chart 4 4: Growth Rates by Segment, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 4 5: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Argentina, 2017
Chart 5 1: Procedures Numbers by Segment, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 2: Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 5 3: Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 1: Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 2: Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market Breakdown, Argentina, 2017
Chart 6 3: Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market Breakdown, Argentina, 2024
Chart 6 4: Total Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 5: MIPLIF Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 6: MITLIF Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 7: LLIF Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 8: OLIF Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 6 9: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market, Argentina, 2017
Chart 7 1: Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 2: Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market Breakdown, Argentina, 2017
Chart 7 3: Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market Breakdown, Argentina, 2024
Chart 7 4: Total Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 5: Retractor Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 6: Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 7 7: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market, Argentina, 2017
Chart 8 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 8 2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Argentina, 2017
Chart 9 1: Facet Fixation Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 9 2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, Argentina, 2017
Chart 10 1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 10 2: Spine Endoscope Market Breakdown, Argentina, 2017
Chart 10 3: Spine Endoscope Market Breakdown, Argentina, 2024
Chart 10 4: Spine Endoscope Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 10 5: Spine Endoscope Instrumentation Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Chart 11 1: Minimally Invasive Instrumentation Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024

List of Figures:
Figure 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking by Segment, Argentina, 2017 (1 of 2)
Figure 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Share Ranking by Segment, Argentina, 2017 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, Argentina, 2017
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, Argentina (1 of 2)
Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, Argentina (2 of 2)
Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Argentina, 2016 – 2017
Figure 1 7: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Markets Covered, Argentina, 2016
Figure 1 8: Key Report Updates
Figure 1 9: Version History
Figure 3 1: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 2)
Figure 3 2: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 2)
Figure 3 3: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 3)
Figure 3 4: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 3)
Figure 3 5: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (3 of 3)
Figure 3 6: Interbody Devices by Company (1 of 2)
Figure 3 7: Interbody Devices by Company (2 of 2)
Figure 3 8: Cervical Artificial Disc Devices by Company
Figure 3 9: Lumbar Artificial Disc Devices by Company
Figure 3 10: Dynamic Posterior Stabilization Devices by Company
Figure 3 11: Interspinous Process Decompression Devices by Company
Figure 3 12: Spinous Process Fixation Devices by Company
Figure 3 13: Facet Fixation Devices by Company
Figure 3 14: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Devices by Company
Figure 3 15: Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices by Company
Figure 3 16: Spine Endoscopes by Company
Figure 3 17: Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices by Company
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Alphatec Spine
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall DePuy Synthes
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall DePuy Synthes
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Orthofix
Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Orthofix
Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Orthofix
Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Orthofix
Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet
Figure 3 32: An ACDF Multi-Center Study Using ViviGen Cellular Bone Matrix
Figure 3 33: A Retrospective Study Using CALIBER® TLIF Expandable Spacer in the Treatment of DDD: 2 Year Follow-up.
Figure 3 34: Comparing Pedicle Screw Systems for the Treatment of Adolescent Paediatric Spine Deformity
Figure 3 35: A Prospective, 5-Year Global Study on MAST™
Figure 3 36: Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation (SCS-PAF)
Figure 3 37: OLIF25™ /OLIF51™ Study
Figure 3 38: AccuLIF® PROSPECTIVE PATIENT OUTCOMES STUDY (APROPOS)
Figure 3 39: Post-Market Surveillance Study of the TM Ardis Interbody Fusion System
Figure 4 1: Currency Exchange Rate, 2017
Figure 4 2: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024 (ARSM)
Figure 4 3: Total Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, United States, 2014 – 2024 (US$M)
Figure 4 4: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024 (ARSM)
Figure 4 5: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024 (US$M)
Figure 4 6: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market Growth by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 4 7: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 4 8: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 5 1: Procedures Numbers by Segment, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 2: Levels Treated by Segment, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 3: Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 4: Total Levels Treated, Minimally Invasive Interbody Devices, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 5: MIPLIF Procedures, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 6: MITLIF Procedures, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 7: LLIF Procedures, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 8: OLIF Procedures, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 9: Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 10: Total Levels Treated, Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screws, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 11: Retractor Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 12: Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Procedures, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 13: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 14: Facet Fixation Procedures, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 5 15: Spinal Endoscope Procedures, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 6 1: Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024 (ARSM)
Figure 6 2: Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market by Segment, United States, 2014 – 2024 (US$M)
Figure 6 3: Total Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 6 4: MIPLIF Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 6 5: MITLIF Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 6 6: LLIF Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 6 7: OLIF Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 6 8: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 6 9: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Interbody Device Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 7 1: Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024 (ARSM)
Figure 7 2: Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, United States, 2014 – 2024 (US$M)
Figure 7 3: Total Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 7 4: Retractor Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 7 5: Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 7 6: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 7 7: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 8 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 8 2: Drivers and Limiters, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 8 3: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 9 1: Facet Fixation Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 9 2: Drivers and Limiters, Facet Fixation Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 9 3: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 10 1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, Argentina, 2014 – 2024 (ARSM)
Figure 10 2: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, United States, 2014 – 2024 (US$M)
Figure 10 3: Spine Endoscope Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 10 4: Spine Endoscope Instrumentation Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 10 5: Drivers and Limiters, Spine Endoscope Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 10 6: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 11 1: Minimally Invasive Instrumentation Market, Argentina, 2014 – 2024
Figure 11 2: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Instrumentation Market, Argentina, 2017
Figure 11 3: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Instrumentation Market, Argentina, 2017
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
3 of 4

Loading
LOADING...

4 of 4
  • Zimmer Biomet
  • Medtronic
  • DePuy Synthes
  • NuVasive
  • Globus Medical
  • Spineart
Please Note: Not all companies are currently active in every segment or sub-report from this suite.
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
5 of 4
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Adroll
adroll