+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market by Device , by Application , and Region - 2022 to 2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 250 Pages
  • November 2022
  • Region: Global
  • Transparency Market Research
  • ID: 5710037

Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market - Scope of Report

This report on the global minimally invasive surgical instruments market studies the past as well as the current growth trends and opportunities to gain valuable insights of the indicators of the market during the forecast period from 2022 to 2031. The report provides revenue of the global minimally invasive surgical instruments market for the period 2017-2031, considering 2021 as the base year and 2031 as the forecast year. The report also provides the compound annual growth rate (CAGR %) of the global minimally invasive surgical instruments market from 2022 to 2031.

The report has been prepared after an extensive research. Primary research involved bulk of the research efforts, wherein analysts carried out interviews with key opinion leaders, industry leaders, and opinion makers. Secondary research involved referring to key players’ product literature, annual reports, press releases, and relevant documents to understand the minimally invasive surgical instruments market.

Secondary research also included Internet sources, statistical data from government agencies, websites, and trade associations. Analysts employed a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches to study various attributes of the global minimally invasive surgical instruments market.

The report includes an elaborate executive summary, along with a snapshot of the growth behavior of various segments included in the scope of the study. Moreover, the report sheds light on the changing competitive dynamics in the global minimally invasive surgical instruments market. These serve as valuable tools for existing market players as well as for entities interested in participating in the global minimally invasive surgical instruments market.

The report delves into the competitive landscape of the global minimally invasive surgical instruments market. Key players operating in the global minimally invasive surgical instruments market have been identified and each one of these has been profiled, in terms of various attributes. Company overview, financial standings, recent developments, and SWOT are attributes of players in the global minimally invasive surgical instruments market profiled in this report.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The research methodology will be a combination of exhaustive primary and secondary research to analyze the market minimally invasive surgical instruments.

Secondary Research

Secondary research includes a search of company literature, technical writing, patent data, Internet sources, and statistical data from government websites, trade associations, and agencies. This has proven to be the most reliable, effective, and successful approach for obtaining precise data, capturing industry participants’ insights, and recognizing business opportunities.

Secondary research sources that we typically refer, but are not limited to:

  • Company websites, presentations, annual reports, white papers, technical paper, product brochure
  • Internal and external proprietary databases and relevant patents
  • National government documents, statistical databases, and market reports
  • News articles, press releases, and webcasts specific to companies operating in the market

Specific Secondary Sources:

Industry Sources:

  • WorldWideScience.org
  • Elsevier, Inc
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • PubMed
  • NCBI
  • Department of Health Care Service
  • Trade Data Sources
  • Trade Map
  • UN Comtrade
  • Trade Atlas
  • Company Information
  • OneSource Business Browser
  • Hoover’s
  • Factiva
  • Bloomberg
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Thomson Mergers & Acquisitions
  • MergerStat
  • Profound

Primary Research

During the course of research, we conduct in-depth interviews and discussions with a wide range of key industry participants and opinion leaders. Primary research represents bulk of research efforts, supplemented by extensive secondary research.

The publisher conducts primary interviews on the ongoing basis with industry participants and commentators to validate data and analysis. A typical research interview fulfills the following functions:

  • Provides first-hand information on market size, market trends, growth trends, competitive landscape, outlook, etc.
  • Helps in validating and strengthening secondary research findings
  • Further develops the analysis team’s expertise and market understanding
  • Primary research involves e-mail interactions, telephonic interviews, as well as face-to-face interviews for each market, category, segment, and sub-segment across geographies

Participants who typically take part in such a process include, but are not limited to:

  • Industry participants: Marketing/product managers, market intelligence managers, and regional sales managers
  • Purchasing/Sourcing managers, technical personnel, distributors
  • Outside experts: Investment bankers, valuation experts, and research analysts specializing in specific markets
  • Key opinion leaders specializing in different areas corresponding to different industry verticals

List of primary participants, but not limited to:

  • Advanced Oncotherapy PLC
  • Danfysik A/S
  • Hitachi, Ltd
  • IBA Worldwide
  • Mevion Medical Systems, Inc
Data Triangulation: Information culled from “Secondary & Primary Sources” is cross-checked with the publisher's “Knowledge Repository”, which is updated every quarter.

Market Estimation: Market size estimations involved in-depth study of product features, technology updates, geographic presence, product demand, sales data (value or volume), historical year-on-year growth, and others. Other approaches were also utilized to derive market size and forecasts. Where no hard data was available, we employed modeling techniques in order to produce comprehensive datasets. A rigorous methodology has been adopted, wherein the available hard data are cross-referenced with the following data types to produce estimates:

Demographic Data: Healthcare expenditure, inflation rates, and others

Industry Indicators: R&D investment, technology stage, and infrastructure, sector growth, and facilities

Market Forecasting: Market forecasts for various segments are derived taking into account drivers, restraints/challenges, and opportunities prevailing in the market and considering advantages/disadvantages of segments/sub-segments over other segments/sub-segments. Business environment, historical sales pattern, unmet needs, competitive intensity, and country-wise surgery data are some of the other pivotal factors, which are considered to derive market forecasts.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary
1.1. Global Market Outlook
1.2. Summary of Statistics
1.3. Key Market Characteristics & Attributes
1.4. Analysis and Recommendations
2. Market Overview
2.1. Market Coverage / Taxonomy
2.2. Market Definition / Scope / Limitations
3. Market Risks and Trends Assessment
3.1. Risk Assessment
3.1.1. COVID-19 Crisis and Impact on Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments
3.1.2. COVID-19 Impact Benchmark with Previous Crisis
3.1.3. Impact on Market Value (US$ Mn)
3.1.4. Assessment by Key Countries
3.1.5. Assessment by Key Market Segments
3.1.6. Action Points and Recommendation for Suppliers
3.2. Key Trends Impacting the Market
3.3. Formulation and Product Development Trends
4. Market Background and Foundation Data Points
4.1. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market (US$ Mn)
4.2. Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Opportunity Assessment (US$ Mn)
4.2.1. Total Available Market
4.2.2. Serviceable Addressable Market
4.2.3. Serviceable Obtainable Market
4.3. Market Scenario Forecast
4.3.1. Demand in optimistic Scenario
4.3.2. Demand in Likely Scenario
4.3.3. Demand in Conservative Scenario
4.4. Investment Feasibility Analysis
4.4.1. Investment in Established Markets
4.4.1.1. In Short Term
4.4.1.2. In Long Term
4.4.2. Investment in Emerging Markets
4.4.2.1. In Short Term
4.4.2.2. In Long Term
4.5. Forecast Factors - Relevance & Impact
4.5.1. Top Companies Historical Growth
4.5.2. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Growth
4.5.3. Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Adoption Rate, By Country
4.6. Market Dynamics
4.6.1. Market Driving Factors and Impact Assessment
4.6.2. Prominent Market Challenges and Impact Assessment
4.6.3. Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Opportunities
4.6.4. Prominent Trends in the Global Market & Their Impact Assessment
5. Key Success Factors
5.1. Manufacturers’ Focus on Low Penetration High Growth Markets
5.2. Banking on with Segments High Incremental Opportunity
5.3. Peer Benchmarking
6. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Demand Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast, 2022-2032
6.1. Historical Market Analysis, 2017-2021
6.2. Current and Future Market Projections, 2022-2032
6.3. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
7. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Value Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast, 2022-2032
7.1. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Analysis, 2017-2021
7.2. Current and Future Market Value (US$ Mn) Projections, 2022-2032
7.2.1. Y-o-Y Growth Trend Analysis
7.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity Analysis
8. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast 2022-2032, By Device
8.1. Introduction / Key Findings
8.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Device, 2017-2021
8.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Device, 2022-2032
8.3.1. Orthopedic
8.3.2. Cardiac
8.3.3. Gastrointestinal
8.3.4. Vascular
8.3.5. Gynecological
8.3.6. Urological
8.3.7. Thoracic
8.3.8. Cosmetic
8.3.9. Dental
8.3.10. Other Applications
8.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Device
9. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast 2022-2032, By Application
9.1. Introduction / Key Findings
9.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Application, 2017-2021
9.3. Current and Future Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis and Forecast By Application, 2022-2032
9.3.1. Handheld Instruments
9.3.2. Inflation Devices
9.3.3. Cutter Instruments
9.3.4. Cutter Instruments
9.3.5. Guiding Devices
9.3.6. Electrosurgical Devices
9.3.7. Auxiliary Device
9.3.8. Monitoring & Visualization Devices
9.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Application
10. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast 2022-2032, By Region
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Historical Market Size (US$ Mn) Analysis By Region, 2017-2021
10.3. Current Market Size (US$ Mn) & Analysis and Forecast By Region, 2022-2032
10.3.1. North America
10.3.2. Latin America
10.3.3. Europe
10.3.4. Asia Pacific
10.3.5. Middle East and Africa (MEA)
10.4. Market Attractiveness Analysis By Region
11. North America Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast 2022-2032
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Pricing Analysis
11.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017-2021
11.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2032
11.4.1. By Country
11.4.1.1. U.S.
11.4.1.2. Canada
11.4.1.3. Rest of North America
11.4.2. By Production Technique
11.4.3. By Application
11.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
11.5.1. By Country
11.5.2. By Production Technique
11.5.3. By Application
12. Latin America Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast 2022-2032
12.1. Introduction
12.2. Pricing Analysis
12.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017-2021
12.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2032
12.4.1. By Country
12.4.1.1. Brazil
12.4.1.2. Mexico
12.4.1.3. Rest of Latin America
12.4.2. By Production Technique
12.4.3. By Application
12.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
12.5.1. By Country
12.5.2. By Production Technique
12.5.3. By Application
13. Europe Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast 2022-2032
13.1. Introduction
13.2. Pricing Analysis
13.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017-2021
13.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2032
13.4.1. By Country
13.4.1.1. Germany
13.4.1.2. France
13.4.1.3. U.K.
13.4.1.4. Italy
13.4.1.5. Benelux
13.4.1.6. Nordic Countries
13.4.1.7. Rest of Europe
13.4.2. By Production Technique
13.4.3. By Application
13.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
13.5.1. By Country
13.5.2. By Production Technique
13.5.3. By Application
14. Asia Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast 2022-2032
14.1. Introduction
14.2. Pricing Analysis
14.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017-2021
14.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2032
14.4.1. By Country
14.4.1.1. China
14.4.1.2. Japan
14.4.1.3. South Korea
14.4.1.4. Rest of Asia Pacific
14.4.2. By Production Technique
14.4.3. By Application
14.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
14.5.1. By Country
14.5.2. By Production Technique
14.5.3. By Application
15. Middle East and Africa Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast 2022-2032
15.1. Introduction
15.2. Pricing Analysis
15.3. Historical Market Value (US$ Mn) Trend Analysis By Market Taxonomy, 2017-2021
15.4. Market Value (US$ Mn) & Forecast By Market Taxonomy, 2022-2032
15.4.1. By Country
15.4.1.1. GCC Countries
15.4.1.2. South Africa
15.4.1.3. Turkey
15.4.1.4. Rest of Middle East and Africa
15.4.2. By Production Technique
15.4.3. By Application
15.5. Market Attractiveness Analysis
15.5.1. By Country
15.5.2. By Production Technique
15.5.3. By Application
16. Key Countries Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis 2017-2021 and Forecast 2022-2032
16.1. Introduction
16.1.1. Market Value Proportion Analysis, By Key Countries
16.1.2. Global Vs. Country Growth Comparison
16.2. US Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.2.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.2.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.2.2.1. By Production Technique
16.2.2.2. By Application
16.3. Canada Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.3.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.3.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.3.2.1. By Production Technique
16.3.2.2. By Application
16.4. Mexico Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.4.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.4.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.4.2.1. By Production Technique
16.4.2.2. By Application
16.5. Brazil Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.5.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.5.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.5.2.1. By Production Technique
16.5.2.2. By Application
16.6. Germany Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.6.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.6.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.6.2.1. By Production Technique
16.6.2.2. By Application
16.7. France Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.7.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.7.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.7.2.1. By Production Technique
16.7.2.2. By Application
16.8. Italy Minimally Invasive Surgical Instrument Market Analysis
16.8.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.8.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.8.2.1. By Production Technique
16.8.2.2. By Application
16.9. BENELUX Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.9.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.9.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.9.2.1. By Production Technique
16.9.2.2. By Application
16.10. UK Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.10.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.10.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.10.2.1. By Production Technique
16.10.2.2. By Application
16.11. Nordic Countries Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.11.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.11.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.11.2.1. By Production Technique
16.11.2.2. By Application
16.12. China Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.12.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.12.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.12.2.1. By Production Technique
16.12.2.2. By Application
16.13. Japan Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.13.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.13.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.13.2.1. By Production Technique
16.13.2.2. By Application
16.14. South Korea Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.14.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.14.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.14.2.1. By Production Technique
16.14.2.2. By Application
16.15. GCC Countries Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.15.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.15.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.15.2.1. By Production Technique
16.15.2.2. By Application
16.16. South Africa Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.16.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.16.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.16.2.1. By Production Technique
16.16.2.2. By Application
16.17. Turkey Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market Analysis
16.17.1. Value Proportion Analysis by Market Taxonomy
16.17.2. Value & Analysis and Forecast by Market Taxonomy, 2017-2032
16.17.2.1. By Production Technique
16.17.2.2. By Application
16.17.3. Competition Landscape and Player Concentration in the Country
17. Market Structure Analysis
17.1. Market Analysis by Tier of Companies
17.2. Market Concentration
17.3. Market Share Analysis of Top Players
17.4. Market Presence Analysis
17.4.1. By Regional footprint of Players
17.4.2. Product footprint by Players
18. Competition Analysis
18.1. Competition Dashboard
18.2. Competition Benchmarking
18.3. Competition Deep Dive
18.3.1. EMIRATES CENTRAL COOLING SYSTEM CORPORATION
18.3.1.1. Overview
18.3.1.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.1.3. Sales Footprint
18.3.1.4. Strategy Overview
18.3.2. NATIONAL CENTRAL COOLING COMPANY PJSC
18.3.2.1. Overview
18.3.2.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.2.3. Sales Footprint
18.3.2.4. Strategy Overview
18.3.3. EMIRATES Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments(EMICOOL), LLC
18.3.3.1. Overview
18.3.3.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.3.3. Sales Footprint
18.3.3.4. Strategy Overview
18.3.4. SHINRYO CORPORATION
18.3.4.1. Overview
18.3.4.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.4.3. Sales Footprint
18.3.4.4. Strategy Overview
18.3.5. ADC ENERGY SYSTEMS LLC
18.3.5.1. Overview
18.3.5.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.5.3. Sales Footprint
18.3.5.4. Strategy Overview
18.3.6. KEPPEL DHCS PTE LTD
18.3.6.1. Overview
18.3.6.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.6.3. Sales Footprint
18.3.6.4. Strategy Overview
18.3.7. LOGSTOR A/S
18.3.7.1. Overview
18.3.7.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.7.3. Sales Footprint
18.3.7.4. Strategy Overview
18.3.8. RAMBOLL GROUP A/S
18.3.8.1. Overview
18.3.8.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.8.3. Sales Footprint
18.3.8.4. Strategy Overview
18.3.9. SIEMENS AG
18.3.9.1. Overview
18.3.9.2. Product Portfolio
18.3.9.3. Sales Footprint
18.3.9.4. Strategy Overview
19. Assumptions and Acronyms Used20. Research Methodology

Companies Mentioned

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes:

  • EMIRATES CENTRAL COOLING SYSTEM CORPORATION
  • NATIONAL CENTRAL COOLING COMPANY PJSC
  • EMIRATES Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments(EMICOOL), LLC
  • SHINRYO CORPORATION
  • ADC ENERGY SYSTEMS LLC
  • KEPPEL DHCS PTE LTD
  • LOGSTOR A/S
  • RAMBOLL GROUP A/S
  • SIEMENS AG