+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 185 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5914465
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) technology plays a pivotal role in refining operations, enabling senior decision-makers to address industry pressures, regulatory developments, and evolving market needs. As refiners strive for operational excellence, advancements in FCC provide opportunities to enhance efficiency, product flexibility, and environmental compliance while responding to competitive and regional factors.

Market Snapshot: Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market Overview

The global fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) market is experiencing a phase of robust expansion, underpinned by continuous innovation and the increasingly demanding landscape refiners encounter. The sector’s value is forecasted to increase at a significant compound annual growth rate. This growth trajectory is driven by adoption of advanced catalysts, the drive toward cleaner fuel regulations, and enhanced capabilities to process a broad array of feedstocks. Senior leaders in the refining industry are focused on optimizing capital allocation and utilizing technological upgrades to manage competitive forces. The introduction of stringent environmental standards and shifting end-product requirements are shaping long-term strategy, compelling operators to embrace flexibility in output and capacity planning. As the regulatory climate evolves and consumer preferences shift, adaptability and strategic response distinguish those able to maintain profitability and resilience.

Scope & Segmentation: Market Coverage and Strategic Focus

  • Components: The scope includes binders, fillers, matrix materials, and specialized zeolite catalysts, notably Zeolite Y and ZSM-5. Each element is critical for raising FCC selectivity, stability, and process efficiency, contributing to consistent product performance and supporting output versatility across grades.
  • Configuration: Both side-by-side and stacked units are highlighted, offering engineering options that support tailored plant layouts, process integration, and responsive scaling of capacity. Adaptable configurations facilitate modernization for refineries of varying sizes and requirements, ensuring that engineering constraints do not hinder production goals.
  • Feedstock Type: This market segment covers deasphalted oils, vacuum gas oil, and residue. The ability of FCC units to process varied feedstocks supports refiners in managing market swings, raw material availability, and risk exposure. Feedstock versatility ensures sustained production targets amidst supply-chain adjustments.
  • Unit Capacity: Refineries can deploy large, medium, or small FCC solutions. These options cater to everything from integrated mega-complexes to modular or regional plants, supporting custom-fit technology deployment that aligns with each operator’s constraints and throughput ambitions.
  • End User: Targeted production lines include diesel, gasoline, and light olefins. This segmentation underlines the pressing need for downstream flexibility, so refiners can align outputs with evolving fuel standards and meet chemical industry feedstock diversity requirements.
  • Regions: The FCC market encompasses the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Each geography faces unique regulatory pressures, investment patterns, technological readiness, and expansion approaches, making regional adaptation a necessity for sustained competitive advantage.
  • Companies Profiled: Leading organizations in the FCC value chain profiled include Axens Joint Stock Company, BASF SE, CECO Environmental Corp., Chevron Lummus Global, DuPont de Nemours, Inc, Emerson Electric Co., Evonik Industries AG, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Fluor Corporation, Honeywell International Inc., JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd., Johnson Matthey Group, Ketjen by Albemarle Corporation, Kuwait Catalyst Company, Magma Group, N.E. CHEMCAT Corporation, Naugra, Shell PLC, Sulzer Ltd., W.R. Grace Company, Yueyang sciensun chemical industry co., LTD, and Zeopore Technologies NV.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Innovations in catalyst frameworks—featuring advanced zeolites and digital optimization—allow refiners to fine-tune product yields and process selectivity, positioning them to respond to evolving market demands.
  • Strategic investments in retrofit and catalytic upgrades help operators comply with emerging environmental regulations while maintaining or improving operational performance objectives.
  • Flexibility in FCC design has become essential as refiners prioritize compatibility with both conventional and alternative hydrocarbon sources, supporting resilient supply strategies.
  • Regional distinctions remain pronounced: North America advances deep conversion capabilities, while Asia-Pacific’s growth centers on stacked configuration adoption for integration and increased output.
  • Collaboration between refiners, catalyst providers, and technology specialists drives digitalization initiatives, directly supporting the industry’s move toward greater sustainability and competitiveness.

Tariff Impact: United States Trade Policy and Value Chain Adaptation

Adjustments to U.S. tariff structures are prompting refiners to reassess procurement and sourcing across the FCC value chain. Increases in levies on catalysts and process modules are leading to modified vendor management, exploration of alternative sources, and strengthened resilience in supplier networks. These shifts place new demands on capital planning and add complexity for companies relying on domestic or imported components, requiring nimble adaptation and proactive supply chain management.

Methodology & Data Sources

This analysis draws from comprehensive secondary research and direct interviews with refinery engineers, catalyst specialists, and supply chain leaders. Findings are validated through shipment records, global trade data, and in-depth feedstock evaluations. Input from industry experts ensures coverage of technology adoption and emerging trends across regions.

Why This Report Matters

  • Delivers segmented analysis to help executives benchmark FCC technology, process adaptation, and feedstock strategies for business-critical decision-making.
  • Provides actionable insights to address evolving regulatory, technological, and supply chain challenges facing modern refineries.
  • Combines expert perspectives and primary research, arming leaders with practical information for effective market assessment and competitive positioning.

Conclusion

Fluid catalytic cracking remains central to refining sector progress and resilience. These insights equip decision-makers to foster sustainable growth and confidently navigate industry transformation.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Adoption of novel zeolite-based catalysts for maximizing propylene yields in FCC units
5.2. Implementation of AI-driven process control systems for real-time FCC reactor optimization
5.3. Integration of carbon capture technologies into FCC units to reduce CO2 emissions and footprint
5.4. Retrofitting existing FCC units with residue upgrading catalysts to process heavy crude blends
5.5. Co-processing of renewable and bio-based feedstocks in FCC to support decarbonization goals
5.6. Development of sulfur-scavenging additives to mitigate SOx emissions from FCC regenerator flue gas
5.7. Optimization of catalyst circulation rates to enhance conversion efficiency and extend cycle length
5.8. Deployment of inline particle size analyzers for monitoring catalyst attrition and activity in FCC units
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Components
8.1. Binder
8.2. Filler
8.3. Matrix
8.4. Zeolite Catalyst
8.4.1. Zeolite Y
8.4.2. ZSM-5 Zeolite
9. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Configuration
9.1. Side by Side Type
9.2. Stacked Type
10. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Feedstock Type
10.1. Deasphalted Oil
10.2. Residue
10.3. Vacuum Gas Oil
11. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Unit Capacity
11.1. Large Capacity
11.2. Medium Capacity
11.3. Small Capacity
12. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by End User
12.1. Diesel Production
12.2. Gasoline Production
12.3. Light Olefins Production
12.3.1. Ethylene
12.3.2. Propylene
13. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Axens Joint Stock Company
16.3.2. BASF SE
16.3.3. CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.
16.3.4. Chevron Lummus Global
16.3.5. DuPont de Nemours, Inc
16.3.6. Emerson Electric Co.
16.3.7. Evonik Industries AG
16.3.8. Exxon Mobil Corporation
16.3.9. Flour Corporation
16.3.10. Honeywell International Inc.
16.3.11. JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd.
16.3.12. Johnson Matthey Group.
16.3.13. Ketjen by Albemarle Corporation
16.3.14. Kuwait Catalyst Company.
16.3.15. Magma Group
16.3.16. N.E. CHEMCAT Corporation
16.3.17. Naugra
16.3.18. Shell PLC
16.3.19. Sulzer Ltd.
16.3.20. W.R. Grace Company
16.3.21. Yueyang sciensun chemical industry co., LTD
16.3.22. Zeopore Technologies NV

Samples

Loading
LOADING...

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Fluid Catalytic Cracking market report include:
  • Axens Joint Stock Company
  • BASF SE
  • CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.
  • Chevron Lummus Global
  • DuPont de Nemours, Inc
  • Emerson Electric Co.
  • Evonik Industries AG
  • Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • Flour Corporation
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd.
  • Johnson Matthey Group.
  • Ketjen by Albemarle Corporation
  • Kuwait Catalyst Company.
  • Magma Group
  • N.E. CHEMCAT Corporation
  • Naugra
  • Shell PLC
  • Sulzer Ltd.
  • W.R. Grace Company
  • Yueyang sciensun chemical industry co., LTD
  • Zeopore Technologies NV

Table Information