+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Foscarnet Sodium Market - Global Forecast 2026-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 184 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6119099
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Foscarnet Sodium Market grew from USD 329.84 million in 2025 to USD 354.27 million in 2026. It is expected to continue growing at a CAGR of 7.30%, reaching USD 540.21 million by 2032.

A comprehensive orientation to foscarnet sodium that frames clinical imperatives, supply chain complexities, and stakeholder coordination for optimized patient access

Foscarnet sodium remains a critical therapeutic option for clinicians treating severe viral infections that do not respond to first-line antivirals. Historically positioned as a second-line antiviral, its role continues to be defined by clinical necessity in patients with resistant cytomegalovirus infections and in populations where alternative therapies are contraindicated. The introduction outlines the clinical context, manufacturing and distribution characteristics, and the regulatory environment that collectively shape the contemporary landscape for this agent.

The drug’s intravenous dosage forms, supply chain sensitivities, and patient cohorts-spanning adults, geriatric patients, and children-require coordinated clinical and commercial strategies. Patient types such as individuals living with AIDS, immunocompromised patients, and transplant recipients drive specialized demand patterns and necessitate close collaboration among hospital pharmacies, specialty centers and outpatient infusion providers. Consequently, stakeholders must align production, cold chain logistics where applicable, and clinician education to ensure consistent, safe access.

Furthermore, the introduction emphasizes the importance of understanding distribution pathways including hospital pharmacies, online pharmacy platforms, and retail outlets that dispense injectables and solutions. As stakeholders navigate reimbursement dynamics and formulary positioning, they should also account for regulatory inspection priorities and quality control expectations that affect contract manufacturers and branded producers alike. In sum, the introduction frames foscarnet sodium not merely as a drug but as a complex clinical commodity requiring integrated operational and strategic planning.

How evolving clinical resistance patterns, manufacturing resilience investments, and distribution digitization are reshaping commercial and operational approaches to foscarnet sodium

The last several years have produced transformative shifts across clinical practice, manufacturing resilience, and distribution technology that materially influence the foscarnet sodium landscape. Clinically, the widening recognition of antiviral resistance patterns and the consequent need for reliable second-line agents have elevated strategic interest in therapies like foscarnet sodium. As clinicians adopt more precision-informed approaches to viral management, demand has become more concentrated around specialized centers that treat high-risk cohorts.

On the manufacturing front, industry participants have accelerated investments in quality management systems, supply redundancy, and contract manufacturing capacity to buffer against disruptions. This transition toward more resilient supply chains has been accompanied by greater scrutiny of raw material sourcing and sterility assurance practices that are essential for injectable products. Concurrently, distribution experienced a digital and operational upgrade: hospital pharmacy management systems, online pharmacy fulfillment platforms, and specialty pharmacy networks have adapted to handle controlled cold chain logistics, batch tracing, and rapid clinical replenishment.

Regulatory expectations have also shifted, with authorities emphasizing robust pharmacovigilance, batch traceability, and clear labeling for use in vulnerable populations. These regulatory clarifications have prompted sponsors and manufacturers to revise clinical support materials and enhance training programs for infusion nurses and pharmacists. Moreover, payer dynamics and the rise of specialty pharmacy services have influenced contracting approaches, prompting manufacturers and distributors to develop patient support and adherence programs tailored to transplant patients and immunocompromised individuals. Taken together, these changes represent a structural evolution from a commoditized second-line therapy to a clinically essential, tightly managed product requiring sophisticated commercial and operational approaches.

The 2025 tariff environment forced procurement realignments, onshoring considerations, and contract innovations to safeguard sterile supply continuity and clinic access to foscarnet sodium

The imposition of tariffs by the United States in 2025 introduced new variables into procurement strategies for pharmaceutical products that rely on imported raw materials, sterile fill-finish services, or finished doses. For foscarnet sodium, which depends on precise sterile manufacturing and, in some cases, international supply relationships for key inputs, the tariff environment created measurable shifts in sourcing, cost structure, and supplier selection. Organizations responded by reassessing supplier portfolios, accelerating onshoring where feasible, and renegotiating long-term agreements to preserve supply continuity.

In reaction to tariff-driven cost pressures, procurement teams prioritized suppliers with integrated quality management and geographically diversified footprints to reduce exposure to single-country tariff volatility. Meanwhile, manufacturers and contract development and manufacturing organizations explored process optimizations and formulation adjustments that could mitigate input cost sensitivity without compromising sterility or clinical performance. Higher-level strategic responses included strengthening strategic stockpiles at hospital and specialty center levels and enhancing visibility across the upstream supply chain to anticipate bottlenecks.

At the payer and contracting level, tariff-induced cost fluctuations encouraged more dynamic pricing clauses and risk-sharing arrangements that align payment with outcome metrics or volume guarantees. These contractual innovations helped stabilize access for high-priority patient populations by diffusing short-term price shocks over multi-year agreements. From a regulatory and compliance perspective, organizations also invested in enhanced documentation and customs expertise to ensure that cross-border supply adjustments complied with evolving trade rules and maintained product integrity. Overall, the 2025 tariff landscape catalyzed a more strategic, supply-aware approach across commercial, procurement, and clinical operations for foscarnet sodium.

Integrated segmentation intelligence that aligns clinical settings, distribution mechanisms, therapeutic indications, patient cohorts, dosage formats, and age considerations for optimized strategy

Understanding how end-user settings, distribution channels, clinical indications, patient types, dosage forms, and age groups interact is central to designing effective commercial and clinical strategies for foscarnet sodium. Demand profiles vary significantly across clinics, hospitals, retail pharmacies, and specialty centers, with hospitals and specialty centers generally managing acute inpatient infusions while clinics and retail pharmacies support outpatient and follow-up dosing. Distribution pathways mirror these clinical roles, so hospital pharmacy systems, online pharmacy fulfillment services, and retail pharmacy networks each play distinct roles in ensuring timely access and continuity of care.

The clinical indications frame utilization intensity and therapeutic urgency. Cytomegalovirus retinitis and ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infections drive high-priority use cases that demand rapid, reliable access to intravenous formulations. Patient types such as individuals living with AIDS, other immunocompromised populations, and transplant recipients present unique safety and monitoring needs that influence how clinicians select dosage regimens and how pharmacies prepare and dispense solutions. Dosage form considerations-primarily sterile injections and ready-to-use solutions-affect manufacturing choices, sterile fill-finish requirements, and cold chain practices, and they impose specific handling and training demands on dispensing sites.

Age group segmentation further nuances clinical and commercial planning. Adult patients may represent the largest absolute pool of users, while geriatric patients require attention to comorbidity management and renal dosing adjustments. Pediatric use, although less common, necessitates specialized formulations, dosing accuracy, and caregiver education. Consequently, cross-functional teams must integrate clinical protocols, dosing support tools, and targeted educational materials across the relevant care settings. When these segmentation dimensions are considered holistically, stakeholders can prioritize investments in specialty pharmacy capabilities, infusion center readiness, and clinician outreach programs that directly address the needs of the highest-risk cohorts.

A nuanced regional perspective that captures procurement practices, regulatory diversity, and healthcare infrastructure differences across primary global markets for foscarnet sodium

Regional dynamics exert material influence on clinical practice patterns, regulatory requirements, and supply chain architecture for foscarnet sodium. In the Americas, healthcare systems show a mixture of large hospital networks and specialized outpatient infusion services that emphasize rapid access and reimbursement navigation. This region typically prioritizes established pharmacy-benefit and hospital formulary pathways, with specialty pharmacies and hospital pharmacy buyers often coordinating to secure uninterrupted supply for transplant and immunocompromised patients.

Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the landscape is heterogeneous, with varying regulatory frameworks and capacity for sterile manufacturing and hospital-based infusion. In some countries, centralized procurement and tendering drive supplier selection, while in others decentralized hospital purchasing creates localized demand signals. Stakeholders operating in this complex regional environment must adapt to differing pharmacovigilance reporting requirements, cold chain capabilities, and clinician practice norms that affect how foscarnet sodium is used and managed.

In Asia-Pacific, rapid healthcare infrastructure development and expanding specialty care capacity have increased demand for advanced antiviral therapies. The region displays a mix of domestic manufacturing capability and reliance on international suppliers for specialized sterile pharmaceuticals. Consequently, companies and healthcare providers active in Asia-Pacific focus on scalability of production, regulatory alignment, and tailored education programs for clinicians treating transplant recipients and immunocompromised patients. Across all regions, cross-border regulatory harmonization efforts and improvements in distribution technology are enabling more predictable international supply flows, but regional nuances in procurement, reimbursement and clinical practice remain decisive factors in strategic planning.

Strategic company approaches spanning innovators, generic manufacturers, contract organizations, and specialty distributors that prioritize sterile quality, supply resilience, and clinical service integration

Companies participating in the foscarnet sodium ecosystem are pursuing distinct strategies that reflect their capabilities in sterile manufacturing, regulatory navigation, and specialty distribution. Innovator firms and established sterile injectable manufacturers focus on maintaining high standards for aseptic processing and pharmacovigilance while exploring lifecycle management initiatives such as patient support services, educational programs for infusion staff, and abbreviated stability innovations to ease pharmacy workflows. These approaches strengthen clinical trust and differentiate offerings in environments where product interchangeability must be carefully managed.

Generic manufacturers and contract development and manufacturing organizations emphasize production efficiency, cost control, and scalability. Their strategic choices include investments in modern clean-room facilities, qualification of secondary suppliers for critical inputs, and adoption of quality-by-design principles to reduce batch failure risk. Specialty distributors and pharmacy benefit managers build capabilities around cold chain logistics, real-time inventory visibility, and clinical liaison services to ensure that high-risk patients receive timely doses. Meanwhile, newer entrants with digital-first models are concentrating on online pharmacy fulfillment, telehealth integration, and patient adherence solutions that address outpatient management challenges.

Across company types, strategic partnerships and alliance models have become more common. Manufacturers increasingly collaborate with specialty pharmacies and hospital networks to deliver bundled services that include medication therapy monitoring and reimbursement support. These collaboration patterns help companies mitigate supply disruption risk, enhance reimbursement pathways, and provide clinicians with the operational confidence needed to prescribe foscarnet sodium for sensitive patient populations.

Practical strategic actions for manufacturers, distributors, and clinical leaders to secure supply resilience, enhance clinician competence, and improve patient safety and access

Leaders in manufacturing, clinical operations, and distribution should prioritize a set of actionable measures to strengthen supply reliability and clinician confidence in using foscarnet sodium. First, increase upstream supplier visibility and qualifying secondary sources for critical raw materials and sterile fill-finish capacity to reduce single-source risk. By aligning procurement strategies with quality audits and multi-sourcing plans, organizations can buffer against trade disruptions and tariff volatility while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Second, invest in targeted clinical education and infusion training programs focused on high-risk cohorts such as transplant recipients and immunocompromised patients. These programs should cover dosing nuances for adult, geriatric and pediatric populations, renal monitoring requirements, and protocols for managing adverse events. Strengthening clinician and pharmacy staff competence reduces medication errors and supports safer outpatient transition pathways. Third, develop distribution and contracting innovations that reflect the realities of hospital pharmacy systems, online pharmacy platforms, and retail pharmacy operations. Risk-sharing agreements, outcome-linked pricing, and dynamic inventory allocation can help stabilize access and manage cost pressures.

Finally, embrace digital tracking and batch-level traceability to ensure end-to-end visibility. Implementing modern serialization, temperature monitoring and analytics enables proactive replenishment and rapid response to quality events. Collectively, these recommendations support a resilient, patient-centered approach that balances clinical imperatives with commercial sustainability.

A rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining primary clinical interviews, supply chain assessments, regulatory review, and scenario-based risk analysis to produce actionable insights

The research methodology employed a mixed-methods approach to gather robust insights into clinical use, manufacturing practices, distribution mechanics, and commercial strategies. Primary qualitative interviews with clinicians, hospital pharmacy directors, specialty pharmacy managers, and supply chain executives provided context on prescribing behaviors, handling practices, and procurement priorities. These conversations informed a detailed assessment of clinical workflows, dosing management across adult, geriatric and pediatric patients, and the operational realities of hospital, clinic and specialty infusion settings.

Complementing primary research, secondary sources including regulatory guidance documents, manufacturing quality standards, and publicly available clinical literature were analyzed to validate clinical indications and to map the regulatory landscape. The methodology also incorporated supplier capability assessments based on facility certifications, aseptic processing qualifications, and historical supply performance data. Distribution channel analysis evaluated the operational characteristics of hospital pharmacies, online pharmacy fulfillment, and retail pharmacy networks, with particular attention to cold chain requirements and batch traceability.

Analytical frameworks included risk mapping for tariff-related supply disruptions, scenario planning for sourcing alternatives, and segmentation modeling that linked end-user settings to dosing forms and patient types. The synthesis prioritized actionable insight over purely descriptive metrics, enabling stakeholders to align clinical, commercial and operational strategies. Throughout, the research maintained strict adherence to confidentiality expectations for interviewees and validated findings through triangulation across multiple information sources.

Consolidated strategic takeaways emphasizing integrated manufacturing, distribution and clinical engagement to protect access for high-risk patients receiving foscarnet sodium

In conclusion, foscarnet sodium occupies a critical niche in antiviral therapy where reliable supply, precise clinical administration, and informed distribution are essential to patient outcomes. The interplay of evolving clinical needs, tariff dynamics, manufacturing readiness and distribution modernization requires stakeholders to adopt coordinated strategies that span procurement, clinician engagement, and logistics. By addressing upstream supplier resilience, investing in clinician and pharmacy training, and innovating contracting and distribution mechanisms, organizations can mitigate disruption risk while ensuring that high-risk patient cohorts retain timely access to therapy.

The core takeaway is that commercial success and clinical reliability hinge on integration: aligning sterile manufacturing excellence with responsive distribution and clinician-centric services. As healthcare systems and supply chains continue to evolve, proactive adaptation-grounded in supplier diversification, regulatory readiness, and digital visibility-will determine which organizations can sustain uninterrupted access for transplant recipients, immunocompromised patients, and other vulnerable groups. Moving forward, stakeholders should translate the insights from this research into concrete, measurable initiatives that protect patient safety and preserve therapeutic options for complex clinical cases.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
2.2.1. Primary Research
2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
5. Market Insights
5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Foscarnet Sodium Market, by Indication
8.1. Cytomegalovirus Retinitis
8.2. Ganciclovir Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection
9. Foscarnet Sodium Market, by Patient Type
9.1. Aids Patients
9.2. Immunocompromised Patients
9.3. Transplant Patients
10. Foscarnet Sodium Market, by Dosage Form
10.1. Injection
10.2. Solution
11. Foscarnet Sodium Market, by Age Group
11.1. Adult
11.2. Geriatric
11.3. Pediatric
12. Foscarnet Sodium Market, by Distribution Channel
12.1. Hospital Pharmacy
12.2. Online Pharmacy
12.3. Retail Pharmacy
13. Foscarnet Sodium Market, by End User
13.1. Clinics
13.2. Hospitals
13.3. Retail Pharmacies
13.4. Specialty Centers
14. Foscarnet Sodium Market, by Region
14.1. Americas
14.1.1. North America
14.1.2. Latin America
14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
14.2.1. Europe
14.2.2. Middle East
14.2.3. Africa
14.3. Asia-Pacific
15. Foscarnet Sodium Market, by Group
15.1. ASEAN
15.2. GCC
15.3. European Union
15.4. BRICS
15.5. G7
15.6. NATO
16. Foscarnet Sodium Market, by Country
16.1. United States
16.2. Canada
16.3. Mexico
16.4. Brazil
16.5. United Kingdom
16.6. Germany
16.7. France
16.8. Russia
16.9. Italy
16.10. Spain
16.11. China
16.12. India
16.13. Japan
16.14. Australia
16.15. South Korea
17. United States Foscarnet Sodium Market
18. China Foscarnet Sodium Market
19. Competitive Landscape
19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
19.5. Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited
19.6. AstraZeneca PLC
19.7. Aurobindo Pharma Limited
19.8. Cipla Limited
19.9. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
19.10. Fresenius Kabi AG
19.11. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
19.12. Hetero Drugs Limited
19.13. Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC
19.14. Lupin Limited
19.15. Mylan N.V.
19.16. Novartis AG
19.17. Pfizer Inc.
19.18. Strides Pharma Science Limited
19.19. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
19.20. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
19.21. Zydus Cadila
List of Figures
FIGURE 1. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 2. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
FIGURE 3. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
FIGURE 4. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 5. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 7. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 8. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 10. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 12. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 13. UNITED STATES FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 14. CHINA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
List of Tables
TABLE 1. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 2. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 3. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY CYTOMEGALOVIRUS RETINITIS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 4. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY CYTOMEGALOVIRUS RETINITIS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 5. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY CYTOMEGALOVIRUS RETINITIS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 6. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY GANCICLOVIR RESISTANT CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 7. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY GANCICLOVIR RESISTANT CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 8. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY GANCICLOVIR RESISTANT CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 9. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 10. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AIDS PATIENTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 11. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AIDS PATIENTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 12. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AIDS PATIENTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 13. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PATIENTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 14. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PATIENTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 15. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY IMMUNOCOMPROMISED PATIENTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 16. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 17. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 18. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 19. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 20. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INJECTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 21. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INJECTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 22. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INJECTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 23. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 24. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 25. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 26. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 27. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY ADULT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 28. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY ADULT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 29. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY ADULT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 30. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY GERIATRIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 31. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY GERIATRIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 32. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY GERIATRIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 33. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PEDIATRIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 34. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PEDIATRIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 35. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PEDIATRIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 36. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 37. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITAL PHARMACY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 38. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITAL PHARMACY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 39. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITAL PHARMACY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 40. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE PHARMACY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 41. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE PHARMACY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 42. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE PHARMACY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 43. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL PHARMACY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 44. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL PHARMACY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 45. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL PHARMACY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 46. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 47. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 48. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 49. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 50. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 51. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 52. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 53. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL PHARMACIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 54. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL PHARMACIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 55. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL PHARMACIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 56. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY CENTERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 57. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY CENTERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 58. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY CENTERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 59. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 60. AMERICAS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 61. AMERICAS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 62. AMERICAS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 63. AMERICAS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 64. AMERICAS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 65. AMERICAS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 66. AMERICAS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 67. NORTH AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 68. NORTH AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 69. NORTH AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 70. NORTH AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 71. NORTH AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 72. NORTH AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 73. NORTH AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 74. LATIN AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 75. LATIN AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 76. LATIN AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 77. LATIN AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 78. LATIN AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 79. LATIN AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 80. LATIN AMERICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 81. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 82. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 83. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 84. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 85. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 86. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 87. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 88. EUROPE FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 89. EUROPE FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 90. EUROPE FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 91. EUROPE FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 92. EUROPE FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 93. EUROPE FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 94. EUROPE FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 95. MIDDLE EAST FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 96. MIDDLE EAST FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 97. MIDDLE EAST FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 98. MIDDLE EAST FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 99. MIDDLE EAST FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 100. MIDDLE EAST FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 101. MIDDLE EAST FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 102. AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 103. AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 104. AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 105. AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 106. AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 107. AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 108. AFRICA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 109. ASIA-PACIFIC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 110. ASIA-PACIFIC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 111. ASIA-PACIFIC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 112. ASIA-PACIFIC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 113. ASIA-PACIFIC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 114. ASIA-PACIFIC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 115. ASIA-PACIFIC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 116. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 117. ASEAN FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 118. ASEAN FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 119. ASEAN FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 120. ASEAN FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 121. ASEAN FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 122. ASEAN FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 123. ASEAN FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 124. GCC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 125. GCC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 126. GCC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 127. GCC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 128. GCC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 129. GCC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 130. GCC FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 131. EUROPEAN UNION FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 132. EUROPEAN UNION FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 133. EUROPEAN UNION FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 134. EUROPEAN UNION FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 135. EUROPEAN UNION FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 136. EUROPEAN UNION FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 137. EUROPEAN UNION FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 138. BRICS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 139. BRICS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 140. BRICS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 141. BRICS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 142. BRICS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 143. BRICS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 144. BRICS FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 145. G7 FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 146. G7 FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 147. G7 FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 148. G7 FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 149. G7 FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 150. G7 FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 151. G7 FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 152. NATO FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 153. NATO FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 154. NATO FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 155. NATO FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 156. NATO FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 157. NATO FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 158. NATO FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 159. GLOBAL FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 160. UNITED STATES FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 161. UNITED STATES FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 162. UNITED STATES FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 163. UNITED STATES FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 164. UNITED STATES FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 165. UNITED STATES FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 166. UNITED STATES FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 167. CHINA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 168. CHINA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY INDICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 169. CHINA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY PATIENT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 170. CHINA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DOSAGE FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 171. CHINA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY AGE GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 172. CHINA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 173. CHINA FOSCARNET SODIUM MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

Companies Mentioned

  • Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited
  • AstraZeneca PLC
  • Aurobindo Pharma Limited
  • Cipla Limited
  • Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
  • Fresenius Kabi AG
  • Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  • Hetero Drugs Limited
  • Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC
  • Lupin Limited
  • Mylan N.V.
  • Novartis AG
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Strides Pharma Science Limited
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Zydus Cadila

Table Information