+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 183 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5715478
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market is undergoing rapid transformation, enabling organizations to drive efficiency and innovation through seamless integration of advanced automation systems. By prioritizing precision, scalability, and data-driven workflows, senior leaders can unlock new levels of operational agility and competitive advantage.

Market Snapshot: Lab Automation in Protein Engineering

The global market for lab automation in protein engineering grew from USD 2.15 billion in 2024 to USD 2.36 billion in 2025, and is projected to reach USD 4.56 billion by 2032, reflecting a CAGR of 9.82%. This momentum is being shaped by the increasing demand across biotechnology, pharmaceutical, and academic sectors for flexible solutions that streamline experimental throughput and enhance data integrity.

Scope & Segmentation of the Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market

This report delivers an in-depth analysis of the following dimensions, ensuring a comprehensive view of competitive and operational strategy for decision-makers:

  • Product Types: Consumables (including plates, reagents, and tips), instruments (bench-top and high-throughput systems), software, and services.
  • Automation Platforms: Biosensors (electrochemical, optical), liquid handling systems (micro-volume, nano-volume), microplate readers (absorbance, fluorescence, luminescence), and robotic workstations (integrated, open).
  • Applications: Directed evolution, rational design within enzyme engineering, lead identification and optimization, protein expression and purification methods (chromatography, filtration), and structure analysis (nuclear magnetic resonance, X-ray crystallography).
  • End Users: Academic research institutes, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and pharmaceutical firms.
  • Technologies: Acoustic liquid handling (piezoelectric, ultrasonic), magnetic bead separation (paramagnetic, superparamagnetic), and microfluidics (continuous flow systems, droplet based systems).
  • Regions: Americas (North America and Latin America), Europe, Middle East & Africa, Asia-Pacific.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Accelerated innovation is driven by the adoption of robotics, modular automation platforms, and cloud analytics, reducing manual bottlenecks and boosting research throughput.
  • Technological advances in miniaturized systems and machine learning enable iterative experimental design and rapid identification of optimal protein variants.
  • Collaborative workflows are enhanced through open, standardized data formats and interoperable controls, supporting distributed teams and remote operations.
  • Organizations are increasingly prioritizing modular architectures to adapt quickly to evolving research demands and mitigate equipment obsolescence.
  • Focus on sustainability is rising, with energy-efficient microfluidics technologies and recycling protocols gaining traction in research environments.
  • Strong partnerships between instrument manufacturers, software providers, and research organizations are key for end-to-end workflow automation and service innovation.

Tariff Impact: Navigating New U.S. Measures in 2025

New tariff measures introduced by the United States in 2025 have influenced capital allocation, procurement strategies, and vendor negotiations. Many organizations have diversified their supplier portfolios and pursued domestic assembly or regional sourcing in response. Procurement and R&D teams are collaborating proactively to forecast lifecycles and account for added costs through structured framework agreements, while vendors adapt by modifying regional configurations and supply chain resilience.

Research Methodology & Data Sources

This report’s insights derive from primary interviews with senior R&D leaders, procurement executives, and automation engineers, paired with secondary research from peer-reviewed publications, patent analyses, technical documentation, and regulatory review. Triangulation and iterative validation ensure precise findings aligned with current industry realities.

Why This Report Matters for B2B Leaders

  • Enables informed investment and procurement decisions by providing granular segmentation across products, platforms, users, and technologies.
  • Guides strategic planning around automation upgrades, risk management, and cross-functional collaborations in protein engineering workflows.
  • Delivers actionable recommendations for enhancing supply chain resilience, optimizing operational agility, and adopting scalable automation frameworks.

Conclusion

With converging trends in automation technology, data management, and procurement strategy, this report equips stakeholders to stay ahead of market shifts and capitalize on emerging opportunities in lab automation for protein engineering.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Implementation of microfluidic droplet systems for parallel single-cell protein evolution assays at megahertz throughput
5.2. Integration of machine learning algorithms with robotic liquid handlers for predictive enzyme engineering optimization
5.3. Deployment of fully automated end-to-end platforms combining gene synthesis, expression screening and analytics for rapid variant discovery
5.4. Adoption of cloud-based data management with real-time visualization to streamline collaborative protein design and workflow tracking
5.5. Use of acoustic liquid handling technologies to reduce sample volumes and improve throughput in high-throughput mutagenesis experiments
5.6. Integration of continuous flow bioreactors with automated monitoring sensors for on-the-fly optimization of protein expression yields
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market, by Product Type
8.1. Consumables
8.1.1. Plates
8.1.2. Reagents
8.1.3. Tips
8.2. Instruments
8.2.1. Bench-Top Systems
8.2.2. High-Throughput Systems
8.3. Software And Services
8.3.1. Services
8.3.2. Software
9. Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market, by Automation Platform
9.1. Biosensors
9.1.1. Electrochemical Biosensors
9.1.2. Optical Biosensors
9.2. Liquid Handling Systems
9.2.1. Micro-Volume Systems
9.2.2. Nano-Volume Systems
9.3. Microplate Readers
9.3.1. Absorbance Readers
9.3.2. Fluorescence Readers
9.3.3. Luminescence Readers
9.4. Robotic Workstations
9.4.1. Integrated Systems
9.4.2. Open Systems
10. Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market, by Application
10.1. Enzyme Engineering
10.1.1. Directed Evolution
10.1.2. Rational Design
10.2. High Throughput Screening
10.2.1. Lead Identification
10.2.2. Lead Optimization
10.3. Protein Expression Purification
10.3.1. Chromatography
10.3.2. Filtration
10.4. Structure Analysis
10.4.1. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
10.4.2. X Ray Crystallography
11. Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market, by End User
11.1. Academic Research Institutes
11.2. Biotechnology Companies
11.3. Contract Research Organizations
11.4. Pharmaceutical Companies
12. Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market, by Technology
12.1. Acoustic Liquid Handling
12.1.1. Piezoelectric Systems
12.1.2. Ultrasonic Systems
12.2. Magnetic Bead Separation
12.2.1. Paramagnetic Beads
12.2.2. Superparamagnetic Beads
12.3. Microfluidics Systems
12.3.1. Continuous Flow Systems
12.3.2. Droplet Based Systems
13. Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Lab Automation in Protein Engineering Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
16.3.2. Danaher Corporation
16.3.3. Agilent Technologies, Inc.
16.3.4. PerkinElmer, Inc.
16.3.5. Tecan Group Ltd.
16.3.6. Sartorius AG
16.3.7. Hamilton Company
16.3.8. Eppendorf AG
16.3.9. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
16.3.10. QIAGEN N.V.

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Lab Automation in Protein Engineering market report include:
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Danaher Corporation
  • Agilent Technologies, Inc.
  • PerkinElmer, Inc.
  • Tecan Group Ltd.
  • Sartorius AG
  • Hamilton Company
  • Eppendorf AG
  • Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
  • QIAGEN N.V.

Table Information