+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 192 Pages
  • November 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5889432
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The in-vitro diagnostics packaging market is rapidly evolving, driven by innovation in materials, regulatory complexity, and emerging global demand for reliable, compliant healthcare solutions. Senior decision-makers must address trends in packaging formats, tariff shifts, and supply chain resilience to harness new opportunities and reduce operational risk.

Market Snapshot: Global Growth and Trends in In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging

The in-vitro diagnostics packaging market grew from USD 7.70 billion in 2024 to USD 8.24 billion in 2025. With an expected CAGR of 7.01%, it is projected to reach USD 13.25 billion by 2032. Market expansion is propelled by technological advances, changing regulatory mandates, and surging demand for secure specimen transport and storage solutions across laboratory and point-of-care settings. Stakeholders are navigating increased material prices and supply fluctuations amidst ongoing demand for sterility and traceability.

Scope & Segmentation: Comprehensive Coverage and Insights

  • Packaging Formats: Blow-fill-seal (ampoules, cartridges, cassettes), flexible packaging (film, laminates, pouches, bags), rigid packaging (microplates, slides, tubes, vials).
  • Material Choices: Glass, plastic, specialty polymers, sustainable materials.
  • End Users: Diagnostic laboratories, hospitals, clinics, point-of-care testing, research institutes.
  • Sterility Levels: Field offerings include both sterile and non-sterile packaging for critical and routine applications.
  • Temperature Requirements: Categories include ambient, frozen, and refrigerated, addressing diverse specimen and reagent needs.
  • Distribution Channels: Direct sales, distributors, and online platforms are leveraged to reach various customer profiles.
  • Regional Markets: Americas (United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru), Europe (United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Poland, Switzerland), Middle East (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Israel), Africa (South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, Kenya), and Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan).
  • Technological Advances: Smart packaging (RFID, barcoding), material science innovations, automation, and robotics.
  • Key Companies Assessed: Amcor plc, Berry Global Group, Gerresheimer AG, Stevanato Group, West Pharmaceutical Services, AptarGroup, SCHOTT AG, Constantia Flexibles Group, Nelipak Corporation, Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG.

Key Takeaways: Strategic Insights for Decision-Makers

  • Advances in automation and robotics are improving production consistency for in-vitro diagnostics packaging and redefining expectations for quality and scalability.
  • Material innovation, particularly in specialty polymers and bio-based resins, is enabling a balance between performance needs and environmental stewardship for healthcare packaging.
  • Digitalization, through RFID and barcode integration, supports regulatory compliance and supply chain transparency, responding to growing requirements for real-time traceability and data-driven logistics.
  • Segmented packaging design is now essential to address the specific sterility and handling needs of diagnostic laboratories, clinical settings, and decentralized point-of-care models.
  • Cold chain management and adaptable packaging solutions are critical to support the integrity of temperature-sensitive reagents across various geographic regions.
  • Industry leaders are using collaborations, regional production, and next-generation polymer development to respond to evolving market and compliance demands.

Tariff Impact: Navigating Cost and Supply Chain Challenges

The introduction of U.S. tariffs in 2025 caused a shift in supply chain strategies and procurement practices for in-vitro diagnostics packaging. Higher import duties on raw materials such as polymers and microplates increased manufacturing costs. The result has been growing investment in nearshoring, automation, and localization to reduce tariff exposure, drive operational efficiency, and optimize inventory management. Distributors are forming alliances with domestic suppliers and shifting portfolios to maintain margin and stability. Buyers are also exploring alternative materials and packaging configurations to control spending while maintaining performance.

Methodology & Data Sources

This report is founded on comprehensive primary and secondary research, including insights from executive interviews, regulatory authorities, and logistics experts. Analysis was validated through triangulation, independent data sources, and rigorous expert review cycles, ensuring robust and actionable findings.

Why This Report Matters

  • Enables market leaders to future-proof packaging strategies and identify high-growth sub-segments and regions.
  • Delivers operational intelligence on competitive positioning, technology adoption, and supply chain optimization in a changing regulatory environment.
  • Guides investment in advanced material platforms and digital solutions to align with compliance and sustainability goals.

Conclusion

Staying ahead in the in-vitro diagnostics packaging sector requires a clear understanding of market drivers, technological progress, and global dynamics. This report provides strategic guidance to unlock operational resilience and support agile decision-making in an evolving landscape.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Adoption of sustainable and recyclable materials in in-vitro diagnostics packaging to meet regulatory and environmental demands
5.2. Integration of smart packaging technologies like RFID and NFC for enhanced traceability and patient safety in IVD kits
5.3. Development of single-use microfluidic cartridges with hermetic sealing for point-of-care in-vitro diagnostic tests
5.4. Customizable cold chain packaging solutions incorporating phase change materials to preserve biomarker stability during transportation
5.5. Shift towards child-resistant and tamper-evident packaging designs to ensure compliance with global safety regulations for IVD products
5.6. Use of antimicrobial coatings on diagnostic device casings to reduce contamination risks and extend shelf life
5.7. Implementation of digital printing and variable data printing for batch-specific labeling and real-time quality control in IVD packaging
5.8. Examination of lightweight polymeric blister packs to reduce packaging weight and minimize waste in high-volume diagnostic assays
5.9. Adoption of ISO 13485 compliant printing inks and adhesives to improve traceability and prevent cross contamination in IVD container labels
5.10. Growth of modular lab-on-chip packaging formats enabling rapid customization and scalability for emerging infectious disease diagnostics
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market, by Packaging Format
8.1. Blow-Fill-Seal
8.1.1. Ampoules
8.1.2. Cartridges & Cassettes
8.2. Flexible Packaging
8.2.1. Film & Laminates
8.2.2. Pouches & Bags
8.3. Rigid Packaging
8.3.1. Microplates & Slides
8.3.2. Tubes & Vials
9. In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market, by Material
9.1. Glass
9.2. Plastic
9.3. Specialty Polymers
9.4. Sustainable Materials
10. In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market, by End User
10.1. Diagnostic Laboratories
10.2. Hospitals & Clinics
10.3. Point-Of-Care Testing
10.4. Research Institutes
11. In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market, by Sterility
11.1. Non-Sterile
11.2. Sterile
12. In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market, by Temperature Requirement
12.1. Ambient
12.2. Frozen
12.3. Refrigerated
13. In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market, by Distribution Channel
13.1. Direct Sales
13.2. Distributors
13.3. Online
14. In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market, by Region
14.1. Americas
14.1.1. North America
14.1.2. Latin America
14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
14.2.1. Europe
14.2.2. Middle East
14.2.3. Africa
14.3. Asia-Pacific
15. In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market, by Group
15.1. ASEAN
15.2. GCC
15.3. European Union
15.4. BRICS
15.5. G7
15.6. NATO
16. In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging Market, by Country
16.1. United States
16.2. Canada
16.3. Mexico
16.4. Brazil
16.5. United Kingdom
16.6. Germany
16.7. France
16.8. Russia
16.9. Italy
16.10. Spain
16.11. China
16.12. India
16.13. Japan
16.14. Australia
16.15. South Korea
17. Competitive Landscape
17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
17.3. Competitive Analysis
17.3.1. Amcor plc
17.3.2. Berry Global Group, Inc.
17.3.3. Gerresheimer AG
17.3.4. Stevanato Group S.p.A.
17.3.5. West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
17.3.6. AptarGroup, Inc.
17.3.7. SCHOTT AG
17.3.8. Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
17.3.9. Nelipak Corporation
17.3.10. Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this In-Vitro Diagnostics Packaging market report include:
  • Amcor plc
  • Berry Global Group, Inc.
  • Gerresheimer AG
  • Stevanato Group S.p.A.
  • West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
  • AptarGroup, Inc.
  • SCHOTT AG
  • Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
  • Nelipak Corporation
  • Lohmann GmbH & Co. KG

Table Information