+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

United States (US) Metal Cans - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 121 Pages
  • March 2026
  • Region: United States
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 5511296
The united states metal cans market size was valued at USD 21.32 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 22.04 billion in 2026 to reach USD 25.67 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 3.09% during the forecast period (2026-2031). This report is Segmented by Material Type (Aluminium, and Steel), Can Structure (Two-Piece, Three-Piece, and Monobloc Aerosol), Capacity/Size (Less Than 250 Ml, 250 To 500 Ml, and More), Manufacturing Process (Drawn and Ironed, Drawn and Redrawn, and More), End-User Industry (Food, Beverage, Personal Care and Cosmetics, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

United States (US) Metal Cans Market Trends and Insights

High Recyclability Rates Drive Packaging Material Substitution

Metal cans retain closed-loop appeal because a recycled unit saves 95% of the energy required for primary smelting. Aluminum scrap fetched USD 991-1,338 per tonne in 2025 and steel cans achieved a 70% capture rate, ensuring strong residual value that brand owners increasingly monetize through take-back programs. Deposit-return laws in California, Oregon, and Michigan push redemption rates beyond 80%, forming regional scrap pools that lower smelter feedstock costs and underpin supply security. These economics have prompted Ball Corporation to target a 90% aluminum-can recycling rate and 85% recycled content by 2030, commitments that filter down to supplier scorecards. As municipal optical-sorting upgrades spread, the United States metal cans market benefits from predictable scrap flows that mitigate raw-material price risk.

Convenience and Extended Shelf Life Offered by Canned Foods

Retort-sterilized cans give ambient shelf life of 24 months, eliminating refrigeration and trimming retail shrink. Although pantry-loading linked to COVID-19 receded by 2024, inflation-sensitive households still favor canned beans and proteins that cost 30-40% less per serving than fresh alternatives during off-season months. Steel-can lightweighting from 0.24 millimeters to 0.21 millimeters has removed 12% of material mass without sacrificing 90 psi pressure ratings. Regulatory hurdles such as FDA low-acid canned-food filings discourage new entrants and protect the installed base of autoclaves, sustaining incremental growth in the United States metal cans market despite pouch competition.

Proliferation of Alternate Packaging Formats Such as PET and Flexible Pouches

Polyethylene-terephthalate commands a 20-30% unit-cost edge over aluminum in 500-milliliter and larger sizes, and resealability adds consumer convenience. Flexible pouches offer 40% weight savings and lower freight by USD 0.02-0.04 per unit, an attractive margin lever for high-volume juice producers. As mechanical recycling for polyethylene-terephthalate tops 2 million tonnes per year, its circularity narrative blunts aluminum’s sustainability advantage. Brand owners now treat packaging as a portfolio, shifting volume to whichever substrate minimizes total delivered cost, creating a lasting drag on the United States metal cans market.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Craft-Beer and RTD Beverage Boom Boosting Can Demand
  • Brand-Owner Circular-Packaging Pledges Securing Can Volumes
  • Volatility in Aluminum and Steel Input Prices
For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Aluminum accounted for 64.23% of 2025 revenue and continues to widen its lead, underpinned by 95% energy savings in recycling and a scrap value of USD 1,338 per tonne. The United States metal cans market for aluminum formats is propelled by Department of Energy grants totaling more than USD 650 million to restart and modernize secondary smelters. ELYSIS inert-anode technology cuts aerosol-can emissions by 70%, letting personal-care brands market net-zero packs at a modest premium. Steel’s 70% recycling rate and retort compatibility keep it relevant for canned soups and pet food, yet heavier gauges and lower scrap incentives cap its expansion. Overall, aluminum’s superior freight efficiency and corporate sustainability fit will sustain a 3.48% CAGR, preserving its dominance of the United States metal cans market.

Steel cans nevertheless hold critical niches in three-piece food applications where internal pressure thresholds exceed aluminum’s economical wall thickness. Investment in magnetic recovery lines maintains steel’s high capture rate, and gauge reductions to 0.21 millimeters have narrowed cost gaps. Consequently, steel’s footprint stabilizes near one-third of the United States' metal cans market share, anchoring categories that prize rigidity over lightweighting.

Two-piece D and I cans delivered 77.91% share in 2025, owing to 95% material utilization and 2,500-unit-per-minute speeds that drive conversion costs below USD 0.04. Seamless walls eliminate light-strike risk and have helped the United States metal cans market size for beverages remain resilient against glass downsizing. Monobloc aerosol cans, although just 4% of revenue, register the fastest 3.62% CAGR because Ball’s ReAl alloy lowers slug weight by 30% and accepts 600-dpi graphics. Three-piece welded formats remain important for soups and specialty cocktails larger than 100 millimeters in diameter, but slower line speeds and higher scrap rates cap growth.

Going forward, two-piece lines will retain scale advantage as craft brewers, energy-drink brands, and RTD cocktails anchor billion-unit demand pools. Yet rapid aerosol adoption in personal care ensures that monobloc producers capture incremental share and enrich the product mix for the United States metal cans market.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Material Type
    • Aluminium
    • Steel
  • By Can Structure
    • Two-Piece
    • Three-Piece
    • Monobloc Aerosol
  • By Capacity / Size
    • Less Than 250 ml
    • 250-500 ml
    • 500-1,000 ml
    • More Than 1,000 ml
  • By Manufacturing Process
    • Drawn and Ironed (D and I)
    • Drawn and Redrawn (DRD)
    • Impact Extrusion
  • By End-User Industry
    • Food
    • Beverage
    • Personal Care and Cosmetics
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Paints and Industrial Chemicals
    • Automotive Fluids and Lubricants
    • Other End-User Industry

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Crown Holdings, Inc.
  • Ball Corporation
  • Silgan Holdings Inc.
  • CAN-PACK S.A.
  • Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
  • Mauser Packaging Solutions Holding Company
  • DS Containers, LLC
  • CCL Industries Inc. (CCL Container Division)
  • Independent Can Company
  • Tecnocap S.p.A.
  • Allstate Can Corporation
  • Envases Universales Group
  • Trivium Packaging B.V.
  • Greif, Inc.
  • Toyo Seikan Group Holdings, Ltd.
  • Montebello Packaging Inc.
  • Metal Container Corporation
  • Novelis Inc.
  • Arconic Corporation
  • Constellium SE

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Drivers
4.1.1 High Recyclability Rates of Metal Packaging
4.1.2 Convenience and Extended Shelf Life Offered by Canned Foods
4.1.3 Craft-Beer and RTD Beverage Boom Boosting Can Demand
4.1.4 Brand-Owner Circular-Packaging Pledges Securing Can Volumes
4.1.5 DOE-Backed Low-Carbon Secondary Aluminum Capacity Expansions
4.1.6 Digital Can Printing Enabling Profitable Micro-Batch SKUs
4.2 Market Restraints
4.2.1 Proliferation of Alternate Packaging Formats Such as PET and Flexible Pouches
4.2.2 Volatility in Aluminum and Steel Input Prices
4.2.3 Domestic Can-Sheet Capacity Constraints Creating Supply Risk
4.2.4 BPA-Substitute Migration Concerns Affecting Consumer Trust
4.3 Industry Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
4.4 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.4.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.4.3 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
4.5 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
4.6 Regulatory Landscape
4.7 Technological Outlook
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Material Type
5.1.1 Aluminium
5.1.2 Steel
5.2 By Can Structure
5.2.1 Two-Piece
5.2.2 Three-Piece
5.2.3 Monobloc Aerosol
5.3 By Capacity / Size
5.3.1 Less Than 250 ml
5.3.2 250-500 ml
5.3.3 500-1,000 ml
5.3.4 More Than 1,000 ml
5.4 By Manufacturing Process
5.4.1 Drawn and Ironed (D and I)
5.4.2 Drawn and Redrawn (DRD)
5.4.3 Impact Extrusion
5.5 By End-User Industry
5.5.1 Food
5.5.2 Beverage
5.5.3 Personal Care and Cosmetics
5.5.4 Pharmaceuticals
5.5.5 Paints and Industrial Chemicals
5.5.6 Automotive Fluids and Lubricants
5.5.7 Other End-User Industry
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Crown Holdings, Inc.
6.4.2 Ball Corporation
6.4.3 Silgan Holdings Inc.
6.4.4 CAN-PACK S.A.
6.4.5 Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
6.4.6 Mauser Packaging Solutions Holding Company
6.4.7 DS Containers, LLC
6.4.8 CCL Industries Inc. (CCL Container Division)
6.4.9 Independent Can Company
6.4.10 Tecnocap S.p.A.
6.4.11 Allstate Can Corporation
6.4.12 Envases Universales Group
6.4.13 Trivium Packaging B.V.
6.4.14 Greif, Inc.
6.4.15 Toyo Seikan Group Holdings, Ltd.
6.4.16 Montebello Packaging Inc.
6.4.17 Metal Container Corporation
6.4.18 Novelis Inc.
6.4.19 Arconic Corporation
6.4.20 Constellium SE
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Crown Holdings, Inc.
  • Ball Corporation
  • Silgan Holdings Inc.
  • CAN-PACK S.A.
  • Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
  • Mauser Packaging Solutions Holding Company
  • DS Containers, LLC
  • CCL Industries Inc. (CCL Container Division)
  • Independent Can Company
  • Tecnocap S.p.A.
  • Allstate Can Corporation
  • Envases Universales Group
  • Trivium Packaging B.V.
  • Greif, Inc.
  • Toyo Seikan Group Holdings, Ltd.
  • Montebello Packaging Inc.
  • Metal Container Corporation
  • Novelis Inc.
  • Arconic Corporation
  • Constellium SE