+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Vascular Closure Device Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 186 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5460268
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Senior executives evaluating the vascular closure device market must navigate a rapidly evolving competitive landscape shaped by technological progress, regulatory developments, and complex global supply dynamics. This overview identifies the primary drivers and complexities impacting commercial and procurement strategy, offering actionable intelligence for informed leadership decisions.

Market Snapshot: Vascular Closure Device Market Growth and Dynamics

The vascular closure device market increased from USD 1.71 billion in 2024 to USD 1.85 billion in 2025 and is anticipated to continue expanding at a CAGR of 7.73%, reaching USD 3.11 billion by 2032. This growth is propelled by the healthcare sector’s increased adoption of minimally invasive techniques and the rising need for efficient hemostasis solutions following catheterization. Evolving reimbursement frameworks and updated patient management standards are influencing how hospitals, clinics, and surgical centers purchase and implement vascular closure technologies. Providers are adapting procurement strategies as procedural volumes grow and care protocols modernize in ambulatory environments.

Scope & Segmentation

The research report delivers comprehensive analysis and strategic segmentation, allowing decision-makers to assess all critical market axes:

  • Product Types: The portfolio includes clip-based devices, bovine collagen plug devices, synthetic collagen plug devices, external compression devices, chitosan sealant-based devices, polyethylene glycol sealant-based devices, and suture-based devices. Each addresses specific clinical demands, supporting tailored device selection based on operator and patient needs.
  • Procedure Types: The market analysis covers angiographic diagnostic procedures, hemodynamic monitoring, cardiovascular interventional procedures, and peripheral vascular interventional procedures, reflecting broad use across interventional disciplines.
  • Access Sites: Both femoral and radial access approaches are assessed, highlighting workflow differences and technology suitability in vascular intervention.
  • End Users: Primary users range from ambulatory surgical centers and clinics to hospitals, where adoption patterns vary according to volume and procedure complexity.
  • Distribution Channels: Direct sales and third-party distributors are evaluated to clarify how market participants reach institutional buyers and streamline logistics.
  • Geographies: The report analyzes regional demand across the Americas (including the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru), Europe (United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Poland, Switzerland), Middle East (United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Israel), Africa (South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, Kenya), and Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan). Diverse regulatory requirements and infrastructure maturity influence local adoption strategies.
  • Leading Companies: Abbott Laboratories, Terumo Corporation, Teleflex Incorporated, Cardinal Health, Boston Scientific, Becton Dickinson, Merit Medical Systems, B. Braun Melsungen, Cook Medical, and Lake Region Medical represent the sector’s top competitors, each leveraging unique strengths and partnerships to address evolving clinical and operational needs.

Key Takeaways: Strategic Insights

  • Technological advancements have enhanced sheath compatibility and ease of deployment, resulting in devices that offer safer, more ergonomic operation for clinical teams.
  • The shift toward outpatient and ambulatory procedures is driving the need for solutions that enable faster recovery and reduce risks of complications, influencing device selection and provider preferences.
  • Asia-Pacific and Latin America are exhibiting accelerated uptake of vascular closure devices, driven by increased investment in healthcare systems and localization strategies by leading manufacturers.
  • Regulatory frameworks are tightening post-market surveillance and emphasizing evidence generation, which is shaping access, reimbursement, and innovation priorities, particularly in the United States, Europe, and emerging markets.
  • Competitive differentiation centers on portfolio expansion, strategic acquisitions, and collaboration with leading medical institutions to refine product features and capture greater market share.

Tariff Impact: Addressing Supply, Pricing, and Sourcing Disruptions

Recent tariff adjustments in the United States have increased import duties on select medical device components, impacting manufacturers that depend on specialized international suppliers. This shift has resulted in variability in landed costs and lead times, prompting both OEMs and healthcare providers to reevaluate sourcing decisions, pricing models, and contract terms. To manage these pressures, companies are exploring alternative suppliers in tariff-exempt regions, bolstering domestic production capacity, and implementing advanced logistics solutions aimed at preserving supply chain resilience and cost stability.

Methodology & Data Sources

This research utilizes a robust, multi-source approach, combining direct interviews with clinicians, procurement decision-makers, and manufacturers, alongside analysis of published literature, regulatory documents, and competitive intelligence resources. The methodology ensures accurate segmentation and trustworthy validation of sector trends.

Why This Report Matters for Decision-Makers

  • Enables data-driven strategies for procurement, investment, and product portfolio management, offering neutral analysis of market drivers, technologies, and competitor positioning.
  • Provides a clear framework for evaluating supply chain stability, anticipating regulatory changes, and aligning organizational strategy with shifting clinical and operational priorities.

Conclusion

This report equips market leaders with strategic insight to address complexity, mitigate risk, and capture opportunities within the vascular closure device industry. Stakeholders can utilize these findings to drive informed, impactful decisions in a dynamic healthcare landscape.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Increasing adoption of bioabsorbable vascular closure systems to enhance patient recovery and reduce complications
5.2. Integration of real-time ultrasound guidance in closure procedures improving procedural accuracy and outcomes
5.3. Shift toward polymer-based closure devices driven by demand for minimally invasive and faster hemostasis solutions
5.4. Growing interest in antimicrobial-coated closure devices to mitigate infection risks in high-volume cath labs
5.5. Impact of evolving reimbursement policies and streamlined regulatory pathways on market entry for innovative VCDs
5.6. Rising competition from suture-mediated versus clip-based closure technologies shaping pricing and development strategies
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Vascular Closure Device Market, by Product Type
8.1. Clip Based Devices
8.2. Collagen Plug Devices
8.2.1. Bovine Collagen Plugs
8.2.2. Synthetic Collagen Plugs
8.3. External Compression Devices
8.4. Sealant Based Devices
8.4.1. Chitosan Sealants
8.4.2. Polyethylene Glycol Sealants
8.5. Suture Based Devices
9. Vascular Closure Device Market, by Procedure Type
9.1. Diagnostic Procedures
9.1.1. Angiographic Procedures
9.1.2. Hemodynamic Monitoring
9.2. Interventional Procedures
9.2.1. Cardiovascular Interventions
9.2.2. Peripheral Vascular Interventions
10. Vascular Closure Device Market, by Access Site
10.1. Femoral Access
10.2. Radial Access
11. Vascular Closure Device Market, by End User
11.1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
11.2. Clinics
11.3. Hospitals
12. Vascular Closure Device Market, by Distribution Channel
12.1. Direct Sales
12.2. Third Party Distributors
13. Vascular Closure Device Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Vascular Closure Device Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Vascular Closure Device Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Abbott Laboratories
16.3.2. Terumo Corporation
16.3.3. Teleflex Incorporated
16.3.4. Cardinal Health, Inc.
16.3.5. Boston Scientific Corporation
16.3.6. Becton, Dickinson and Company
16.3.7. Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
16.3.8. B. Braun Melsungen AG
16.3.9. Cook Medical LLC
16.3.10. Lake Region Medical, Inc.
List of Tables
List of Figures

Samples

Loading
LOADING...

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Vascular Closure Device market report include:
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Terumo Corporation
  • Teleflex Incorporated
  • Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Becton, Dickinson and Company
  • Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
  • B. Braun Melsungen AG
  • Cook Medical LLC
  • Lake Region Medical, Inc.

Table Information