+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Wound Closure Devices Market - Global Forecast 2025-2030

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 195 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5896398
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Senior decision-makers are rapidly adapting as the wound closure devices market undergoes significant transformation, shaped by innovation, evolving clinical requirements, and mounting procurement complexities across global healthcare landscapes.

Market Snapshot: Wound Closure Devices Market Overview

The wound closure devices market is experiencing measurable expansion, with global revenues rising from USD 14.91 billion in 2024 to USD 15.91 billion in 2025. A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.91% is projected through 2030, positioning the market to reach USD 22.27 billion. Increased adoption of minimally invasive therapies, demographic shifts fueling demand, and strategic integration of advanced biomaterials and digital monitoring solutions are central to this trajectory. These drivers support improved patient care, enable faster recovery, and enhance operational efficiencies in diverse care environments ranging from metropolitan hospitals to home healthcare. Senior leaders in medical technology and procurement functions must anticipate and adapt to these trends to maintain competitive advantage.

Scope & Segmentation of the Wound Closure Devices Market

  • Product Types: The market is segmented into adhesives and tissue sealants, closure strips and tapes, collagen-based sealants, cyanoacrylate adhesives, fibrin sealants, mechanical devices, tissue expanders, wound closure systems, staplers (manual and powered), and sutures (absorbable and non-absorbable). Segment choice impacts clinical workflow, closure durability, and compatibility with next-generation digital systems.
  • Wound Types: Key applications cover acute wounds, surgical incisions, traumatic injuries, chronic wounds, arterial ulcers, diabetic ulcers, pressure ulcers, and venous ulcers. Each category demands specific closure protocols and product combinations to align with evolving standards of care.
  • Usability: Both disposable and reusable devices are integral, allowing organizations to balance infection control imperatives with cost controls and sustainability programs.
  • Application Areas: Products serve cardiothoracic, cosmetic and plastic, dental and maxillofacial, emergency and trauma, gastrointestinal and colorectal, general, neurosurgical, obstetrics and gynecology, ophthalmic, orthopedic, and vascular surgery. Emerging markets require adaptable solutions for underserved areas of practice.
  • Patient Groups: Solutions are targeted for adults, geriatric patients, and pediatric populations, reflecting varying anatomical and clinical nuances.
  • End Users: Primary buyers include ambulatory surgical centers, home healthcare entities, hospitals, and trauma centers, each guided by different procurement and compliance standards.
  • Distribution Channels: Offline and online distribution options are complemented by direct brand websites and leading eCommerce platforms, expanding access and purchasing flexibility.
  • Regions Covered: The analysis extends to the Americas (covering North and Latin America), Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region, offering a granular view of market penetration and regulatory variations.
  • Examined Companies: The report profiles competitive strategies and product innovations from 3M Company, Grünenthal GmbH, Advanced Medical Solutions Group plc, Alliqua BioMedical, Inc., AROA BIOSURGERY LIMITED, Smith+Nephew plc, AVITA Medical, Inc., B. Braun SE, Baxter International Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation, Chemence, Inc., Coloplast A/S, Convatec Group Plc, CooperSurgical, Inc., Corza Medical, Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, DermaClip US, LLC, Dukal, LLC, Essity AB, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Futura Surgicare Pvt. Ltd., Healthium Medtech Limited, Medtronic plc, Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Mölnlycke Health Care AB, Stryker Corporation, Teleflex Incorporated., Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., and Riverpoint Medical.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Emerging biomaterials and implementation of digital monitoring are shaping personalized wound therapies and enhancing clinical outcomes across complex cases.
  • Powered stapling devices, platforms with AI integration, and adoption of novel hemostatic agents are changing traditional closure approaches and supporting improved patient throughput.
  • Procurement teams are adopting value-driven purchase models and entering bundled agreements to manage cost constraints, particularly in environments impacted by international tariffs.
  • Market entry and product success increasingly depend on regional adaptation strategies, reflecting disparities in infrastructure, reimbursement, and regulation.
  • Innovator-manufacturer partnerships facilitate faster scale-up and support new product introductions, especially for specialty adhesives and suture technologies.
  • Talent with expertise in biomaterials, regulatory affairs, and analytics is driving sustained growth and enabling responsive product development strategies.

Tariff Impact on Wound Closure Device Procurement

Recent introductions of tariffs in the United States have required manufacturers to reexamine global sourcing practices. Elevated import duties on advanced tapes and adhesives have complicated supply chain dynamics. Healthcare providers are responding by standardizing procurement through longer-term contracts and focusing on value-based supplier relationships. Companies are also pursuing tariff exemptions and new alliances to safeguard continuity and protect profit margins in a volatile economic climate.

Methodology & Data Sources

A comprehensive, multi-layered research approach underpins this report. Data gathering included in-depth interviews with industry experts and stakeholders. Extensive secondary research utilized peer-reviewed publications, clinical trial data, regulatory filings, and proprietary datasets. Triangulation techniques assured the reliability of identified market drivers and trends.

Why This Wound Closure Devices Report Matters

  • Access timely intelligence on emerging technologies, regulatory challenges, and procurement approaches across every major global region and care setting.
  • Strengthen your organization's product development and go-to-market strategies through actionable segmentation and a clear understanding of evolving reimbursement pathways.
  • Leverage detailed competitor profiling to inform partnership, investment, and innovation decisions tailored to dynamic healthcare environments.

Conclusion

The wound closure devices market continues its evolution, propelled by accelerated digital integration and regulatory change. Strategic foresight and flexible segmentation will remain critical for sustained market presence and operational resilience.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Increasing adoption of absorbable barbed sutures for faster surgical closure and reduced knot tying complexity
5.2. Growth in the use of antimicrobial sutures with triclosan coating to minimize postoperative infection rates
5.3. Expansion of tissue adhesive applications for minimally invasive procedures and improved patient comfort
5.4. Integration of smart wound closure systems with biosensors for real-time healing monitoring and data analytics
5.5. Rising preference for laser tissue welding technologies to reduce thermal damage and accelerate hemostasis
5.6. Development of biodegradable staples for internal wound closure to eliminate secondary removal procedures
5.7. Surge in demand for robotic-assisted suturing tools improving precision in complex surgical interventions
5.8. Emergence of automated wound closure devices with AI-guided cut and seal capabilities in operating theaters
5.9. Increasing collaboration between device manufacturers and digital health firms to enable remote wound assessment
5.10. Introduction of multifunctional hydrogel patches combining hemostatic, antimicrobial, and tissue regenerative properties
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Product Type
8.1. Adhesives & Tissue Sealants
8.1.1. Closure Strips & Tapes
8.1.2. Collagen-Based Sealants
8.1.3. Cyanoacrylate Adhesives
8.1.4. Fibrin Sealants
8.2. Mechanical Devices
8.2.1. Tissue Expanders
8.2.2. Wound Closure Systems
8.3. Staplers
8.3.1. Manual Staplers
8.3.2. Powered Staplers
8.4. Sutures
8.4.1. Absorbable
8.4.2. Non-Absorbable
9. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Wound Type
9.1. Acute Wounds
9.1.1. Surgical Incisions
9.1.2. Traumatic Injuries
9.2. Chronic Wounds
9.2.1. Arterial Ulcers
9.2.2. Diabetic Ulcers
9.2.3. Pressure Ulcers
9.2.4. Venous Ulcers
10. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Usability
10.1. Disposable
10.2. Reusable
11. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Application
11.1. Cardiothoracic Surgery
11.2. Cosmetic & Plastic Surgery
11.3. Dental & Maxillofacial Surgery
11.4. Emergency Medicine & Trauma
11.5. Gastrointestinal & Colorectal Surgery
11.6. General Surgery
11.7. Neurosurgery
11.8. Obstetrics & Gynecology
11.9. Ophthalmic Surgery
11.10. Orthopedic Surgery
11.11. Vascular Surgery
12. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Patient Group
12.1. Adult
12.2. Geriatric
12.3. Pediatric
13. Wound Closure Devices Market, by End User
13.1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
13.2. Home Healthcare
13.3. Hospitals
13.4. Trauma Centers
14. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Distribution Channel
14.1. Offline
14.2. Online
14.2.1. Brand Websites
14.2.2. eCommerce Platform
15. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Region
15.1. Americas
15.1.1. North America
15.1.2. Latin America
15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
15.2.1. Europe
15.2.2. Middle East
15.2.3. Africa
15.3. Asia-Pacific
16. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Group
16.1. ASEAN
16.2. GCC
16.3. European Union
16.4. BRICS
16.5. G7
16.6. NATO
17. Wound Closure Devices Market, by Country
17.1. United States
17.2. Canada
17.3. Mexico
17.4. Brazil
17.5. United Kingdom
17.6. Germany
17.7. France
17.8. Russia
17.9. Italy
17.10. Spain
17.11. China
17.12. India
17.13. Japan
17.14. Australia
17.15. South Korea
18. Competitive Landscape
18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
18.3. Competitive Analysis
18.3.1. 3M Company
18.3.2. Smith+Nephew plc
18.3.3. B. Braun SE
18.3.4. Baxter International Inc.
18.3.5. Boston Scientific Corporation
18.3.6. Coloplast A/S
18.3.7. Essity AB
18.3.8. Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
18.3.9. Medtronic plc
18.3.10. Stryker Corporation
18.3.11. Teleflex Incorporated.
18.3.12. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
List of Tables
List of Figures

Samples

Loading
LOADING...

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Wound Closure Devices market report include:
  • 3M Company
  • Grünenthal GmbH
  • Advanced Medical Solutions Group plc
  • Alliqua BioMedical, Inc.
  • AROA BIOSURGERY LIMITED
  • Smith+Nephew plc
  • AVITA Medical, Inc.
  • B. Braun SE
  • Baxter International Inc.
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Chemence, Inc.
  • Coloplast A/S
  • Convatec Group Plc
  • CooperSurgical, Inc.
  • Corza Medical
  • Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation
  • DermaClip US, LLC
  • Dukal, LLC
  • Essity AB
  • Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
  • Futura Surgicare Pvt. Ltd.
  • Healthium Medtech Limited
  • Medtronic plc
  • Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd.
  • Mölnlycke Health Care AB
  • Stryker Corporation
  • Teleflex Incorporated.
  • Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
  • Riverpoint Medical

Table Information