Compression Therapy Market by Technique, Product and Application - Global Forecast to 2022

  • ID: 4380161
  • Report
  • Region: Global
  • 158 Pages
  • Markets and Markets
1 of 5
Global Compression Therapy Market Projected to Reach USD 3.40 Billion by 2022 from USD 2.70 Billion in 2017, at a CAGR of 4.7%

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • 3M Company
  • Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • DJO Global Inc.
  • Medi GmbH & Co. Kg
  • Paul Hartmann AG
  • Sigvaris
  • MORE

"Compression Therapy Market by Technique (Static, Dynamic), Product (Compression Garment (Stockings, bandages, Wraps), Compression Braces, Compression Pump), Application (Varicose Vein, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Lymphedema, Leg Ulcer) - Global Forecast to 2022"

"The compression therapy market projected to grow at a CAGR of 4.7%."

The global compression therapy market is projected to reach USD 3.40 billion by 2022 from USD 2.70 billion in 2017, at a CAGR of 4.7%. The factors driving the growth of the compression therapy market include the growing target patient population, significant sports injuries & accidents across the globe, and technological advancements in the orthopedic industry. However, the lack of universally accepted standards for compression products and lower patient compliance for compression garments are the key factors restraining the growth of the compression therapy market globally.

"The compression pumps segment is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period."

During the forecast period, compression pumps are expected to grow at the highest CAGR. Factors such as the increasing incidence of cancer, rising prevalence of chronic venous diseases, and growing number of hip and knee surgeries are expected to drive the growth of the compression pumps market during the forecast period.

"The lymphedema segment to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period."

On the basis of applications, the lymphedema treatment segment is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. The growing adoption of compression therapy for lymphedema treatment is attributed to the rising patient population for primary and secondary lymphedema, coupled with the increasing patient preference for compression therapy in lymphedema treatment (owing to the clinical benefits offered by compression therapy products).

"Asia-Pacific is expected to register the highest growth rate during the forecast period."

Geographically, the compression therapy market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Rest of the World. Asia-Pacific is expected to register the highest growth rate during the forecast period, owing to the rising per capita healthcare expenditure across emerging Asian countries, rapid expansion in the target patient population, and growing awareness about the different target disorders among healthcare professionals through conferences.

Breakdown of supply-side primary interviews: by company type, designation, and region:

  • By Company Type - Tier 1 - 25%, Tier 2 - 30% and Tier 3 - 45%
  • By Designation - C-level - 26%, Director Level - 30%, Others - 44%
  • By Region - North America - 34%, Europe - 26%, APAC - 23%, RoW - 17%

In 2016, the global compression therapy market was dominated by BSN medical (Germany), DJO Global Inc. (U.S.), medi GmbH & Co KG (Germany), Tactile Medical (U.S.), PAUL HARTMANN AG (Germany), and SIGVARIS (Switzerland). Product launches, agreements, and collaborations were the major strategies adopted by market players to achieve growth in the market.

Research Coverage

This report studies the compression therapy market based on product, technique, and application. The report also studies factors (such as drivers, restraints, opportunities, and challenges) affecting the market growth. It analyzes opportunities and challenges in the market for stakeholders and provides details of the competitive landscape for the market leaders. Furthermore, the report analyzes micromarkets with respect to their individual growth trends, prospects, and contributions to the total market. The report forecasts the revenue of the market segments with respect to four main regions.

Reasons to Buy the Report:

From an insights perspective, this research report has focused on various levels of analysis-industry trends, market share analysis of top players, and company profiles, which together comprise and discuss basic views on the competitive landscape, emerging and high-growth segments of the compression therapy market, and high-growth regions and countries and their respective drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities.

The report will enrich both established firms as well as new entrants/smaller firms to gauge the pulse of the market, which in turn help firms garner greater market shares. Firms purchasing the report could use anyone or a combination of the below-mentioned five strategies for strengthening their market shares.

The report provides insights on the following pointers:

  • Market Penetration: Comprehensive information on product portfolios offered by the major players in the compression therapy market. The report analyzes the compression therapy market based on product, technique, application, and region
  • Product Development: Detailed insights on the research and development activities and product launches in the compression therapy market
  • Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative emerging markets. The report analyzes the markets for various compression therapy products across geographies
  • Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the compression therapy market
  • Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, strategies, products, distribution networks, and manufacturing capabilities of leading players in the compression therapy market.
READ MORE
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
2 of 5

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • 3M Company
  • Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • DJO Global Inc.
  • Medi GmbH & Co. Kg
  • Paul Hartmann AG
  • Sigvaris
  • MORE

1 Introduction
    1.1 Objectives of the Study
    1.2 Market Definition
    1.3 Market Scope
           1.3.1 Markets Covered
           1.3.2 Years Considered for the Study
    1.4 Limitations
    1.5 Currency
    1.6 Market Stakeholders

2 Research Methodology
    2.1 Research Data
           2.1.1 Secondary Data
                    2.1.1.1 Key Data From Secondary Sources
           2.1.2 Primary Data
                    2.1.2.1 Key Data From Primary Sources
    2.2 Market Size Estimation
           2.2.1 Top-Down Approach
           2.2.2 Bottom-Up Approach
    2.3 Market Data Validation and Triangulation
    2.4 Assumptions for the Study

3 Executive Summary

4 Premium Insights
    4.1 Global Compression Therapy Market, By Garment (2017 vs 2022)
    4.2 Global Market: Geographic Growth Opportunities Till 2022
    4.3 Limited Patient Compliance to Compression Therapy: Key Reasons (2017)
    4.4 Improvement in Patient Compliance for Compression Therapy: Key Factors (2017)
    4.5 Product Classification for Compression Hosiery: Major Countries (2017)
    4.6 Product Classification for Compression Bandages: Germany and Britain (2017)
    4.7 Regulatory Standards for Compression Stockings, By Region (2017)
    4.8 Geriatric Population, By Region, 2015 vs 2030 vs 2050
    4.9 Regional Analysis: Diabetes Population, 2015 vs 2040 (Million)
    4.10 Regional Analysis: Hip and Knee Replacement Surgeries (2013)
    4.11 Number of Road Accidents Worldwide: 2010 vs 2014
    4.12 U.S.: Lymphedema Treatment Market Overview (2015)
    4.13 U.S.: Venous Leg Ulcers Market Overview (2014)

5 Market Overview
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Market Dynamics
           5.2.1 Drivers
                    5.2.1.1 Presence of A Large Target Patient Population
                    5.2.1.2 Increasing Incidence of Sports Injuries and Accidents
                    5.2.1.3 Technological Advancements in Orthopedic Procedures
                    5.2.1.4 Clinical Evidence Favoring the Adoption of Compression Therapy in the Management of Target Diseases
           5.2.2 Restraints
                    5.2.2.1 Lack of Universally Accepted Standards for Compression Products
                    5.2.2.2 Low Patient Compliance for Compression Garments
           5.2.3 Opportunities
                    5.2.3.1 Growth Potential Offered By Emerging Markets
                    5.2.3.2 Rising Patient Awareness Regarding the Benefits of Compression Therapy in Target Disease Management
           5.2.4 Challenges
                    5.2.4.1 Significant Adoption of Alternative Therapies for Specific Target Indications

6 Compression Therapy Market, By Technique
    6.1 Introduction
    6.2 Static Compression Therapy
    6.3 Dynamic Compression Therapy

7 Compression Therapy Market, By Product
    7.1 Introduction
    7.2 Compression Garments
           7.2.1 Compression Stockings
           7.2.2 Compression Bandages & Wraps
           7.2.3 Other Compression Garments
    7.3 Compression Pumps
    7.4 Compression Braces

8 Compression Therapy Market, By Application
    8.1 Introduction
    8.2 Varicose Vein Treatment
    8.3 Deep Vein Thrombosis Treatment
    8.4 Lymphedema Treatment
    8.5 Leg Ulcer Treatment
    8.6 Other Applications

9 Compression Therapy Market, By Region
    9.1 Introduction
    9.2 North America
           9.2.1 U.S.
           9.2.2 Canada
    9.3 Europe
           9.3.1 Germany
           9.3.2 U.K.
           9.3.3 France
           9.3.4 Rest of Europe
    9.4 Asia-Pacific
           9.4.1 Japan
           9.4.2 China
           9.4.3 India
           9.4.4 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    9.5 Rest of the World

10 Competitive Landscape
     10.1 Introduction
     10.2 Leading Players in the Compression Therapy Market
     10.3 Competitive Leadership Mapping
             10.3.1 Visionary Leaders
             10.3.2 Innovators
             10.3.3 Dynamic Differentiators
             10.3.4 Emerging Companies
     10.4 Competitive Benchmarking
             10.4.1 Strength of Product Portfolio (25 Players)
             10.4.2 Business Strategy Excellence (25 Players)

*Top 25 Companies Analysed for This Study are - 3M Company (U.S.), Medtronic PLC (Ireland), Bio Compression Systems Inc. (U.S.), BSN Medical (Germany), Medi GmbH & Co. Kg (Germany), Paul Hartmann AG (Germany), Smith & Nephew PLC (U.K.), Cardinal Health Inc. (U.S.), Sigvaris (Switzerland), Sanyleg S.R.L. (Italy), Tactile Medical (U.S.), Convatec Inc. (U.K.), DJO Global, Inc. (U.S.), Arjohuntleigh (Getinge Group) (Sweden), Julius Zorn GmbH (Juzo)(Germany), Gottfried Medical, Inc. (U.S.), Thermotek Inc (U.S.), Aci Medical Management, Inc. (U.S.), Bauerfiend AG (Germany), OFA Bamberg GmbH (Germany), Mego Afek Ltd. (Isreal), Medline Industries, Inc. (U.S.), Devon Medical Products (U.S.), Lohmann & Rauscher GmbH & Co. Kg Germany, Thuasne Group (France).

11 Company Profiles
(Overview, Strength of Product Portfolio Business Strategy Excellence Products Offering, Recent Development’s, Business Strategy)*
     11.1 3M Company
     11.2 Medtronic PLC
     11.3 Bio Compression Systems, Inc.
     11.4 BSN Medical
     11.5 Medi GmbH & Co. Kg
     11.6 Paul Hartmann AG
     11.7 Smith & Nephew PLC.
     11.8 Cardinal Health, Inc.
     11.9 Sigvaris
     11.10 Sanyleg S.R.L.
     11.11 Tactile Medical
     11.12 Convatec Inc.
     11.13 DJO Global Inc.
     11.14 Arjohuntleigh (Subsidiary of Getinge Group)
     11.15 Julius Zorn GmbH

*Details on Overview, Strength of Product Portfolio Business Strategy Excellence Products Offering, Recent Development’s, Business Strategy Might Not Be Captured in Case of Unlisted Companies.

List of Tables

Table 1 U.K., France, and Germany Have Robust Regulatory Standards for Product Classification & Testing of Compression Hosiery
Table 2 Comparison of British and German Compression Bandage Pressures
Table 3 Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 4 Static Compression Therapy Market, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 5 Static Compression Therapy Market, By Country, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 6 Dynamic Compression Therapy Market, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 7 Dynamic Compression Therapy Market, By Country, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 8 Global Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 9 Compression Garments Market, By Type, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 10 Compression Garments Market, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 11 Compression Garments Market, By Country, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 12 Compression Stockings Market, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 13 Compression Bandages and Wraps Market, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 14 Other Compression Garments Market, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 15 Compression Pumps Market, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 16 Compression Pumps Market, By Country, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 17 Compression Braces Market, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 18 Compression Braces Market, By Country, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 19 Compression Therapy Market, By Application, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 20 Global Market for Varicose Vein Treatment, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 21 Market for Deep Vein Thrombosis Treatment, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 22 Market for Lymphedema Treatment, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 23 Market for Leg Ulcer Treatment, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 24 Market for Other Applications, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 25 Market, By Region, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 26 North America: Compression Therapy Market, By Country, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 27 North America: Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 28 North America: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 29 North America: Compression Garments Market, By Type, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 30 North America: Market, By Application, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 31 U.S.: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 32 U.S.: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 33 Canada: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 34 Canada: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 35 Europe: Compression Therapy Market, By Country, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 36 Europe: Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 37 Europe: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 38 Europe: Compression Garments Market, By Type, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 39 Europe: Market, By Application, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 40 Germany: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 41 Germany: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 42 U.K.: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 43 U.K.: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 44 France: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 45 France: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 46 RoE: Compression Therapy Market, By Type, 2015-2021 (USD Million)
Table 47 RoE: Market, By Product, 2015-2021 (USD Million)
Table 48 Asia-Pacific: Compression Therapy Market, By Country, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 49 Asia-Pacific: Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 50 Asia-Pacific: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 51 Asia-Pacific: Compression Garments Market, By Type, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 52 Asia-Pacific: Market, By Application, 2015- 2022 (USD Million)
Table 53 Japan: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 54 Japan: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 55 China: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 56 China: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 57 India: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 58 India: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 59 RoAPAC: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 60 RoAPAC: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 61 RoW: Compression Therapy Market, By Technique, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 62 RoW: Market, By Product, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 63 RoW: Compression Garments Market, By Type, 2015-2022 (USD Million)
Table 64 RoW: Market, By Application, 2015-2022 (USD Million)

List of Figures

Figure 1 Compression Therapy Market: Research Design
Figure 2 Breakdown of Primary Interviews: By Company Type, Designation, and Region
Figure 3 Data Triangulation Methodology
Figure 4 Global Market, By Product, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 5 Global Market, By Garment Segment, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 6 Global Market, By Technique, 2017 vs 2022
Figure 7 Global Market, By Application, 2017 vs 2022 (USD Million)
Figure 8 Geographical Snapshot of the global Market
Figure 9 Compression Bandages & Wraps Segment Will Continue to Dominate the Global Market in 2022
Figure 10 India and China are Lucrative Markets for Manufacturers of Compression Therapy
Figure 11 Difficulty of Using Compression Hosiery-Primary Reason for the Non-Compliance to Compression Therapy
Figure 12 Proper Hosiery Fitting Would Improve Compliance to Compression Therapy
Figure 13 German Standard-Most-Widely Adopted Regulatory Criteria for Compression Stocking Classification
Figure 14 Asia to Have the Largest Geriatric Population By 2050
Figure 15 Asia-Pacific to Have the Largest Diabetes Population By 2040
Figure 16 European Countries Accounted for the Largest Number of Hip and Knee Replacement Surgeries in 2013
Figure 17 U.S. Witnessed the Highest Number of Road Accident Cases Worldwide in 2014
Figure 18 Lymphedema Management is Expected to Be A Lucrative Market in the U.S.
Figure 19 Estimated Total Addressable Market Potential for Venous Leg Ulcers Management in the U.S.
Figure 20 Global Compression Therapy Market: Drivers, Restraints, Opportunities, and Challenges
Figure 21 Dynamic Compression Therapy Segment to Grow at A Higher CAGR During the Forecast Period
Figure 22 Geographic Snapshot: Global Compression Therapy Market (2017)
Figure 23 North America: Market Snapshot
Figure 24 Europe: Market Snapshot
Figure 25 Asia-Pacific: Market Snapshot
Figure 26 RoW: Market Snapshot
Figure 27 Global Market Ranking: Top 5 Players (2016)
Figure 28 Market (Global), Competitive Leadership Mapping, 2017
Figure 29 3M Company: Company Snapshot (2016)
Figure 30 Medtronic PLC: Company Snapshot (2015)
Figure 31 Paul Hartmann AG: Company Snapshot (2016)
Figure 32 Smith & Nephew PLC.: Company Snapshot (2016)
Figure 33 Cardinal Health Inc.: Company Snapshot (2016)
Figure 34 Tactile Medical: Company Snapshot (2016)
Figure 35 Convatec Inc.: Company Snapshot (2015)
Figure 36 DJO Global Inc: Company Snapshot (2016)
Figure 37 Getinge Group: Company Snapshot (2016)

Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
3 of 5

Loading
LOADING...

4 of 5

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • 3M Company
  • Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • DJO Global Inc.
  • Medi GmbH & Co. Kg
  • Paul Hartmann AG
  • Sigvaris
  • MORE

The global compression therapy market is projected to reach USD 3.40 Billion by 2022 from USD 2.70 Billion in 2017, at a CAGR of 4.7%. Factors such as the high adoption of rehabilitation/preventive care as a part of the long-term disease management strategy for venous diseases; rising prevalence of target diseases such as DVT, lymphedema, and varicose veins; commercialization of aesthetically superior compression stockings; and rising number of sclerotherapy-related surgeries are the key factors driving the growth of the market.

This report broadly segments the compression therapy market into product, technique, application, and region. On the basis of product, the market is categorized into compression garments (compression stockings, compression bandages & wraps, and other compression garments), compression pumps, and compression braces. In 2017, the compression garments segment is expected to account for the largest share of the market due to increasing number of sports injuries and growing number of plastic & aesthetic surgical procedures.

On the basis of technique, the market is categorized into static and dynamic compression therapy. The static compression therapy segment is estimated to account for the largest market share in 2017. Availability of patient-friendly compression garments and procedural advantages in disease management are key factors driving the growth of the market.

Based on applications, the market is categorized into five segments, namely, varicose vein treatment, deep vein thrombosis treatment, lymphedema treatment, leg ulcer treatment, and other applications. The varicose vein treatment segment is expected to account for the largest market share in 2017. Rising incidences of obesity, age-related degeneration, and hypertension are major factors that increase the prevalence of varicose veins across the globe and stimulate market growth.

This report covers the market across four major geographies, namely, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Rest of the World (RoW). Of the four geographic regions studied in the report, North America is estimated to command the largest share of the market in 2017. The large share of the North American market can be mainly attributed to the presence of a number of compression therapy product manufacturers and growing prevalence of target conditions.

However, Asia-Pacific is expected to register the highest growth rate during the forecast period. This can primarily be attributed to the rising per capita healthcare expenditure across emerging Asian countries, rapid expansion in the target patient population, and growing awareness about the different target disorders among healthcare professionals through conferences.

Compression Therapy Market

The lack of universally accepted standards for compression products and lower patient compliance for compression garments are the key factors restraining the growth of the compression therapy market globally. The major players in the market are BSN medical (Germany), DJO Global Inc. (U.S.), medi GmbH & Co KG (Germany), Tactile Medical (U.S.), PAUL HARTMANN AG (Germany), and SIGVARIS (Switzerland). The other players in this market include Sanyleg S.r.l. (Italy), 3M Company (U.S.), ConvaTec Inc. (U.K.), ArjoHuntleigh (Getinge Group) (Sweden), and Julius Zorn GmbH (Juzo) (Germany).

Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
5 of 5
  • 3M Company
  • Arjohuntleigh (Subsidiary of Getinge Group)
  • BSN Medical
  • Bio Compression Systems, Inc.
  • Cardinal Health, Inc.
  • Convatec Inc.
  • DJO Global Inc.
  • Julius Zorn GmbH
  • Medi GmbH & Co. Kg
  • Medtronic PLC
  • Paul Hartmann AG
  • Sanyleg S.R.L.
  • Sigvaris
  • Smith & Nephew PLC.
  • Tactile Medical
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
6 of 5
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Adroll
adroll