Measuring Mental Disorders. Psychiatry, Science and Society

Table of Contents

Part 1. Basic Principles: Strengths and Limitations of Psychiatric Assessment Tools 1. The Spread of Psychiatric Nosography into Science: Origins and Issues of the Research on Depression (1950-1985) 2. The Hamilton Scale as an Analyzer for the Epistemological Difficulties in Research on Depression

Part 2. Developments: Chronicles of Successful Tests 3. A Golden Standard to Evaluate OCD: On the Use of the Y-BOCS 4. Objectifying Dementia: the Use of the Mini-Mental State Exam in Medical Research and Practice

Part 3. Uses: the Tests in Context 5. The MMSE in Practice: the Medical Relationship Reflected through the Administration of a Neuropsychological Test 6. From Care to Risk Prevention: the Success of Screening Tests for Drugs at the Workplace (United States/France)

Authors

Philippe Le Moigne Sociologist, Research Fellow at French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) - UCL. Philippe Le Moigne holds a PhD in sociology. He is a researcher at the French Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), and teaches at the University of Paris René Descartes. His research first focused on the prescription and consumption of psychotropic drugs in the general population. He then became interested in the history, use and epistemology of measuring instruments designed by psychiatry, particularly in the field of depression. This question led him later to address more broadly the problem of the applicability of experimental methods to the knowledge and treatment of mental disorders. In these different areas, Philippe Le Moigne's analyzes focus on the effects that the personalization of social life has had on psychiatric practice and research. He showed how this trend has given legitimacy to individual ill-being and worked in this direction to spread psychotropic drugs, well beyond the treatment of mental disorders. In the same way, Philippe Le Moigne sought to explain why the use of measuring instruments ended up dominating psychiatric knowledge, showing how, in this context of personalization, clinical practice seemed to be able to give rise only to subjective judgments