Key Questions Answered in this Report
- What are the key regulations governing the development, commercialization, and clinical use of minimally invasive surgical systems market, across the globe?
- What are the key technological developments on which the current industry leaders are spending their major share of research and development (R&D) investment?
- How is the role of minimally invasive surgery technologies expected to evolve in the future?
- Who are the leading players which hold significant dominance on the global minimally invasive surgical systems market, currently?
- How likely are current business models to persist in the future?
- What are the key market drivers, challenges, growth opportunities, and trends?
- How do minimally invasive procedures function as compared to each other?
- How is the expiration of patents likely to disrupt market dynamics?
- What are the key strategies incorporated by the leading players in the minimally invasive surgical systems landscape?
- What is the likelihood of new players entering the market in the near-term?
- What is the current revenue contribution for different endoscopes and endoscopy systems, and how would it evolve in the forecast period?
- What is the current revenue contribution for the different types of conventional minimally invasive surgical systems, and how would it evolve in the forecast period?
- What is the current revenue contribution for the different types of surgical robotic systems, and how would it evolve in the forecast period?
- Which countries contribute to the major share of current demand and which countries hold significant scope for business expansion activities, by the key players?
Key USPs of the Report
Following are some of the key sections of the report:
Industry Analysis (Section 4)
The industry analysis section encompasses a description of the industry structure as well as the whole supply chain. Furthermore, this section consists of other forms of analyses such as patent analysis, regulatory landscape, and awaited technological developments. The patent analysis section covers the filing trend and analyzes the impact of patent expiration on the market. This section will aid the readers in staying updated with the latest regulations as well as discuss how the market is likely to unfold during the next ten years.
Competitive Landscape (section 5)
This section comprises the following information:
- Market Share Analysis
This section includes key insights on the revenue share of the players operating in the market, both for conventional minimally invasive surgical systems and surgical robotics. It will provide information on who the leading players in the market are. The section will also include brand share analysis for surgical robotics and conventional minimally invasive surgical systems.
- Key Strategies and Developments
The section provides information on the recent developments in the market, which includes the following categories - funding activities, M&A activities, partnerships, alliances & business expansions, regulatory & legal, new offerings, and procurement & sales.
- Global Market Scenario (section 6)
This section encompasses information on the limitations and assumptions considered while sizing the market, along with a detailed description and impact analysis for the market dynamics, i.e. growth factors, challenges, and market opportunities.
In addition, the report provides a detailed analysis and growth forecast for each segment in the subsequent sections. Country-wise analysis has been provided for 25 leading countries across the globe.
“In surgical robotics, I think the biggest challenge for the market players is reducing the dimensions of the instruments and making them smaller. Making instruments smaller is a more complex process since the whole design, right from the ports and the supporting instruments needs to change. This is something that the industry is trending toward, and it will be exciting to see the new mechanisms to maneuver such small instruments with complex designs.”
Conventional Minimally Invasive Surgeries
“The industry has been largely driven by changing preferences due to increasing desire for better surgical outcomes. One way the industry has transformed is that minimally invasive surgeries have witnessed increasing support, both from patients and surgeons. The market is expected to continue to grow and gain more preference even in developing countries.”
Scope of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market
The report constitutes an in-depth study of the global minimally invasive surgical systems market, including a thorough analysis of the types of products, both conventional and robotic minimally invasive surgical systems. The study also presents a detailed analysis of the market dynamics and the estimation of the market size over the forecast period 2020-2030. The scope of this report is focused on the different types of product types in minimally invasive surgeries such as video and visualization systems, endoscopes and endoscopy systems, and others, along with different applications, end-users, and country-wise analysis.
The purpose of the study is to gain a holistic view of the global minimally invasive surgical systems market in terms of various factors influencing it, including regulations and technological advancements. The market has been segmented into product type, application, end-user, and region. The scope of this report is centered upon conducting a detailed study of the products allied with the global minimally invasive surgical systems market. In addition, the study also includes exhaustive information on the market opportunities, patent analysis, competitive landscape, market share of leading manufacturers, the growth potential of each product, end-user, application, and region, as well as other vital information with respect to the minimally invasive surgical systems market.
Key Companies in the Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market
Some of the key players contributing to the global minimally invasive surgical systems market are as follows:
- Conventional Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems
Olympus Corporation, Boston Scientific Corporation, Stryker Corporation, Medtronic Plc, J&J, Hoya Corporation, B. Braun Melsungen AG, FUJIFILM Medical Systems U.S.A., Inc., Smith & Nephew plc, Fortimedix Surgical B.V., and Cook Medical LLC.
- Surgical Robotics
Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Stryker Corporation, Corindus, Inc., Smith & Nephew Plc, Zimmer Biomet, Medtronic Plc, Medrobotics Corporation, and Renishaw Plc
Enterprise License customers will receive an Excel spreadsheet containing additional data.
1. Product Defintion
2. Scope of Research
2.1 Key Questions Answered in the Report
2.2 Research Scope
3. Research Methodology
3.1 Primary Research
3.2 Secondary Research
3.3 Data Sources Categorization
3.4 Companies Profiled in the Report
3.5 Brief Overview of the Market Estimation Process
3.6 Data Validation
3.7 Assumptions and Limitations
4. Industry Analysis
4.1 Industry Structure
4.1.1 Conventional Minimally Invasive Surgical System Manufacturers
4.1.2 Surgical Robots Manufacturers
4.1.3 Contract Manufacturers
4.2 Industry Supply Chain Analysis
4.3 Regulatory Framework and Government Initiatives
4.3.1 Regulations in North America
4.3.2 Regulations in the European Union (EU)
4.3.3 Regulations in Other Countries
4.4 Patent Analysis
4.4.1 Conventional Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems
126.96.36.199 Awaited Technological Developments
188.8.131.52 Patent Filing Trend
184.108.40.206 Patent Expiration Analysis
4.4.2 Surgical Robotics
220.127.116.11 Awaited Technological Developments
18.104.22.168 Patent Filing Trend
22.214.171.124 Patent Expiration Analysis
4.5 Future Potential: Scope for Advancements
4.5.1 Growing Prominence of Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
4.5.2 The Future of Conventional Minimally Invasive Surgical Technologies
4.5.3 Outlook on Next Generation Surgical Robotics
5. Competitive Landscape
5.1 Market Share Analysis
5.2 Key Strategies and Developments
5.2.1 Funding Activities
5.2.2 M&A Activities
5.2.3 Partnerships, Alliances and Business Expansions
5.2.4 Regulatory and Legal
5.2.5 New Offerings
5.2.6 Procurement and Sales
5.3 Product Mapping Analysis
5.4 Business Model Analysis
5.5 Competitive Benchmarking
6. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market Scenario
6.1 Assumptions and Limitations
6.2 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
6.3 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market Size and Forecast
6.4 Market Dynamics
6.4.1 Impact Analysis
6.4.2 Market Growth Promoting Factors
6.4.3 Market Growth Restraining Factors
6.4.4 Market Growth Opportunities
6.5 Market Estimation Method
6.6 Key Vendors
7. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Product Type), 2018-2030
7.1 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
7.2 Conventional Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems
7.2.1 Endoscopes and Endoscopic Systems
126.96.36.199 Rigid Endoscopes
188.8.131.52.1 Urology Endoscopes
184.108.40.206.1.4 Other Urology Endoscopes
220.127.116.11.4 Gynecology Endoscopes
18.104.22.168.6 ENT Endoscopes
22.214.171.124.7 Other Rigid Endoscopes (GI)
126.96.36.199 Flexible Endoscopes
188.8.131.52.1 Gastrointestinal Endoscopes
184.108.40.206.1.6 Other GI Endoscopes
220.127.116.11.2 Urology Endoscopes
18.104.22.168.3 Gynecology Endoscopes
22.214.171.124.7 ENT Endoscopes
7.2.2 Video and Visualization Systems
126.96.36.199.1 Single-Chip Cameras
188.8.131.52.2 3-Chip Cameras
184.108.40.206 Displays and Monitors
220.127.116.11 Video Recorders
18.104.22.168 Camera Heads
22.214.171.124 Video Convertors
126.96.36.199 Video Processors
7.2.3 Instruments and Accessories
188.8.131.52 Irrigation Systems
184.108.40.206 Endoscope Tip Protector, Tubing, Water Systems
220.127.116.11 Procedure Kits
18.104.22.168 Retrieval Kits
22.214.171.124 Injection Needles
126.96.36.199 Energy Devices
188.8.131.52 Closure Devices
184.108.40.206 Hand Instruments
220.127.116.11 Access Devices
7.2.4 Capsule Endoscopy
18.104.22.168 Workstations and Data Recorders
22.214.171.124 Others (Services and Patency System)
7.2.5 Others (Reprocessing, Sterilization)
7.3 Surgical Robotics
7.3.1 Robotic Systems
7.3.2 Instruments & Accessories
8. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Application), 2018-2030
8.1 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
8.2 Urology Surgery
8.2.1 Surgical Robotics
8.2.2 Conventional MISS
8.3 Gynecology Surgery
8.3.1 Surgical Robotics
8.3.2 Conventional MISS
8.4 General Surgery
8.4.1 Surgical Robotics
8.4.2 Conventional MISS
8.5 Cardiovascular Surgery
8.5.1 Surgical Robotics
8.5.2 Conventional MISS
8.6 Orthopedic Surgery
8.6.1 Surgical Robotics
8.6.2 Conventional MISS
8.7 Head and Neck Surgery
8.7.1 Surgical Robotics
8.7.2 Conventional MISS
8.8.1 Surgical Robotics
8.8.2 Conventional MISS
9. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by End User), 2018-2030
9.1 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
9.2.1 Surgical Robotics
9.2.2 Conventional MISS
9.3 Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs)
9.3.1 Surgical Robotics
9.3.2 Conventional MISS
9.4 Specialty Clinics
9.4.1 Surgical Robotics
9.4.2 Conventional MISS
10. Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market (by Region), 2018-2030
10.2 North America Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market
10.2.1 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
10.2.2 Market Size and Forecast
10.2.3 Market Dynamics
10.2.4 Key Vendors
10.2.5 North America Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market, by Country
10.3 Europe Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market
10.3.1 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
10.3.2 Market Size and Forecast
10.3.3 Market Dynamics
10.3.4 Key Vendors
10.3.5 Europe Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market, by Country
10.4 Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market
10.4.1 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
10.4.2 Market Size and Forecast
10.4.3 Market Dynamics
10.4.4 Key Vendors
10.4.5 Asia-Pacific Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market, by Country
10.4.5.3 South Korea
10.4.5.4 Australia & New Zealand
10.5 Latin America Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market
10.5.1 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
10.5.2 Market Size and Forecast
10.5.3 Market Dynamics
10.5.4 Key Vendors
10.5.5 Latin America Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market, by Country
10.6 Middle East & Africa Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market
10.6.1 Key Findings and Opportunity Assessment
10.6.2 Market Size and Forecast
10.6.3 Market Dynamics
10.6.4 Key Vendors
10.6.5 Middle East & Africa Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market, by Country
11. Company Profiles
11.2 Boston Scientific Corporation
11.2.1 Company Overview
11.2.2 Role of Boston Scientific Corporation in the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Systems Market
11.2.4 Key Insights on the Financial Health of the Company
11.2.5 SWOT Analysis
11.3 Cook Medical LLC
11.4 Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
11.5 Johnson & Johnson
11.6 Medrobotics Corporation
11.7 Medtronic Plc
11.8 Olympus Corporation
11.9 Renishaw Plc
11.10 Restoration Robotics, Inc.
11.11 Smith & Nephew Plc
11.12 Stereotaxis, Inc.
11.13 Mako Surgical Corp. (Stryker Corporation)
11.14 THINK Surgical, Inc.
11.15 Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Cook Medical LLC
- Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
- Johnson & Johnson
- Mako Surgical Corp. (Stryker Corporation)
- Medrobotics Corporation
- Medtronic Plc
- Olympus Corporation
- Renishaw Plc
- Restoration Robotics, Inc.
- Smith & Nephew Plc
- Stereotaxis, Inc.
- THINK Surgical, Inc.
- Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.