+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Structural Health Monitoring Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 193 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5146266
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The structural health monitoring market enables leaders to proactively enhance infrastructure safety and optimize asset performance by leveraging advanced, integrated monitoring technologies. These solutions provide critical data insights, supporting effective decision-making, asset longevity, and reliable operations in mission-critical environments.

Market Snapshot: Structural Health Monitoring Market Size and Growth

The structural health monitoring market continues its steady growth trajectory, with current projections signaling an expansion from USD 4.72 billion in 2024 to USD 5.31 billion in 2025, ultimately reaching an estimated USD 12.73 billion by 2032. This positive outlook is primarily propelled by rising implementation across vital sectors, including civil infrastructure, aerospace, energy, marine, and oil and gas. Increasing adoption is tied to the growing need for real-time diagnostics embedded within asset management strategies. As a result, organizations gain improved awareness of emerging risks, build stronger resilience into operations, and support robust approaches to sustainable infrastructure stewardship.

Scope & Segmentation: In-Depth Structural Health Monitoring Market Insights

  • Offering: Integrated hardware such as accelerometers, displacement sensors, inclinometers, tiltmeters, and strain gauges operates seamlessly with analytics and predictive maintenance software, while pre- and post-installation services maximize system uptime and long-term reliability.
  • Monitoring Approach: Active and passive approaches each support early risk detection and allow for customized asset integrity management, reflecting diverse industry needs and varying on-site requirements.
  • Technology: Both wired and wireless platforms enable flexible deployment models, supporting central installations for new builds or distributed sensor networks in existing assets, ensuring scalable and adaptive operations.
  • Application: Solutions are applied to critical assets such as airframes, bridges, dams, wind turbines, stadiums, buildings, industrial machinery, and process equipment, underpinning proactive asset management and lifecycle consistency across diverse structures.
  • End User: Key sectors like aerospace and defense, energy, infrastructure management, and mining realize consistent safety improvements and operational continuity by deploying tailored monitoring systems designed for sector-specific challenges.
  • Region: The market covers the Americas (U.S., Canada, Brazil, LATAM), EMEA (Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Middle East, Africa), and Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Southeast Asia), enabling targeted solutions for complex regional infrastructure requirements and regulatory frameworks.
  • Companies: Prominent players such as Hottinger Brüel & Kjaer GmbH, James Fisher and Sons PLC, AVT Reliability Ltd., Siemens AG, and Xylem Inc. set technology benchmarks and enhance industry best practices through continued collaboration and innovation.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Continuous, real-time sensing and advanced analytics support more accurate maintenance scheduling, streamline resource use, and sharpen risk oversight for asset managers.
  • As organizations seek adaptable monitoring strategies, Internet of Things integration and flexible wireless systems allow alignment with operational and budget shifts.
  • Deploying digital twin models alongside sensor investments strengthens predictive maintenance and centralized performance oversight, granting greater lifecycle control across core assets.
  • Strategic partnerships among equipment suppliers, technology vendors, and service specialists facilitate efficient implementation and simplify integration into established asset management workflows.
  • Sustainable infrastructure planning is advanced by applying robust monitoring protocols, enabling organizations to better address environmental requirements and achieve internal sustainability objectives.
  • Flexible, modular system architectures permit standardization of monitoring practices across varying asset types and operational lifespans, reducing complexity for asset owners.

Tariff Impact: Addressing U.S. Trade Policy Changes

Forthcoming U.S. tariff policy shifts in 2025 prompt structural health monitoring providers to recalibrate procurement and supply methods. Companies favor local assembly, expand supplier diversity, and pursue advances in sensor design to maintain on-time, reliable delivery. These initiatives safeguard project progress and supply chain stability despite evolving trade conditions.

Methodology & Data Sources

The findings in this report are built on comprehensive secondary research and direct interviews with field experts. A multi-step, validated analytical approach incorporates data triangulation to ensure insights reflect current realities and forecasted shifts across the structural health monitoring market.

Why This Report Matters

  • Delivers actionable market trend analysis, highlighting evolving technology use and regional dynamics to inform strategic investment decisions.
  • Arms leadership with practical direction to address regulatory intricacies and supply chain risks, supporting robust contingency planning and compliance.
  • Equips decision-makers with the guidance needed to align operational performance, regulatory adherence, and sustainability ambitions for competitive advantage.

Conclusion

Applying these structural health monitoring market insights empowers organizations to reinforce infrastructure reliability, focus on sustainable growth, and better navigate sector-specific challenges.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Growing use of SHM in aging infrastructure to prevent catastrophic failures worldwide
5.2. Government regulations mandating SHM for public safety in bridges and dams globally
5.3. Increasing adoption of wireless sensors for cost-effective and scalable structural monitoring systems
5.4. Integration of AI and machine learning for predictive maintenance in SHM applications
5.5. Rising demand for real-time data analytics to enhance structural safety and efficiency
5.6. Expansion of SHM in wind energy sector for turbine blade health monitoring
5.7. Development of smart cities driving SHM adoption in high-rise buildings and stadiums
5.8. Increased investment in R&D for advanced sensors and data acquisition technologies
5.9. IoT-enabled SHM systems gaining traction for remote and continuous infrastructure monitoring
5.10. Cloud-based SHM platforms revolutionizing data storage, visualization, and remote diagnostics
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Offering
8.1. Hardware
8.1.1. Accelerometers
8.1.2. Displacement Sensors
8.1.3. Inclinometers & Tiltmeters
8.1.4. Sensors
8.1.5. Strain Gauges
8.2. Services
8.2.1. Post-Installation
8.2.2. Pre-Installation
8.3. Software
8.3.1. Data Management Software
8.3.2. Predictive Maintenance Software
9. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Monitoring Approach
9.1. Active Monitoring
9.2. Passive Monitoring
10. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Technology
10.1. Wired
10.2. Wireless
11. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Application
11.1. Airframes & Wind Turbines
11.2. Bridges & Dams
11.3. Buildings & Stadiums
11.4. Large Machines & Equipment
12. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by End User
12.1. Aerospace & Defence
12.2. Energy
12.3. Infrastructure
12.4. Mining
13. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Hottinger Brüel & Kjaer GmbH
16.3.2. James Fisher and Sons PLC
16.3.3. Acellent Technologies Inc.
16.3.4. AVT Reliability Ltd.
16.3.5. Beanair GmbH
16.3.6. Bridge Diagnostics
16.3.7. Campbell Scientific, Inc.
16.3.8. COWI A/S
16.3.9. ElastiSense
16.3.10. FEAC Engineering P.C.
16.3.11. First Sensor AG by TE Connectivity Ltd.
16.3.12. Geocomp, Inc.
16.3.13. Geokon
16.3.14. Infibra Technologies Srl
16.3.15. KDM Engineers [India] Pvt. Ltd.
16.3.16. Kinemetrics, Inc.
16.3.17. National Instruments by Emerson Electric Co
16.3.18. Nova Ventures Group Corp.
16.3.19. Rst Instruments Ltd.
16.3.20. Sensuron LLC
16.3.21. Setpoint Technologies Ltd.
16.3.22. SGS S.A.
16.3.23. SHM Canada Consulting Limited
16.3.24. Siemens AG
16.3.25. Sisgeo Srl
16.3.26. SITES AFLA (Pty) Ltd.
16.3.27. Sixense Group
16.3.28. Sodis Lab
16.3.29. Somni Solutions
16.3.30. Xylem Inc.

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Structural Health Monitoring market report include:
  • Hottinger Brüel & Kjaer GmbH
  • James Fisher and Sons PLC
  • Acellent Technologies Inc.
  • AVT Reliability Ltd.
  • Beanair GmbH
  • Bridge Diagnostics
  • Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • COWI A/S
  • ElastiSense
  • FEAC Engineering P.C.
  • First Sensor AG by TE Connectivity Ltd.
  • Geocomp, Inc.
  • Geokon
  • Infibra Technologies Srl
  • KDM Engineers [India] Pvt. Ltd.
  • Kinemetrics, Inc.
  • National Instruments by Emerson Electric Co
  • Nova Ventures Group Corp.
  • Rst Instruments Ltd.
  • Sensuron LLC
  • Setpoint Technologies Ltd.
  • SGS S.A.
  • SHM Canada Consulting Limited
  • Siemens AG
  • Sisgeo Srl
  • SITES AFLA (Pty) Ltd.
  • Sixense Group
  • Sodis Lab
  • Somni Solutions
  • Xylem Inc.

Table Information