+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 150 Pages
  • March 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 5239314
The critical infrastructure protection market size is projected to be USD 150.62 billion in 2025, USD 158.73 billion in 2026, and reach USD 190.53 billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 3.72% from 2026 to 2031. This report is Segmented by Component (Solutions, and Services), Security Type (Physical Safety and Security, Cybersecurity, and More), Deployment Mode (On-Premise, and Cloud/X-as-a-Service), Vertical (Energy and Power, BFSI, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) Market Trends and Insights

Growing Government Mandates in North America and Europe

Regulatory pressure is compressing multi-year modernization roadmaps into accelerated funding cycles across electricity, water, and transport operators. The United States final performance goals published in 2025 compel sixteen critical sectors to implement continuous monitoring, zero-trust segmentation, and incident-response drills by 2027. Europe’s NIS2 Directive widens the compliance net to more than 160,000 entities and introduces fines up to 2% of global turnover for lapses. Supply-chain mapping clauses have triggered board-level reviews that expose untracked dependencies on legacy firmware and end-of-life components, pushing demand for vendor-risk-management platforms certified under IEC 62443. Procurement solicitations now bundle asset inventory tools with managed detection and response services, reflecting the realization that regulations require both technology and round-the-clock expertise.

State-Backed OT Cyber-Attacks on Energy and Water Utilities

Nation-state campaigns have shifted from data theft to kinetic disruption, exploiting weakly segmented substations and water-treatment facilities. A February 2025 investigation confirmed lateral movement from enterprise email servers into substation controllers at multiple U.S. cooperatives before operators isolated traffic. The United Kingdom issued a September 2025 advisory after reconnaissance of water-utility historian databases, noting the continued presence of default credentials on decades-old HMIs. Utilities are therefore fast-tracking purchases of unidirectional gateways, protocol-aware firewalls, and out-of-band sensors that collect encrypted traffic for cloud analytics without introducing write paths. Vendors that can baseline industrial protocols passively are winning contracts where downtime for active scanning is unacceptable.

Shortage of OT-Skilled Cybersecurity Workforce

Utilities and manufacturers are competing for engineers who can decipher both Modbus packet captures and Active Directory logs. The United States forecasts 32% growth in security-analyst demand through 2034, but only 12% of practitioners have hands-on SCADA experience. A 2025 SANS study found that 68% of operators lack staff able to tune industrial firewalls, leading to over-dependence on vendors and 29% higher consulting rates since 2024. This scarcity delays greenfield deployments, inflates labor budgets, and pushes smaller operators toward managed detection subscriptions that shift expertise off-site.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:
  • Smart-Grid Roll-Outs Driving Integrated Physical-Cyber Spending
  • 5G and Edge Expansion Increasing Telecom Attack Surface in Asia-Pacific
  • Legacy OT-Security Interoperability Gaps
For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Solutions controlled 61.73% of 2025 spending, illustrating how video surveillance, access controllers, and industrial firewalls still anchor the critical infrastructure protection market size at facility level. Yet recurrent audits under NIS2 and United States performance goals are steering buyers toward advisory, integration, and managed response offerings that promise predictable subscription lines rather than sporadic capital spikes. Services revenue is expected to climb at a 3.77% CAGR through 2031, and the critical infrastructure protection industry now treats round-the-clock monitoring as a budgeted utility rather than a discretionary add-on. Operators struggling with scarce OT talent increasingly outsource log triage and incident containment, driving multi-year contracts that bundle compliance reporting and staff augmentation.

The shift also stems from integration headaches caused by mixed-generation PLCs and diversified camera fleets. Managed service providers absorb that complexity, promising single-pane dashboards and defined mean-time-to-respond metrics. Vendors therefore position hardware as an on-ramp to lifecycle services, and market leaders publicly report double-digit service growth that exceeds hardware units. This trend spreads the critical infrastructure protection market across suppliers able to couple remote patch orchestration, zero-trust policy tuning, and operator training under fixed-price arrangements, enlarging addressable spend beyond initial equipment roll-outs.

Physical safety and security retained 52.81% of aggregate 2025 investment, covering fences, scanners, and PSIM dashboards that long defined baseline safeguards across plants and airports. However, convergence pressure is pushing cybersecurity subcategories to outgrow traditional gear, adding 4.01% CAGR as the preferred defensive layer for digital process controls. When identity-centric policies govern turbine access and encrypted engineering files, buyers perceive software upgrades as quicker and less disruptive than concrete walls, accelerating the cybersecurity share of the critical infrastructure protection market size.

Adoption is strongest in network-centric tools that decode IEC 61850 traffic and apply signatureless anomaly models, areas where multi-protocol visibility remains scarce. Identity and access management enters procurement checklists as remote engineers require VPN-less but authenticated pathways to HMIs. Data-at-rest encryption and secure coding standards rise alongside API exposure to third-party analytics, nudging product roadmaps toward DevSecOps integrations. The pivot does not diminish perimeter hardware importance, yet budget weight is plainly tilting to cybersecurity layers that mitigate ransomware and data-tampering threats.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Component
    • Solutions
    • Services
  • By Security Type
    • Physical Safety and Security
      • Screening and Scanning
        • Video Surveillance
        • Access Control
        • PSIM and PIAM
        • CBRNE Detection
    • Cybersecurity
      • Network Security
      • SCADA / OT Security
      • Identity and Access Management
      • Data and Application Security
      • Secure Communications
  • By Deployment Mode
    • On-Premise
    • Cloud / X-as-a-Service
  • By Vertical
    • Energy and Power
    • BFSI
    • Transportation
    • Telecommunications
    • Government and Defense
    • Chemical and Manufacturing
    • Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • Sensitive Infrastructure and Data Centers
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • Germany
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • New Zealand
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • GCC
        • Turkey
        • Israel
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Nigeria
        • Egypt
        • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America maintained 40.47% of 2025 global revenue, bolstered by federal grants, USD 60 billion utility security budgets, and deep vendor ecosystems. Performance-goal deadlines spark purchase orders that intertwine perimeter upgrades with OT-firewall refresh cycles and cloud-delivered threat intelligence. Canada’s Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act extends mandatory audits to telecommunications and energy firms, accelerating deployments of continuous monitoring consoles, while Mexican regulators now require LNG pipeline operators to implement vulnerability management and incident-reporting frameworks. This continental policy alignment sustains volume orders for asset discovery and managed detection subscriptions.

Asia-Pacific is forecast to post the quickest 4.05% CAGR through 2031 as China, India, Japan, and South Korea embed security clauses inside smart-city, rail, and manufacturing blueprints. Beijing’s 2025 industrial-control action plan mandates vulnerability scans and network segmentation across steel and petrochemical lines, channeling spend into multi-vendor packet brokers and OT-SOC buildouts. India’s substation directive drives joint tenders pairing domestic EPC firms with global anomaly-detection vendors, while Japan’s updated guidelines elevate supply-chain integrity to board-level KPI status. Regional threat-intelligence sharing through South Korea’s ICS program further encourages automation of detection, producing a rising tide for specialized platforms.

Europe’s NIS2 compliance wave sweeps medium-sized utilities and transport operators into the investment cycle, and Germany’s sector catalog aligns national guidance with IEC 62443, removing ambiguity that once delayed procurement. The Middle East augments its share through sovereign-wealth outlays on port, airport, and desalination security, typified by Saudi Arabia’s USD 2.1 billion allocation to NEOM’s converged surveillance and OT-segmentation package. The United Arab Emirates adds telecom license mandates that cement industrial firewall demand. In contrast, South America and Africa lag due to fragmented rules and constrained budgets, yet Brazil’s baseline requirements and South Africa’s cybercrime statutes sow the seeds for gradual uptake as vendors introduce scalable, pay-as-you-grow service tiers.



List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • ABB Ltd.
  • Airbus SE
  • BAE Systems PLC
  • Booz Allen Hamilton
  • Claroty Ltd.
  • Cisco Systems Inc.
  • Darktrace PLC
  • Dragos Inc.
  • Fortinet Inc.
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • Hexagon AB
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • IBM Corporation
  • Johnson Controls International
  • Kaspersky Lab Inc.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc.
  • Raytheon Technologies Corporation
  • Schneider Electric SE
  • Siemens AG
  • Thales Group
  • Trellix
  • Waterfall Security Solutions Ltd.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Growing Government Mandates in North America and Europe
4.2.2 State-Backed OT Cyber-Attacks on Energy and Water Utilities
4.2.3 Smart-Grid Roll-Outs Driving Integrated Physical-Cyber Spending
4.2.4 5G and Edge Expansion Increasing Telecom Attack Surface in Asia-Pacific
4.2.5 IT-OT Convergence Accelerating Zero-Trust Adoption
4.2.6 Public-Private Funding for Airport and Port Security in Middle East
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Legacy OT-Security Interoperability Gaps
4.3.2 Shortage of OT-Skilled Cybersecurity Workforce
4.3.3 High Total Cost of Ownership of End-to-End Solutions
4.3.4 Fragmented Regulations in Emerging Economies
4.4 Value Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory and Technological Outlook
4.6 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Degree of Competition
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Component
5.1.1 Solutions
5.1.2 Services
5.2 By Security Type
5.2.1 Physical Safety and Security
5.2.1.1 Screening and Scanning
5.2.1.1.1 Video Surveillance
5.2.1.1.2 Access Control
5.2.1.1.3 PSIM and PIAM
5.2.1.1.4 CBRNE Detection
5.2.2 Cybersecurity
5.2.2.1 Network Security
5.2.2.2 SCADA / OT Security
5.2.2.3 Identity and Access Management
5.2.2.4 Data and Application Security
5.2.2.5 Secure Communications
5.3 By Deployment Mode
5.3.1 On-Premise
5.3.2 Cloud / X-as-a-Service
5.4 By Vertical
5.4.1 Energy and Power
5.4.2 BFSI
5.4.3 Transportation
5.4.4 Telecommunications
5.4.5 Government and Defense
5.4.6 Chemical and Manufacturing
5.4.7 Healthcare and Life Sciences
5.4.8 Sensitive Infrastructure and Data Centers
5.5 By Geography
5.5.1 North America
5.5.1.1 United States
5.5.1.2 Canada
5.5.1.3 Mexico
5.5.2 South America
5.5.2.1 Brazil
5.5.2.2 Argentina
5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
5.5.3 Europe
5.5.3.1 United Kingdom
5.5.3.2 Germany
5.5.3.3 France
5.5.3.4 Italy
5.5.3.5 Spain
5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
5.5.4.1 China
5.5.4.2 Japan
5.5.4.3 India
5.5.4.4 South Korea
5.5.4.5 New Zealand
5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
5.5.5.1 Middle East
5.5.5.1.1 GCC
5.5.5.1.2 Turkey
5.5.5.1.3 Israel
5.5.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
5.5.5.2 Africa
5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
5.5.5.2.2 Nigeria
5.5.5.2.3 Egypt
5.5.5.2.4 Rest of Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 ABB Ltd.
6.4.2 Airbus SE
6.4.3 BAE Systems PLC
6.4.4 Booz Allen Hamilton
6.4.5 Claroty Ltd.
6.4.6 Cisco Systems Inc.
6.4.7 Darktrace PLC
6.4.8 Dragos Inc.
6.4.9 Fortinet Inc.
6.4.10 General Dynamics Corporation
6.4.11 Hexagon AB
6.4.12 Honeywell International Inc.
6.4.13 IBM Corporation
6.4.14 Johnson Controls International
6.4.15 Kaspersky Lab Inc.
6.4.16 Lockheed Martin Corporation
6.4.17 Northrop Grumman Corporation
6.4.18 Palo Alto Networks Inc.
6.4.19 Raytheon Technologies Corporation
6.4.20 Schneider Electric SE
6.4.21 Siemens AG
6.4.22 Thales Group
6.4.23 Trellix
6.4.24 Waterfall Security Solutions Ltd.
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • ABB Ltd.
  • Airbus SE
  • BAE Systems PLC
  • Booz Allen Hamilton
  • Claroty Ltd.
  • Cisco Systems Inc.
  • Darktrace PLC
  • Dragos Inc.
  • Fortinet Inc.
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • Hexagon AB
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • IBM Corporation
  • Johnson Controls International
  • Kaspersky Lab Inc.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc.
  • Raytheon Technologies Corporation
  • Schneider Electric SE
  • Siemens AG
  • Thales Group
  • Trellix
  • Waterfall Security Solutions Ltd.