+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Edible Films and Coatings for Fruits and Vegetables - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026-2031)

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 250 Pages
  • August 2026
  • Region: Global
  • Mordor Intelligence
  • ID: 5324089
The edible films and coatings for fruits and vegetables market size was valued at USD 0.98 billion in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 1.05 billion in 2026 to reach USD 1.46 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 6.84% during the forecast period (2026-2031). This report is Segmented by Ingredient Type (Proteins, Polysaccharides, Lipids, Composites), Application (Fruits - Citrus, Berries, Pome Fruits, Stone Fruits; Vegetables - Leafy Greens, Nightshades, Root and Tuber), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Edible Films And Coatings For Fruits And Vegetables Market Trends and Insights

Consumer shift toward clean-label and natural preservatives replaces synthetics

The increasing consumer preference for clean-label and natural preservatives is driving the adoption of edible films and coatings for fruits and vegetables. This shift is fueled by heightened scrutiny of product labels and a growing demand for health-conscious and sustainable choices. Edible films and coatings, typically plant-derived and composed of minimal ingredients, offer an effective alternative to synthetic additives. The Food Standards Agency’s Food and You 2: Wave 9 survey in 2024 revealed that 53% of United Kingdom adults check ingredient lists, and 50% review nutritional information at least occasionally when purchasing food, underscoring the importance of transparency in preservative systems. Edible coatings made from polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids provide a "label-friendly" solution by extending shelf life and maintaining freshness through physical barrier functions, often incorporating naturally derived antimicrobials or antioxidants to support “no artificial preservatives” claims without compromising quality. Companies like Apeel (now operating as Oliver) have demonstrated the effectiveness of such coatings in reducing waste and maintaining plant-based ingredient lists, as seen in partnerships with retailers like Kroger in the United States. Premium and organic brands are increasingly adopting invisible coatings that preserve taste and appearance while extending shelf life, aligning with consumer preferences for fresh-looking produce without "chemical-sounding" additives. Mainstream supermarket private labels are also under pressure to adopt clean-label attributes, driving the broader application of edible coatings across categories such as berries, pome fruits, and leafy greens. Regulatory and NGO scrutiny on synthetic preservatives further supports this trend, with manufacturers leveraging GRAS or widely accepted bio-based materials for strategic flexibility. Clear communication about the natural, plant-based composition of these coatings builds consumer trust, supports premium pricing, and enhances brand equity. Additionally, as awareness of food waste grows, clean-label coatings are positioned as a natural method of shelf-life extension, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers. This convergence of label scrutiny, natural ingredient preferences, and sustainability expectations is reinforcing consumer demand and driving growth in the market for edible films and coatings for fruits and vegetables.

Innovations like plant-based coatings extend shelf life

Plant-based coatings, formulated from polysaccharides, plant proteins, and lipids, are gaining traction as effective solutions for extending the shelf life of fruits and vegetables. These coatings create thin, edible barriers that minimize moisture loss and gas exchange, preserving firmness, visual appeal, and marketability. This aligns with the increasing consumer preference for plant-based solutions. According to the Good Food Institute Europe, by 2025, 51% of adults in the United Kingdom and Germany plan to adjust their diets by either increasing plant-based food consumption or reducing animal meat and dairy intake, with approximately 20% intending to do both. This shift in dietary habits is driving demand for plant-based technologies, including packaging and preservation solutions, making bio-based coatings more attractive to retailers and brands emphasizing "plant-forward" strategies. These coatings can be tailored for specific produce categories, such as berries, citrus fruits, or leafy greens, by modifying film-former blends and permeability to ensure extended shelf life without compromising texture or sensory quality, which is critical for retail acceptance. Companies like Hazel Technologies demonstrate how plant-derived compounds can effectively slow ripening and spoilage in fresh produce supply chains, integrating seamlessly into existing packing and distribution workflows while maintaining a natural, label-friendly appeal. Retailers expanding plant-based and flexitarian product ranges increasingly seek alignment between product contents and preservation methods, positioning plant-based edible films and coatings as complementary solutions. This technology is particularly advantageous in export-heavy categories like avocados, berries, and stone fruits, where extended transit times highlight the benefits of shelf-life extension, reducing shrinkage and write-offs at the retail level. Successful outcomes, such as reduced waste and improved on-shelf quality, further drive research and development into new plant sources, bioactive components, and advanced processing techniques, reinforcing plant-based coatings as a key growth driver in the edible films and coatings market.

High production costs from natural, agricultural raw materials

The high production costs associated with natural, agricultural raw materials present a significant challenge for the edible films and coatings market. These products depend on biopolymers such as proteins, polysaccharides, and lipids, which are often more expensive and less price-stable than commodity petrochemical resins. This is particularly evident when these materials are derived from food-grade crops or specialty by-products that require additional purification and quality control. Seasonal variability, competing uses in food and feed, and fragmented supply chains further exacerbate procurement risks, forcing manufacturers to maintain higher-cost inventories or enter long-term contracts with elevated raw material prices. Achieving the desired barrier, mechanical, and sensory properties typically requires multi-component formulations that include plasticizers, emulsifiers, and natural antimicrobials or antioxidants, increasing ingredient complexity and cost per kilogram compared to conventional plastic films. Processing these natural materials into consistent coatings demands precise control of parameters such as pH, temperature, and viscosity, along with specialized application systems for dipping or spraying irregular fruit and vegetable surfaces. These factors contribute to higher capital and operating expenses, deterring smaller packers from adoption. Unlike conventional plastic packaging, which benefits from decades of industrial-scale production and standardized processes, edible coating production is still developing large-scale infrastructure, resulting in relatively high unit costs and limited economies of scale in many regions. For brand owners and retailers targeting value-conscious or price-sensitive consumers, the premium associated with coated produce can be a deterrent, especially when the added cost cannot be easily passed on to consumers without risking a decline in sales volumes. These factors collectively hinder faster and broader adoption of edible films and coatings for fruits and vegetables globally.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  • Regulatory push to reduce plastic waste boosts biodegradable alternatives
  • Need to minimize post-harvest losses in perishable produce
  • Poor moisture barrier in polysaccharide films compared to plastics

Segment Analysis

Polysaccharides remain a key component of composite systems, holding 39.92% of the market share in 2025. Materials such as chitosan, recognized for its Generally Recognized as Safe status by the Food and Drug Administration, and alginate, valued for its seaweed-derived sustainability, make polysaccharides an attractive base matrix. Proteins, including whey, soy, and zein, accounted for approximately 24.78% of the market volume in 2025. These proteins are increasingly co-formulated with polysaccharides due to their excellent film-forming properties and compatibility with bioactive additives like nisin and natamycin, which enhance structural integrity and microbial protection. Lipids, such as carnauba wax and shellac, continue to play a critical role as outer moisture-barrier components, particularly in tropical fruit exports where reducing transpiration and maintaining gloss are essential for preserving visual appeal and weight during extended shipping periods. Companies like Decco demonstrate how lipid-focused layers are integrated into composite systems tailored to meet regulatory and customer requirements across different regions. The combined strengths of polysaccharides for sustainability, proteins for structural and functional benefits, and lipids for moisture control are driving the increasing adoption of composite ingredient systems in the edible films and coatings market for fruits and vegetables.

Besides, composites are projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.62% during 2026-2031, surpassing the market average of 6.84%. This growth is driven by the ability of composite systems, which combine polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids, to deliver enhanced performance in moisture control, gas-barrier properties, and mechanical strength, capabilities that single-ingredient films often lack. Hydrophobic lipids act as effective water-vapor barriers, while proteins provide oxygen and aroma barriers along with cohesive strength. These features address the high water-vapor transmission rates of standalone polysaccharide layers, making composites particularly suitable for moisture-sensitive products such as leafy greens and thin-skinned berries. Composite coatings can also be customized to match specific respiration rates and surface properties, reducing reliance on plastic overwrap. Furthermore, composites enable the integration of bioactive agents, such as antimicrobials, antioxidants, and nutraceuticals, into distinct layers, allowing controlled release near the produce surface while optimizing the outer layer for handling and appearance. Companies like Sufresca illustrate how multi-component systems can be tailored to various commodities and packaging conditions while maintaining label-friendly formulations.

Complete Report Scope:

  • By Ingredient Type
    • Proteins
    • Polysaccharides
    • Lipids
    • Composites
  • By Application
    • Fruits
      • Citrus
      • Berries
      • Pome Fruits
      • Stone Fruits
    • Vegetables
      • Leafy Greens
      • Nightshades
      • Root and Tuber
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
      • Rest of North America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • Italy
      • France
      • Spain
      • Netherlands
      • Poland
      • Belgium
      • Sweden
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • Australia
      • Indonesia
      • South Korea
      • Thailand
      • Singapore
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Colombia
      • Chile
      • Peru
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East and Africa
      • South Africa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Nigeria
      • Egypt
      • Morocco
      • Turkey
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific accounted for a 35.18% market share in 2025, driven by increasing cold-chain capacity, export-oriented strategies, and supportive policies. Investments such as China’s USD 24.4 billion cold-chain infrastructure and India’s National Centre for Cold Chain Development initiatives aim to address post-harvest loss rates of approximately 13%. Edible coatings are increasingly viewed as complementary to refrigeration, providing a protective micro-barrier around individual fruits and vegetables. For example, Maharashtra’s grape-export clusters have demonstrated a 12% to 15% reduction in spoilage during ocean transport to Europe by combining cold storage with coatings, showcasing the potential for broader adoption in other high-value horticulture regions. However, regulatory requirements in countries like Indonesia and Thailand, which mandate separate approvals for each coating formulation and use case, delay time-to-market. This complexity benefits larger players such as Decco and AgroFresh, which possess in-house regulatory expertise and regional presence, enabling them to navigate multi-country registrations more efficiently than smaller competitors.

South America is projected to grow at a 7.28% compound annual growth rate during 2026 to 2031, the fastest regional growth rate, driven by export-oriented horticulture and increasing sustainability pressures. Brazil’s USD 166.5 billion agricultural export sector plays a pivotal role, with the Ministry of Agriculture promoting alginate coatings for mango and papaya exports to reduce rejection rates at European ports. Chile’s exporters of blueberries, cherries, and table grapes have adopted composite films to extend transit tolerance during long ocean voyages to China and the United States, achieving an additional five to seven days of post-arrival shelf life, which supports premium pricing in distant markets. In countries like Colombia and Peru, where rural cold-chain infrastructure is limited, coatings that extend shelf life without relying solely on refrigeration are strategically valuable. International suppliers and regional innovators are targeting these markets with solutions that balance robustness under variable conditions with regulatory compliance for key export destinations.

North America and Europe, with their mature cold-chain networks, are shaping the market through sustainability mandates, plastic-reduction policies, and clean-label consumer preferences. In the European Union, the Single-Use Plastics Directive is driving demand for cellulose and alginate films and coatings that meet compostability standards and integrate with paper-based packaging systems. Similarly, California’s legislation requiring recyclable or compostable single-use packaging by 2032 has led West Coast berry growers to trial alginate sprays that enable fibre-based or open packaging formats, reducing or eliminating plastic trays while maintaining transport resilience. Meanwhile, the Middle East and Africa remain emerging markets, with adoption concentrated in high-value niches such as South Africa’s citrus industry and the United Arab Emirates’ premium date sector. However, fragmented regulatory frameworks and the lack of harmonized edible-coating standards in countries like Nigeria and Egypt require suppliers to secure country-specific approvals, increasing entry costs and slowing market penetration.


List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  • Apeel Sciences
  • RPM International Inc. (Mantrose-Haeuser)
  • Sufresca
  • Hazel Technologies, Inc.
  • Tate & Lyle PLC
  • Cargill Inc.
  • DSM-Firmenich N.V.
  • Ingredion Incorporated
  • Kerry Group plc
  • Ashland Global
  • PolyNatural
  • Liquidseal BV
  • JBT Corporation
  • Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd
  • Flo Chemical (FloZein)
  • Bio Naturals Solutions
  • Mori Inc.
  • DECCO Post-Harvest
  • Nagase & Co.
  • Tipa Corp Ltd

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Consumer shift toward clean-label and natural preservatives replaces synthetics
4.2.2 Innovations like plant-based coatings extend shelf life
4.2.3 Regulatory push to reduce plastic waste boosts biodegradable alternatives
4.2.4 Need to minimize post-harvest losses in perishable produce
4.2.5 Incorporation of bioactive compounds for added nutrition and safety
4.2.6 Consumer preference for sustainable, environmentally aligned packaging
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High production costs from natural, agricultural raw materials
4.3.2 Poor moisture barrier in polysaccharide films compared to plastics
4.3.3 Variability in performance across fruit/vegetable types
4.3.4 Reliance on seasonal inputs causing supply disruptions
4.4 Supply Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Porter’s Five Forces
4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Ingredient Type
5.1.1 Proteins
5.1.2 Polysaccharides
5.1.3 Lipids
5.1.4 Composites
5.2 By Application
5.2.1 Fruits
5.2.1.1 Citrus
5.2.1.2 Berries
5.2.1.3 Pome Fruits
5.2.1.4 Stone Fruits
5.2.2 Vegetables
5.2.2.1 Leafy Greens
5.2.2.2 Nightshades
5.2.2.3 Root and Tuber
5.3 By Geography
5.3.1 North America
5.3.1.1 United States
5.3.1.2 Canada
5.3.1.3 Mexico
5.3.1.4 Rest of North America
5.3.2 Europe
5.3.2.1 Germany
5.3.2.2 United Kingdom
5.3.2.3 Italy
5.3.2.4 France
5.3.2.5 Spain
5.3.2.6 Netherlands
5.3.2.7 Poland
5.3.2.8 Belgium
5.3.2.9 Sweden
5.3.2.10 Rest of Europe
5.3.3 Asia-Pacific
5.3.3.1 China
5.3.3.2 India
5.3.3.3 Japan
5.3.3.4 Australia
5.3.3.5 Indonesia
5.3.3.6 South Korea
5.3.3.7 Thailand
5.3.3.8 Singapore
5.3.3.9 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.3.4 South America
5.3.4.1 Brazil
5.3.4.2 Argentina
5.3.4.3 Colombia
5.3.4.4 Chile
5.3.4.5 Peru
5.3.4.6 Rest of South America
5.3.5 Middle East and Africa
5.3.5.1 South Africa
5.3.5.2 Saudi Arabia
5.3.5.3 United Arab Emirates
5.3.5.4 Nigeria
5.3.5.5 Egypt
5.3.5.6 Morocco
5.3.5.7 Turkey
5.3.5.8 Rest of Middle East and Africa
6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Positioning Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Apeel Sciences
6.4.2 RPM International Inc. (Mantrose-Haeuser)
6.4.3 Sufresca
6.4.4 Hazel Technologies, Inc.
6.4.5 Tate & Lyle PLC
6.4.6 Cargill Inc.
6.4.7 DSM-Firmenich N.V.
6.4.8 Ingredion Incorporated
6.4.9 Kerry Group plc
6.4.10 Ashland Global
6.4.11 PolyNatural
6.4.12 Liquidseal BV
6.4.13 JBT Corporation
6.4.14 Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd
6.4.15 Flo Chemical (FloZein)
6.4.16 Bio Naturals Solutions
6.4.17 Mori Inc.
6.4.18 DECCO Post-Harvest
6.4.19 Nagase & Co.
6.4.20 Tipa Corp Ltd
7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Apeel Sciences
  • RPM International Inc. (Mantrose-Haeuser)
  • Sufresca
  • Hazel Technologies, Inc.
  • Tate & Lyle PLC
  • Cargill Inc.
  • DSM-Firmenich N.V.
  • Ingredion Incorporated
  • Kerry Group plc
  • Ashland Global
  • PolyNatural
  • Liquidseal BV
  • JBT Corporation
  • Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd
  • Flo Chemical (FloZein)
  • Bio Naturals Solutions
  • Mori Inc.
  • DECCO Post-Harvest
  • Nagase & Co.
  • Tipa Corp Ltd