+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Livestock Monitoring Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 185 Pages
  • November 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5454945
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The livestock monitoring market is undergoing rapid transformation as digital technologies elevate animal health and farm operations. Senior leaders seeking resilient, sustainable agricultural strategies increasingly turn to data-driven solutions for competitiveness and compliance.

Market Snapshot: Livestock Monitoring Market Size and Growth

The Livestock Monitoring Market grew from USD 1.83 billion in 2024 to USD 1.96 billion in 2025. It is projected to reach USD 3.27 billion by 2032, advancing at a CAGR of 7.48%.

The market demonstrates sustained momentum, reinforced by the demand for real-time animal health insights, increasing global protein requirements, and the implementation of advanced sustainability initiatives. Growth is further accelerated by digital transformation across both large-scale commercial operations and smallholder farms.

Scope & Segmentation

This report examines the livestock monitoring ecosystem with a focus on both the diversity of offerings and user profiles. The study delivers coverage across key operational factors, highlighting the core areas driving adoption and innovation:

  • Offering: Hardware such as non-wearable systems and wearable devices, a range of services including analytics, consulting, installation, maintenance, upgrades, and monitoring-as-a-service, plus software for visualization, alerts, and machine learning-driven insights.
  • Livestock Types: Cattle (beef and dairy), equine, poultry, sheep and goats, and swine, each presenting unique requirements and challenges in health tracking and management.
  • Applications: Behavior and activity tracking, health and stress monitoring, environmental data collection, feeding and nutrition management, location tracking, milking optimization, and reproductive management.
  • End Users: Agribusinesses, animal welfare agencies, dairy cooperatives, individual farmers, government bodies, research institutions, and veterinarians, each leveraging monitoring data for operational or regulatory goals.
  • Farm Sizes: Large commercial entities with advanced infrastructure, and small to medium-sized operations requiring adaptive, cost-efficient technologies.
  • Regions: Americas (with extensive adoption and private investment), Europe, Middle East and Africa (ranging from highly regulated to cost-driven environments), and Asia-Pacific (characterized by government programs and modernization across a spectrum of farm sizes).

Key Takeaways: Insights for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Precision livestock monitoring is shifting from manual observation to integrated platforms using IoT, sensor networks, and artificial intelligence to enhance herd health and productivity.
  • Regulatory trends and rising consumer expectations around traceability and animal welfare are shaping investment priorities and operational models for agribusinesses and producers.
  • Technology providers are fostering partnerships across academia, startups, and government agencies, creating new pathways for innovation and solution deployment.
  • The adoption of hybrid cloud and edge computing architectures is broadening accessibility, particularly across remote and connectivity-challenged geographies.
  • Segment-specific solutions, including scalable wearable devices for smaller farms and comprehensive analytics for corporate operations, are catalyzing broader market inclusion.
  • Regional characteristics—such as infrastructure maturity, public funding, and policy initiatives—directly inform go-to-market strategies for technology vendors and service providers.

Tariff Impact: Shaping Supply Chains and Cost Structures

The implementation of US tariff policies in 2025 has introduced new layers of complexity for global supply chains and sourcing strategies within the livestock monitoring sector. As import duties on components increase, manufacturers and service providers have rebalanced their operational footprints—seeking local partnerships to manage procurement costs and foster regional fulfillment capacity. Organizations emphasize total cost of ownership and strengthen negotiations with alternative logistics networks to adapt to evolving regulatory environments, directly impacting investment decisions and service delivery.

Livestock Monitoring Market: Methodology & Data Sources

The research employs an integrated framework that combines analysis of secondary data, direct interviews across multiple regions, and quantitative validation. Data triangulation reinforces accuracy, while scenario testing and expert panel reviews ensure that recommendations are robust and reflect the realities of rapidly changing market dynamics.

Why This Report Matters

  • Enables informed investment and technology integration decisions by providing clarity on emerging market segments and changing regulatory requirements.
  • Supports strategic planning through in-depth analysis of regional adoption trends and the evolving roles of suppliers, service providers, and regulatory stakeholders.
  • Delivers actionable insights for optimizing operational efficiency, meeting sustainability objectives, and strengthening value chain collaboration.

Conclusion

Innovation in livestock monitoring continues to shape the future of agriculture through data-driven decision-making and cross-sector collaboration. Senior leaders who prioritize integrated platforms, stakeholder training, and adaptive strategies will be well positioned to achieve operational excellence and sustainable growth in a dynamic global landscape.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Integration of AI-powered wearable sensors for real-time livestock health diagnostics
5.2. Adoption of IoT-enabled remote monitoring systems to optimize pasture grazing strategies
5.3. Deployment of drone-based thermal imaging for early detection of livestock diseases
5.4. Implementation of blockchain traceability solutions to enhance farm-to-fork transparency
5.5. Utilization of big data analytics for predictive modeling of cattle behavior and welfare
5.6. Development of low-power edge computing devices for continuous livestock monitoring in remote areas
5.7. Integration of genomics and sensor data to enable precision breeding and disease resistance tracking
5.8. Adoption of wearable biosensors for continuous monitoring of livestock metabolic and reproductive health
5.9. Use of automated weight and activity tracking to improve feed efficiency and reduce waste in feedlots
5.10. Emergence of cloud-based livestock health management platforms supporting multi-farm data integration and analytics
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Livestock Monitoring Market, by Offering
8.1. Hardware
8.1.1. Non-Wearable Systems
8.1.2. Wearable Devices
8.2. Services
8.2.1. Data Analytics & Consulting
8.2.2. Installation & Setup
8.2.3. Maintenance & Upgrades
8.2.4. Monitoring-as-a-Service
8.3. Software
9. Livestock Monitoring Market, by Livestock Type
9.1. Cattle
9.1.1. Beef Cattle
9.1.2. Dairy Cattle
9.2. Equine
9.3. Poultry
9.4. Sheep & Goats
9.5. Swine
10. Livestock Monitoring Market, by Application
10.1. Behavior & Activity Tracking
10.2. Environmental Condition Monitoring
10.3. Feeding & Nutrition Management
10.4. Health Monitoring
10.5. Location & Movement Monitoring
10.6. Milking Process Optimization
10.7. Reproductive / Fertility Tracking
10.8. Welfare & Stress Detection
11. Livestock Monitoring Market, by End-User
11.1. Agribusiness Corporations
11.2. Animal Welfare Agencies
11.3. Dairy Cooperatives
11.4. Farmers / Producers
11.5. Governments / Policy Authorities
11.6. Research Institutions
11.7. Veterinarians
12. Livestock Monitoring Market, by Farm Size
12.1. Large Commercial Farms
12.2. Small & Medium-Sized Farms
13. Livestock Monitoring Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Livestock Monitoring Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Livestock Monitoring Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Accent Advanced Systems, SLU
16.3.2. Afimilk Ltd.
16.3.3. Cisco Systems Inc.
16.3.4. Dairymaster
16.3.5. DeLaval
16.3.6. Fancom BV by CTB, Inc.
16.3.7. Fullwood Ltd.
16.3.8. Gallagher Group Limited
16.3.9. GEA Group AG
16.3.10. HID Global Corporation by Assa Abloy
16.3.11. Hokofarm Group
16.3.12. Lely International N.V.
16.3.13. Merck Animal Health
16.3.14. Microsoft Corporation
16.3.15. Nedap N.V.
16.3.16. Peacock Technology Ltd
16.3.17. Sum-It Computer Systems Ltd.
16.3.18. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
16.3.19. Telit Corporate Group
16.3.20. Zoetis Inc.
16.3.21. MooCall
16.3.22. BouMatic

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Livestock Monitoring market report include:
  • Accent Advanced Systems, SLU
  • Afimilk Ltd.
  • Cisco Systems Inc.
  • Dairymaster
  • DeLaval
  • Fancom BV by CTB, Inc.
  • Fullwood Ltd.
  • Gallagher Group Limited
  • GEA Group AG
  • HID Global Corporation by Assa Abloy
  • Hokofarm Group
  • Lely International N.V.
  • Merck Animal Health
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Nedap N.V.
  • Peacock Technology Ltd
  • Sum-It Computer Systems Ltd.
  • Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
  • Telit Corporate Group
  • Zoetis Inc.
  • MooCall
  • BouMatic

Table Information