FEATURED COMPANIES
- Abbott
- Baxter
- GE Healthcare
- Karl Storz
- NuVasive
- Siemens Healthineers
The Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market is estimated to be USD 22.73 Bn in 2021 and is expected to reach USD 37.89 Bn by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 10.76%.
However, factors such as the high costs of the instruments and the risks associated with improper sterilization procedures are likely to restrain the market growth. Moreover, the lack of skilled surgeons is a key challenge to the market.
By Product Type, the market is classified into Energy Devices, Handheld Instruments, Inflation Systems, Access Devices, Suction/Irrigation Systems, Laparoscopes, Cutter Instruments, Guiding Devices, Closure Devices, and Accessories.
By Application, the market is classified as Cardiothoracic Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Gynecological Surgery, Cosmetic/Bariatric Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Urological Surgery, and Others.
By End User, the market is classified as Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgery Center & Clinics, and Others.
By Geography, North America is projected to lead the market.
2. Abbott has launched a minimally invasive heart valve repair device through its clip delivery system for treating mitral regurgitation in the Indian market.. - 1st December 2020
Market Dynamics
The growing prevalence of surgeries and increasing popularity of minimally invasive surgeries due to the associated benefits such as smaller incisions, less trauma, increased accuracy, and shorter recovery time have led to high demand for minimally invasive surgical instruments, driving the market growth. Besides, the innovations in medical device technologies and new materials enabling changes in instrument construction, such as the use of memory metals to make heat-activated scissors or forceps, are anticipated to create lucrative opportunities for the market.However, factors such as the high costs of the instruments and the risks associated with improper sterilization procedures are likely to restrain the market growth. Moreover, the lack of skilled surgeons is a key challenge to the market.
Market Segmentation
The Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market is segmented further based on Product, Application, End-User, and Geography.By Product Type, the market is classified into Energy Devices, Handheld Instruments, Inflation Systems, Access Devices, Suction/Irrigation Systems, Laparoscopes, Cutter Instruments, Guiding Devices, Closure Devices, and Accessories.
By Application, the market is classified as Cardiothoracic Surgery, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, Gynecological Surgery, Cosmetic/Bariatric Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Urological Surgery, and Others.
By End User, the market is classified as Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgery Center & Clinics, and Others.
By Geography, North America is projected to lead the market.
Recent Developments
1. Siemens Healthineers has launched the Cios Flow1 to provide ease and efficiency in managing imaging workflows for surgical interventions.. - 30th November 20202. Abbott has launched a minimally invasive heart valve repair device through its clip delivery system for treating mitral regurgitation in the Indian market.. - 1st December 2020
Company Profiles
Some of the companies covered in this report are Medtronic, Ethicon, B. Braun, Smith & Nephew, Stryker, Abbott, Conmed, Applied Medical, Hoya, and Zimmer Biomet, etc.Countries Studied
- America (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, United States, Rest of Americas)
- Europe (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Rest of Europe)
- Middle-East and Africa (Egypt, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, Rest of MEA)
- Asia-Pacific (Australia, Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Taiwan, Rest of Asia-Pacific)
Competitive Quadrant
The report includes a Competitive Quadrant, a proprietary tool to analyze and evaluate the position of companies based on their Industry Position score and Market Performance score. The tool uses various factors for categorizing the players into four categories. Some of these factors considered for analysis are financial performance over the last 3 years, growth strategies, innovation score, new product launches, investments, growth in market share, etc.Why buy this report?
- The report offers a comprehensive evaluation of the Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market. The report includes in-depth qualitative analysis, verifiable data from authentic sources, and projections about market size. The projections are calculated using proven research methodologies.
- The report has been compiled through extensive primary and secondary research. The primary research is done through interviews, surveys, and observation of renowned personnel in the industry.
- The report includes an in-depth market analysis using Porter’s 5 forces model and the Ansoff Matrix. In addition, the impact of Covid-19 on the market is also featured in the report.
- The report also includes the regulatory scenario in the industry, which will help you make a well-informed decision. The report discusses major regulatory bodies and major rules and regulations imposed on this sector across various geographies.
- The report also contains the competitive analysis using Positioning Quadrants, the analyst's Proprietary competitive positioning tool.
Report Highlights:
- A complete analysis of the market, including parent industry
- Important market dynamics and trends
- Market segmentation
- Historical, current, and projected size of the market based on value and volume
- Market shares and strategies of key players
- Recommendations to companies for strengthening their foothold in the market
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
FEATURED COMPANIES
- Abbott
- Baxter
- GE Healthcare
- Karl Storz
- NuVasive
- Siemens Healthineers
1 Report Description
1.1 Study Objectives
1.2 Market Definition
1.3 Currency
1.4 Years Considered
1.5 Language
1.6 Key Stakeholders
2 Research Methodology
2.1 Research Process
2.2 Data Collection and Validation
2.2.1 Secondary Research
2.2.2 Primary Research
2.2.3 Models
2.3 Market Size Estimation
2.3.1 Bottom-Up Approach
2.3.2 Top-Down Approach
2.4 Assumptions of the Study
2.5 Limitations of the Study
3 Executive Summary
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Market Size and Segmentation
3.3 Market Outlook
4 Market Influencers
4.1 Drivers
4.1.1 Growing Prevalence of Surgeries
4.1.2 Increasing Popularity and Accuracy of Minimally Invasive Surgeries
4.1.3 Growing Demand for Robot-Assisted Surgeries
4.2 Restraints
4.2.1 High Costs of the Instruments
4.3 Opportunities
4.3.1 Growing Innovations in Medical Device Technologies and Materials
4.3.2 High Demand for Miniature Instruments by Microengineering
4.4 Challenges
4.4.1 Changing Regulatory Landscape and Loosely defined Regulations and Reimbursment Policies
5 Market Analysis
5.1 Regulatory Scenario
5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.3 Impact of COVID-19
5.4 Ansoff Matrix Analysis
6 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, By Product
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Energy Devices
6.3 Handheld Instruments
6.3.1 Graspers
6.3.2 Retractors/Elevators
6.3.3 Dilators
6.3.4 Other Handheld Instruments
6.4 Inflation Systems
6.4.1 Balloons
6.4.2 Balloon Inflation Devices
6.4.3 Other Inflation Systems
6.5 Access Devices
6.6 Suction/Irrigation Systems
6.7 Laparoscopes
6.7.1 Video Laparoscopes
6.7.2 Fiber Laparoscopes
6.8 Cutter Instruments
6.8.1 Trocars
6.8.2 Reposable Scissors
6.8.3 Other Cutter Instruments
6.9 Guiding Devices
6.9.1 Guiding Catheters
6.9.2 Guidewires
6.10 Closure Devices
6.11 Accessories
7 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, By Application
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Cardiothoracic Surgery
7.3 Gastrointestinal Surgery
7.4 Orthopedic Surgery
7.5 Gynecological Surgery
7.6 Cosmetic/Bariatric Surgery
7.7 Urological Surgery
7.8 Others
8 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, By End User
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Hospitals
8.3 Ambulatory Surgery Centers & Clinics
8.4 Others
9 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, By Geography
9.1 Introduction
9.2 America
9.2.1 Argentina
9.2.2 Brazil
9.2.3 Canada
9.2.4 Chile
9.2.5 Colombia
9.2.6 Mexico
9.2.7 Peru
9.2.8 United States
9.2.9 Rest of Americas
9.3 Europe
9.3.1 Austria
9.3.2 Belgium
9.3.3 Denmark
9.3.4 Finland
9.3.5 France
9.3.6 Germany
9.3.7 Italy
9.3.8 Netherlands
9.3.9 Norway
9.3.10 Poland
9.3.11 Russia
9.3.12 Spain
9.3.13 Sweden
9.3.14 Switzerland
9.3.15 United Kingdom
9.3.16 Rest of Europe
9.4 Middle East and Africa
9.4.1 Egypt
9.4.2 Israel
9.4.3 Qatar
9.4.4 Saudi Arabia
9.4.5 South Africa
9.4.6 United Arab Emirates
9.4.7 Rest of MEA
9.5 Asia-Pacific
9.5.1 Australia
9.5.2 Bangladesh
9.5.3 China
9.5.4 India
9.5.5 Indonesia
9.5.6 Japan
9.5.7 Malaysia
9.5.8 Philippines
9.5.9 Singapore
9.5.10 South Korea
9.5.11 Sri Lanka
9.5.12 Thailand
9.5.13 Taiwan
9.5.14 Rest of Asia-Pacific
10 Competitive Landscape
10.1 Competitive Quadrant
10.2 Market Share Analysis
10.3 Strategic Initiatives
10.3.1 M&A and Investments
10.3.2 Partnerships and Collaborations
10.3.3 Product Developments and Improvements
11 Company Profiles
11.1 Medtronic
11.2 Johnson and Johnson
11.3 Smith and Nephew
11.4 Zimmer Biomet
11.5 Abbott
11.6 Stryker
11.7 Boston Scientific
11.8 Applied Medical
11.9 Microline Surgicals
11.10 Richard Wolf
11.11 Olympus
11.12 ConMed
11.13 Karl Storz
11.14 B. Braun
11.15 Intuitive
11.16 Philips Healthcare
11.17 Siemens Healthineers
11.18 GE Healthcare
11.19 DePuy Synthes
11.20 NuVasive
11.21 Novartis
11.22 Hoya
11.23 Becton, Dickinson, and Company
11.24 Baxter
11.25 Terumo
11.26 Allergan
12 Appendix
12.1 Questionnaire
1.1 Study Objectives
1.2 Market Definition
1.3 Currency
1.4 Years Considered
1.5 Language
1.6 Key Stakeholders
2 Research Methodology
2.1 Research Process
2.2 Data Collection and Validation
2.2.1 Secondary Research
2.2.2 Primary Research
2.2.3 Models
2.3 Market Size Estimation
2.3.1 Bottom-Up Approach
2.3.2 Top-Down Approach
2.4 Assumptions of the Study
2.5 Limitations of the Study
3 Executive Summary
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Market Size and Segmentation
3.3 Market Outlook
4 Market Influencers
4.1 Drivers
4.1.1 Growing Prevalence of Surgeries
4.1.2 Increasing Popularity and Accuracy of Minimally Invasive Surgeries
4.1.3 Growing Demand for Robot-Assisted Surgeries
4.2 Restraints
4.2.1 High Costs of the Instruments
4.3 Opportunities
4.3.1 Growing Innovations in Medical Device Technologies and Materials
4.3.2 High Demand for Miniature Instruments by Microengineering
4.4 Challenges
4.4.1 Changing Regulatory Landscape and Loosely defined Regulations and Reimbursment Policies
5 Market Analysis
5.1 Regulatory Scenario
5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.3 Impact of COVID-19
5.4 Ansoff Matrix Analysis
6 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, By Product
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Energy Devices
6.3 Handheld Instruments
6.3.1 Graspers
6.3.2 Retractors/Elevators
6.3.3 Dilators
6.3.4 Other Handheld Instruments
6.4 Inflation Systems
6.4.1 Balloons
6.4.2 Balloon Inflation Devices
6.4.3 Other Inflation Systems
6.5 Access Devices
6.6 Suction/Irrigation Systems
6.7 Laparoscopes
6.7.1 Video Laparoscopes
6.7.2 Fiber Laparoscopes
6.8 Cutter Instruments
6.8.1 Trocars
6.8.2 Reposable Scissors
6.8.3 Other Cutter Instruments
6.9 Guiding Devices
6.9.1 Guiding Catheters
6.9.2 Guidewires
6.10 Closure Devices
6.11 Accessories
7 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, By Application
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Cardiothoracic Surgery
7.3 Gastrointestinal Surgery
7.4 Orthopedic Surgery
7.5 Gynecological Surgery
7.6 Cosmetic/Bariatric Surgery
7.7 Urological Surgery
7.8 Others
8 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, By End User
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Hospitals
8.3 Ambulatory Surgery Centers & Clinics
8.4 Others
9 Global Minimally Invasive Surgical Instruments Market, By Geography
9.1 Introduction
9.2 America
9.2.1 Argentina
9.2.2 Brazil
9.2.3 Canada
9.2.4 Chile
9.2.5 Colombia
9.2.6 Mexico
9.2.7 Peru
9.2.8 United States
9.2.9 Rest of Americas
9.3 Europe
9.3.1 Austria
9.3.2 Belgium
9.3.3 Denmark
9.3.4 Finland
9.3.5 France
9.3.6 Germany
9.3.7 Italy
9.3.8 Netherlands
9.3.9 Norway
9.3.10 Poland
9.3.11 Russia
9.3.12 Spain
9.3.13 Sweden
9.3.14 Switzerland
9.3.15 United Kingdom
9.3.16 Rest of Europe
9.4 Middle East and Africa
9.4.1 Egypt
9.4.2 Israel
9.4.3 Qatar
9.4.4 Saudi Arabia
9.4.5 South Africa
9.4.6 United Arab Emirates
9.4.7 Rest of MEA
9.5 Asia-Pacific
9.5.1 Australia
9.5.2 Bangladesh
9.5.3 China
9.5.4 India
9.5.5 Indonesia
9.5.6 Japan
9.5.7 Malaysia
9.5.8 Philippines
9.5.9 Singapore
9.5.10 South Korea
9.5.11 Sri Lanka
9.5.12 Thailand
9.5.13 Taiwan
9.5.14 Rest of Asia-Pacific
10 Competitive Landscape
10.1 Competitive Quadrant
10.2 Market Share Analysis
10.3 Strategic Initiatives
10.3.1 M&A and Investments
10.3.2 Partnerships and Collaborations
10.3.3 Product Developments and Improvements
11 Company Profiles
11.1 Medtronic
11.2 Johnson and Johnson
11.3 Smith and Nephew
11.4 Zimmer Biomet
11.5 Abbott
11.6 Stryker
11.7 Boston Scientific
11.8 Applied Medical
11.9 Microline Surgicals
11.10 Richard Wolf
11.11 Olympus
11.12 ConMed
11.13 Karl Storz
11.14 B. Braun
11.15 Intuitive
11.16 Philips Healthcare
11.17 Siemens Healthineers
11.18 GE Healthcare
11.19 DePuy Synthes
11.20 NuVasive
11.21 Novartis
11.22 Hoya
11.23 Becton, Dickinson, and Company
11.24 Baxter
11.25 Terumo
11.26 Allergan
12 Appendix
12.1 Questionnaire
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
- Medtronic
- Johnson and Johnson
- Smith and Nephew
- Zimmer Biomet
- Abbott
- Stryker
- Boston Scientific
- Applied Medical
- Microline Surgicals
- Richard Wolf
- Olympus
- ConMed
- Karl Storz
- B. Braun
- Intuitive
- Philips Healthcare
- Siemens Healthineers
- GE Healthcare
- DePuy Synthes
- NuVasive
- Novartis
- Hoya
- Becton, Dickinson, and Company
- Baxter
- Terumo
- Allergan
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
LOADING...
