+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Structural Health Monitoring Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 193 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5146266
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Structural health monitoring solutions are reshaping the approach senior leaders take toward infrastructure risk and asset optimization. As operational landscapes evolve, forward-looking organizations are leveraging continuous monitoring to strengthen reliability and fulfill modern compliance standards.

Market Snapshot: Structural Health Monitoring Market Size and Growth

The structural health monitoring market is experiencing substantial growth, propelled by an increasing commitment to infrastructure safety and reliability across multiple sectors. Estimated at USD 4.72 billion in 2024, the market is projected to reach USD 5.31 billion by 2025 and is expected to accelerate to USD 12.73 billion by 2032. Civil infrastructure, energy, aerospace, marine, and oil and gas are integrating monitoring platforms to improve their ability to detect vulnerabilities and respond to incidents. The rising adoption of real-time systems supports compliance and enhances operational dependability while addressing modernization efforts and adapting to new regulatory requirements. Industry players are capitalizing on these trends, prioritizing data-driven infrastructure management.

Scope & Segmentation: Key Structural Health Monitoring Market Segments

  • Offering: Integrated hardware—including accelerometers, displacement sensors, inclinometers, tiltmeters, and strain gauges—analytics software, and service packages deliver a unified view of asset condition across major industries.
  • Monitoring Approach: Organizations can choose between active and passive monitoring models, tailoring strategies to accommodate asset risk and maintenance needs for greater control over system outcomes.
  • Technology: Scalable wired and wireless solutions provide real-time coverage for new and legacy assets alike, supporting dynamic infrastructure portfolios and diverse environments.
  • Application: Systems are increasingly deployed in bridges, buildings, dams, wind turbines, stadiums, airframes, and process machinery to safeguard structural health and address regulatory demands.
  • End User: Sectors such as aerospace, defense, energy, mining, and asset management implement these solutions to reinforce safety targets, streamline regulatory adherence, and maintain operational excellence.
  • Region: Adoption extends across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific, with the U.S., Canada, Brazil, Europe, China, India, and Japan responding to region-specific conditions and evolving guidelines.
  • Companies: Key providers, including Hottinger Brüel & Kjaer GmbH, James Fisher and Sons PLC, AVT Reliability Ltd., Siemens AG, and Xylem Inc., deliver specialized technologies and partnership models for large-scale deployment.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Integrated sensors and analytics tools give early insights into asset health, allowing leaders to take proactive actions that minimize unexpected downtime.
  • IoT-enabled sensor networks and wireless platforms improve visibility across complex facilities, supporting large-scale monitoring and compliance management.
  • Digital twin technology strengthens asset transparency and helps in scenario-based planning, maximizing asset lifecycle value.
  • Collaboration between manufacturers, service providers, and software specialists fosters effective scalability and eases the upgrade process without disrupting core operations.
  • Modular system architectures support adaptable monitoring frameworks, enabling responses to shifting organizational priorities or investment portfolios.

Tariff Impact: Responding to Shifts in U.S. Trade Policy

Changing U.S. tariff policies are compelling structural health monitoring organizations to fine-tune procurement and reinforce supply chain defenses. Senior decision-makers are adapting by increasing localized assembly, broadening supplier bases, and enhancing engineering workflows to manage dynamic trade conditions and maintain project schedules.

Methodology & Data Sources

This analysis employs comprehensive secondary research, expert review, and a staged methodology. Rigorous data triangulation ensures that insights are current and actionable for structural health monitoring stakeholders.

Why This Report Matters

  • Equips executives to adjust operational strategies in line with regulatory updates and emerging technologies for informed investment planning.
  • Delivers practical approaches for enhancing compliance, streamlining supply chain resilience, and managing risks as the market evolves.
  • Supports organizations in aligning infrastructure operations to sustainability benchmarks and long-term asset value objectives.

Conclusion

Utilizing robust market insights, senior leaders can strengthen infrastructure management, boost operational stability, and develop resilient, future-focused strategies across their asset portfolios.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Growing use of SHM in aging infrastructure to prevent catastrophic failures worldwide
5.2. Government regulations mandating SHM for public safety in bridges and dams globally
5.3. Increasing adoption of wireless sensors for cost-effective and scalable structural monitoring systems
5.4. Integration of AI and machine learning for predictive maintenance in SHM applications
5.5. Rising demand for real-time data analytics to enhance structural safety and efficiency
5.6. Expansion of SHM in wind energy sector for turbine blade health monitoring
5.7. Development of smart cities driving SHM adoption in high-rise buildings and stadiums
5.8. Increased investment in R&D for advanced sensors and data acquisition technologies
5.9. IoT-enabled SHM systems gaining traction for remote and continuous infrastructure monitoring
5.10. Cloud-based SHM platforms revolutionizing data storage, visualization, and remote diagnostics
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Offering
8.1. Hardware
8.1.1. Accelerometers
8.1.2. Displacement Sensors
8.1.3. Inclinometers & Tiltmeters
8.1.4. Sensors
8.1.5. Strain Gauges
8.2. Services
8.2.1. Post-Installation
8.2.2. Pre-Installation
8.3. Software
8.3.1. Data Management Software
8.3.2. Predictive Maintenance Software
9. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Monitoring Approach
9.1. Active Monitoring
9.2. Passive Monitoring
10. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Technology
10.1. Wired
10.2. Wireless
11. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Application
11.1. Airframes & Wind Turbines
11.2. Bridges & Dams
11.3. Buildings & Stadiums
11.4. Large Machines & Equipment
12. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by End User
12.1. Aerospace & Defence
12.2. Energy
12.3. Infrastructure
12.4. Mining
13. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Structural Health Monitoring Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Hottinger Brüel & Kjaer GmbH
16.3.2. James Fisher and Sons PLC
16.3.3. Acellent Technologies Inc.
16.3.4. AVT Reliability Ltd.
16.3.5. Beanair GmbH
16.3.6. Bridge Diagnostics
16.3.7. Campbell Scientific, Inc.
16.3.8. COWI A/S
16.3.9. ElastiSense
16.3.10. FEAC Engineering P.C.
16.3.11. First Sensor AG by TE Connectivity Ltd.
16.3.12. Geocomp, Inc.
16.3.13. Geokon
16.3.14. Infibra Technologies Srl
16.3.15. KDM Engineers [India] Pvt. Ltd.
16.3.16. Kinemetrics, Inc.
16.3.17. National Instruments by Emerson Electric Co
16.3.18. Nova Ventures Group Corp.
16.3.19. Rst Instruments Ltd.
16.3.20. Sensuron LLC
16.3.21. Setpoint Technologies Ltd.
16.3.22. SGS S.A.
16.3.23. SHM Canada Consulting Limited
16.3.24. Siemens AG
16.3.25. Sisgeo Srl
16.3.26. SITES AFLA (Pty) Ltd.
16.3.27. Sixense Group
16.3.28. Sodis Lab
16.3.29. Somni Solutions
16.3.30. Xylem Inc.

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Structural Health Monitoring market report include:
  • Hottinger Brüel & Kjaer GmbH
  • James Fisher and Sons PLC
  • Acellent Technologies Inc.
  • AVT Reliability Ltd.
  • Beanair GmbH
  • Bridge Diagnostics
  • Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • COWI A/S
  • ElastiSense
  • FEAC Engineering P.C.
  • First Sensor AG by TE Connectivity Ltd.
  • Geocomp, Inc.
  • Geokon
  • Infibra Technologies Srl
  • KDM Engineers [India] Pvt. Ltd.
  • Kinemetrics, Inc.
  • National Instruments by Emerson Electric Co
  • Nova Ventures Group Corp.
  • Rst Instruments Ltd.
  • Sensuron LLC
  • Setpoint Technologies Ltd.
  • SGS S.A.
  • SHM Canada Consulting Limited
  • Siemens AG
  • Sisgeo Srl
  • SITES AFLA (Pty) Ltd.
  • Sixense Group
  • Sodis Lab
  • Somni Solutions
  • Xylem Inc.

Table Information