+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

2022 United States PFAS Analytical Instrumentation Market

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 49 Pages
  • July 2022
  • Region: United States
  • Verify Markets
  • ID: 5645007

Measuring PFAS Contamination Pivotal to Health and Water Treatment

This analysis shows the United States PFAS (per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances) Analytical Instrumentation Market was valued at over $75 million USD in 2021 and expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 20% from 2021 to 2028, reaching revenues over $350 million USD by 2028. A comprehensive analysis of the PFAS analytical instrumentation market for the United States including market sizing, market share by competitor, drivers, restraints and market forecasts to 2028. 

The United States PFAS Analytical Instrumentation Market is dominated by a few companies, which hold a significant market share with key competitors having an advantage with brand recognition. However, it is unlikely for a dominant player to emerge by capturing the majority of market share in the future as new players are likely to influx the market with intensifying competition.

There has been a growing concern among companies that manufacture products that utilize PFAS in some aspect of the manufacturing process, or end product, about being subjected to PFAS product liability lawsuits. An increased understanding of the potential health impact of unknown PFAS compounds is likely to put pressure on more industries to start testing and limiting PFAS in their products in the future. The long-term market growth is likely to be sustained by industries, academia, and regulatory bodies.

The key factors influencing sales of PFAS analytical instruments are ease of use, data reproducibility and reliability, low cost of ownership and prompt after sales customer service. Companies are increasingly integrating service offerings and consumables to help customers improve productivity and operational efficiency.

This study aims to provide a detailed analysis on the U.S. PFAS Analytical Instrumentation Market along with qualitative trends for the year 2021.

The market numbers included in this report represent revenues generated by companies operating in the PFAS analytical instrumentation market in the United States. The base year for the study is 2021 and the forecast period is from 2021 until 2028.

This report captures the following information:

  • Market Size, Growth Rate, Revenue Forecasts (2021-2028)
  • Growth Drivers & Restraints
  • Market Data
  • Market Share Analysis
  • By Technology
  • By Market Participants
  • By End Users
  • By Distribution
  • Market Trends
  • Quotes by Key Industry Participants

End-User Segments include:

  • Commercial Testing Laboratories
  • Wastewater Treatment Plants
  • Drinking Water Treatment Plants
  • Regulatory Bodies & Federal Agencies
  • Academic R&D
  • Industrial Facilities

Perfluoroalky and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS):

PFAS are a group of man-made fluorinated organic chemicals. They are identified by signature elemental bonds of fluorine and carbon, which are extremely strong, and makes it difficult for these chemicals to disintegrate in the environment. Certain PFAS are sometimes referred to as “forever chemicals” because they bioaccumulate and are long lasting in the environment. There are thousands of PFAS chemicals.

For the PFAS analytical instrumentation market, the analyst has segmented the market by two measuring techniques: Liquid Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC). At the moment, EPA has only approved PFAS measurement by LC-MS/MS technique. PFAS analysis by CIC technique is at the drafting stage and EPA is currently reviewing the results of the multi-laboratory validation study to finalize the method and add formal performance criteria.

Table of Contents


I. Research Scope, Methodology, Definition.II. Segmentation by end users (commercial testing laboratories, wastewater treatment, drinking water treatment, regulatory & federal bodies, academic, industrial facilities)
III. Executive Summary
a. Major data points
b. Competitive factors

IV. Market DriversV Market Restraints
VI. Market trends
a. Competitive landscape.
b. Product trends
c. Technology trends
d. Trends by end users
e. Distribution trends.
f. After sales service

VII. Market Data.
a. Revenue forecast, total market.
b. Segmentation by technology (Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry vs. Combustion ion chromatography)
c. Market share by technology - Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
d. Market share by technology - Combustion ion chromatography
e. Market share by end users (Commercial testing laboratories, wastewater treatment, drinking water treatment, regulatory & federal bodies, academic, industrial facilities)
f. Market share by distribution

Samples

Loading
LOADING...

Executive Summary

Currently, the market is dominated by a few companies that hold a significant market share. Key competitors have an advantage with brand recognition. However, it is unlikely for a dominant player to emerge by capturing the majority of market share in the future as new players are likely to flood the market with intensifying competition.

The main drivers for PFAS analytical instrumentation demand is increased awareness about the widespread prevalence of PFAS contamination, approval of PFAS Action Act of 2021 by the U.S. House of Representatives and the $10.0 billion funding allotted to address PFAS contamination through President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The PFAS Action act is likely to significantly fast-track the process for categorizing certain PFAS compounds as unsafe and allow the EPA significant discretion over future PFAS regulation.

“States are increasingly taking action and developing limits. Once PFAS is discovered and determined to be in concentrations that can likely be harmful to human health, each individual state will likely implement more stringent limits. This will have a larger economic effect and higher market revenue,” notes Shilpa Tiku, Chief Research Officer. “With increasing awareness and public outrage regarding PFAS, PFAS manufacturers will likely continue to be sued. In addition to utilities, there are several manufacturers and companies that are responsible for contamination that are worried about being fined from a litigation perspective.”

The initial market growth spike is likely to be driven by commercial testing laboratories, utilities, and regulatory bodies. In 2021, commercial testing laboratories have emerged as the largest end user segment of PFAS analytical instruments, followed by wastewater treatment utilities. There has been a growing concern among companies that manufacture products that utilize PFAS in some aspect of the manufacturing process, or end product, about being subjected to PFAS product liability lawsuits. An increased understanding of the potential health impact of unknown PFAS compounds is likely to put pressure on more industries to start testing and limiting PFAS in their products in the future.  The long-term market growth is likely to be sustained by industries, academia, and regulatory bodies.

The key factors influencing sales of PFAS analytical instruments are ease of use, data reproducibility and reliability, low cost of ownership, and prompt after sales customer service. Companies are increasingly integrating service offerings and consumables to help customers improve productivity and operational efficiency.

The demand for LC-MS/MS instruments from manufacturers of products containing PFAS is likely to increase in the future. The manufacturers need to understand PFAS contributing products and detectable contamination guidelines. Companies must have an opportunity to assess and correct the situation before facing significant fines and litigation. Most of the PFAS regulation in the United States is likely to be focused on limiting total PFAS where measurement of overall PFAS through a combustion IC (ion chromatography), or CIC, the technique will be useful in understanding what level of treatment is needed based on the level of contamination.

The complexity of the instrumentation and shortage of experienced professionals for PFAS analysis is likely to be barriers in the widespread adoption of PFAS analytical instrumentation. There is limited or no toxicity data available for most PFAS currently being used in commerce, and it is challenging for the EPA to research and understand the risks these substances may pose to human health and the environment in the short-term.

The United States PFAS Analytical Instrumentation Market report has been segmented by technology, end-user, and distribution channel. The report captures various market dynamics such as growth drivers, restraints, market revenues and forecast, market trends, and the competitive landscape.

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Agilent Technologies, Inc.
  • Metrohm AG
  • Perkin Elmer
  • Shimadzu Corporation
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Methodology

Loading
LOADING...

Table Information