+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 193 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6081813
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market is rapidly redefining advanced therapy manufacturing with integrated solutions that help organizations improve scalability, compliance, and operational consistency. As automation aligns with closed-system architecture, decision-makers gain important options to drive efficiencies and future-proof production.

Market Snapshot: Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market

The global Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market expanded from USD 1.08 billion in 2024 to USD 1.26 billion in 2025. With a projected CAGR of 16.25%, the market is poised to reach USD 3.63 billion by 2032, reflecting strong demand across biopharmaceuticals and clinical manufacturing.

Robust investment, emerging regulatory frameworks, and process innovations are collectively supporting system adoption in both clinical and commercial-scale environments.

Scope & Segmentation

This report delivers a detailed segmentation of the Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, providing senior leaders with transparency into the critical product, processing, and regional variables:

  • Product Type: Automated Systems; Closed Systems
  • Application: Allogeneic therapies including Hematopoietic Stem Cell, Mesenchymal Stem Cell, Natural Killer Cell; Autologous therapies including CAR T Cell, Hematopoietic Stem Cell, Mesenchymal Stem Cell
  • Technology: Centrifugation (Density Gradient, Fixed Angle, Swing Bucket); Filtration (Microfiltration, Ultrafiltration); Magnetic Separation (Immunomagnetic Bead, Paramagnetic Separation)
  • End User: Contract Research Organizations; Hospitals & Clinics; Pharmaceutical & Biotech Companies; Research Institutes
  • Process Type: Cell Counting & Analysis (Automated, Manual); Cell Preparation (Formulation, Thawing); Cell Separation (Centrifugation, Filtration, Magnetic); Cell Storage (Long Term, Short Term); Cell Washing (Automated, Manual)
  • Regional Coverage: Americas (North America—United States, Canada, Mexico; Latin America—Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru), Europe, Middle East & Africa (Europe—United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Poland, Switzerland; Middle East—United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Israel; Africa—South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, Kenya), Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan)
  • Companies Analyzed: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Miltenyi Biotec GmbH, Terumo BCT Inc., Lonza Group AG, Cytiva Inc. (a Danaher business), Sartorius AG, Becton Dickinson and Company, Bio-Techne Corporation, STEMCELL Technologies Inc., Merck KGaA

Key Takeaways: Insights for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Automated and closed processing platforms are central to standardizing manufacturing and reducing contamination risks in cell therapy production.
  • System selection increasingly hinges on platform compatibility with diverse cell types and integration flexibility across different operational environments.
  • Technological advances such as robotics, integrated analytics, and modularity are supporting higher throughput and more reliable quality outcomes.
  • Operational focus is shifting toward end-to-end documentation and digital batch record generation to comply with dynamic regulatory requirements.
  • Region-specific investment and policy environments are shaping deployment strategies, with tailored solutions gaining traction in growth markets.
  • Strategic partnerships and supply chain resilience are becoming decisive factors for manufacturers aiming to accelerate product roll-outs and maintain cost controls.

Tariff Impact: Navigating 2025 U.S. Trade Policy Shifts

The 2025 U.S. tariff regime introduces increased costs for imported bioprocessing equipment, consumables, and reagents. Original equipment manufacturers may shift sourcing toward domestic or near-shored suppliers to mitigate impacts on the total cost of ownership. These changes could lengthen sales cycles and prompt negotiation of cost-sharing agreements or the redesign of platforms to ensure continued competitiveness. Global supply chains will need to diversify, and tariff-friendly product variants may become crucial to safeguarding uninterrupted therapy delivery.

Methodology & Data Sources

The report’s research framework blends primary interviews with senior industry stakeholders and secondary analysis of peer-reviewed publications, regulatory filings, and vendor disclosures. Triangulation of data sources ensures validation and accuracy for both quantitative and qualitative findings, delivering a robust and actionable market assessment.

Why This Report Matters

  • Enables executives to align investment and procurement strategy with the latest segmentation insights and emerging regulatory landscapes.
  • Supports technology leaders in benchmarking operational models and identifying innovation opportunities based on evolving process requirements.
  • Equips stakeholders with actionable intelligence to adapt supply chains and product offerings amid shifting global trade policies.

Conclusion

Automated and closed cell therapy processing systems are transforming advanced therapy manufacturing through standardization, process optimization, and compliance. Leaders leveraging these solutions are poised to achieve operational excellence and sustainable market advantage in an evolving global landscape.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Integration of real time process analytical technologies for enhanced closed cell therapy manufacturing efficiency
5.2. Adoption of modular automated cell processing platforms to accelerate personalized therapy development timelines
5.3. Implementation of AI driven process control systems for optimizing autologous cell therapy production yields
5.4. Development of closed automated workflows to minimize contamination risks in CAR T cell manufacturing
5.5. Emergence of scalable all in one bioreactor solutions for high throughput cell therapy processing
5.6. Collaboration between equipment vendors and biopharma companies to standardize automation interfaces and protocols
5.7. Regulatory harmonization efforts driving design of compliant automated cell processing systems across global regions
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, by Product Type
8.1. Automated Systems
8.2. Closed Systems
9. Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, by Application
9.1. Allogeneic
9.1.1. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Therapy
9.1.2. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy
9.1.3. Natural Killer Cell Therapy
9.2. Autologous
9.2.1. Car T Cell Therapy
9.2.2. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Therapy
9.2.3. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy
10. Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, by Technology
10.1. Centrifugation
10.1.1. Density Gradient Centrifugation
10.1.2. Fixed Angle Centrifugation
10.1.3. Swing Bucket Centrifugation
10.2. Filtration
10.2.1. Microfiltration
10.2.2. Ultrafiltration
10.3. Magnetic Separation
10.3.1. Immunomagnetic Bead Separation
10.3.2. Paramagnetic Separation
11. Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, by End User
11.1. Contract Research Organizations
11.2. Hospitals & Clinics
11.3. Pharmaceutical & Biotech Companies
11.4. Research Institutes
12. Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, by Process Type
12.1. Cell Counting & Analysis
12.1.1. Automated Counting
12.1.2. Manual Counting
12.2. Cell Preparation
12.2.1. Formulation
12.2.2. Thawing
12.3. Cell Separation
12.3.1. Centrifugation Separation
12.3.2. Filtration Separation
12.3.3. Magnetic Separation
12.4. Cell Storage
12.4.1. Long Term Storage
12.4.2. Short Term Storage
12.5. Cell Washing
12.5.1. Automated Washing
12.5.2. Manual Washing
13. Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
16.3.2. Miltenyi Biotec GmbH
16.3.3. Terumo BCT, Inc.
16.3.4. Lonza Group AG
16.3.5. Cytiva Inc. (a Danaher business)
16.3.6. Sartorius AG
16.3.7. Becton Dickinson and Company
16.3.8. Bio-Techne Corporation
16.3.9. STEMCELL Technologies Inc.
16.3.10. Merck KGaA

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Automated & Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems market report include:
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
  • Miltenyi Biotec GmbH
  • Terumo BCT, Inc.
  • Lonza Group AG
  • Cytiva Inc. (a Danaher business)
  • Sartorius AG
  • Becton Dickinson and Company
  • Bio-Techne Corporation
  • STEMCELL Technologies Inc.
  • Merck KGaA

Table Information