+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Global Terminal Tractor Market (2023-2028) Competitive Analysis, Impact of Covid-19, Ansoff Analysis

  • PDF Icon


  • 189 Pages
  • February 2024
  • Infogence Global Research
  • ID: 5669355

The demand for electric and automated terminal tractors would create growth opportunities for the terminal tractor market

The Global Terminal Tractor Market is estimated to be USD 733.31 Mn in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 963.87 Mn by 2028 growing at a CAGR of 5.62%.

Market Dynamics

Market dynamics are forces that impact the prices and behaviors of the stakeholders. These forces create pricing signals which result from the changes in the supply and demand curves for a given product or service. Forces of Market Dynamics may be related to macro-economic and micro-economic factors. There are dynamic market forces other than price, demand, and supply. Human emotions can also drive decisions, influence the market, and create price signals.

As the market dynamics impact the supply and demand curves, decision-makers aim to determine the best way to use various financial tools to stem various strategies for speeding the growth and reducing the risks.

Market Segmentations

  • The Global Terminal Tractor Market is segmented based on Type, Axle, Tonnage, Propulsion Type, Applications, Industry, and Geography.
  • By Type, the market is classified into Automated and Manual.
  • By Axle, the market is classified into 4x2, 4x4, and 6X4.
  • By Tonnage, the market is classified into 50-100 Ton, < 50 Ton, and >100 Ton.
  • By Propulsion Type, the market is classified into CNG, Diesel, Electric, and Hybrid.
  • By Applications, the market is classified into Airport, Logistics, Marine Port, and Oil & Gas.
  • By Industry, the market is classified into Food & Beverages, Inland Waterways & Marine Service, Rail Logistics, and Retail Industry.
  • By Geography, the market is classified into Americas, Europe, Middle-East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific.

Company Profiles

The report provides a detailed analysis of the competitors in the market. It covers the financial performance analysis for the publicly listed companies in the market. The report also offers detailed information on the companies' recent development and competitive scenario. Some of the companies covered in this report are Autocar, LLC, Battle Motors, Inc., Hoist Material Handling, Inc., Hyster-Yale Group Inc., MOL Cy, Orange EV, LLV, Terberg Group, TICO Tractors, Transporter Industry International Gmbh, Volvo Group, etc.

Countries Studied

  • America (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, United States, Rest of Americas)
  • Europe (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Rest of Europe)
  • Middle-East and Africa (Egypt, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, Rest of MEA)
  • Asia-Pacific (Australia, Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Taiwan, Rest of Asia-Pacific)

Competitive Quadrant

The report includes Competitive Quadrant, a proprietary tool to analyze and evaluate the position of companies based on their Industry Position score and Market Performance score. The tool uses various factors for categorizing the players into four categories. Some of these factors considered for analysis are financial performance over the last 3 years, growth strategies, innovation score, new product launches, investments, growth in market share, etc.

Ansoff Analysis

  • The report presents a detailed Ansoff matrix analysis for the Global Terminal Tractor Market. Ansoff Matrix, also known as Product/Market Expansion Grid, is a strategic tool used to design strategies for the growth of the company. The matrix can be used to evaluate approaches in four strategies viz. Market Development, Market Penetration, Product Development and Diversification. The matrix is also used for risk analysis to understand the risk involved with each approach.
  • The publisher analyses the Global Terminal Tractor Market using the Ansoff Matrix to provide the best approaches a company can take to improve its market position.
  • Based on the SWOT analysis conducted on the industry and industry players, the publisher has devised suitable strategies for market growth.

Why buy this report?

  • The report offers a comprehensive evaluation of the Global Terminal Tractor Market. The report includes in-depth qualitative analysis, verifiable data from authentic sources, and projections about market size. The projections are calculated using proven research methodologies.
  • The report has been compiled through extensive primary and secondary research. The primary research is done through interviews, surveys, and observation of renowned personnel in the industry.
  • The report includes an in-depth market analysis using Porter's 5 forces model and the Ansoff Matrix. In addition, the impact of Covid-19 on the market is also featured in the report.
  • The report also includes the regulatory scenario in the industry, which will help you make a well-informed decision. The report discusses major regulatory bodies and major rules and regulations imposed on this sector across various geographies.
  • The report also contains the competitive analysis using Positioning Quadrants, the Proprietary competitive positioning tool.

Report Highlights:

  • A complete analysis of the market, including parent industry
  • Important market dynamics and trends
  • Market segmentation
  • Historical, current, and projected size of the market based on value and volume
  • Market shares and strategies of key players
  • Recommendations to companies for strengthening their foothold in the market

Table of Contents

1 Report Description
1.1 Study Objectives
1.2 Market Definition
1.3 Currency
1.4 Years Considered
1.5 Language
1.6 Key Stakeholders
2 Research Methodology
2.1 Research Process
2.2 Data Collection and Validation
2.2.1 Secondary Research
2.2.2 Primary Research
2.2.3 Models
2.3 Market Size Estimation
2.3.1 Bottom-Up Approach
2.3.2 Top-Down Approach
2.4 Assumptions of the Study
2.5 Limitations of the Study
3 Executive Summary
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Market Size, Segmentations, and Outlook
4 Market Dynamics
4.1 Drivers
4.1.1 Rising Seaborne Trade Across the Globe
4.1.2 Growing Demand for Container Handling
4.1.3 Growing Demand From E-Commerce and Logistics Industries
4.2 Restraints
4.2.1 Large Capital Cost of Terminal Tractors and other Port Equipment
4.3 Opportunities
4.3.1 Growth Opportunities for Technology Suppliers with Rising Automation Level of Terminal Tractor
4.4 Challenges
4.4.1 Lack of Synchronization with other Port Equipment
5 Market Analysis
5.1 Regulatory Scenario
5.2 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
5.3 Impact of COVID-19
5.4 Ansoff Matrix Analysis
5.5 PESTLE Analysis
6 Global Terminal Tractor Market, By Type
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Automated
6.3 Manual
7 Global Terminal Tractor Market, By Axle
7.1 Introduction
7.2 4x2
7.3 4x4
7.4 6X4
8 Global Terminal Tractor Market, By Tonnage
8.1 Introduction
8.2 50-100 Ton
8.3 < 50 Ton
8.4 >100 Ton
9 Global Terminal Tractor Market, By Propulsion Type
9.1 Introduction
9.2 CNG
9.3 Diesel
9.4 Electric
9.5 Hybrid
10 Global Terminal Tractor Market, By Applications
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Airport
10.3 Logistics
10.4 Marine Port
10.5 Oil & Gas
11 Global Terminal Tractor Market, By Industry
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Food & Beverages
11.3 Inland Waterways & Marine Service
11.4 Rail Logistics
11.5 Retail Industry
12 Americas’ Terminal Tractor Market
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Argentina
12.3 Brazil
12.4 Canada
12.5 Chile
12.6 Colombia
12.7 Mexico
12.8 Peru
12.9 United States
12.10 Rest of Americas
13 Europe’s Terminal Tractor Market
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Austria
13.3 Belgium
13.4 Denmark
13.5 Finland
13.6 France
13.7 Germany
13.8 Italy
13.9 Netherlands
13.10 Norway
13.11 Poland
13.12 Russia
13.13 Spain
13.14 Sweden
13.15 Switzerland
13.16 United Kingdom
13.17 Rest of Europe
14 Middle East and Africa’s Terminal Tractor Market
14.1 Introduction
14.2 Egypt
14.3 Israel
14.4 Qatar
14.5 Saudi Arabia
14.6 South Africa
14.7 United Arab Emirates
14.8 Rest of MEA
15 APAC’s Terminal Tractor Market
15.1 Introduction
15.2 Australia
15.3 Bangladesh
15.4 China
15.5 India
15.6 Indonesia
15.7 Japan
15.8 Malaysia
15.9 Philippines
15.10 Singapore
15.11 South Korea
15.12 Sri Lanka
15.13 Thailand
15.14 Taiwan
15.15 Rest of Asia-Pacific
16 Competitive Landscape
16.1 Competitive Quadrant
16.2 Market Share Analysis
16.3 Strategic Initiatives
16.3.1 M&A and Investments
16.3.2 Partnerships and Collaborations
16.3.3 Product Developments and Improvements
17 Company Profiles
17.1 Autocar, LLC
17.2 Battle Motors, Inc.
17.3 BYD Motors Inc.
17.4 Chengli Special Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
17.5 Crane Carrier Company
17.6 Daysworth International
17.7 Dongfeng Commercial Vehicle Co. Ltd.
17.8 Hoist Material Handling, Inc.
17.9 Hyster-Yale Group Inc.
17.10 Kalmar (Cargotec Corp.)
17.11 Konecranes Oyj
17.12 Linde Material Handling
17.13 Mafi Transport-Systeme GmbH
17.14 MOL Cy
17.15 Orange EV, LLV
17.16 Terberg Group
17.17 TICO Tractors
17.18 Transporter Industry International Gmbh
17.19 Volvo Group
18 Appendix
18.1 Questionnaire

Companies Mentioned

  • Autocar, LLC
  • Battle Motors, Inc.
  • BYD Motors Inc.
  • Chengli Special Automobile Group Co., Ltd.
  • Crane Carrier Company
  • Daysworth International
  • Dongfeng Commercial Vehicle Co. Ltd.
  • Hoist Material Handling, Inc.
  • Hyster-Yale Group Inc.
  • Kalmar (Cargotec Corp.)
  • Konecranes Oyj
  • Linde Material Handling
  • Mafi Transport-Systeme GmbH
  • MOL Cy
  • Orange EV, LLV
  • Terberg Group
  • TICO Tractors
  • Transporter Industry International Gmbh
  • Volvo Group