+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Agricultural Tires Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 199 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5716196
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Senior decision-makers in the agricultural tires sector face a challenging market climate requiring proactive approaches to procurement, supplier evaluation, and operational resilience. Strategic adaptation is becoming essential as shifting farming needs, technology innovation, and evolving risks reshape expectations for reliability and performance.

Agricultural Tires Market Snapshot: Size, Growth, and Innovation

The global agricultural tires market reached USD 8.19 billion in 2024, with projected growth to USD 8.67 billion in 2025 and an anticipated market size of USD 12.78 billion by 2032. This growth, reflected in a 5.71% CAGR, is driven by expansive mechanization in agribusiness, rapid deployment of next-generation tire technologies, and increasing end-user demand for durability and high-performance traction. Procurement teams are tasked with meeting highly varied equipment needs, driving agile sourcing and proactive supplier engagement. Evolving climate patterns and changes in crop scheduling require adaptive sourcing and risk management to maintain operational productivity and competitive positioning within the agricultural tires segment.

Scope & Segmentation: Strategic Intelligence for Procurement

This report delivers actionable insight for procurement leaders navigating the complex agricultural tires landscape. Detailed segmentation enables tailored sourcing and supplier strategies to address diverse operational and regional needs:

  • Application Segments: Assess procurement requirements for tractors, combine harvesters, implements, irrigation systems, and sprayers. Evaluating compatibility with mixed-age fleets and multi-crop operations helps maximize asset utilization and lifecycle value.
  • Product Types: Compare bias, radial, and solid tire designs. Matching tire type to workload and field conditions supports both standard and specialized operational needs, increasing equipment effectiveness and reducing downtime.
  • Distribution Channels: Choose from aftermarket, dealership, e-commerce, and OEM pathways. Integrating these channels strengthens fleet management, technical oversight, and ensures continuity of service across a wide range of equipment.
  • Ply Ratings: Select appropriate ply ratings, from two-ply up to sixteen-ply, to align with specific machinery demands and support both durability and cost-predictability in ongoing maintenance plans.
  • Rim Sizes: Source tires suitable for sub-thirty inch, thirty to forty-five inch, and over forty-five inch rims, optimizing for equipment fit as standards and regional machinery preferences continue to evolve.
  • Regions: Address unique compliance requirements and environmental factors in the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Tailoring procurement to local standards and climates ensures sustained productivity.
  • Leading Companies: Review offerings from Michelin SCA, Bridgestone Corporation, Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Trelleborg AB, Titan International Inc, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd, Balkrishna Industries Limited, Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd, and Mitas a.s., with a focus on reliability, sustainability, and innovation benchmarks.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Deployment of advanced materials and structural engineering is elevating efficiency, enabling fleets to adapt across varying terrain and farming conditions.
  • Procurement practices now increasingly prioritize tires with renewable material content and circular design principles, supporting enterprise sustainability goals and regulatory compliance.
  • The implementation of smart tire solutions, including embedded sensors, empowers predictive maintenance capabilities and streamlined fleet operations with reduced unplanned downtime.
  • Digital procurement tools are simplifying sourcing workflows; nonetheless, ongoing collaboration with knowledgeable dealers remains essential for technical validation and service reliability.
  • Robust risk management depends on thorough supplier vetting and development of contingency frameworks, ensuring procurement can flexibly respond to regulatory adjustments and local climate volatility.

Tariff Impact: Navigating U.S. Policy Shifts

Recent U.S. tariffs imposed on imported agricultural tires require procurement leaders to implement enhanced compliance protocols and adjust sourcing processes. Strategies such as revising inventory levels, renegotiating supplier contracts, and adopting supply chain monitoring tools can help secure ongoing fleet readiness and minimize operational disruptions caused by policy changes.

Methodology & Data Sources

This report’s findings are grounded in validated market metrics, regulatory analysis, and input from senior executives and industry experts. The methodology emphasizes best practices across materials engineering, manufacturing, and logistics, aligning with current requirements specific to agricultural supply chains.

Why This Report Matters

  • Empowers supply chain and procurement professionals with practical guidance on addressing regulatory shifts and mitigating agricultural sector supply risks.
  • Provides a technology-focused and regional view that supports the development of robust sourcing strategies while maintaining supplier quality standards.
  • Facilitates benchmarking and continuous improvement through targeted peer comparisons and actionable insights.

Conclusion

By applying these insights, procurement executives can reinforce supply chain resilience, optimize sourcing, and sustain operational continuity in the continuously evolving agricultural tires market.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Real-time field data collection through IoT-enabled smart agricultural tires improving yield
5.2. Adoption of low-pressure flotation tires to minimize soil compaction in modern cropping systems
5.3. Development of bio-based and sustainable rubber compounds for eco-friendly agricultural tires
5.4. Rising demand for airless and foam-filled farm tires reducing downtime from punctures
5.5. Integration of precision seeding and spraying functions with tire pressure monitoring technology
5.6. Customized tread patterns designed for specific soil types and crop harvesting requirements
5.7. Strategic partnerships between tire manufacturers and agtech companies for end-to-end solutions
5.8. Expansion of radial traction tires with reinforced sidewalls for heavier autonomous farm equipment
5.9. Government subsidy programs accelerating adoption of advanced high-performance farm tires
5.10. Growing replacement market in emerging economies driving volume demand for durable ag tires
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Agricultural Tires Market, by Application
8.1. Combine
8.1.1. Bias
8.1.2. Radial
8.2. Implement
8.2.1. Bias
8.2.2. Radial
8.3. Irrigation Equipment
8.3.1. Bias
8.3.2. Radial
8.4. Sprayer
8.4.1. Bias
8.4.2. Radial
8.5. Tractor
8.5.1. Bias
8.5.2. Radial
8.5.2.1. Tube Type
8.5.2.2. Tubeless
9. Agricultural Tires Market, by Product Type
9.1. Bias
9.2. Radial
9.2.1. Tube Type
9.2.2. Tubeless
9.3. Solid
10. Agricultural Tires Market, by Distribution Channel
10.1. Aftermarket
10.1.1. Dealer
10.1.2. Distributor
10.1.3. E Commerce
10.2. Original Equipment Manufacturer
11. Agricultural Tires Market, by Ply Rating
11.1. Six To Eight Ply
11.2. Ten To Sixteen Ply
11.3. Two To Four Ply
12. Agricultural Tires Market, by Rim Size
12.1. Less Than Thirty Inch
12.2. More Than Forty Five Inch
12.3. Thirty To Forty Five Inch
13. Agricultural Tires Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Agricultural Tires Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Agricultural Tires Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Michelin SCA
16.3.2. Bridgestone Corporation
16.3.3. Continental Aktiengesellschaft
16.3.4. Trelleborg AB
16.3.5. Titan International, Inc.
16.3.6. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
16.3.7. Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd.
16.3.8. Balkrishna Industries Limited
16.3.9. Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd.
16.3.10. Mitas a.s.

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Agricultural Tires market report include:
  • Michelin SCA
  • Bridgestone Corporation
  • Continental Aktiengesellschaft
  • Trelleborg AB
  • Titan International, Inc.
  • The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
  • Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd.
  • Balkrishna Industries Limited
  • Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd.
  • Mitas a.s.

Table Information