+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 189 Pages
  • November 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5789008
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is reshaping minimally invasive gastrointestinal procedures, setting new standards in both surgical precision and patient outcomes. As this advanced technique gains traction globally, healthcare stakeholders are reevaluating their priorities, practices, and investments across rapidly changing care pathways.

Market Snapshot: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market Growth and Dynamics

The Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market grew from USD 412.94 million in 2024 to USD 436.60 million in 2025. It is projected to continue its upward trajectory, achieving a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.09% and reaching USD 662.90 million by 2032. Market expansion is propelled by technological advancements, increasing clinical adoption, and evolving reimbursement structures, particularly in regions where detection and management of early-stage gastrointestinal cancers are prioritized. The market’s performance reflects demand for minimally invasive solutions and ongoing efforts to strike a balance between procedural innovation and healthcare cost control.

Scope & Segmentation of the Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market

  • Product Categories: Accessory devices such as caps & hoods, forceps & clips, injection needles, insufflation units, trocars, and a variety of knives (dual, flex, hook, insulation-tipped, triangle-tipped); endoscopy devices including colonoscopes, duodenoscopes, and gastroscopes.
  • Procedure Types: Full-thickness resection, hybrid ESD, and partial-thickness resection, representing varying levels of lesion complexity and practitioner expertise.
  • Indication Types: Colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, and gastric cancer, each requiring tailored procedural and device approaches.
  • Disease Conditions: Benign tumors and malignant tumors, further segmented into invasive and non-invasive forms to reflect clinical risk and intervention needs.
  • End-User Profiles: Ambulatory surgical centers, hospitals, and specialty clinics, each influencing procurement patterns and technology adoption.
  • Regional Coverage: Americas (United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru), Europe (United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Poland, Switzerland), Middle East (United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Israel), Africa (South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, Kenya), and Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan).
  • Key Industry Players: Ambu A/S, Beijing ZKSK Technology Co., Ltd., Boston Scientific Corporation, ConMed Corporation, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Fujifilm Holdings Corporation, Hoya Corporation, Ovesco Endoscope AG, Olympus Corporation, Medtronic PLC, Micro-Tech Endoscopy, Zeon Medical Inc., and others.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • ESD enables en bloc resection, lowering recurrence and reducing reliance on traditional surgery, directly influencing both patient safety and resource allocation.
  • Continuous innovation in knife design, high-definition imaging, and electrosurgical tools is broadening the range of treatable lesions and streamlining workflow efficiency.
  • Artificial intelligence integration supports clinicians by improving mucosal abnormality detection, contributing to greater procedural consistency and standardization across diverse clinical settings.
  • Supply chain vulnerabilities, highlighted by recent tariff introductions, are prompting a shift toward regional procurement diversification and localized manufacturing.
  • Strategic collaborations between device manufacturers, software companies, and research institutions drive faster product validation, expand portfolios, and strengthen market positioning.
  • Regional market strategies are essential, as reimbursement systems and regulatory environments vary and directly impact adoption rates and commercialization potential.

Tariff Impact on the Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Supply Chain

Recent tariff measures in the United States have introduced new cost pressures for manufacturers relying on imported components, particularly in precision knives and insufflation units. Manufacturers and healthcare providers are mitigating these impacts by renegotiating vendor contracts, reallocating resources to high-volume centers, and accelerating efforts to localize supply chains. These responses are expected to drive greater innovation and more resilient procurement models moving forward.

Methodology & Data Sources

This report adopts a multi-phase approach, combining primary interviews with leading endoscopists, hospital administrators, and procurement specialists, alongside secondary analysis of clinical trials, peer-reviewed literature, and product documentation. Findings are validated through expert advisory panels and data triangulation to ensure actionable insights and accuracy.

Why This Report Matters for Decisive Market Actions

  • Enables senior executives to benchmark against evolving clinical, regulatory, and technological trends shaping the ESD landscape.
  • Delivers tailored guidance for optimizing portfolio strategies, supply chain resilience, and competitive positioning in mature and emerging regions.
  • Empowers strategic decisions that capitalize on synergistic opportunities and adapt to shifting market and trade policy environments.

Conclusion

The Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market continues to advance through procedural refinement, digital innovation, and evolving clinical applications. Decision-makers equipped with this intelligence can proactively shape strategies that support sustainable growth, robust patient outcomes, and operational resilience in this rapidly progressing field.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Expansion of water-jet and hybrid knife technologies for faster and safer lesion dissection in ESD
5.2. Adoption of artificial intelligence-driven lesion recognition systems in endoscopic submucosal dissection workflows
5.3. Development of multifunctional endoscopic knives enabling simultaneous incision and hemostasis during ESD procedures
5.4. Emergence of disposable endoscope platforms reducing cross-contamination risks in submucosal dissection treatments
5.5. Integration of high-definition 3D imaging and augmented reality overlays for precision in ESD lesion targeting
5.6. Growth of ESD training simulation programs employing virtual reality to accelerate physician proficiency in Asia-Pacific markets
5.7. Partnerships between medical device manufacturers and academic centers for clinical validation of novel traction devices for ESD
5.8. Regulatory approvals of next-generation endoscopic injection solutions enhancing submucosal lifting and procedural efficiency
5.9. Rising utilization of traction-assisted ESD techniques using clip-and-line systems to reduce procedure time and complications
5.10. Increase in reimbursement policies supporting outpatient endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures in developed healthcare systems
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market, by Product
8.1. Accessory Devices
8.1.1. Cap & Hood
8.1.2. Forceps & Clips
8.1.3. Injection Needles
8.1.4. Insufflations Units
8.1.5. Knives
8.1.5.1. Dual
8.1.5.2. Flex
8.1.5.3. Hook
8.1.5.4. Insulation-tipped
8.1.5.5. Triangle-tipped
8.1.6. Trocars
8.2. Endoscopy Devices
8.2.1. Colonoscopes
8.2.2. Duodenoscopes
8.2.3. Gastroscopes
9. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market, by Procedure Type
9.1. Full-Thickness Resection
9.2. Hybrid ESD
9.3. Partial-Thickness Resection
10. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market, by Indication Type
10.1. Colorectal Cancer
10.2. Esophageal Cancer
10.3. Gastric Cancer
11. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market, by Disease Condition
11.1. Benign Tumors
11.2. Malignant Tumors
11.2.1. Invasive
11.2.2. Non-Invasive
12. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market, by End-User Type
12.1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
12.2. Hospitals
12.3. Specialty Clinics
13. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Ambu A/S
16.3.2. Beijing ZKSK Technology Co., Ltd.
16.3.3. Boston Scientific Corporation
16.3.4. ConMed Corporation
16.3.5. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
16.3.6. Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
16.3.7. Hoya Corporation
16.3.8. Huger Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.
16.3.9. Interscope, Inc.
16.3.10. Jiangsu Vedkang Medical Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
16.3.11. Karl Storz SE & Co. KG
16.3.12. Leo Medical Co. Ltd.
16.3.13. Medi-Globe GmbH by DCC Healthcare
16.3.14. Medtronic PLC
16.3.15. Micro-Tech Endoscopy
16.3.16. Mizuho America, Inc.
16.3.17. MTW-Endoskopie W. Haag KG
16.3.18. Olympus Corporation
16.3.19. Ovesco Endoscope AG
16.3.20. Richard Wolf GmbH
16.3.21. SonoScape Medical Corp.
16.3.22. Steris Corporation
16.3.23. Zeon Medical Inc.
16.3.24. Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection market report include:
  • Ambu A/S
  • Beijing ZKSK Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • ConMed Corporation
  • Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
  • Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
  • Hoya Corporation
  • Huger Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.
  • Interscope, Inc.
  • Jiangsu Vedkang Medical Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Karl Storz SE & Co. KG
  • Leo Medical Co. Ltd.
  • Medi-Globe GmbH by DCC Healthcare
  • Medtronic PLC
  • Micro-Tech Endoscopy
  • Mizuho America, Inc.
  • MTW-Endoskopie W. Haag KG
  • Olympus Corporation
  • Ovesco Endoscope AG
  • Richard Wolf GmbH
  • SonoScape Medical Corp.
  • Steris Corporation
  • Zeon Medical Inc.
  • Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.

Table Information