+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Global Transaction Monitoring Market (2023-2028) Competitive Analysis, Impact of Covid-19, Ansoff Analysis

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 137 Pages
  • February 2024
  • Region: Global
  • Infogence Global Research
  • ID: 5820229

Financial institutions need to balance between minimizing false positives while ensuring effective detection of illicit activities

The Global Transaction Monitoring Market is estimated to be USD 17.25 Bn in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 36.35 Bn by 2028 growing at a CAGR of 16.07%.

Transaction monitoring is the management, inspection, and analysis of a completed transaction on a business application or information system. Businesses employ transaction monitoring to manage a variety of client interactions successfully and efficiently. To comply with various AML and counter-terrorist funding (CTF) requirements, transaction monitoring data is largely utilized to submit Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) and other reporting obligations. The world's financial regulators are starting to make transaction monitoring a requirement under the law. Large amounts of transactional data must be analyzed in real-time or very soon after they are collected using cutting-edge technology and analytical tools.

The market is being driven by the increase in demand for data protection laws and the dearth of expensive security solutions for payment network integration. The demand that businesses manage their money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) operations as well as KYC compliance will support the market's upward expansion.

Lack of technological know-how, lack of awareness, and a lack of expert knowledge will restrain the market. This is especially true in underdeveloped economies. Payment monitoring systems can be very beneficial for businesses, but these systems require knowledgeable, skilled staff who have relevant experience in logical and analytical thinking as well as financial domain knowledge. Currently, there is a shortage of experts in solution development, including statisticians, ethical hackers, data analysts, and data scientists. The biggest challenge that companies in the transaction monitoring market industry face is the development of more sophisticated technologies that are easier for users who aren't IT or business analytics experts to use. Making a less complex system might lead to issues because an effective system requires that the end users have a solid understanding of the product.

However, the market has an opportunity due to integration of advance technology such AI, machine learning and big data. Machine learning and artificial intelligence will ultimately be beneficial for the market. Such cutting-edge technologies provide a higher level of security and protect the user's sensitive information. Advanced analytics provides protection and safety against preventative hazards; as a result, this will boost the reputation of transaction monitoring technology internationally. Processes for transaction monitoring and screening perform better because of technological advancements.

Market Segmentations

  • The Global Transaction Monitoring Market is segmented based on Component, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, Function, Application, Industry, and Geography.
  • By Component, the market is classified into Solution and Services.
  • The Service Segment is anticipated to grow at fastest CAGR the market. The segment is further categorized into two categories namely, Professional Services and Managed Services. The growth is due to the increasing demand for outsourcing transaction monitoring activities.
  • By Deployment Mode, the market is classified into On-Premises and Cloud Based.
  • The cloud deployment model is the one that is expanding at the fastest rate in the Transaction Monitoring Industry. Small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) have embraced the cloud deployment strategy since it allows them to focus on their core competencies rather than incurring costs for network infrastructure. Businesses can save money by using a cloud-based transaction monitoring service instead of purchasing hardware, software, storage, and technical staff. Because thieves commonly target financial transactions, their security is of the utmost importance.
  • By Organization Size, the market is classified into Large Enterprises and Small & medium enterprises (SMEs).
  • The SMEs category is anticipated to grow at a higher CAGR during the projected period due to the expanding data protection regulations and lack of expensive security solutions inside the payment network infrastructure. Despite their small size, SMEs service a vast array of customers worldwide. Small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) rarely invest in a strong and all-encompassing transaction monitoring system.
  • By Function, the market is classified into Case Management, KYC/Customer Onboarding, Dashboard & Reporting, and Watch List Screening.
  • The KYC/Customer Onboarding segment is expected to hold a significant share of the market. The increasing need for compliance with regulatory requirements and the rise in fraudulent activities have led to the adoption of KYC/Customer Onboarding solutions, which has fueled the growth of this segment.
  • By Application, the market is classified into Anti-Money Laundering, Customer Identity Management, and Fraud Detection and Prevention.
  • The Fraud Detection and Prevention holds the largest market share and as the highest CAGR. By spotting and preventing fraudulent transactions before they are processed, it helps to lower financial losses. It increases consumer confidence and aids businesses in identifying new dangers and patterns of fraud. Businesses may keep ahead of potential fraudsters and modify their prevention efforts as needed by studying transaction data and spotting patterns.
  • By Industry, the market is classified into BFSI, Government & Defense, Retail, IT & Telecom, Healthcare, Energy & utilities, Manufacturing, and Others.
  • The BFSI sector is likely to account for a considerable portion of the global transaction monitoring market share. To maintain compliance with legal requirements relating to anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing, it is one of the industries that significantly rely on transaction monitoring (CTF). Higher-risk transactions are given priority for review in BFSI institutions that monitor transactions using a risk-based methodology. This entails determining the risk levels of a consumer based on details about their business, geography, previous transactions, and the products or services they use. It adheres to legislative regulations.
  • By Geography, the market is classified into the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific.
  • Americas is flourishing its dominance in the global transaction monitoring market due to factors such as the government's increased attention on maintaining and repairing civil infrastructure, the ageing infrastructure, and the growing requirement to manage KYC compliance. Also, there is a large-scale implementation of advanced analytics to protect the safety and security of important documents against proactive hazards. This is because the majority of international e-commerce transactions currently take place in the United States and the rest of the American region. The United States of America, which currently accounts for the majority of global e-commerce transactions, is the reason for this since it is in the Americans region.

Recent Development

  • NetGuardians announced that it extended its NG|Screener platform and applied it to money-laundering transaction monitoring. In order to increase operational effectiveness and reduce expenses, it monitors massive quantities of transactions with extreme accuracy and a marked reduction in false warnings. - November 2022
  • SAS Institute Inc. partnered with Neterium and Orange Bank to achieve real-time sanctions screening in the cloud. In contrast, built-in AI and advanced screening technologies improve detection relevance and allow analysts to monitor a holistic, real-time view of AML risk. - October 2022
  • Nasdaq introduced AI technologies to help retail and commercial banks simplify AML investigations. - September 2020

Company Profiles

The report provides a detailed analysis of the competitors in the market. It covers the financial performance analysis for the publicly listed companies in the market. The report also offers detailed information on the companies' recent development and competitive scenario. Some of the companies covered in this report are ACI Worldwide, ACTICO, BAE Systems, Beam Solutions, Experian, Fair Isaac Fidelity National Information Services, Fiserv, etc.

Countries Studied

  • America (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, United States, Rest of Americas)
  • Europe (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Rest of Europe)
  • Middle East and Africa (Egypt, Israel, Qatar, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, Rest of MEA)
  • Asia-Pacific (Australia, Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Taiwan, Rest of Asia-Pacific)
  • The report includes Competitive Quadrant, a proprietary tool to analyze and evaluate the position of companies based on their Industry Position score and Market Performance score. The tool uses various factors for categorizing the players into four categories. Some of these factors considered for analysis are financial performance over the last 3 years, growth strategies, innovation score, new product launches, investments, growth in market share, etc.

Ansoff Analysis

  • The report presents a detailed Ansoff matrix analysis for the Global Transaction Monitoring Market. Ansoff Matrix, also known as Product/Market Expansion Grid, is a strategic tool used to design strategies for the growth of the company. The matrix can be used to evaluate approaches in four strategies viz. Market Development, Market Penetration, Product Development and Diversification. The matrix is also used for risk analysis to understand the risk involved with each approach.
  • The publisher analyses the Global Transaction Monitoring Market using the Ansoff Matrix to provide the best approaches a company can take to improve its market position.
  • Based on the SWOT analysis conducted on the industry and industry players, the publisher has devised suitable strategies for market growth.

Why buy this report?

  • The report offers a comprehensive evaluation of the Global Transaction Monitoring Market. The report includes in-depth qualitative analysis, verifiable data from authentic sources, and projections about market size. The projections are calculated using proven research methodologies.
  • The research report also provides a detailed market size analysis and projections in volume and value terms. The projections are calculated using verified research methodologies.
  • Excel data sheet for the market size will also be provided with the report.
  • The report has been compiled through extensive primary and secondary research. The primary research is done through interviews, surveys, and observation of renowned personnel in the industry.
  • The report includes an in-depth market analysis using Porter’s 5 forces model, PESTLE Analysis, and the Ansoff Matrix. In addition, the impact of COVID-19 on the market is also featured in the report.
  • The report includes the regulatory scenario in the industry, which will help you make a well-informed decision. The report discusses major regulatory bodies and major rules and regulations imposed on this sector across various geographies.
  • The report includes Self-Assessment Form, which helps customers evaluate their position in the market compared to their competitors.
  • The report offers customized research - tailored uniquely to our customers with a quick turnaround time. We offer a 15% customization option at no extra charge to all our clients for any of our syndicated reports.

Report Highlights:

  • A complete analysis of the market, including the parent industry
  • Important market dynamics and trends
  • Impact Analysis - a comprehensive assessment to confront risk and make strategic & operational decisions to counter the changes in the market environment.
  • Market segmentation
  • Competitive Analysis: Comparative analysis of competitor
  • Historical, current, and projected size of the market based on value and volume
  • Market size of the US states
  • Market shares and strategies of key players
  • Recommendations to companies for strengthening their foothold in the market

Table of Contents

1 Report Description
1.1 Study Objectives
1.2 Market Definition
1.3 Currency
1.4 Years Considered
1.5 Language
1.6 Key Stakeholders
2 Research Methodology
2.1 Research Process
2.2 Data Collection and Validation
2.2.1 Secondary Research
2.2.2 Primary Research
2.2.3 Models
2.3 Market Size Estimation
2.3.1 Bottom-Up Approach
2.3.2 Top-Down Approach
2.4 Assumptions of the Study
2.5 Limitations of the Study
3 Executive Summary
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Market Size, Segmentations and Outlook
4 Market Dynamics
4.1 Impact Analysis
4.2 Drivers
4.2.1 Need to Mitigate Money Laundering, Managing KYC Compliance and CTF Activities
4.2.2 Increasing Need for Organizations to Comply with Stringent Regulatory Agreements
4.2.3 Utilization of Advance Analytics to Provide Proactive Risk Alerts
4.2.4 Growing Integration of Advance Technology such AI, Machine Learning and Big Data
4.3 Restraints
4.3.1 Lack of Risk Analysis Professional
4.4 Opportunities
4.4.1 Increase in the Deployment of Digital Transactions
4.4.2 Increasing Demand from Non-Banking Financial Institutions
4.4.3 Increasing Digitalization in Payment Transaction Process
4.5 Challenges
4.5.1 Complications in Managing Cross-Border and Multi-Jurisdictional AML Compliance
5 Market Analysis
5.1 Regulatory Scenario
5.2 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
5.3 PESTEL Analysis
5.4 Impact of Covid-19
5.5 Ansoff Matrix Analysis
6 Global Transaction Monitoring Market, By Component
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Solution
6.3 Services
6.3.1 Professional Services
6.3.2 Managed Services
7 Global Transaction Monitoring Market, By Deployment Mode
7.1 Introduction
7.2 On-Premises
7.3 Cloud Based
8 Global Transaction Monitoring Market, By Organization Size
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Large Enterprises
8.3 Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
9 Global Transaction Monitoring Market, By Function
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Case Management
9.3 KYC/Customer Onboarding
9.4 Dashboard & Reporting
9.5 Watch List Screening
10 Global Transaction Monitoring Market, By Application
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Anti-Money Laundering
10.3 Customer Identity Management
10.4 Fraud Detection and Prevention
10.5 Compliance Management
11 Global Transaction Monitoring Market, By Industry Vertical
11.1 Introduction
11.2 BFSI
11.3 Government & Defense
11.4 Retail
11.5 IT & Telecom
11.6 Healthcare
11.7 Energy & Utilities
11.8 Manufacturing
11.9 Others
12 Americas' Transaction Monitoring Market
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Argentina
12.3 Brazil
12.4 Canada
12.5 Chile
12.6 Colombia
12.7 Mexico
12.8 Peru
12.9 United States
12.10 Rest of Americas
13 Europe's Transaction Monitoring Market
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Austria
13.3 Belgium
13.4 Denmark
13.5 Finland
13.6 France
13.7 Germany
13.8 Italy
13.9 Ireland
13.10 Luxembourg
13.11 Netherlands
13.12 Norway
13.13 Poland
13.14 Russia
13.15 Spain
13.16 Sweden
13.17 Switzerland
13.18 United Kingdom
13.19 Rest of Europe
14 Middle East and Africa's Transaction Monitoring Market
14.1 Introduction
14.2 Egypt
14.3 Israel
14.4 Nigeria
14.5 Qatar
14.6 Saudi Arabia
14.7 South Africa
14.8 United Arab Emirates
14.9 Rest of MEA
15 APAC's Transaction Monitoring Market
15.1 Introduction
15.2 Australia
15.3 Bangladesh
15.4 China
15.5 India
15.6 Indonesia
15.7 Japan
15.8 Malaysia
15.9 Philippines
15.10 Singapore
15.11 South Korea
15.12 Sri Lanka
15.13 Thailand
15.14 Taiwan
15.15 Rest of Asia-Pacific
16 Competitive Landscape
16.1 Competitive Quadrant
16.2 Market Share Analysis
17 Company Profiles
17.1 ACI Worldwide, Inc.
17.1.1 Company Overview
17.1.2 Company Snapshot
17.1.3 Product Overview
17.1.4 Business Overview
17.1.5 SWOT Analysis
17.1.6 Recent Development
17.2 ACTICO GmbH
17.2.1 Company Overview
17.2.2 Company Snapshot
17.2.3 Product Overview
17.2.4 Business Overview
17.2.5 SWOT Analysis
17.2.6 Recent Development
17.3 BAE Systems PLC
17.3.1 Company Overview
17.3.2 Company Snapshot
17.3.3 Product Overview
17.3.4 Business Overview
17.3.5 SWOT Analysis
17.3.6 Recent Development
17.4 Beam Solutions, Inc.
17.4.1 Company Overview
17.4.2 Company Snapshot
17.4.3 Product Overview
17.4.4 Business Overview
17.4.5 SWOT Analysis
17.4.6 Recent Development
17.5 Bottomline Technologies
17.5.1 Company Overview
17.5.2 Company Snapshot
17.5.3 Product Overview
17.5.4 Business Overview
17.5.5 SWOT Analysis
17.5.6 Recent Development
17.6 Caseware International, Inc.
17.6.1 Company Overview
17.6.2 Company Snapshot
17.6.3 Product Overview
17.6.4 Business Overview
17.6.5 SWOT Analysis
17.6.6 Recent Development
17.7 ComplianceWise
17.7.1 Company Overview
17.7.2 Company Snapshot
17.7.3 Product Overview
17.7.4 Business Overview
17.7.5 SWOT Analysis
17.7.6 Recent Development
17.8 Eastnets
17.8.1 Company Overview
17.8.2 Company Snapshot
17.8.3 Product Overview
17.8.4 Business Overview
17.8.5 SWOT Analysis
17.8.6 Recent Development
17.9 Experian PLC
17.9.1 Company Overview
17.9.2 Company Snapshot
17.9.3 Product Overview
17.9.4 Business Overview
17.9.5 SWOT Analysis
17.9.6 Recent Development
17.10 Fair Isaac Corp.
17.10.1 Company Overview
17.10.2 Company Snapshot
17.10.3 Product Overview
17.10.4 Business Overview
17.10.5 SWOT Analysis
17.10.6 Recent Development
17.11 Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
17.11.1 Company Overview
17.11.2 Company Snapshot
17.11.3 Product Overview
17.11.4 Business Overview
17.11.5 SWOT Analysis
17.11.6 Recent Development
17.12 Fiserv, Inc.
17.12.1 Company Overview
17.12.2 Company Snapshot
17.12.3 Product Overview
17.12.4 Business Overview
17.12.5 SWOT Analysis
17.12.6 Recent Development
17.13 IdentityMind Global
17.13.1 Company Overview
17.13.2 Company Snapshot
17.13.3 Product Overview
17.13.4 Business Overview
17.13.5 SWOT Analysis
17.13.6 Recent Development
17.14 Infrasoft Technologies Ltd.
17.14.1 Company Overview
17.14.2 Company Snapshot
17.14.3 Product Overview
17.14.4 Business Overview
17.14.5 SWOT Analysis
17.14.6 Recent Development
17.15 Nice Ltd.
17.15.1 Company Overview
17.15.2 Company Snapshot
17.15.3 Product Overview
17.15.4 Business Overview
17.15.5 SWOT Analysis
17.15.6 Recent Development
17.16 Oracle Corp.
17.16.1 Company Overview
17.16.2 Company Snapshot
17.16.3 Product Overview
17.16.4 Business Overview
17.16.5 SWOT Analysis
17.16.6 Recent Development
17.17 Refinitiv Ltd.
17.17.1 Company Overview
17.17.2 Company Snapshot
17.17.3 Product Overview
17.17.4 Business Overview
17.17.5 SWOT Analysis
17.17.6 Recent Development
17.18 SAS Institute, Inc.
17.18.1 Company Overview
17.18.2 Company Snapshot
17.18.3 Product Overview
17.18.4 Business Overview
17.18.5 SWOT Analysis
17.18.6 Recent Development
17.19 Software Ag
17.19.1 Company Overview
17.19.2 Company Snapshot
17.19.3 Product Overview
17.19.4 Business Overview
17.19.5 SWOT Analysis
17.19.6 Recent Development
17.20 Thomson Reuters Corp.
17.20.1 Company Overview
17.20.2 Company Snapshot
17.20.3 Product Overview
17.20.4 Business Overview
17.20.5 SWOT Analysis
17.20.6 Recent Development
18 Appendix
18.1 Self-Assessment Form

Companies Mentioned

  • ACI Worldwide, Inc.
  • ACTICO GmbH
  • BAE Systems PLC
  • Beam Solutions, Inc.
  • Bottomline Technologies
  • Caseware International, Inc.
  • ComplianceWise
  • Eastnets
  • Experian PLC
  • Fair Isaac Corp.
  • Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
  • Fiserv, Inc.
  • IdentityMind Global
  • Infrasoft Technologies Ltd.
  • Nice Ltd.
  • Oracle Corp.
  • Refinitiv Ltd.
  • SAS Institute, Inc.
  • Software Ag
  • Thomson Reuters Corp.

Table Information