+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Global Biological Skin Substitutes Market - Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2018-2028

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 183 Pages
  • October 2023
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 5895566
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization

The Hospitals & Clinics Segment is Experiencing the Fastest Growth, with North America Emerging as the Largest Regional Market

Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

In 2022, the biological skin substitutes market reached a valuation of USD 403.09 million, and it is poised to experience robust growth in the forecast period, with a projected Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8.08% through 2028. This growth can be attributed to several factors, including an escalating incidence of chronic wounds, an expanding geriatric population, and the growing adoption of regenerative medicine techniques.

The market for biological skin substitutes has witnessed significant expansion in recent years, and this trend is anticipated to persist throughout the forecast period. These substitutes find application in the treatment of a diverse array of wounds, encompassing burns, diabetic foot ulcers, and surgical wounds. They are fabricated from a variety of materials, ranging from animal and human tissues to synthetic materials and their combinations.

A prominent driver stimulating growth in the biological skin substitutes market is the escalating occurrence of chronic wounds, particularly prevalent in aging demographics. Chronic wounds are challenging to treat and frequently necessitate interventions exceeding conventional wound care approaches to facilitate proper healing. Concurrently, the demand for advanced wound care products is growing, aiming to enhance healing outcomes and curtail the overall cost of care.

Furthermore, the augmentation of the biological skin substitutes market is facilitated by the mounting embrace of regenerative medicine methodologies. Regenerative medicine employs stem cells and other biologic entities to prompt tissue regeneration and repair. As the domain of regenerative medicine advances, the utilization of biological skin substitutes is poised to become more prevalent.

The expansion of the biological skin substitutes market is also propelled by the introduction of novel products that promise improved healing outcomes and reduced risks of complications. For instance, select biological skin substitutes are engineered to mimic the structural and functional characteristics of natural skin. This emulation can enhance healing outcomes and diminish the likelihood of rejection or infection.

Nonetheless, the market faces challenges stemming from the substantial costs associated with these products. While biological skin substitutes offer tangible advantages over traditional wound care methods, their production costs can be considerable, and insurance coverage may not be universally available. Consequently, access to these products for patients who stand to benefit from them could be restricted.

In spite of these challenges, the trajectory for growth in the biological skin substitutes market remains optimistic. The growing demand for advanced wound care products is anticipated to expedite the development of innovative biological skin substitutes. Moreover, advancements in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering are anticipated to further propel market expansion.

Additionally, the rise in the application of regenerative medicine techniques is bolstering market growth. Regenerative medicine involves the utilization of stem cells and other biologic materials to incite tissue regeneration and repair. The growing popularity of regenerative medicine techniques in the treatment of chronic wounds has led to an increased demand for biological skin substitutes.

Furthermore, there is a growing preference for biological skin substitutes crafted from natural materials, including animal and human tissues. This preference is based on the lower risk of adverse reactions or rejection associated with these natural materials when compared to synthetic alternatives.

The development of pioneering technologies such as 3D printing and tissue engineering is driving innovation within the biological skin substitutes market. These technologies are enabling the creation of intricate and sophisticated skin substitutes that more closely replicate the structure and function of natural skin.

Recent years have witnessed a surge in product launches and developments in the realm of biological skin substitutes. This surge is fueled by the escalating demand for advanced wound care products and the increasing embrace of regenerative medicine techniques.

For instance, Organogenesis, Inc., a prominent provider of regenerative medicine solutions, introduced an updated version of its Apligraf product in 2021. Apligraf is a bi-layered living cell therapy employed in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers. The enhanced version boasts an extended shelf life and improved handling properties, facilitating ease of use for healthcare providers.

Furthermore, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, a specialized pharmaceutical company, secured FDA approval for its StrataGraft® product in 2020. StrataGraft® constitutes regenerative skin tissue used to address deep partial-thickness burns. It is created from human cells and designed to closely emulate the structure and functionality of natural skin. This product offers a fresh treatment avenue for patients afflicted with deep partial-thickness burns who may not be suitable candidates for autografting.

In a similar vein, MyOwn Medicines, a regenerative medicine entity, launched MyOwn Skin™ in 2021. MyOwn Skin™ is a personalized skin substitute crafted from the patient's own skin cells. This product is tailored for the treatment of chronic wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers. This personalized approach to skin substitutes is poised to enhance healing outcomes while reducing the potential for adverse reactions or rejection.

Increasing Adoption of Regenerative Medicine Techniques

The escalating adoption of regenerative medicine techniques is exerting a profound influence on the expansion of the worldwide market for biological skin substitutes. Regenerative medicine encompasses the utilization of stem cells, growth factors, and other biologic constituents to stimulate the rejuvenation and reparation of tissues.

As the incorporation of regenerative medicine techniques becomes more pervasive, there is an anticipated surge in the requisition for biological skin substitutes. These products play a pivotal role in numerous regenerative medicine strategies and are frequently employed to furnish a structural framework for the revitalization and mending of tissues.

The intensifying interest in regenerative medicine techniques is driving augmented investments in research and development within the field. This impetus is propelling innovation, ultimately culminating in the creation of novel and enhanced biological skin substitutes that offer superior support for tissue rejuvenation and restoration.

The embrace of regenerative medicine techniques is poised to broaden the comprehensive market for biological skin substitutes. The rationale behind this expansion is that these techniques are being harnessed to address a more extensive spectrum of conditions, spanning from chronic wounds and burns to reconstructive surgery.

The application of regenerative medicine techniques, which encompasses the utilization of biological skin substitutes, is closely correlated with enhanced recuperative outcomes. These products have been substantiated to stimulate tissue regeneration and repair, subsequently contributing to expedited recovery periods and ameliorated functional results for patients.

Moreover, regenerative medicine techniques, including the employment of biological skin substitutes, are often associated with cost-effectiveness. by stimulating tissue renewal and mending, these products have the potential to mitigate the necessity for more intricate and costly interventions, such as skin grafts and reconstructive surgery. The growing traction gained by regenerative medicine techniques is significantly shaping the trajectory of the global biological skin substitutes market. As these techniques become more widely integrated, the demand for biological skin substitutes is expected to amplify, thereby catalyzing innovation and fostering the expansion of the overarching market for these products.

Growing Incidences of Chronic Wounds

The escalating prevalence of chronic wounds is a pivotal determinant in shaping the expansion of the worldwide market for biological skin substitutes. Chronic wounds denote wounds that exhibit protracted healing periods and constitute a significant global health concern. They can arise due to an array of factors, encompassing diabetes, impaired circulation, and pressure ulcers. In addressing chronic wounds, biological skin substitutes are garnering increasing attention and are regarded as a promising remedy for this challenge.

As the frequency of chronic wounds surges, there is a concomitant rise in the demand for efficacious treatment alternatives. Within this context, biological skin substitutes emerge as a viable solution and are progressively gaining traction within healthcare domains as providers seek innovative avenues for managing chronic wounds.

Innovations in technology are propelling the creation of novel and enhanced biological skin substitutes that are adept at fostering tissue regeneration and repair. This transformative process is instigating innovation within the market and leading to the formulation of products that manifest heightened effectiveness in addressing chronic wounds.

The augmenting prevalence of chronic wounds is engendering an expansion of the overarching market for biological skin substitutes. These products are being harnessed to combat an increasingly diverse range of conditions, including pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and venous leg ulcers.

Biological skin substitutes have demonstrated their capacity to stimulate tissue regeneration and repair, thereby culminating in ameliorated healing outcomes for individuals contending with chronic wounds. This enhancement translates into swifter recovery periods and an improved quality of life for patients grappling with these conditions.

Furthermore, the utilization of biological skin substitutes in the management of chronic wounds can yield economic benefits for healthcare providers. These products possess the potential to curtail the necessity for more invasive and costly interventions, such as skin grafts and reconstructive surgery.

The escalating incidence of chronic wounds constitutes a paramount influencer driving the evolution of the global biological skin substitutes market. As the quest for effective therapeutic alternatives gathers momentum, healthcare providers are increasingly looking to biological skin substitutes as a propitious solution.

Market Segmentation

Global Biological Skin Substitutes market can be segmented on the basis of type, application, end user and region. Based on type, the market can be further divided into human donor tissue-derived products, acellular animal derived products, and biosynthetic products. Based on application, the market is further bifurcated into chronic wounds and acute wounds. Based on end user, the market is divided into hospitals & clinics, ambulatory care centers, and others. On the basis of region, the market is divided into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, and Middle East & Africa.

Market Players

Smith & Nephew, plc, 3M Company, Organogenesis, Inc., Stratatech Corporation, Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Tissue Regenix Group, Mimedx Group are some of the leading players operating in the global Biological Skin Substitutes market.

Download Sample Report

Report Scope

In this report, global Biological Skin Substitutes market has been segmented into following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Biological Skin Substitutes Market, by Type:

  • Human Donor Tissue-Derived Products
  • Acellular Animal Derived Products
  • Biosynthetic Products

Biological Skin Substitutes Market, by Application:

  • Chronic Wounds
  • Acute Wounds

Biological Skin Substitutes Market, by End User:

  • Hospitals & Clinics
  • Ambulatory Care Centers
  • Others

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Biological Skin Substitutes Market.

Available Customization

The following customization option is available based on your specific needs: Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).


This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validations
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Type (Human Donor Tissue-Derived Products, Acellular Animal Derived Products, Biosynthetic Products)
5.2.2. By Application (Chronic Wounds v/s Acute Wounds)
5.2.3. By End User (Hospitals & Clinics, Ambulatory Care Centers, Others)
5.2.4. By Region
5.2.5. By Company (2022)
5.3. Product Map
5.3.1. By Type
5.3.2. By Application
5.3.3. By End User
5.3.4. By Region
6. North America Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Type
6.2.2. By Application
6.2.3. By End User
6.2.4. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.1.1.1. By Value
6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.1.2.1. By Type
6.3.1.2.2. By Application
6.3.1.2.3. By End User
6.3.2. Canada Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.2.1.1. By Value
6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.2.2.1. By Type
6.3.2.2.2. By Application
6.3.2.2.3. By End User
6.3.3. Mexico Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.3.1.1. By Value
6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.3.2.1. By Type
6.3.3.2.2. By Application
6.3.3.2.3. By End User
7. Europe Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Type
7.2.2. By Application
7.2.3. By End User
7.2.4. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. France Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.1.1.1. By Value
7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.1.2.1. By Type
7.3.1.2.2. By Application
7.3.1.2.3. By End User
7.3.2. Germany Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.2.1.1. By Value
7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.2.2.1. By Type
7.3.2.2.2. By Application
7.3.2.2.3. By End User
7.3.3. United Kingdom Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.3.1.1. By Value
7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecasty
7.3.3.2.1. By Type
7.3.3.2.2. By Application
7.3.3.2.3. By End User
7.3.4. Italy Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.4.1.1. By Value
7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.4.2.1. By Type
7.3.4.2.2. By Application
7.3.4.2.3. By End User
7.3.5. Spain Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.5.1.1. By Value
7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.5.2.1. By Type
7.3.5.2.2. By Application
7.3.5.2.3. By End User
8. Asia-Pacific Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Type
8.2.2. By Application
8.2.3. By End User
8.2.4. By Country
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.1.1.1. By Value
8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.1.2.1. By Type
8.3.1.2.2. By Application
8.3.1.2.3. By End User
8.3.2. India Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.2.1.1. By Value
8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.2.2.1. By Type
8.3.2.2.2. By Application
8.3.2.2.3. By End User
8.3.3. Japan Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.3.1.1. By Value
8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.3.2.1. By Type
8.3.3.2.2. By Application
8.3.3.2.3. By End User
8.3.4. South Korea Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.4.1.1. By Value
8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.4.2.1. By Type
8.3.4.2.2. By Application
8.3.4.2.3. By End User
8.3.5. Australia Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.5.1.1. By Value
8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.5.2.1. By Type
8.3.5.2.2. By Application
8.3.5.2.3. By End User
9. South America Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Type
9.2.2. By Application
9.2.3. By End User
9.2.4. By Country
9.3. South America: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Brazil Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.1.1.1. By Value
9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.1.2.1. By Type
9.3.1.2.2. By Application
9.3.1.2.3. By End User
9.3.2. Argentina Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.2.1.1. By Value
9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.2.2.1. By Type
9.3.2.2.2. By Application
9.3.2.2.3. By End User
9.3.3. Colombia Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.3.1.1. By Value
9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.3.2.1. By Type
9.3.3.2.2. By Application
9.3.3.2.3. By End User
10. Middle East and Africa Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Type
10.2.2. By Application
10.2.3. By End User
10.2.4. By Country
10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
10.3.1. South Africa Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.1.1.1. By Value
10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.1.2.1. By Type
10.3.1.2.2. By Application
10.3.1.2.3. By End User
10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.2.1.1. By Value
10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.2.2.1. By Type
10.3.2.2.2. By Application
10.3.2.2.3. By End User
10.3.3. UAE Biological Skin Substitutes Market Outlook
10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.3.1.1. By Value
10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.3.2.1. By Type
10.3.3.2.2. By Application
10.3.3.2.3. By End User
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Recent Development
12.2. Mergers & Acquisitions
12.3. Type Launches
13. Global Biological Skin Substitutes Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
14.1. Competition in the Industry
14.2. Potential of New Entrants
14.3. Power of Suppliers
14.4. Power of Customers
14.5. Threat of Substitute Types
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. Business Overview
15.2. Type Offerings
15.3. Recent Developments
15.4. Key Personnel
15.5. SWOT Analysis
15.5.1. Smith & Nephew, plc
15.5.2. 3M Company
15.5.3. Organogenesis, Inc.
15.5.4. Stratatech Corporation
15.5.5. Integra LifeSciences Corporation
15.5.6. Tissue Regenix Group
15.5.7. Mimedx Group
16. Strategic Recommendations17.

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Smith & Nephew, PLC
  • 3M Company
  • Organogenesis, Inc.
  • Stratatech Corporation
  • Integra LifeSciences Corporation
  • Tissue Regenix Group
  • Mimedx Group

Table Information