+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Oncology Biosimilars Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends Opportunity, and Forecast, 2028F

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 178 Pages
  • October 2023
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 5900213
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization

Global Oncology Biosimilars Market Has Valued at USD 3.27 Billion in 2022 and is Anticipated to Project Robust Growth in the Forecast Period with a CAGR of 6.84% Through 2028

Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

Global Oncology Biosimilars Market has valued at USD 3.27 billion in 2022 and is anticipated to project robust growth in the forecast period with a CAGR of 6.84% through 2028. Oncology The Global Oncology Biosimilar Market is a dynamic and rapidly evolving sector within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. It is characterized by the development, approval, and commercialization of biosimilar versions of biologic drugs used in the treatment of various cancers.

Oncology biosimilars are biologic drugs designed to be highly similar to reference biologics (originator biologic drugs) that are already approved and widely used in cancer treatment. These biosimilars are developed to provide cost-effective alternatives while maintaining comparable safety and efficacy profiles to the reference biologics.

Key Market Drivers

Rising Prevalence of Cancer Worldwide

The escalating prevalence of cancer worldwide is a profound and multifaceted driver that significantly influences the dynamics of the Global Oncology Biosimilars Market Cancer, often referred to as the 'modern epidemic,' has seen an alarming increase in incidence rates across the globe. This surge is attributable to a multitude of factors, including lifestyle changes, aging populations, environmental factors, and genetic predispositions. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that cancer will become the leading cause of death worldwide in the coming years, making it imperative to find cost-effective treatment options.Cancer's prevalence extends beyond its direct impact on healthcare systems. It infiltrates economies, imposing a substantial financial burden on individuals, families, and societies. The costs associated with cancer treatment, including biologic therapies, have been a significant concern. In this context, biosimilars, with their potential for cost savings, emerge as a promising solution.

Access to cancer treatment is not uniform across regions and socioeconomic strata. Low- and middle-income countries often face challenges in providing their populations with access to the latest cancer therapies, including biologics. The rising prevalence of cancer underscores the pressing need for accessible treatment options, and biosimilars can bridge this accessibility gap by offering effective yet more affordable alternatives.

The sustainability of healthcare systems is a global concern. The relentless rise in cancer incidence strains healthcare resources, necessitating innovative solutions to maintain the quality of care. Biosimilars, by reducing the financial burden of cancer treatment, can contribute to the sustainability of healthcare systems and ensure that adequate resources are allocated to cancer care without compromising other essential medical services.

Cost-Efficiency and Accessibility

Cost-efficiency and accessibility are two interrelated drivers that exert a profound influence on the Global Oncology Biosimilars Market. The synergy between these factors not only transforms the landscape of cancer treatment but also shapes the dynamics of the biosimilars market. Cancer treatments, particularly biologic therapies, are notorious for their high costs. The economic implications of cancer treatment are a cause for concern for individuals, healthcare systems, and governments alike. As cancer prevalence rises globally, the financial burden on patients and healthcare systems escalates. This financial strain creates a compelling need for cost-effective alternatives, making biosimilars an attractive solution. Cancer can be financially devastating for patients and their families. Many cancer treatments, including biologics, are prohibitively expensive, leading to significant out-of-pocket expenses. Biosimilars, designed to offer therapeutic equivalence at a lower cost, provide relief to patients by making cancer treatment more affordable and accessible. This affordability factor enhances the quality of life for patients and ensures that they have access to vital treatments.

Cost-effective biosimilars widen the spectrum of treatment options available to healthcare providers and patients. This diversity is especially critical in oncology, where treatment plans are often tailored to the individual patient's needs. Biosimilars offer a versatile toolkit for healthcare providers, enabling them to select treatments based on both clinical effectiveness and cost-efficiency. Healthcare systems worldwide are grappling with the challenge of balancing quality care with budget constraints. The introduction of biosimilars, which are typically more affordable than their reference biologics, can lead to substantial cost savings for healthcare systems. These savings can then be reinvested in improving cancer care infrastructure, research, and other essential healthcare services.

Access to advanced cancer treatments is not uniform across the globe. Low- and middle-income countries often face barriers in providing their populations with the latest cancer therapies. Biosimilars hold the promise of leveling the playing field by offering effective yet affordable alternatives. This democratization of access to cancer treatment aligns with global health equity goals.

Regulatory Support and Approval

Regulatory support and approval represent a pivotal market driver in the Global Oncology Biosimilars Market. This driver plays a central role in shaping the landscape for biosimilars and influencing their widespread adoption across the healthcare industry. Regulatory bodies worldwide have established comprehensive and stringent evaluation processes for biosimilars. These processes are designed to ensure that biosimilars are equivalent to their reference biologics in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy. The rigor of these evaluations instills confidence in healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders regarding the reliability and effectiveness of biosimilars. One of the most striking advantages of regulatory support is the accelerated market entry it provides for biosimilars. Compared to the protracted timelines associated with the development and approval of novel biologics, biosimilars benefit from more streamlined pathways. This expedites their availability to patients in need, addressing unmet medical needs in

Regulatory backing enhances the trust and confidence of healthcare professionals in biosimilars. Physicians and clinicians are more inclined to prescribe biosimilars when they have assurance in the regulatory processes governing these products. This trust is instrumental in fostering the adoption of biosimilars as viable treatment options. Regulatory support ensures that biosimilars maintain cost-effectiveness while upholding quality and safety standards. This is of paramount importance given the financial constraints faced by healthcare systems worldwide. Biosimilars, as cost-effective alternatives to biologics, align with the goal of achieving high-value healthcare and cost containment.

The regulatory environment promotes competition in the pharmaceutical market. As biosimilars gain regulatory approval, they create competition for originator biologics. This competition exerts downward pressure on the pricing of biologics, making cancer treatment more affordable for patients and healthcare systems.

Advancements in Biotechnology

The role of advancements in biotechnology as a market driver for the Global Oncology Biosimilars Market cannot be understated. These innovations are instrumental in shaping the landscape of biosimilars and their relevance in cancer treatment Advancements in biotechnology have enabled manufacturers to create biosimilars that closely resemble their reference biologics. Through improved techniques in cell line development, protein expression, and purification, biosimilars can now achieve a higher degree of similarity in terms of structure and function. This enhanced similarity reassures healthcare professionals and patients about the efficacy and safety of biosimilars. Biotechnological progress has ushered in methods to maintain the consistency and quality of biosimilars over time. This is crucial for ensuring that biosimilars consistently deliver the same therapeutic outcomes as their reference products. Patients and healthcare providers can rely on biosimilars to provide predictable and effective treatment.

Advancements in biotechnology have broadened the scope of therapeutic indications for biosimilars. Manufacturers can now explore new therapeutic areas and expand their biosimilar portfolios. In oncology, this translates to an increasing number of treatment options for various types of cancers, catering to a wider patient population. Biotechnological innovations have led to more efficient and scalable manufacturing processes for biosimilars. This translates to increased production capacity and cost-effectiveness. As a result, biosimilars become more accessible and affordable, addressing the economic burden associated with cancer treatment.

Regulatory agencies worldwide have adapted to the evolving landscape of biotechnology, ensuring that biosimilars meet stringent quality and safety standards. This regulatory compliance fosters confidence among healthcare professionals and patients, encouraging the adoption of biosimilars in cancer treatment.

Key Market Challenges

Regulatory Complexity and Stringency

Clinical Trials and Data Requirements: Regulatory authorities, particularly the FDA and EMA, have stringent requirements for demonstrating the similarity, safety, and efficacy of biosimilars. Conducting extensive clinical trials to generate robust data can be time-consuming and costly. This complexity in demonstrating biosimilarity can slow down the approval process. Regulatory guidelines for biosimilars continue to evolve, introducing uncertainty and challenges for manufacturers. Frequent updates and shifts in regulatory expectations can create hurdles for companies seeking approval for their oncology biosimilars. The issue of interchangeability and automatic substitution with reference biologics is another regulatory challenge. Achieving an interchangeability designation often requires additional clinical trials, adding to the time and cost burden.

Patent Litigation and Market Exclusivity

Originator biologic manufacturers often resort to patent litigation to extend their market exclusivity. These legal battles can delay the entry of biosimilars into the market. The complex nature of biologics patents can lead to protracted legal disputes.

Regulatory authorities may grant exclusivity extensions to reference biologics for various reasons, such as pediatric indications or orphan drug status. These extensions can further delay biosimilar market entry, limiting competition.

The legal and regulatory costs associated with biosimilar development and patent litigation can be substantial. Smaller manufacturers may find it challenging to navigate these hurdles, potentially slowing down their entry into the market.

Physician and Patient Acceptance

Physicians and patients may have limited familiarity with biosimilars compared to reference biologics. This lack of awareness can lead to hesitancy in adopting biosimilars in oncology practice.

Despite regulatory assurances of biosimilarity, some healthcare professionals and patients may perceive differences between biosimilars and reference biologics. This perception can create resistance to adopting biosimilars in cancer treatment.

Effective education and communication about the safety and efficacy of biosimilars are essential. However, not all healthcare systems invest in comprehensive educational initiatives, which can hinder adoption.

Key Market Trends

Expanding Oncology Biosimilar Portfolio:

The oncology biosimilars market is witnessing an expansion of biosimilar offerings targeting a wide range of cancer types. Initially focused on breast cancer and hematologic malignancies, biosimilar manufacturers are now developing products for lung, colorectal, and gastric cancers, among others. This trend diversifies treatment options for cancer patients.

Notable reference biologics in oncology, such as trastuzumab (Herceptin) and bevacizumab (Avastin), have attracted multiple biosimilar developers. This competition leads to a variety of biosimilar options for healthcare providers, promoting cost savings and enhancing access to treatment. Monoclonal antibodies represent a significant portion of oncology biologics. Biosimilar development in this category is booming, with the introduction of biosimilars for rituximab (Rituxan), cetuximab (Erbitux), and other monoclonal antibodies. These biosimilars are poised to revolutionize the treatment landscape.

Increased Global Acceptance and Adoption:

Regulatory authorities worldwide, including the FDA, EMA, and WHO, are establishing clear guidelines for biosimilar approval in oncology. This regulatory alignment fosters confidence in biosimilars among healthcare professionals, patients, and payers, leading to increased adoption.

The cost-effectiveness of biosimilars has been a driving force behind their adoption. Healthcare systems and providers are recognizing the potential for substantial cost savings by incorporating biosimilars into treatment protocols. This, in turn, enhances patient access to high-quality cancer care. As more real-world data on the safety and efficacy of oncology biosimilars becomes available, healthcare providers are gaining insights into their performance in clinical practice. This data-driven approach further bolsters acceptance and usage.

Biosimilar Development for Immuno-Oncology Agents:

Immuno-oncology has transformed cancer treatment paradigms. Biosimilar developers are now targeting immuno-oncology agents, including checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and nivolumab (Opdivo). These biosimilars have the potential to offer cost-effective alternatives in a rapidly evolving therapeutic area. Immuno-oncology biologics are complex and costly. Biosimilars for these agents have the potential to generate substantial cost savings, making them an attractive proposition for both healthcare systems and patients. Biosimilar developers are focusing on the global market for immuno-oncology biosimilars. Expanding their reach beyond local or regional markets, manufacturers are seeking approvals in multiple countries to maximize their impact on cancer treatment worldwide.

Segmental Insights

Drug Class Insights

Based on the category of Drug Class, the Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) segment emerged as the dominant player in the global market for Oncology Biosimilars in 2022. Monoclonal antibodies have gained widespread acceptance and usage in the field of oncology. These biologics are designed to target specific proteins or receptors on cancer cells, inhibiting their growth and promoting the body's immune response against cancer. As a result, mAbs have become integral to the treatment of various cancer types, including breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and hematological malignancies.

In oncology, reference biologics such as trastuzumab (Herceptin), rituximab (Rituxan), and bevacizumab (Avastin) are well-established treatments for specific cancer indications. These reference mAbs have a proven track record of efficacy and are widely prescribed by oncologists. The existence of these reference biologics creates a compelling market for biosimilar alternatives. Many of the pioneering mAbs in oncology have faced or are nearing patent expirations. This opens the door for biosimilar manufacturers to develop and introduce biosimilar versions of these blockbuster drugs. The expiration of patents allows biosimilar developers to offer cost-effective alternatives to the reference mAbs, fostering competition in the market. These factors are expected to drive the growth of this segment.

Type of Cancer Insight

Based on the category of Type of Cancer, the Breast Cancer segment emerged as the dominant player in the global market for Oncology Biosimilars in 2022. Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers globally, affecting millions of individuals each year. Its widespread occurrence and the sheer number of patients seeking treatment make it a primary focus for pharmaceutical companies and biosimilar developers. The substantial patient population creates a robust market for biosimilars targeting breast cancer therapies.

Several reference biologics for breast cancer treatment have been widely used and established for years. Notable examples include trastuzumab (Herceptin) for HER2-positive breast cancer and bevacizumab (Avastin) for various breast cancer indications. These reference biologics have a well-documented track record of effectiveness, making them prime targets for biosimilar development.

Many of the reference biologics used in breast cancer treatment have faced or are nearing patent expirations. This opens the door for biosimilar developers to create alternative versions of these biologics. Patent expirations create a competitive environment in which biosimilars can provide cost-effective alternatives to the reference drugs, thereby expanding patient access to treatment. Regulatory agencies have recognized the significance of biosimilars in breast cancer treatment and have established clear guidelines for their approval. These guidelines ensure that biosimilars are rigorously evaluated for quality, safety, and efficacy, while also expediting the approval process. Regulatory support has accelerated the market entry of biosimilar breast cancer therapies.

Distribution Channel Insights

The hospital pharmacies segment is projected to experience rapid growth during the forecast period. Hospitals are pivotal centers for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of cancer. They house specialized oncology departments staffed with oncologists, nurses, and pharmacists who are well-equipped to administer and manage cancer therapies, including biosimilars. Hospital-based cancer care ensures patients receive comprehensive treatment and monitoring, aligning with the complex nature of cancer treatment. Oncology biosimilars often require specific handling, administration, and monitoring due to their complex nature. Hospital pharmacies are well-prepared to meet these requirements, ensuring the safe and effective delivery of biosimilar therapies. This includes managing cold chain storage for certain biosimilars and providing the necessary infrastructure for intravenous administration. These factors collectively contribute to the growth of this segment.

Regional Insights

Europe emerged as the dominant player in the global Oncology Biosimilars market in 2022, holding the largest market share in terms of value. Europe has been at the forefront of establishing a robust regulatory framework for biosimilars, including those in oncology. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) pioneered biosimilar regulation and approval pathways, offering clear guidelines for manufacturers. This early establishment of regulatory procedures has enabled a swift influx of biosimilars into the European market. European regulatory authorities maintain stringent quality and safety standards for biosimilars. These standards ensure that biosimilars meet the same level of quality, safety, and efficacy as their reference biologics. The commitment to patient safety and the credibility of European biosimilars contribute to their dominance in the market. Physicians in Europe have embraced biosimilars as viable treatment options, backed by confidence in the regulatory processes and real-world evidence. Patients, too, have shown acceptance, driven by the potential for cost savings and increased access to high-quality cancer care.

The Asia-Pacific market is poised to be the fastest-growing market, offering lucrative growth opportunities for Oncology Biosimilars players during the forecast period. Factors such as The Asia-Pacific region is experiencing a rising burden of cancer, driven by factors such as population growth, aging demographics, and lifestyle changes. As cancer incidence increases, the demand for cost-effective treatment options, including biosimilars, is expected to surge. Countries in the Asia-Pacific region are increasingly adopting regulatory frameworks and approval pathways for biosimilars. This aligns with global trends and creates an environment conducive to biosimilar development and market entry. Cost-effectiveness is a critical factor in healthcare decisions in the Asia-Pacific region. Biosimilars are recognized as valuable tools for providing accessible cancer care while managing healthcare expenditure.

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Oncology Biosimilars Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Oncology Biosimilars Market, By Drug Class:

  • Monoclonal Antibodies
  • G-CSF
  • Hematopoietic Agents
  • Others

Oncology Biosimilars Market, By Type of Cancer:

  • Breast Cancer
  • Lung Cancer
  • Stomach Cancer
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Cervical Cancer
  • Blood Cancer
  • Brain Cancer
  • Others

Oncology Biosimilars Market, By Distribution Channel:

  • Retail Pharmacies
  • Hospital Pharmacies
  • Online Pharmacies

Oncology Biosimilars Market, By Region:

  • North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • Europe
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Italy
  • Germany
  • Spain
  • Asia-Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • Japan
  • Australia
  • South Korea
  • South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE
  • Kuwait
  • Turkey
  • Egypt

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Oncology Biosimilars Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Oncology Biosimilars market report with the given market data, the publisher offers customizations according to a company's specific needs.


This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Distribution Channels
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Drug Class (Monoclonal Antibodies, G-CSF, Hematopoietic Agents, Others)
5.2.2. By Type of Cancer (Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer, Stomach Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Cervical Cancer, Blood Cancer, Brain Cancer, Others)
5.2.3. By Distribution Channel (Retail Pharmacies, Hospital Pharmacies, Online Pharmacies)
5.2.4. By Region
5.2.5. By Company (2022)
5.3. Market Map
6. North America Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Drug Class
6.2.2. By Type of Cancer
6.2.3. By Distribution Channel
6.2.4. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.1.1.1. By Value
6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.1.2.1. By Drug Class
6.3.1.2.2. By Type of Cancer
6.3.1.2.3. By Distribution Channel
6.3.2. Canada Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.2.1.1. By Value
6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.2.2.1. By Drug Class
6.3.2.2.2. By Type of Cancer
6.3.2.2.3. By Distribution Channel
6.3.3. Mexico Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.3.1.1. By Value
6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.3.2.1. By Drug Class
6.3.3.2.2. By Type of Cancer
6.3.3.2.3. By Distribution Channel
7. Europe Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Drug Class
7.2.2. By Type of Cancer
7.2.3. By Distribution Channel
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. Germany Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.1.1.1. By Value
7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.1.2.1. By Drug Class
7.3.1.2.2. By Type of Cancer
7.3.1.2.3. By Distribution Channel
7.3.2. United Kingdom Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.2.1.1. By Value
7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.2.2.1. By Drug Class
7.3.2.2.2. By Type of Cancer
7.3.2.2.3. By Distribution Channel
7.3.3. Italy Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.3.1.1. By Value
7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecasty
7.3.3.2.1. By Drug Class
7.3.3.2.2. By Type of Cancer
7.3.3.2.3. By Distribution Channel
7.3.4. France Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.4.1.1. By Value
7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.4.2.1. By Drug Class
7.3.4.2.2. By Type of Cancer
7.3.4.2.3. By Distribution Channel
7.3.5. Spain Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.5.1.1. By Value
7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.5.2.1. By Drug Class
7.3.5.2.2. By Type of Cancer
7.3.5.2.3. By Distribution Channel
8. Asia-Pacific Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Drug Class
8.2.2. By Type of Cancer
8.2.3. By Distribution Channel
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.1.1.1. By Value
8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.1.2.1. By Drug Class
8.3.1.2.2. By Type of Cancer
8.3.1.2.3. By Distribution Channel
8.3.2. India Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.2.1.1. By Value
8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.2.2.1. By Drug Class
8.3.2.2.2. By Type of Cancer
8.3.2.2.3. By Distribution Channel
8.3.3. Japan Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.3.1.1. By Value
8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.3.2.1. By Drug Class
8.3.3.2.2. By Type of Cancer
8.3.3.2.3. By Distribution Channel
8.3.4. South Korea Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.4.1.1. By Value
8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.4.2.1. By Drug Class
8.3.4.2.2. By Type of Cancer
8.3.4.2.3. By Distribution Channel
8.3.5. Australia Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.5.1.1. By Value
8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.5.2.1. By Drug Class
8.3.5.2.2. By Type of Cancer
8.3.5.2.3. By Distribution Channel
9. South America Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Drug Class
9.2.2. By Type of Cancer
9.2.3. By Distribution Channel
9.3. South America: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Brazil Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.1.1.1. By Value
9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.1.2.1. By Drug Class
9.3.1.2.2. By Type of Cancer
9.3.1.2.3. By Distribution Channel
9.3.2. Argentina Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.2.1.1. By Value
9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.2.2.1. By Drug Class
9.3.2.2.2. By Type of Cancer
9.3.2.2.3. By Distribution Channel
9.3.3. Colombia Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.3.1.1. By Value
9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.3.2.1. By Drug Class
9.3.3.2.2. By Type of Cancer
9.3.3.2.3. By Distribution Channel
10. Middle East and Africa Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Drug Class
10.2.2. By Type of Cancer
10.2.3. By Distribution Channel
10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
10.3.1. South Africa Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.1.1.1. By Value
10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.1.2.1. By Drug Class
10.3.1.2.2. By Type of Cancer
10.3.1.2.3. By Distribution Channel
10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.2.1.1. By Value
10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.2.2.1. By Drug Class
10.3.2.2.2. By Type of Cancer
10.3.2.2.3. By Distribution Channel
10.3.3. UAE Oncology Biosimilars Market Outlook
10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.3.1.1. By Value
10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.3.2.1. By Drug Class
10.3.3.2.2. By Type of Cancer
10.3.3.2.3. By Distribution Channel
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers & Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Recent Developments
12.2. Product Launches
12.3. Mergers & Acquisitions
13. Global Oncology Biosimilars Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Competitive Landscape
14.1. Teva Pharmaceuticals
14.2. STADA Arzneimittel AG
14.3. Shanghai Henlius Biotech Inc
14.4. Sandoz (Novartis) AG
14.5. Samsung Bioepis Co Ltd.
14.6. Pfizer Inc
14.7. Pfenex Inc.
14.8. Mylan Inc
14.9. Innovent Biologics Inc
14.10. Celltrion Healthcare Co Ltd
15. Strategic Recommendations16. About the Publisher & Disclaimer

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Teva Pharmaceuticals
  • STADA Arzneimittel AG
  • Shanghai Henlius Biotech Inc
  • Sandoz (Novartis) AG
  • Samsung Bioepis Co Ltd.
  • Pfizer Inc
  • Pfenex Inc.
  • Mylan Inc
  • Innovent Biologics Inc
  • Celltrion Healthcare Co Ltd

Table Information