+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Defense Electronics Obsolescence Managment Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 197 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5968034
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Defense electronics obsolescence management is rising to the forefront as defense organizations navigate shifting technology cycles and increasingly complex supply chains. With elevated focus on resilient systems, senior decision-makers must address evolving readiness demands and ensure the long-term continuity of critical defense assets.

Market Snapshot: Defense Electronics Obsolescence Management

The Defense Electronics Obsolescence Management Market is exhibiting steady growth, advancing from USD 3.17 billion in 2024 to a projected USD 3.42 billion in 2025. A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.97% is forecast through 2032, highlighting robust modernization across militaries worldwide. This upward momentum is closely tied to intensified efforts in supply chain resilience, enhanced risk management, and the demand for operational continuity. The role of regulatory oversight is expanding, driving proactive investment in mitigation strategies that focus on lowering system risks, boosting reliability, and supporting the sustainability of national defense infrastructure.

Scope & Segmentation of the Defense Electronics Obsolescence Management Market

This report delivers an in-depth assessment of the defense electronics obsolescence management landscape, enabling leaders to make data-backed decisions and adjust to rapidly evolving environments. The breadth of coverage includes:

  • Solution Type: Covers component procurement, digital engineering for redesign, lifecycle extension, software maintenance, and advanced verification such as electrical and X-ray testing.
  • Component Type: Examines connectors and cables for secure defense communication, integrated circuits that require tight compatibility, passive components needing rigorous qualification, printed circuit boards for system adaptability, and modular sensors or actuators for flexible operation.
  • Platform: Considers military assets across fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft, ground vehicles, surface and subsurface naval fleets, satellites, and launch vehicles, addressing distinct sustainment requirements for each.
  • End User: Profiles defense contractors and military organizations, spotlighting their processes for tailored procurement, sustainment standards, and dependable system oversight.
  • Region: Analyzes developments in the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa (notably key defense economies), and Asia-Pacific, including country-specific drivers across China, India, Japan, Australia, and others.
  • Company Coverage: Provides detailed perspectives on industry leaders such as Lockheed Martin, Raytheon Technologies, Northrop Grumman, BAE Systems, General Dynamics, The Boeing Company, L3Harris Technologies, Thales Group, Leonardo, and Airbus.

Key Takeaways for Senior Decision-Makers

  • Coordinated procurement, engineering, and sustainment activities are critical to maintaining operational continuity and adapting to shifting readiness requirements.
  • Application of digital engineering and predictive analytics streamlines early identification of lifecycle risks and accelerates redesigns across both current and emerging defense platforms.
  • Prioritizing modular and open-system architectures simplifies component upgrades and technical qualification, supporting more agile lifecycle management.
  • Improved data-sharing channels among contractors, government agencies, and service providers enable better forecasting and responsive planning for obsolescence events.
  • Diversified sourcing strategies and supplier qualification processes at a regional level—including engagement with technology partners—enhance resilience against disruptions and evolving regulatory landscapes.

Tariff Impact on Defense Supply Chains and Obsolescence Programs

Recent changes in U.S. tariff regimes have driven defense electronics organizations to re-evaluate supply chain and sourcing models. Emphasis on near-shoring, broadening sourcing strategies, and reinforcing supplier qualification are helping organizations address risks tied to volatile trade environments. Collaborations with allied and tariff-exempt suppliers are supporting more predictable costs and improved delivery reliability, keeping obsolescence initiatives aligned with mission objectives. In this climate, agile risk management and adaptive sourcing are key to maintaining uninterrupted program execution.

Methodology & Data Sources

This analysis is grounded in extensive interviews with professionals active in procurement, engineering, and sustainment roles at leading defense contractors. Key findings are corroborated through rigorous review of procurement documentation, regulatory standards, technology roadmaps, and third-party laboratory and expert verification.

Why This Report Matters

  • Enables senior leaders to anticipate and proactively manage obsolescence challenges, supporting both procurement efficiency and the longevity of capital assets.
  • Guides the development of robust supply chain and partnership strategies designed to optimize lifecycle risk reduction and operational stability.
  • Supports strategic alignment between buyers and suppliers for cost-effective, consistent performance over the entire lifecycle of defense electronics programs.

Conclusion

This report gives decision-makers clear, actionable frameworks to balance modernization with sustainment, ensuring reliable defense electronics performance in the face of constant technological and operational change.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Integration of predictive analytics and AI algorithms to anticipate lifecycle failures in defense electronics
5.2. Implementation of blockchain-enabled traceability solutions to secure military component provenance
5.3. Adoption of additive manufacturing technologies for on-demand legacy part reproduction and qualification
5.4. Development of open architecture modular electronic platforms to streamline obsolescence upgrades
5.5. Strategic partnerships between defense primes and aftermarket suppliers for certified component refurbishing
5.6. Use of digital twin environments for real-time monitoring and virtual testing of obsolescing systems
5.7. Regulatory adaptation and harmonization for rapid recertification of substitute electronic modules
5.8. Leveraging circular economy principles to extend the service life of ruggedized defense hardware
5.9. Deployment of supply chain risk management software to mitigate semiconductor shortages in military programs
5.10. Integration of secure lifecycle data management platforms for end-to-end electronic component tracking
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Defense Electronics Obsolescence Managment Market, by Solution Type
8.1. Component Procurement
8.2. Design & Redesign
8.3. Lifecycle Extension
8.4. Software Maintenance
8.5. Testing & Inspection
8.5.1. Electrical Testing
8.5.2. X-ray Inspection
9. Defense Electronics Obsolescence Managment Market, by Component Type
9.1. Connectors & Cables
9.2. Integrated Circuits
9.3. Passive Components
9.4. Printed Circuit Boards
9.5. Sensors & Actuators
10. Defense Electronics Obsolescence Managment Market, by Platform
10.1. Aircraft
10.1.1. Fixed-Wing Aircraft
10.1.2. Rotary-Wing Aircraft
10.2. Land Vehicles
10.2.1. Armored Personnel Carriers
10.2.2. Reconnaissance Vehicles
10.2.3. Tanks
10.3. Naval Vessels
10.3.1. Submarines
10.3.2. Surface Ships
10.4. Space Systems
10.4.1. Launch Vehicles
10.4.2. Satellites
11. Defense Electronics Obsolescence Managment Market, by End User
11.1. Defense Contractors
11.2. Military Forces
12. Defense Electronics Obsolescence Managment Market, by Region
12.1. Americas
12.1.1. North America
12.1.2. Latin America
12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
12.2.1. Europe
12.2.2. Middle East
12.2.3. Africa
12.3. Asia-Pacific
13. Defense Electronics Obsolescence Managment Market, by Group
13.1. ASEAN
13.2. GCC
13.3. European Union
13.4. BRICS
13.5. G7
13.6. NATO
14. Defense Electronics Obsolescence Managment Market, by Country
14.1. United States
14.2. Canada
14.3. Mexico
14.4. Brazil
14.5. United Kingdom
14.6. Germany
14.7. France
14.8. Russia
14.9. Italy
14.10. Spain
14.11. China
14.12. India
14.13. Japan
14.14. Australia
14.15. South Korea
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
15.3. Competitive Analysis
15.3.1. Lockheed Martin Corporation
15.3.2. Raytheon Technologies Corporation
15.3.3. Northrop Grumman Corporation
15.3.4. BAE Systems plc
15.3.5. General Dynamics Corporation
15.3.6. The Boeing Company
15.3.7. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
15.3.8. Thales Group
15.3.9. Leonardo S.p.A
15.3.10. Airbus SE

Samples

Loading
LOADING...

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Defense Electronics Obsolescence Managment market report include:
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • Raytheon Technologies Corporation
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • BAE Systems plc
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • The Boeing Company
  • L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
  • Thales Group
  • Leonardo S.p.A
  • Airbus SE

Table Information