+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

PFAS Filtration Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 198 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5977706
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The PFAS filtration market is experiencing significant change, driven by evolving compliance demands and new treatment capabilities. Senior decision-makers in sectors managing water and environmental assets are prioritizing integrated, forward-looking solutions to ensure regulatory and operational resilience amid shifting risk conditions.

Market Snapshot: PFAS Filtration Market Growth

The PFAS filtration market was valued at USD 2.13 billion in 2024, with expectations to reach USD 2.27 billion in 2025 at a CAGR of 7.35%. This growth reflects intensified regulatory oversight, the adoption of next-generation filtration technologies, and sustainability efforts across the sector. Organizations are transitioning from short-term fixes to a holistic asset management perspective, with focus on lifecycle efficiency, broad compliance, and adaptable procurement. There is growing demand for integrated, scalable systems that assure both environmental and operational value, with procurement strategies recognizing the importance of future-ready investment and robust risk mitigation.

Scope & Segmentation of the PFAS Filtration Market

  • Offering: Equipment and system solutions, various filter types (bulk, cartridge, inline), and service models (onsite, offsite) are designed for flexible deployment.
  • Filtration Technology: Tools supplied include activated carbon, ion exchange, nanofiltration, electrocoagulation, and reverse osmosis, supporting versatile and customized responses to PFAS contamination challenges.
  • Contaminant Type: Filtration approaches address a range of PFAS compounds such as HFPO-DA, PFHXS, PFNA, PFOS, and PFOA, ensuring systems comply with current and emerging regulatory standards.
  • Operation Type: Configurable systems support batch, continuous, or semi-continuous processes, aligning with unique site and project requirements.
  • Usage Type: Both fixed and mobile solutions are available, promoting asset adaptability across diverse operational settings.
  • Deployment Area: Installations serve both point of entry and point of use, meeting demands from residential, industrial, and commercial users.
  • Application: Use cases include drinking water treatment, groundwater remediation, industrial wastewater management, landfill leachate solutions, stormwater management, and surface water protection projects.
  • End-User: The market targets commercial buildings, industrial facilities (such as chemical, pharmaceutical, textile, and food plants), and residential users, delivering purpose-built filtration systems.
  • Regions: Major centers include the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, with strong adoption in countries such as the United States, China, Germany, India, and Brazil. Regional compliance drivers and procurement behaviors often shape system requirements.
  • Major Companies: Key participants include Veolia Environnement SA, Cyclopure Inc., AECOM, Calgon Carbon Corporation by Kuraray Group, Clean Harbors Inc., DuPont de Nemours Inc., Enviri Corporation, Evoqua Water Technologies LLC by Xylem Inc., Filtra-Systems Company LLC, Hydranautics by Nitto Denko Corporation, Jacobs Solutions Inc., Lanxess AG, Lenntech B.V., Merck KGaA, Newterra Corporation, Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Pentair, Puraffinity Ltd., ResinTech Inc., WSP Global Inc., Envirogen Technologies Inc., Pall Corporation, 3M Company, and SciDev Limited.

Key Takeaways: Strategic Insights for the PFAS Filtration Market

  • Procurement decisions increasingly hinge on regulatory readiness and data-driven analytics, emphasizing continuous PFAS management and supplier accountability.
  • Hybrid systems—integrating both filtration and destruction technologies—are gaining traction for projects requiring advanced treatment solutions.
  • Supply strategies are shifting as organizations emphasize regional partnerships and modular, locally produced systems for greater procurement agility and reduced global risk.
  • Market segmentation highlights differences in requirements by end-user and geography, helping buyers tailor purchasing to meet specific operational and regulatory objectives.
  • Lifecycle planning and cost-modeling are guiding organizations toward scalable upgrades and sustained asset performance, supporting long-term procurement value.
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration among laboratories, remediation professionals, and system vendors enhances solution integration and strengthens PFAS management frameworks.

Tariff Impact on PFAS Filtration Procurement

Changing tariff policies are reshaping capital investments and supplier choices. Organizations are prioritizing procurement strategies that focus on local manufacturing, modular system design, and regional supplier relationships. These adjustments help reduce exposure to trade volatility and support stable, predictable delivery of essential PFAS filtration solutions. Procurement teams increasingly evaluate tariff resilience and supply flexibility in their contract terms and supplier vetting processes.

Methodology & Data Sources

Research findings were developed through direct interviews with solution providers, integrators, end-users, and remediation experts. These insights are further supported by detailed case studies and technical literature analysis, ensuring practical recommendations relevant to executive decision-making.

Why This Report Matters

  • Supports strategic evaluation of technology adoption, supply chain models, and procurement risk in a dynamic PFAS filtration environment.
  • Offers industry benchmarks to refine investment strategies and tailor operational approaches in line with regional and compliance requirements.
  • Delivers actionable, field-tested guidance validated by sectorwide stakeholder engagement and direct project experience.

Conclusion

The ability to align filtration technology, operational practices, and supply strategies with regulatory and market changes will determine success in managing PFAS risks. Building adaptable infrastructure and leveraging sector partnerships support sustainable organizational and environmental outcomes.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Growth of sustainable and eco-friendly PFAS filtration materials addressing environmental concerns
5.2. Increasing investment in R&D for multi-contaminant filtration systems including PFAS compounds
5.3. Growing demand for point-of-use PFAS filtration solutions in households
5.4. Development of cost-effective PFAS filtration methods making solutions accessible to smaller municipalities
5.5. Innovations in membrane technology driving enhanced PFAS filtration efficiency across industries
5.6. Emergence of portable and decentralized PFAS filtration units enhancing water safety in remote areas
5.7. Integration of AI and IoT technologies improving real-time monitoring in PFAS filtration systems
5.8. Rising regulatory pressure globally intensifying demand for advanced PFAS filtration solutions
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. PFAS Filtration Market, by Offering
8.1. Equipment & Systems
8.1.1. Accessories
8.1.2. Filters
8.1.2.1. Bulk Filters
8.1.2.2. Cartridge Filters
8.1.2.3. Inline Filters
8.1.3. Media
8.1.3.1. Composite Media
8.1.3.2. Granular Media
8.1.3.3. Non-Granular Media
8.2. Services
8.2.1. Offsite
8.2.2. Onsite
9. PFAS Filtration Market, by Filtration Technology
9.1. Activated Carbon Filtration
9.2. Electrocoagulation Filtering
9.3. Ion Exchange Systems
9.4. Nanofiltration
9.5. Reverse Osmosis
10. PFAS Filtration Market, by Contaminant Type
10.1. Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA)
10.2. Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHXS)
10.3. Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA)
10.4. Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)
10.5. Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)
11. PFAS Filtration Market, by Operation Type
11.1. Batch Filtration
11.2. Continuous Filtration
11.3. Semi-Continuous Filtration
12. PFAS Filtration Market, by Usage Type
12.1. Fixed/Permanent Installations
12.2. Portable/Mobile Systems
13. PFAS Filtration Market, by Deployment Area
13.1. Point of Entry (POE)
13.2. Point of Use (POU)
14. PFAS Filtration Market, by Application
14.1. Drinking Water Treatment
14.2. Groundwater Remediation
14.3. Industrial Wastewater Treatment
14.4. Landfill Leachate Treatment
14.5. Stormwater Management
14.6. Surface Water Protection
15. PFAS Filtration Market, by End-User
15.1. Commercial Facilities
15.2. Industrial Sector
15.2.1. Chemical Manufacturing
15.2.2. Food Processing
15.2.3. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
15.2.4. Textile Industry
15.3. Residential Use
16. PFAS Filtration Market, by Region
16.1. Americas
16.1.1. North America
16.1.2. Latin America
16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
16.2.1. Europe
16.2.2. Middle East
16.2.3. Africa
16.3. Asia-Pacific
17. PFAS Filtration Market, by Group
17.1. ASEAN
17.2. GCC
17.3. European Union
17.4. BRICS
17.5. G7
17.6. NATO
18. PFAS Filtration Market, by Country
18.1. United States
18.2. Canada
18.3. Mexico
18.4. Brazil
18.5. United Kingdom
18.6. Germany
18.7. France
18.8. Russia
18.9. Italy
18.10. Spain
18.11. China
18.12. India
18.13. Japan
18.14. Australia
18.15. South Korea
19. Competitive Landscape
19.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
19.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
19.3. Competitive Analysis
19.3.1. Veolia Environnement SA
19.3.2. Cyclopure, Inc.
19.3.3. AECOM
19.3.4. Calgon Carbon Corporation by Kuraray Group
19.3.5. Clean Harbors, Inc.
19.3.6. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
19.3.7. Enviri Corporation
19.3.8. Evoqua Water Technologies LLC by Xylem Inc.
19.3.9. Filtra-Systems Company LLC
19.3.10. Hydranautics by Nitto Denko Corporation
19.3.11. Jacobs Solutions Inc.
19.3.12. Lanxess AG
19.3.13. Lenntech B.V.
19.3.14. Merck KGaA
19.3.15. Newterra Corporation
19.3.16. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
19.3.17. Pentair
19.3.18. Puraffinity Ltd.
19.3.19. ResinTech, Inc.
19.3.20. WSP Global Inc.
19.3.21. Envirogen Technologies, Inc.
19.3.22. Pall Corporation
19.3.23. 3M Company
19.3.24. SciDev Limited

Samples

Loading
LOADING...

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this PFAS Filtration market report include:
  • Veolia Environnement SA
  • Cyclopure, Inc.
  • AECOM
  • Calgon Carbon Corporation by Kuraray Group
  • Clean Harbors, Inc.
  • DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
  • Enviri Corporation
  • Evoqua Water Technologies LLC by Xylem Inc.
  • Filtra-Systems Company LLC
  • Hydranautics by Nitto Denko Corporation
  • Jacobs Solutions Inc.
  • Lanxess AG
  • Lenntech B.V.
  • Merck KGaA
  • Newterra Corporation
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation
  • Pentair
  • Puraffinity Ltd.
  • ResinTech, Inc.
  • WSP Global Inc.
  • Envirogen Technologies, Inc.
  • Pall Corporation
  • 3M Company
  • SciDev Limited

Table Information