+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

PFAS Filtration Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 198 Pages
  • October 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5977706
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Senior leaders across water utilities, manufacturing, and environmental services are confronting increasingly complex requirements for PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) filtration, where evolving regulations, diverse technological options, and operational challenges demand informed, future-ready strategies. This report offers a strategic overview, segmentation detail, and actionable insights to aid in navigating market shifts and optimizing PFAS mitigation investments.

Market Snapshot: PFAS Filtration Market Growth and Dynamics

The PFAS filtration market is experiencing robust expansion as regulatory standards tighten worldwide. In 2024, the market was valued at USD 2.13 billion, rising to USD 2.27 billion by 2025. Forecasts indicate a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.35% through 2032, with the total value projected to reach USD 3.76 billion. These figures reflect mounting global pressure on industries and municipalities to mitigate PFAS contamination through advanced treatment solutions. Drivers include enhanced detection methods, expanding regulated PFAS lists, and increased community and investor scrutiny of treatment processes and outcomes.

Scope & Segmentation

  • Offering: Equipment & systems (accessories, filters including bulk, cartridge, and inline types, and filtration media such as composite, granular, and non-granular) as well as service models (offsite and onsite support).
  • Filtration Technology: Activated carbon filtration, electrocoagulation, ion exchange systems, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis, each with varying performance for different PFAS removal scenarios.
  • Contaminant Type: Includes Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA), Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHXS), Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA), Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS), and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA).
  • Operation Type: Batch, continuous, and semi-continuous filtration models to adapt to organizational needs.
  • Usage Type: Fixed/permanent installations and portable/mobile systems ensure tailored deployment.
  • Deployment Area: Point of entry (POE) and point of use (POU) applications for full-facility and localized protection.
  • Application: Drinking water, groundwater remediation, industrial wastewater, landfill leachate, stormwater management, and surface water protection contexts.
  • End-User: Segmented into commercial facilities, industrial sector (chemical manufacturing, food processing, pharmaceuticals, textiles), and residential markets.
  • Regions: Americas (North & Latin America), Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific with differentiated regulatory landscapes and adoption trends.
  • Vendors: Analysis includes major players such as Veolia Environnement SA, Cyclopure, Inc., AECOM, Calgon Carbon Corporation by Kuraray Group, DuPont de Nemours, Inc., Evoqua Water Technologies LLC by Xylem Inc., among others.

Key Takeaways for PFAS Filtration Decision-Makers

  • Regulatory frameworks are expanding, requiring operators to consider ongoing PFAS source control and adaptable system design instead of one-off remediation.
  • Diverse technologies are converging, enabling multi-stage solutions that improve removal efficiency while simplifying long-term operations and residuals management.
  • Equipment procurement and lifecycle cost dynamics are shifting due to increased scrutiny of supply-chain resilience and modular solution adoption.
  • Customizing deployment by contaminant and application type yields stronger compliance outcomes and operational alignment, especially for sites with unique PFAS profiles or industrial processes.
  • Community, regulatory, and investor expectations now strongly influence procurement, emphasizing transparency, validated performance, and sustainable waste handling.
  • Vendors with robust field validation, scalable service models, and strong supply partnership networks are best positioned for long-term success in this sector.

Tariff Impact on PFAS Filtration Supply and Procurement

Newly enacted tariffs from 2025 have altered the supply and procurement landscape for PFAS filtration. Import duties on components and finished products have prompted procurement teams to consider domestic sourcing, regional partnerships, and alternative supply channels. This environment is fostering localized manufacturing, strategic supplier diversification, and modular system adoption in order to manage cost volatility, lead times, and service continuity.

Methodology & Data Sources

This research integrates insights from structured stakeholder interviews spanning technology providers, system integrators, end-users, and remediation experts. Field case studies illustrate practical outcomes and inform segmentation insights. Secondary data review from technical literature and vendor documentation supplements and validates primary findings for accurate, actionable market intelligence.

Why This Report Matters

  • Enables strategic planning aligned with evolving regulations, emerging technologies, and supply-chain disruptions.
  • Provides granular market segmentation for targeted investment, resource allocation, and partnership selection.
  • Equips decision-makers with field-tested insights and risk mitigation strategies relevant to real-world implementation.

Conclusion

Effective PFAS filtration requires aligning advanced technologies with evolving compliance and operational realities. The right solutions balance enduring performance, transparent practices, and adaptive supply models to ensure lasting environmental stewardship and business value.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Growth of sustainable and eco-friendly PFAS filtration materials addressing environmental concerns
5.2. Increasing investment in R&D for multi-contaminant filtration systems including PFAS compounds
5.3. Growing demand for point-of-use PFAS filtration solutions in households
5.4. Development of cost-effective PFAS filtration methods making solutions accessible to smaller municipalities
5.5. Innovations in membrane technology driving enhanced PFAS filtration efficiency across industries
5.6. Emergence of portable and decentralized PFAS filtration units enhancing water safety in remote areas
5.7. Integration of AI and IoT technologies improving real-time monitoring in PFAS filtration systems
5.8. Rising regulatory pressure globally intensifying demand for advanced PFAS filtration solutions
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. PFAS Filtration Market, by Offering
8.1. Equipment & Systems
8.1.1. Accessories
8.1.2. Filters
8.1.2.1. Bulk Filters
8.1.2.2. Cartridge Filters
8.1.2.3. Inline Filters
8.1.3. Media
8.1.3.1. Composite Media
8.1.3.2. Granular Media
8.1.3.3. Non-Granular Media
8.2. Services
8.2.1. Offsite
8.2.2. Onsite
9. PFAS Filtration Market, by Filtration Technology
9.1. Activated Carbon Filtration
9.2. Electrocoagulation Filtering
9.3. Ion Exchange Systems
9.4. Nanofiltration
9.5. Reverse Osmosis
10. PFAS Filtration Market, by Contaminant Type
10.1. Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA)
10.2. Perfluorohexane Sulfonate (PFHXS)
10.3. Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA)
10.4. Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)
10.5. Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)
11. PFAS Filtration Market, by Operation Type
11.1. Batch Filtration
11.2. Continuous Filtration
11.3. Semi-Continuous Filtration
12. PFAS Filtration Market, by Usage Type
12.1. Fixed/Permanent Installations
12.2. Portable/Mobile Systems
13. PFAS Filtration Market, by Deployment Area
13.1. Point of Entry (POE)
13.2. Point of Use (POU)
14. PFAS Filtration Market, by Application
14.1. Drinking Water Treatment
14.2. Groundwater Remediation
14.3. Industrial Wastewater Treatment
14.4. Landfill Leachate Treatment
14.5. Stormwater Management
14.6. Surface Water Protection
15. PFAS Filtration Market, by End-User
15.1. Commercial Facilities
15.2. Industrial Sector
15.2.1. Chemical Manufacturing
15.2.2. Food Processing
15.2.3. Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
15.2.4. Textile Industry
15.3. Residential Use
16. PFAS Filtration Market, by Region
16.1. Americas
16.1.1. North America
16.1.2. Latin America
16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
16.2.1. Europe
16.2.2. Middle East
16.2.3. Africa
16.3. Asia-Pacific
17. PFAS Filtration Market, by Group
17.1. ASEAN
17.2. GCC
17.3. European Union
17.4. BRICS
17.5. G7
17.6. NATO
18. PFAS Filtration Market, by Country
18.1. United States
18.2. Canada
18.3. Mexico
18.4. Brazil
18.5. United Kingdom
18.6. Germany
18.7. France
18.8. Russia
18.9. Italy
18.10. Spain
18.11. China
18.12. India
18.13. Japan
18.14. Australia
18.15. South Korea
19. Competitive Landscape
19.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
19.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
19.3. Competitive Analysis
19.3.1. Veolia Environnement SA
19.3.2. Cyclopure, Inc.
19.3.3. AECOM
19.3.4. Calgon Carbon Corporation by Kuraray Group
19.3.5. Clean Harbors, Inc.
19.3.6. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
19.3.7. Enviri Corporation
19.3.8. Evoqua Water Technologies LLC by Xylem Inc.
19.3.9. Filtra-Systems Company LLC
19.3.10. Hydranautics by Nitto Denko Corporation
19.3.11. Jacobs Solutions Inc.
19.3.12. Lanxess AG
19.3.13. Lenntech B.V.
19.3.14. Merck KGaA
19.3.15. Newterra Corporation
19.3.16. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
19.3.17. Pentair
19.3.18. Puraffinity Ltd.
19.3.19. ResinTech, Inc.
19.3.20. WSP Global Inc.
19.3.21. Envirogen Technologies, Inc.
19.3.22. Pall Corporation
19.3.23. 3M Company
19.3.24. SciDev Limited

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this PFAS Filtration market report include:
  • Veolia Environnement SA
  • Cyclopure, Inc.
  • AECOM
  • Calgon Carbon Corporation by Kuraray Group
  • Clean Harbors, Inc.
  • DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
  • Enviri Corporation
  • Evoqua Water Technologies LLC by Xylem Inc.
  • Filtra-Systems Company LLC
  • Hydranautics by Nitto Denko Corporation
  • Jacobs Solutions Inc.
  • Lanxess AG
  • Lenntech B.V.
  • Merck KGaA
  • Newterra Corporation
  • Parker-Hannifin Corporation
  • Pentair
  • Puraffinity Ltd.
  • ResinTech, Inc.
  • WSP Global Inc.
  • Envirogen Technologies, Inc.
  • Pall Corporation
  • 3M Company
  • SciDev Limited

Table Information