+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Naval Combat Systems Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2021-2031

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 186 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 6008152
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization
Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

The Global Naval Combat Systems Market is projected to expand from USD 41.45 Billion in 2025 to USD 58.04 Billion by 2031, achieving a CAGR of 5.77%. Naval combat systems comprise the integrated electronic networks, sensors, and weaponry equipped on military vessels to direct command, control, and threat engagement missions. The market is primarily driven by rising geopolitical instability and territorial disputes, which require improved maritime surveillance and strike capacities. Additionally, nations are prioritizing the modernization of aging fleets to ensure interoperability and sustain strategic deterrence against rising asymmetric threats, fostering a continuous demand for updated architectures distinct from general technological trends.

However, the market encounters a major obstacle regarding the high costs of developing and integrating these sophisticated technologies. Budgetary limits often hinder procurement initiatives, especially in price-sensitive regions, despite the operational need. Highlighting the substantial funding environment required, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute reported that global military expenditure rose by 9.4 percent in real terms in 2024, reaching $2.71 trillion. While this spending supports market expansion, the massive capital requirements for advanced naval systems continue to restrict rapid growth in developing markets.

Market Drivers

Rising global defense budgets and military spending act as a key driver for the market, facilitating the capital needed for comprehensive fleet modernization initiatives. Governments are dedicating significant resources to acquire new vessels and update existing platforms with integrated sensors and weaponry to preserve strategic deterrence. This financial focus enables the procurement of high-cost architectures essential for maritime dominance and guarantees interoperability among allied forces. As noted by the U.S. Department of the Navy in March 2024 within the 'Highlights of the Department of the Navy FY 2025 Budget', the service requested $32.4 billion explicitly for shipbuilding and conversion to maintain a combat-credible fleet, funding the installation of updated management networks on next-generation hulls.

Concurrently, the integration of artificial intelligence and autonomous technologies is altering naval operational needs, requiring systems capable of managing unmanned assets. Navies are pivoting toward network-centric warfare where unmanned surface and underwater vehicles function alongside traditional combatants, necessitating adaptable command modules.

This technological evolution calls for new software architectures able to process immense amounts of sensor data without human interference. According to the U.S. Department of Defense's 'Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Request' from March 2024, the department sought $500 million for the Replicator initiative to hasten the deployment of all-domain autonomous systems. The industrial impact is evident in contractor results; Thales reported a Defense and Security order intake of €6.1 billion in the first half of 2024.

Market Challenges

The high cost linked to the development and integration of complex naval combat systems remains a primary barrier to wider market growth. Advanced electronic networks, sensors, and weaponry demand significant capital investment for research, engineering, and installation. These financial requirements often lead to prolonged procurement cycles or reduced program scopes, as naval forces must weigh modernization targets against limited budgets. Consequently, the immense unit cost of these integrated architectures restricts the capacity of price-sensitive nations to acquire updated capabilities, thereby limiting the volume of new contracts and slowing the overall rate of market adoption.

This financial burden is exemplified by the substantial share of defense budgets needed to support such acquisitions. According to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, in 2024, member nations allocated an estimated 30.9 percent of their total defense expenditure specifically toward major equipment and associated research and development. This heavy allocation highlights the resource-intensive nature of procuring modern military hardware. Such high capital barriers prevent the rapid diffusion of new technologies into developing maritime security forces, directly impeding the growth potential of the global market.

Market Trends

There is a clear transition away from proprietary, closed systems toward open-architecture frameworks that enable navies to rapidly incorporate best-of-breed sensors. The adoption of Modular Open Systems Architecture (MOSA) expedites upgrades and lowers vendor lock-in by separating software from specific hardware. The extent of this shift is visible in major procurement programs meant to unify fleet capabilities through shared software libraries. As reported by USNI News in July 2025 regarding the 'Missile Defense Agency Issues Lockheed Martin Aegis Contract Worth Up to $2.97B', the agency awarded a contract worth up to $2.97 billion to Lockheed Martin to upgrade the Aegis combat system, explicitly requiring integration into the Integrated Combat Systems software architecture.

Simultaneously, navies are moving high-energy laser systems from experimental prototypes to operational fleet integration to combat asymmetric threats such as drone swarms. These directed energy weapon systems provide deep magazines and a significantly lower cost-per-shot relative to traditional kinetic interceptors, making them vital for financial sustainability. This operationalization is accelerating through significant manufacturing commitments aimed at equipping frontline vessels with laser-directed energy weapons. According to Naval Technology in November 2025, in the 'MBDA wins £316m contract to supply DragonFire to Royal Navy', the UK Ministry of Defence awarded a £316 million contract to MBDA UK to deliver DragonFire laser systems for installation on Royal Navy Type 45 destroyers.

Key Players Profiled in the Naval Combat Systems Market

  • BAE Systems PLC
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • RTX Corporation
  • Thales Group
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • Saab AB
  • L3Harris Technologies Inc.
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Safran SA
  • Elbit Systems Ltd.

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Naval Combat Systems Market has been segmented into the following categories:

Naval Combat Systems Market, by Type:

  • Weapon Systems
  • Electronic Warfare
  • C4ISR

Naval Combat Systems Market, by Platform Type:

  • Aircraft Carrier
  • Destroyers
  • Frigates
  • Corvettes
  • Submarine

Naval Combat Systems Market, by Region:

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Naval Combat Systems Market.

Available Customization

The analyst offers customization according to your specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Type (Weapon Systems, Electronic Warfare, C4ISR)
5.2.2. By Platform Type (Aircraft Carrier, Destroyers, Frigates, Corvettes, Submarine)
5.2.3. By Region
5.2.4. By Company (2025)
5.3. Market Map
6. North America Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Type
6.2.2. By Platform Type
6.2.3. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
6.3.2. Canada Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
6.3.3. Mexico Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
7. Europe Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Type
7.2.2. By Platform Type
7.2.3. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. Germany Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
7.3.2. France Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
7.3.3. United Kingdom Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
7.3.4. Italy Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
7.3.5. Spain Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
8. Asia-Pacific Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Type
8.2.2. By Platform Type
8.2.3. By Country
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
8.3.2. India Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
8.3.3. Japan Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
8.3.4. South Korea Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
8.3.5. Australia Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
9. Middle East & Africa Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Type
9.2.2. By Platform Type
9.2.3. By Country
9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
9.3.2. UAE Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
9.3.3. South Africa Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
10. South America Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Type
10.2.2. By Platform Type
10.2.3. By Country
10.3. South America: Country Analysis
10.3.1. Brazil Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
10.3.2. Colombia Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
10.3.3. Argentina Naval Combat Systems Market Outlook
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Mergers & Acquisitions (If Any)
12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
12.3. Recent Developments
13. Global Naval Combat Systems Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
14.1. Competition in the Industry
14.2. Potential of New Entrants
14.3. Power of Suppliers
14.4. Power of Customers
14.5. Threat of Substitute Products
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. BAE Systems PLC
15.1.1. Business Overview
15.1.2. Products & Services
15.1.3. Recent Developments
15.1.4. Key Personnel
15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
15.2. Lockheed Martin Corporation
15.3. RTX Corporation
15.4. Thales Group
15.5. General Dynamics Corporation
15.6. Saab AB
15.7. L3Harris Technologies Inc.
15.8. Northrop Grumman Corporation
15.9. Safran SA
15.10. Elbit Systems Ltd.
16. Strategic Recommendations

Companies Mentioned

The key players profiled in this Naval Combat Systems market report include:
  • BAE Systems PLC
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • RTX Corporation
  • Thales Group
  • General Dynamics Corporation
  • Saab AB
  • L3Harris Technologies Inc.
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Safran SA
  • Elbit Systems Ltd.

Table Information