+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 196 Pages
  • November 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6016535
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The gastrointestinal bleeding treatment devices market is rapidly evolving as healthcare organizations embrace next-generation technologies, data-driven platforms, and more dynamic regulatory standards. This drives significant changes in purchasing, technology integration, and patient management—factors that matter to leaders overseeing strategic decisions and procurement in the clinical device sector.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market Snapshot

The gastrointestinal bleeding treatment devices market grew from USD 559.43 million in 2024 to USD 590.93 million in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 859.29 million by 2032, reflecting a CAGR of 5.51%.

The primary drivers include demand for minimally invasive solutions, rising adoption of digital platforms, and broader clinical utilization. New regulatory measures and more favorable reimbursement policies are encouraging product advancement, enabling better device adoption and reliable market expansion.

Scope & Segmentation of the Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market

  • Product Types: Endoscopic clips deliver mechanical hemostasis, while various hemostatic agents—including powders, sheets, and sprays—provide tailored support for bleeding control. Injection therapies such as alcohol sclerosant, epinephrine, and polidocanol offer chemical alternatives for intervention. Thermal technologies—ranging from argon plasma coagulation to bipolar and heater probes—ensure targeted energy-based treatments.
  • Technology: The segment comprises flexible and rigid endoscopic systems, radiological approaches like angiographic embolization and mesenteric stenting, and both laparoscopic and conventional surgical methods, reflecting differing needs for clinical complexity and intervention.
  • Application Areas: Devices are implemented in cases of angiodysplasia, Dieulafoy lesion, Mallory-Weiss tear, peptic ulcers, and variceal bleeding. Each application requires customizable procedural techniques and adaptable device design.
  • End Users: Deployment environments include ambulatory surgical centers, gastroenterology clinics, and inpatient as well as outpatient hospital settings. Distinct procurement cycles and workflow preferences inform technology selection in each domain.
  • Indication Type: Solutions cover both lower (colonic and rectal) and upper (duodenal, esophageal, gastric) gastrointestinal bleeding, ensuring compatibility with anatomical and varying clinical severity requirements.
  • Regions Covered: The market analysis spans North and Latin America, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Notably, China, India, and Japan lead adoption, influenced by localized clinical imperatives and diverse device preferences.
  • Companies Analyzed: Competitive profiling includes Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic plc, Olympus Corporation, FUJIFILM Holdings, HOYA Corporation, Cook Medical, Johnson & Johnson, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Teleflex Incorporated, and ConMed Corporation, all reflecting sectoral innovation and a broad product range.

Key Takeaways for Senior Stakeholders

  • Collaboration between engineering, clinical, and compliance teams accelerates development of improved hemostatic materials and digital delivery solutions, establishing updated care protocols and influencing value-based models.
  • Minimally invasive devices and ongoing miniaturization shift treatment to outpatient procedures, deliver higher lesion-targeting precision, and boost operational efficiency.
  • Artificial intelligence and digital imaging tools are advancing diagnostic confidence, supporting more informed intraoperative decisions and expanding device adoption for challenging cases.
  • Procurement increasingly focuses on reimbursement reforms and outcome measurement, guiding long-term supplier partnerships and evaluation metrics.
  • Strengthening collaboration between radiology and endoscopy initiates demand for hybrid devices, enhancing the capacity to manage diverse, complex bleeding events.
  • Adaptive supply chain models—centered on localization and diversified sourcing—support resilience in response to regulatory changes and global distribution challenges.

Tariff Impact on Supply Chain and Cost Structures

The 2025 introduction of new US tariffs on select medical device components is influencing cost structures for gastrointestinal bleeding treatment device suppliers. Companies are shifting toward localized production, dual sourcing, and updated supplier agreements to maintain profitability and robust operations. Healthcare purchasers are placing a greater emphasis on supplier dependability and supply chain integrity, adjusting procurement standards to reinforce strategic planning in a volatile market scenario.

Research Methodology & Data Sources

Insights in this report result from structured interviews with clinical and procurement leaders, combined with secondary review of peer-reviewed literature, regulatory publications, and certified industry datasets. Cross-analysis with market participants validates findings to address the information needs of executive stakeholders.

Why This Report Matters

  • Empowers decision-makers to anticipate key trends, manage regulatory risks, and adapt investment strategies related to gastrointestinal bleeding treatment devices.
  • Delineates current developments in device segmentation, clinical application, and operational shifts arising from new reimbursement and oversight guidelines.
  • Supports organizations in aligning R&D, logistics, and commercialization plans for sustainable performance within evolving global regulatory frameworks.

Conclusion

Continuous product innovation and adaptive supply strategies shape this market, allowing organizations to address changing clinical demands and regulatory expectations confidently.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Adoption of AI-powered endoscopy platforms for real-time bleeding detection and management
5.2. Development of novel hemostatic powders with targeted adhesion for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage control
5.3. Integration of telemedicine and remote monitoring solutions for post-endoscopic bleeding management in rural patients
5.4. Emergence of biodegradable stent technologies for sustained esophageal variceal hemorrhage treatment
5.5. Utilization of over-the-scope clips combined with injectable gels for refractory gastrointestinal bleeding cases
5.6. Advancements in endoscopic suturing devices enabling precise defect closure in acute GI bleeding procedures
5.7. Adoption of digital health platforms for real-time data analytics in gastrointestinal bleeding outcomes tracking
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market, by Product Type
8.1. Endoscopic Clips
8.2. Hemostatic Agents
8.2.1. Powder
8.2.2. Sheets
8.2.3. Spray
8.3. Injection Therapy
8.3.1. Alcohol Sclerosant
8.3.2. Epinephrine
8.3.3. Polidocanol
8.4. Thermal Devices
8.4.1. Argon Plasma Coagulation
8.4.2. Bipolar Probes
8.4.3. Heater Probes
9. Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market, by Technology
9.1. Endoscopic
9.1.1. Flexible Endoscopy
9.1.2. Rigid Endoscopy
9.2. Radiologic
9.2.1. Angiographic Embolization
9.2.2. Mesenteric Stenting
9.3. Surgical
9.3.1. Laparoscopic Surgery
9.3.2. Open Surgery
10. Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market, by Application
10.1. Angiodysplasia
10.2. Dieulafoy Lesion
10.3. Mallory-Weiss Tear
10.4. Peptic Ulcer
10.5. Variceal Bleeding
11. Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market, by End User
11.1. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
11.2. Gastroenterology Clinics
11.3. Hospitals Inpatient
11.4. Hospitals Outpatient
12. Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market, by Indication Type
12.1. Lower GI
12.1.1. Colonic Bleeding
12.1.2. Rectal Bleeding
12.2. Upper GI
12.2.1. Duodenal Bleeding
12.2.2. Esophageal Bleeding
12.2.3. Gastric Bleeding
13. Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. Competitive Landscape
16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
16.3. Competitive Analysis
16.3.1. Boston Scientific Corporation
16.3.2. Medtronic plc
16.3.3. Olympus Corporation
16.3.4. FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation
16.3.5. HOYA Corporation
16.3.6. Cook Medical LLC
16.3.7. Johnson & Johnson
16.3.8. B. Braun Melsungen AG
16.3.9. Teleflex Incorporated
16.3.10. ConMed Corporation

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Gastrointestinal Bleeding Treatment Devices market report include:
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Medtronic PLC
  • Olympus Corporation
  • FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation
  • HOYA Corporation
  • Cook Medical LLC
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • B. Braun Melsungen AG
  • Teleflex Incorporated
  • ConMed Corporation

Table Information