+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2021-2031

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 180 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 6034941
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization
Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

The Global Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market is projected to expand from USD 9.68 Billion in 2025 to USD 13.19 Billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 5.29%. These specialized gantry structures are anchored at port terminals to transfer intermodal containers between docked vessels and the quay. The primary catalyst for this growth is the deployment of ultra-large container vessels, which requires equipment with extended outreach and superior lifting height. Furthermore, the fundamental drive for port efficiency compels operators to invest in faster handling capabilities to minimize vessel turnaround times, reflecting structural requirements of modern maritime trade rather than transient preferences.

However, high capital expenditure requirements pose a significant barrier that can impede rapid market expansion, particularly in developing regions. Terminal operators must navigate complex financing landscapes and fluctuating global trade volumes, which often dictate procurement timelines. This cautious approach to infrastructure investment is evident in recent industry figures; according to the Port Equipment Manufacturers Association, the global market recorded the delivery of 208 ship-to-shore cranes in 2024. This statistic underscores a measured pace of deployment as stakeholders balance capacity enhancements with economic prudence.

Market Drivers

Escalating global seaborne trade and container traffic serve as the primary structural catalyst for the Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market, creating a necessity for higher throughput capacities at major terminals. As container traffic intensifies, port operators are compelled to scale their infrastructure to accommodate increased cargo density and larger vessel sizes. This demand is supported by recent industry projections; according to BIMCO's July 2024 'Container Shipping Market Overview', global container volumes were forecast to grow by between 5.0% and 6.0% in 2024. This surge forces terminals to replace legacy equipment with cranes capable of faster cycle times and extended outreach, driving sales for leading manufacturers like Liebherr, whose Maritime Cranes segment achieved a turnover of €977 million according to their April 2024 Annual Report.

Simultaneously, the expansion and modernization of global port infrastructure are accelerating market activity as operators prioritize operational efficiency and turnaround optimization. Terminals are aggressively retrofitting existing fleets or commissioning advanced units to mitigate congestion and maintain competitiveness. This trend toward high-performance solutions is evident in recent financial disclosures; according to Konecranes' October 2024 Interim Report, the Port Solutions segment recorded an order intake of €334 million in the third quarter alone, representing a 43.2% increase year-on-year. This sharp rise highlights the critical focus on upgrading port capabilities to handle complex logistical requirements.

Market Challenges

The high capital expenditure required to acquire ship-to-shore cranes constitutes a formidable barrier that directly restricts market growth. These massive units demand significant upfront financial commitment, forcing terminal operators to rely on complex credit structures that are highly sensitive to global economic shifts. When trade forecasts become uncertain or interest rates increase, the financial risk associated with such large-scale infrastructure investments becomes prohibitive for many ports. Consequently, decision-makers often postpone necessary equipment upgrades or expansion projects to preserve liquidity, leading to a tangible slowdown in procurement activity.

This pattern of investment reticence is evident in specific regional market contractions where economic caution has delayed infrastructure modernization. According to the Port Equipment Manufacturers Association, in 2024, the volume of ship-to-shore cranes delivered to North American terminals declined to 28 units, representing a significant drop from the 47 units recorded in the previous year. This decrease demonstrates how financial constraints and fiscal prudence effectively throttle equipment uptake in key regions, thereby limiting the broader expansion potential of the global industry.

Market Trends

The Transition to Remote Operation Stations (ROS) and Control Rooms is fundamentally altering the operational paradigm of the Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market, driven by the need to decouple human operators from the physical hazards of the cabin. This trend is characterized by the migration of control functions to centralized, ergonomic office environments, which significantly enhances safety and allows for the implementation of advanced assist systems. Terminal operators are increasingly retrofitting legacy infrastructure with these technologies to extend asset lifecycles and improve precision, as highlighted by DatamarNews in October 2025, which reported that Log-In completed a R$42 million investment to upgrade three cranes at Vila Velha Terminal with Remote Crane Operation Systems (RCOS) and 3D vision technology.

Concurrently, the Adoption of Electrified and Hybrid Low-Emission Powertrains has emerged as a critical trend, compelled by stringent environmental regulations and corporate decarbonization goals. Ports are shifting away from diesel-hydraulic systems in favor of fully electric units that utilize grid power or battery technologies to achieve zero-emission operations at the quay. This shift is particularly evident in the design of greenfield terminals where sustainability is a core procurement criterion, exemplified by WorldCargo News in February 2025, which noted that the new Rijeka Gateway terminal integrated four ZPMC ship-to-shore cranes as part of a fleet where 95% of the equipment is electric and powered exclusively by renewable energy.

Key Players Profiled in the Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market

  • Liebherr Group
  • Wison Group
  • SANY Group
  • Anupam Industries Limited
  • Kalmar Corporation
  • MacGregor Industrial Supplies Limited
  • Terex Corporation
  • NCCCO Services, LLC

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market has been segmented into the following categories:

Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market, by Product Type:

  • High-Profile Cranes
  • Low-Profile Cranes

Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market, by Power Supply:

  • Diesel
  • Electric
  • Hybrid

Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market, by Outreach:

  • Up-to 40m
  • 40m to 49m
  • 50m to 60m
  • Greater than 60m

Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market, by Lifting Capacity:

  • Panamax STS Cranes
  • Post Panamax STS Cranes
  • Super-Post Panamax STS Cranes

Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market, by Region:

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market.

Available Customization

The analyst offers customization according to your specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Product Type (High-Profile Cranes, Low-Profile Cranes)
5.2.2. By Power Supply (Diesel, Electric, Hybrid)
5.2.3. By Outreach (Up-to 40m, 40m to 49m, 50m to 60m, Greater than 60m)
5.2.4. By Lifting Capacity (Panamax STS Cranes, Post Panamax STS Cranes, Super-Post Panamax STS Cranes)
5.2.5. By Region
5.2.6. By Company (2025)
5.3. Market Map
6. North America Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Product Type
6.2.2. By Power Supply
6.2.3. By Outreach
6.2.4. By Lifting Capacity
6.2.5. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
6.3.2. Canada Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
6.3.3. Mexico Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
7. Europe Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Product Type
7.2.2. By Power Supply
7.2.3. By Outreach
7.2.4. By Lifting Capacity
7.2.5. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. Germany Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
7.3.2. France Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
7.3.3. United Kingdom Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
7.3.4. Italy Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
7.3.5. Spain Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
8. Asia-Pacific Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Product Type
8.2.2. By Power Supply
8.2.3. By Outreach
8.2.4. By Lifting Capacity
8.2.5. By Country
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
8.3.2. India Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
8.3.3. Japan Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
8.3.4. South Korea Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
8.3.5. Australia Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
9. Middle East & Africa Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Product Type
9.2.2. By Power Supply
9.2.3. By Outreach
9.2.4. By Lifting Capacity
9.2.5. By Country
9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
9.3.2. UAE Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
9.3.3. South Africa Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
10. South America Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Product Type
10.2.2. By Power Supply
10.2.3. By Outreach
10.2.4. By Lifting Capacity
10.2.5. By Country
10.3. South America: Country Analysis
10.3.1. Brazil Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
10.3.2. Colombia Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
10.3.3. Argentina Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market Outlook
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Mergers & Acquisitions (If Any)
12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
12.3. Recent Developments
13. Global Ship-to-Shore Cranes Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
14.1. Competition in the Industry
14.2. Potential of New Entrants
14.3. Power of Suppliers
14.4. Power of Customers
14.5. Threat of Substitute Products
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. Liebherr Group
15.1.1. Business Overview
15.1.2. Products & Services
15.1.3. Recent Developments
15.1.4. Key Personnel
15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
15.2. Wison Group
15.3. SANY Group
15.4. Anupam Industries Limited
15.5. Kalmar Corporation
15.6. MacGregor Industrial Supplies Limited
15.7. Terex Corporation
15.8. NCCCO Services, LLC
16. Strategic Recommendations

Companies Mentioned

The key players profiled in this Ship-to-Shore Cranes market report include:
  • Liebherr Group
  • Wison Group
  • SANY Group
  • Anupam Industries Limited
  • Kalmar Corporation
  • MacGregor Industrial Supplies Limited
  • Terex Corporation
  • NCCCO Services, LLC

Table Information