+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Military Wearables Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2021-2031

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 185 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 6036367
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization
Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

The Global Military Wearables Market is projected to expand from USD 5.67 Billion in 2025 to USD 7.18 Billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 4.01%. These systems, comprising body-worn electronics and smart textiles, are engineered to augment dismounted soldiers by improving their communication, physiological monitoring, and situational awareness capabilities. The primary catalyst for this market is the critical operational need for network-centric warfare, where personnel survivability and real-time data transmission are essential. This demand is underpinned by major government investments in soldier modernization; according to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, member nations' total military spending hit USD 1.5 trillion in 2024, indicating significant funds are available for upgrading tactical equipment and procuring advanced defense technologies.

However, the market faces a substantial hurdle regarding Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP) constraints. As the functionality of wearable devices expands, their power requirements increase, necessitating the use of heavy battery packs. This added weight burdens the soldier, negatively impacting endurance and mobility during prolonged field missions, which in turn impedes the widespread expansion of the market.

Market Drivers

Increasing government funding for soldier modernization programs is fundamentally transforming the sector as nations aim to equip infantry with enhanced lethality and survivability. Defense departments are dedicating significant budgets to shift from analog gear to integrated digital soldier systems, accelerating the acquisition of smart textiles and body-worn electronics while enabling manufacturers to manage the high research and development costs of next-generation ruggedized equipment. For example, Rheinmetall announced in a February 2025 press release titled 'Rheinmetall awarded framework contract for soldier systems' that it secured a record €3.1 billion framework contract to update the Infantry Soldier of the Future system for the German Bundeswehr. These allocations occur within a broader financial context where, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, global military expenditure reached a historic peak of $2.72 trillion in 2024, providing a solid capital base for such advanced technological acquisitions.

Furthermore, the critical need for superior C4ISR capabilities and situational awareness drives the adoption of tactical computing devices and wearable displays. Modern combat requires dismounted soldiers to act as connected nodes within the Internet of Military Things (IoMT), sharing navigation intelligence and target data in real time. This operational imperative compels manufacturers to create low-latency solutions that integrate seamlessly with battle management networks, boosting the market for sophisticated tactical processors. Illustrating this trend, GovCon Wire reported in February 2025 in the article 'ACI Secures $276M Army Contract for Nett Warrior Support' that the U.S. Army awarded a $276 million contract to Augustine Consulting Inc. to support the Nett Warrior program, a pivotal system for delivering precise battlefield information to ground unit leaders.

Market Challenges

The limitations associated with Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP) represent a primary technical barrier restricting the growth of the global military wearables market. As reliance on network-centric capabilities increases, the energy density required for continuous sensor operation and data transmission necessitates heavy battery packs. This increased weight burden directly impairs the physical agility and endurance of soldiers, creating a detrimental trade-off between technological capability and combat effectiveness. Consequently, defense agencies are forced to limit the procurement scale of power-intensive wearable systems to avoid compromising the mobility of dismounted units during operations.

This operational constraint persists despite a historic rise in available defense capital. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute reported in April 2024 that global military expenditure reached a record high of USD 2.44 trillion. While this figure indicates a robust financial environment for acquiring advanced defense tools, the physical restrictions imposed by current battery technologies prevent the market from fully absorbing these funds. As a result, the adoption rate of comprehensive wearable suits remains capped by the physiological limits of the human operator rather than by budget availability.

Market Trends

The deployment of Integrated Visual Augmentation Systems (IVAS) signifies a fundamental shift in soldier lethality, evolving from traditional night vision to heads-up displays that overlay tactical data directly into the operator's view. This technology merges thermal imaging, navigation, and platoon-level connectivity into a single visor, allowing infantry to engage targets with greater precision while maintaining situational awareness without checking handheld devices. The scale of this transition is reflected in federal procurement priorities; according to DefenseScoop's March 2024 article 'Army seeks $255M to procure more than 3,000 IVAS augmented reality systems in fiscal 2025', the U.S. Army requested $255 million to acquire 3,162 units of the IVAS 1.2 variant, emphasizing the strategic goal of equipping dismounted units with fighter-pilot-like capabilities.

Simultaneously, the proliferation of soft robotic exosuits is emerging as a practical solution to musculoskeletal injuries caused by increasing equipment loads. Unlike rigid industrial exoskeletons, these systems employ cable-driven actuators and powered textiles to synchronize with human gait, effectively reducing the metabolic energy cost of carrying heavy rucksacks over rough terrain. This focus on physiological augmentation is driving specific research funding to validate efficacy before widespread fielding; for instance, the U.S. Department of Defense announced in its 'Contracts for May 8, 2024' release that it awarded a $9.3 million contract to the Jackson Foundation to support exoskeleton research services, highlighting the commitment to integrating these technologies into standard infantry operations.

Key Players Profiled in the Military Wearables Market

  • ABB Ltd.
  • Aeris Technologies, Inc.
  • Atmos International Limited
  • Physical Sciences Inc.
  • Schneider Electric S.E
  • Siemens Energy AG
  • Teledyne FLIR LLC
  • L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • BAE Systems PLC

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Military Wearables Market has been segmented into the following categories:

Military Wearables Market, by Product Type:

  • Eyewear
  • Headwear
  • Wristwear
  • Bodywear
  • Others

Military Wearables Market, by End User:

  • Airborne Forces
  • Land Forces
  • Naval Forces

Military Wearables Market, by Region:

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Military Wearables Market.

Available Customization

The analyst offers customization according to your specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Military Wearables Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Product Type (Eyewear, Headwear, Wristwear, Bodywear, Others)
5.2.2. By End User (Airborne Forces, Land Forces, Naval Forces)
5.2.3. By Region
5.2.4. By Company (2025)
5.3. Market Map
6. North America Military Wearables Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Product Type
6.2.2. By End User
6.2.3. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Military Wearables Market Outlook
6.3.2. Canada Military Wearables Market Outlook
6.3.3. Mexico Military Wearables Market Outlook
7. Europe Military Wearables Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Product Type
7.2.2. By End User
7.2.3. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. Germany Military Wearables Market Outlook
7.3.2. France Military Wearables Market Outlook
7.3.3. United Kingdom Military Wearables Market Outlook
7.3.4. Italy Military Wearables Market Outlook
7.3.5. Spain Military Wearables Market Outlook
8. Asia-Pacific Military Wearables Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Product Type
8.2.2. By End User
8.2.3. By Country
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Military Wearables Market Outlook
8.3.2. India Military Wearables Market Outlook
8.3.3. Japan Military Wearables Market Outlook
8.3.4. South Korea Military Wearables Market Outlook
8.3.5. Australia Military Wearables Market Outlook
9. Middle East & Africa Military Wearables Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Product Type
9.2.2. By End User
9.2.3. By Country
9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Military Wearables Market Outlook
9.3.2. UAE Military Wearables Market Outlook
9.3.3. South Africa Military Wearables Market Outlook
10. South America Military Wearables Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Product Type
10.2.2. By End User
10.2.3. By Country
10.3. South America: Country Analysis
10.3.1. Brazil Military Wearables Market Outlook
10.3.2. Colombia Military Wearables Market Outlook
10.3.3. Argentina Military Wearables Market Outlook
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Mergers & Acquisitions (If Any)
12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
12.3. Recent Developments
13. Global Military Wearables Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
14.1. Competition in the Industry
14.2. Potential of New Entrants
14.3. Power of Suppliers
14.4. Power of Customers
14.5. Threat of Substitute Products
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. ABB Ltd.
15.1.1. Business Overview
15.1.2. Products & Services
15.1.3. Recent Developments
15.1.4. Key Personnel
15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
15.2. Aeris Technologies, Inc.
15.3. Atmos International Limited
15.4. Physical Sciences Inc.
15.5. Schneider Electric S.E
15.6. Siemens Energy AG
15.7. Teledyne FLIR LLC
15.8. L3Harris Technologies, Inc
15.9. Northrop Grumman Corporation
15.10. BAE Systems plc
16. Strategic Recommendations

Companies Mentioned

The key players profiled in this Military Wearables market report include:
  • ABB Ltd.
  • Aeris Technologies, Inc.
  • Atmos International Limited
  • Physical Sciences Inc.
  • Schneider Electric S.E
  • Siemens Energy AG
  • Teledyne FLIR LLC
  • L3Harris Technologies, Inc
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • BAE Systems PLC

Table Information