+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Military Jammer Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2021-2031

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 180 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 6040372
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization
Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

The Global Military Jammer Market is projected to expand significantly, growing from USD 7.26 Billion in 2025 to USD 10.85 Billion by 2031, representing a compound annual growth rate of 6.93%. These electronic warfare systems are essential for disrupting enemy communications, radar, and navigation by transmitting interfering radio frequency energy. The market's upward trajectory is primarily driven by rising geopolitical instability, the extensive proliferation of unmanned aerial systems, and the increasing digitization of battlefield operations, all of which demand heightened spectrum dominance. Highlighting the scale of this financial commitment, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) reported that global military expenditure reached 2.7 trillion dollars in 2024, reflecting the massive investment nations are making in defense modernization and electronic readiness.

Despite this growth, the market faces a substantial obstacle in the rapid technological advancement of Electronic Counter-Countermeasures (ECCM). As adversaries deploy sophisticated frequency-hopping algorithms and anti-jamming protocols, jamming systems risk becoming obsolete shortly after they are fielded. This rapid turnover necessitates continuous, capital-intensive research cycles to ensure systems remain operationally relevant. Consequently, the high costs and technical complexities involved in constantly upgrading these technologies can burden procurement budgets, potentially delaying the effective integration of jamming capabilities across broader military forces.

Market Drivers

The rapid spread of hostile Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) acts as a primary catalyst for the market, forcing defense agencies to procure specialized jamming solutions to counter asymmetric aerial threats. With state and non-state actors increasingly utilizing low-cost commercial drones for surveillance and attacks, militaries are aggressively funding non-kinetic defeat systems to disrupt command links and protect forces. This strategic priority is reflected in fiscal planning; as noted by DefenseScoop in March 2024, the U.S. Army requested $447 million for fiscal 2025 specifically for counter-small UAS capabilities, including the mobile and fixed-site LIDS family of systems.

Simultaneously, the modernization of military electronic warfare architectures is accelerating the development of software-defined jamming pods capable of overcoming complex enemy air defenses. Transitioning from legacy analog systems to intelligent, frequency-agile platforms is vital for maintaining electromagnetic spectrum superiority against near-peer rivals. In September 2024, L3Harris Technologies announced it had secured a contract worth up to $587 million to provide advanced tactical jamming pods under the Next Generation Jammer - Low Band program. This push for advanced capability is global, illustrated by Lockheed Martin receiving a $113 million contract in 2024 to supply surface electronic warfare systems to the government of Japan, emphasizing the worldwide need for fleet electronic readiness.

Market Challenges

The swift technological evolution of Electronic Counter-Countermeasures (ECCM) presents a major barrier to the growth of the Global Military Jammer Market. As adversaries continuously refine anti-jamming protocols and frequency-hopping algorithms, jamming systems face the risk of becoming technically obsolete almost immediately upon deployment. This dynamic compels manufacturers to engage in perpetual, capital-intensive research cycles to maintain operational relevance, significantly increasing the development costs associated with effective electronic warfare systems.

This need for constant innovation creates a heavy financial burden that often diverts funds from mass procurement to development. According to the Aerospace, Security and Defence Industries Association of Europe (ASD), defense Research and Development (R&D) expenditure in the sector rose by 9.4 percent in 2024, reaching 25.2 billion euros. Such escalating costs for developing next-generation capabilities strain defense budgets, effectively limiting the quantity of advanced units that nations can afford to acquire. Consequently, the high financial threshold required to maintain spectrum dominance delays the widespread integration of updated jamming capabilities, directly slowing the overall volume of market growth.

Market Trends

The integration of jamming payloads onto unmanned autonomous platforms is fundamentally reshaping the market by decentralizing electronic attack capabilities and enabling high-risk stand-in jamming operations. Defense forces are increasingly moving away from relying solely on large, manned electronic warfare aircraft, opting instead to equip expendable or reusable drones with compact jamming modules. This shift allows commanders to project electromagnetic disruption deep into contested areas without endangering personnel, significantly improving the suppression of enemy air defenses. Highlighting this trend, Washington Technology reported in January 2025 that BlueHalo secured a $49.9 million contract from the U.S. Navy to deliver sensor hardware and support electronic warfare initiatives for uncrewed aerial systems.

Concurrently, the shift toward multi-domain and network-centric jamming operations is characterizing the market as nations seek unified combat solutions that synchronize effects across land, air, and the electromagnetic spectrum. Modern procurement strategies are evolving beyond standalone jamming units, favoring integrated packages where electronic warfare systems operate in concert with kinetic assets like artillery and combat drones to dismantle adversary networks. This move toward comprehensive, multi-layered capability is evident in major international deals; as reported by Global Defense Corp in December 2025, Elbit Systems received a $2.3 billion contract to supply the United Arab Emirates with a suite of systems, including unmanned combat platforms and electronic warfare capabilities.

Key Players Profiled in the Military Jammer Market

  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • BAE Systems PLC
  • RTX Corporation
  • L3Harris Technologies Inc.
  • Thales SA
  • Leonardo S.p.A.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • Mercury Systems, Inc.
  • Rheinmetall AG
  • Chemring Group PLC

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Military Jammer Market has been segmented into the following categories:

Military Jammer Market, by Jamming Type:

  • Radar Systems
  • Communication Network

Military Jammer Market, by Deployment Type:

  • Ground-based
  • Naval
  • Airborne

Military Jammer Market, by Application Type:

  • Counter-IED
  • Bomb Disposal
  • Military Convoy Protection
  • Anti-Riot & Law Enforcement

Military Jammer Market, by Region:

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Military Jammer Market.

Available Customization

The analyst offers customization according to your specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Military Jammer Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Jamming Type (Radar Systems, Communication Network)
5.2.2. By Deployment Type (Ground-based, Naval, Airborne)
5.2.3. By Application Type (Counter-IED, Bomb Disposal, Military Convoy Protection, Anti-Riot & Law Enforcement)
5.2.4. By Region
5.2.5. By Company (2025)
5.3. Market Map
6. North America Military Jammer Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Jamming Type
6.2.2. By Deployment Type
6.2.3. By Application Type
6.2.4. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Military Jammer Market Outlook
6.3.2. Canada Military Jammer Market Outlook
6.3.3. Mexico Military Jammer Market Outlook
7. Europe Military Jammer Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Jamming Type
7.2.2. By Deployment Type
7.2.3. By Application Type
7.2.4. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. Germany Military Jammer Market Outlook
7.3.2. France Military Jammer Market Outlook
7.3.3. United Kingdom Military Jammer Market Outlook
7.3.4. Italy Military Jammer Market Outlook
7.3.5. Spain Military Jammer Market Outlook
8. Asia-Pacific Military Jammer Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Jamming Type
8.2.2. By Deployment Type
8.2.3. By Application Type
8.2.4. By Country
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Military Jammer Market Outlook
8.3.2. India Military Jammer Market Outlook
8.3.3. Japan Military Jammer Market Outlook
8.3.4. South Korea Military Jammer Market Outlook
8.3.5. Australia Military Jammer Market Outlook
9. Middle East & Africa Military Jammer Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Jamming Type
9.2.2. By Deployment Type
9.2.3. By Application Type
9.2.4. By Country
9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Military Jammer Market Outlook
9.3.2. UAE Military Jammer Market Outlook
9.3.3. South Africa Military Jammer Market Outlook
10. South America Military Jammer Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Jamming Type
10.2.2. By Deployment Type
10.2.3. By Application Type
10.2.4. By Country
10.3. South America: Country Analysis
10.3.1. Brazil Military Jammer Market Outlook
10.3.2. Colombia Military Jammer Market Outlook
10.3.3. Argentina Military Jammer Market Outlook
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Mergers & Acquisitions (If Any)
12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
12.3. Recent Developments
13. Global Military Jammer Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
14.1. Competition in the Industry
14.2. Potential of New Entrants
14.3. Power of Suppliers
14.4. Power of Customers
14.5. Threat of Substitute Products
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. Northrop Grumman Corporation
15.1.1. Business Overview
15.1.2. Products & Services
15.1.3. Recent Developments
15.1.4. Key Personnel
15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
15.2. BAE Systems plc
15.3. RTX Corporation
15.4. L3Harris Technologies Inc.
15.5. Thales SA
15.6. Leonardo S.p.A.
15.7. Lockheed Martin Corporation
15.8. Mercury Systems, Inc.
15.9. Rheinmetall AG
15.10. Chemring Group PLC
16. Strategic Recommendations

Companies Mentioned

The key players profiled in this Military Jammer market report include:
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • BAE Systems PLC
  • RTX Corporation
  • L3Harris Technologies Inc.
  • Thales SA
  • Leonardo S.p.A.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • Mercury Systems, Inc.
  • Rheinmetall AG
  • Chemring Group PLC

Table Information