+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2021-2031

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 180 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 6050195
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization
Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

The Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market is projected to expand from USD 4.91 Billion in 2025 to USD 6.44 Billion by 2031, achieving a Compound Annual Growth Rate of 4.62%. This sector encompasses specialized containment solutions such as rigid drums, flexible pouches, and intermediate bulk containers, all designed to maintain the safety and effectiveness of agrochemicals like fertilizers and pesticides. The market's upward trajectory is primarily underpinned by the growing global need to improve crop yields, which necessitates higher volumes of chemical inputs, as well as strict safety regulations governing the logistics of hazardous materials. Data from the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2024 indicates that global agricultural pesticide usage hit 3.70 million tonnes, underscoring the massive scale of products that require secure packaging.

However, the market faces significant hurdles related to environmental sustainability, specifically regarding the intricate process of recycling and disposing of contaminated plastic waste. Developing effective circular economy frameworks for packaging that has held hazardous chemicals is difficult, and increasing regulatory demands to cut down on non-recyclable materials create ongoing obstacles. These challenges threaten to limit market growth and force companies to make expensive adjustments to their supply chains to ensure compliance and sustainability.

Market Drivers

The rising global demand for food and the consequent need for improved crop yields serve as the main engines for growth in the agricultural chemical packaging industry. As farmers aim to get the most out of their land, the use of nutrients and crop protection agents increases, driving the need for durable, large-volume containers that guarantee product stability during transport. This increase in chemical usage directly boosts the demand for rigid intermediate bulk containers and jerry cans capable of holding potent formulations safely. For instance, the International Fertilizer Association's "Medium-Term Fertilizer Outlook 2024-2028" report from August 2024 forecasts that global fertilizer consumption will hit 203.7 million tonnes of nutrients in the 2024 financial year, highlighting the massive supply chain needs for specialized packaging to ensure safe delivery from factories to farms.

Concurrently, the shift towards sustainable and biodegradable packaging materials is altering market dynamics, spurred by strict environmental laws and a move towards circular economy models. Manufacturers are progressively swapping out standard high-density polyethylene for compostable options and post-consumer recycled resins to reduce plastic waste in agricultural environments. This change is backed by industry recovery initiatives that require the collection and processing of used containers. Cleanfarms' "2023 Annual Report", released in June 2024, noted that farmers returned 2.37 million kilograms of small empty containers for recycling, demonstrating the industry's dedication to recovery. Additionally, the OECD and FAO project a 1.3% annual growth in global agricultural production over the next decade as of 2024, suggesting that sustainable packaging solutions must expand quickly to meet this ongoing rise in output.

Market Challenges

Environmental sustainability represents a significant obstacle to the expansion of the agricultural chemical packaging sector, particularly concerning the management of plastic waste contaminated with hazardous residues. Since these containers hold dangerous chemicals, they cannot be processed through standard municipal recycling systems, requiring the implementation of costly and specialized reverse logistics networks. Consequently, manufacturers must operate within a strict regulatory environment that mandates expensive lifecycle management strategies to avoid environmental harm. This complexity drains financial resources that could otherwise be used for innovation and production scaling, thereby squeezing profit margins and hindering the uptake of advanced packaging solutions in areas lacking such recycling infrastructure.

The scale of this waste management challenge is highlighted by the immense volume of materials that need specialized treatment. In 2024, the Ag Container Recycling Council reported collecting roughly 11 million pounds of high-density polyethylene containers for recycling across the United States. This figure emphasizes the massive operational undertaking necessary to handle industry waste. The requirement to sustain these extensive recovery networks imposes a continuous financial burden on the market, restricting the rate at which suppliers can ramp up production to satisfy increasing agricultural demands.

Market Trends

Integrating digital anti-counterfeiting measures is becoming a key strategic focus for manufacturers aiming to fight the growing trade in illegal agrochemicals. With counterfeit and adulterated crop protection products threatening farm productivity and brand reputation, companies are adding holographic tags, encrypted QR codes, and NFC labels to their packaging for authentication purposes. This move towards digitalization enables stakeholders to instantly verify the origin of products, protecting the supply chain from dangerous, unregulated substances. The necessity of this shift is underscored by the size of the black market; a February 2024 report by CropLife Brasil titled "Low Prices and Misinformation Encourage the Illegal Pesticides Market in Brazil" revealed that illegal pesticide seizures in the country jumped to 813 tonnes in the 2022-2023 cycle, more than double the previous period's confiscations.

At the same time, the market is seeing a broad move towards Closed Transfer System (CTS) compatible containers to significantly enhance handling efficiency and operator safety. This trend involves modifying standard chemical closures and caps to connect easily with coupling devices, allowing farmers to move hazardous liquids into sprayer tanks without opening the containers. By removing the pouring step, these systems prevent spills and drastically reduce direct contact with concentrated active ingredients, meeting strict occupational health requirements. The impact is substantial; a June 2024 article in Farmers Weekly, "Cereals 2024: Sprayer closed transfer system starts UK rollout", reported that the easyconnect system reduced sprayer operator exposure to pesticides by about 95% compared to conventional filling methods.

Key Players Profiled in the Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market

  • SIG Group AG
  • Codefine International SA
  • Black Forest Container Systems, LLC
  • Greif, Inc.
  • Amcor PLC
  • NNZ Group BV
  • LC Packaging International BV
  • ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
  • Nexus Packaging Ltd.
  • Mauser Packaging Solutions

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market has been segmented into the following categories:

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, by Product Type:

  • Bags & Pouches
  • Bottles & Containers
  • Drums & Intermediate Bulk Containers
  • Others

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, by Material Type:

  • Paper
  • Plastic
  • Metal
  • Others

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, by Chemical:

  • Pesticides
  • Insecticides
  • Herbicides
  • Fertilizers
  • Others

Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market, by Region:

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market.

Available Customization

The analyst offers customization according to your specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Product Type (Bags & Pouches, Bottles & Containers, Drums & Intermediate Bulk Containers, Others)
5.2.2. By Material Type (Paper, Plastic, Metal, Others)
5.2.3. By Chemical (Pesticides, Insecticides, Herbicides, Fertilizers, Others)
5.2.4. By Region
5.2.5. By Company (2025)
5.3. Market Map
6. North America Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Product Type
6.2.2. By Material Type
6.2.3. By Chemical
6.2.4. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
6.3.2. Canada Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
6.3.3. Mexico Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
7. Europe Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Product Type
7.2.2. By Material Type
7.2.3. By Chemical
7.2.4. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. Germany Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
7.3.2. France Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
7.3.3. United Kingdom Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
7.3.4. Italy Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
7.3.5. Spain Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
8. Asia-Pacific Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Product Type
8.2.2. By Material Type
8.2.3. By Chemical
8.2.4. By Country
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
8.3.2. India Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
8.3.3. Japan Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
8.3.4. South Korea Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
8.3.5. Australia Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
9. Middle East & Africa Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Product Type
9.2.2. By Material Type
9.2.3. By Chemical
9.2.4. By Country
9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
9.3.2. UAE Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
9.3.3. South Africa Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
10. South America Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Product Type
10.2.2. By Material Type
10.2.3. By Chemical
10.2.4. By Country
10.3. South America: Country Analysis
10.3.1. Brazil Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
10.3.2. Colombia Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
10.3.3. Argentina Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market Outlook
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Mergers & Acquisitions (If Any)
12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
12.3. Recent Developments
13. Global Agricultural Chemical Packaging Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
14.1. Competition in the Industry
14.2. Potential of New Entrants
14.3. Power of Suppliers
14.4. Power of Customers
14.5. Threat of Substitute Products
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. SIG Group AG
15.1.1. Business Overview
15.1.2. Products & Services
15.1.3. Recent Developments
15.1.4. Key Personnel
15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
15.2. Codefine International SA
15.3. Black Forest Container Systems, LLC
15.4. Greif, Inc.
15.5. Amcor plc
15.6. NNZ Group BV
15.7. LC Packaging International BV
15.8. ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
15.9. Nexus Packaging Ltd.
15.10. Mauser Packaging Solutions
16. Strategic Recommendations

Companies Mentioned

The key players profiled in this Agricultural Chemical Packaging market report include:
  • SIG Group AG
  • Codefine International SA
  • Black Forest Container Systems, LLC
  • Greif, Inc.
  • Amcor PLC
  • NNZ Group BV
  • LC Packaging International BV
  • ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
  • Nexus Packaging Ltd.
  • Mauser Packaging Solutions

Table Information