+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Nuclear Fusion Power and Other Plasma Engineering Materials and Hardware Opportunities: Markets 2026-2046

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 218 Pages
  • July 2025
  • Region: Global
  • Zhar Research
  • ID: 6064829

The high expectations for fusion power will be met if the materials challenges are overcome. It is time for an unbiassed report on fusion power materials with PhD level analysis of the good, the bad and the possible in this large new market for advanced materials. It is the 283-page, Research report, “Nuclear Fusion Power and Other Plasma Engineering Materials Opportunities: Markets, Technology 2026-2046”. It has 6 SWOT appraisals, 7 chapters and covers 61 companies with 103 infograms, tables and graphs pulling it all together. Because the subject is now progressing rapidly, analysis of a large amount of research advances through 2025 is a major feature throughout.

Dealing with troublesome materials

Primary author Dr Peter Harrop advises, “The largest opportunity is for grid electricity followed by AI data centers but launch dates promised by those raising money should be treated with caution. Of the materials being trialled in fusion reactors, there are far too many that are extremely expensive, scarce, toxic or toxigen intermediaries. Resulting massive decommissioning costs are a concern.

For viability and wider use, a priority is making fusion reactor-generators simpler and smaller because this can mean less to go wrong, longer life, lower cost, more applications. Can we avoid fusion being another way of boiling water for power and instead produce electricity directly? Can materials be more multipurpose and much more efficient in their desired functions? What about reactor designs that are inherently simpler and smaller, and the same for subsystems such as THz gyrotrons, highest-power excimer lasers, magnets using high temperature superconductors and more? We closely look at all these aspects and the spin-off industries providing earlier paybacks for your advanced materials.”

Report structure

The 40-page “Executive Summary and Conclusions” is sufficient for those with limited time, for here are the basics of the fusion value chain, illustrating materials and hardware opportunities such as those adjacent to the plasma and membrane materials and related devices by level of sophistication. See 3 SWOT appraisals, 22 key conclusions, 30 forecast lines 2026-2046. 

The big picture is then introduced in Chapter 2. “Fusion Power and Other Plasma Engineering Materials in the Context of Renewable Energy, the Hydrogen Economy Reinvented and Other Industry” (34 pages). See why the hydrogen economy is being reinvented after poor progress with conventional hydrogen as a fuel and how fusion hydrogen may become the only really successful form of hydrogen fuel. See examples of fusion materials challenges that are your opportunities. Introduced here are hydrogen isotopes and their primary uses actual and targetted and the examples of solving the beryllium and lithium-6 supply and cost problems. There is a comparison of actual fission and planned fusion power systems and how the long duration energy storage LDES toolkit will partner fusion power because of maintenance intervals and unpredictable interruptions. See earliest dates for fusion grid electricity being delivered and how other fusion and plasma engineering and other uses for deuterium derisks investment. 

You are then ready for the deep dive of 85 page, “Chapter 3. Basics of Fusion and Examples of its High-Value Materials Opportunities”. Its overview is followed by candidate fuels, reactions, reactor operating principles and designs then candidate fusion fuels and reactions, deuterium and tritium sourcing with many 2025 research advances assessed. See deuterium, tritium, alpha particle and neutron -related fusion research advances through 2025, candidate operating principles and designs of fusion power reactors with changing views on winning technologies and changing relative achievements and plans.

Here are milestones, reasons for size reduction and examples of companies for fusion power with the big picture of premium-pricing materials opportunities : liquids, solids, gases and plasma. Highlights here are coverage of steels and other alloys for general fusion facility structures, radiative environments with 2025 research, resisting hydrogen embrittlement, welding and other structural optimisation with 2025 research, hydrogen tank materials and chemical hydrogen storage materials. There is hydrogen leakage causing global warming: 2025 research, tritium and deuterium membranes in context of others used in energy value chain: 2025 research, beryllium with SWOT and 2025 research:Miresso then Tungsten with SWOT and 2025 research: United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority.

Chapter 4. “Magnetic Confinement Fusion Power: Materials and Hardware Opportunities” (28 pages) deeply examines the many variants from the point of view of materials requirements and possible success. Again, there is much on latest industrial initiatives and intentions and a flood of 2025 research. Examples with advances through 2025 include materials opportunities adjacent to the plasma, magnet advances, heat sink/ heat transfer, coolant materials advances, molten salts and their containment, divertor materials research in 2025 and the new ITER installation, plasma heating systems and robotics, fusion power supplies and electricity generation systems, electricity generation options. Increasingly attractive stellarators and their materials research in 2025 are covered too. 

Chapter 5. Inertial Confinement and Magneto-Inertial Fusion Power: Materials and Hardware Opportunities (28 pages) deeply examines these often-different materials requirements emerging. That includes neodymium glass, ultraviolet and quantum cascade lasers, with extra detail on Xcimer’s advances 2025-2030. What are the fusion target material opportunities, HUB and NIF project targets, fundamentals of target operation? Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories LLNL National Ignition Facility NIF progress is detailed but is China pulling ahead? Other inertial and magneto-inertial confinement developers are examined plus the hybrid option of Helion and its key materials and devices.

Chapter 6. “Changing Investment Focus, Companies, Hardware and Materials to Watch” takes 11 pages to present data showing that magnetic confinement tokamaks keep the lead in investments but certain others are coming up fast, greatly increasing their chance of commercial success. See the companies and regions pulling ahead and the enabling materials and hardware receiving particular attention. The report then closes with Chapter 7. “Materials Opportunities in Fusion Technologies beyond Fusion Power Generation” derisking your investment and providing earlier paybacks, from deep drilling to spacecraft propulsion, neutron sources, gyrotrons generally, high temperature superconductors generally and making new medical isotopes for cancer treatments. “Nuclear Fusion Power and Other Plasma Engineering Materials Opportunities: Markets, Technology 2026-2046” is your essential source of latest information and opportunity concerning this large new opportunity. 

Table of Contents

1. Executive summary and conclusions
1.1 Purpose of this report
1.2 Methodology of this analysis
1.3 Seven general conclusions
1.4 Eleven conclusions concerning materials and hardware
1.5  23 key fusion reactor materials opportunities from 2025 research and developers prioritised
1.6 Materials and hardware opportunities adjacent to the plasma
1.7 Membrane materials in the fusion value chain and related devices by level of sophistication
1.8 Three conclusions: Investment trends in private fusion companies
1.9 SWOT appraisal of the potential of fusion grid power
1.10 SWOT appraisal of magnetic confinement fusion as a potential source grid electricity
1.11 SWOT appraisal of inertial confinement fusion as a potential source grid electricity
1.12 Fusion and allied systems, materials and hardware roadmap for technology vs market 2025-2045
1.13 Market forecasts in 22 lines, graphs 2025-2045
1.13.1 Specialist materials and assemblies for fusion power including experiments: market inorganic vs organic $ billion 2025-2045
1.13.2 Hydrogen hardware market: fusion reactors + 7 lines $ billion 2025-2045, table, graphs
1.13.3 Number of companies seeking to make fusion reactors 2025-2045
1.13.4 Fusion machine energy output trend with and without ignition 1997-2046
1.13.5 Hydrogen market million tonnes 2025-2046 in seven lines, table, graphs

2. Fusion power and other plasma engineering materials in the context of renewable energy, the hydrogen economy reinvented and other industry
2.1 Overview with 2025 conference report, SWOT appraisal of the potential of fusion grid power
2.2 Hydrogen economy: a false start, reinvention and the promise of hydrogen fusion
2.2.1 The big picture
2.2.2 The hydrogen economy objectives and how priorities are changing
2.2.3 Why the first concept of a hydrogen economy is failing
2.2.4 Reinvention to leverage strengths leads to different beneficiaries
2.2.5 New realities: how the hydrogen economy objective is being reinvented
2.2.6 Hype curve for the hydrogen economy adding fusion 2021-2046
2.2.7 Materials for the hydrogen economy reinvented: analysis of 136 latest research papers
2.3 Private fusion companies and governments race into hydrogen fusion power
2.4 Major government investment in fusion power
2.5 Examples of fusion materials challenges that are your opportunities
2.5.1 Hydrogen isotopes and their primary uses actual and targetted
2.5.2 Solving the beryllium and lithium-6 supply and cost problems
2.6 Comparison of properties of regular hydrogen (protium) with other fuels and with the deuterium and tritium forms of hydrogen
2.7 Comparison of actual fission and planned fusion power systems
2.8 Long duration energy storage LDES will partner fusion power
2.9 Earliest dates for fusion grid electricity being delivered
2.10 Other fusion and plasma engineering and other uses for deuterium derisks investment

3. Basics of fusion and examples of its high-value materials opportunities
3.1 Overview
3.2 Candidate fuels, reactions, reactor operating principles and designs
3.2.1 Candidate fusion fuels and reactions, deuterium and tritium sourcing, 2025 research
3.2.2 Deuterium-related fusion research advances in 2025
3.2.3 Tritium-related fusion research advances in 2025
3.2.4 Alpha particle-related fusion research advances in 2025
3.2.5 Neutron-related fusion research advances in 2025
3.2.6 Candidate operating principles and designs of fusion power reactors
3.2.7 Changing views on winning technologies and changing relative achievements and plans
3.3 Milestones, reasons for size reduction and examples of companies for fusion power
3.4 Big picture of materials opportunities : liquids, solids, gases and plasma
3.4.1 Materials are a primary challenge to fusion power: premium pricing opportunities
3.4.2 Fusion subsystems present many added burdens for materials: SWOT and Kyoto Fusioneering
3.4.3 Radiation and plasma damage of the materials: research in 2025 and future needs
3.4.4 Some candidate materials reflecting various of these needs
3.5 Steel and other iron-based alloy formulations and structures for fusion reactor facilities
3.5.1 Steels for general fusion facility structures, radiative environments with 2025 research
3.5.2 Resisting hydrogen embrittlement
3.5.3 Welding and other structural optimisation with 2025 research
3.6 Hydrogen tank materials and chemical hydrogen storage materials
3.6.1 Hydrogen tank materials
3.6.2 Hydrogen leakage causing global warming: 2025 research
3.7 Tritium and deuterium membranes in context of others used in energy value chain, 2025 research
3.8 Beryllium with SWOT and 2025 research: Miresso
3.8.1 General
3.8.2 2025 research
3.8.3 Miresso
3.8.4 SWOT appraisal of beryllium in fusion reactors
3.9 Tungsten with SWOT and 2025 research: United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
3.9.1 General
3.9.2 2025 research
3.9.3 SWOT appraisal of tungsten in fusion reactors

4. Magnetic confinement fusion power: materials and hardware opportunities
4.1 Overview
4.2 SWOT appraisal of magnetic confinement fusion as a potential source grid electricity
4.3 Magnetic confinement geometries for fusion power
4.4 Materials opportunities adjacent to the plasma
4.4.1 Multilayer wall and proximate structures
4.4.2 Wall conditioning materials advances through 2025
4.4.3 Multifunctional blanket materials research in 2025
4.5 Magnet advances
4.6 Heat sink/ heat transfer, coolant materials advances
4.7 Divertor materials research in 2025 and the new ITER installation
4.8 Plasma heating systems and robotics
4.9 Fusion power supplies and electricity generation systems
4.9.1 Power generation from fusion reactors
4.9.2 Power supply to fusion reactors
4.10 Examples of tokamak and Z-Pinch hardware opportunities: JET, ITER, EAST and others
4.11 Research in 2025 on toroidal and allied fusion power hardware
4.11.1 General
4.11.2 Stellarators and their materials research in 2025
4.12 Inside-out magnetic confinement:
4.12.1 OpenStar levitated dipole fusion reactor
4.12.2 Reverse triangulation
4.12.3 TAE field reversal

5. Inertial confinement and magneto-inertial fusion power: materials and hardware opportunities
5.1 Overview
5.2 SWOT appraisal of inertial confinement fusion as a potential source grid electricity
5.3 Laser-based inertial confinement fusion (LICF) laser designs
5.3.1 Neodymium glass lasers
5.3.2 Ultraviolet lasers
5.3.3 Quantum cascade lasers
5.3.4 Xcimer advances 2025-2030
5.4 Fusion target opportunities
5.4.1 HUB project targets
5.4.2 NIF project targets
5.4.3 Fundamentals of target operation
5.5 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories LLNL National Ignition Facility NIF
5.6 China pulling ahead?
5.7 Other inertial and magneto-inertial confinement developers
5.7.1 General picture
5.7.2 Helion and its key materials and devices
5.7.3 Electrostatic inertial confinement fusion advances in 2025

6. Changing Investment focus, companies, hardware and materials to watch
6.1 Sudden surge in interest and investment: which technology and why
6.2 Investment in private companies
6.3 Investor intentions and deals by technology
6.4 Global effort
6.5 Analysis of private fusion companies racing to make hydrogen fusion electricity generators
6.6 Winning fusion power companies by country, various performance criteria, funding
6.6 Winning fusion power locations and technologies for government vs private investments
6.7 Significant key enabling materials and hardware attracting investment
6.8 Primary mentions of high added-value materials indicating popularity with examples of fusion uses

7. Materials opportunities in fusion technologies beyond fusion power generation
7.1 Overview
7.2 Principles proposed for fusion-propelled spacecraft
7.3 Electrostatic inertial confinement fusion advances, targetted uses in 2025
7.4 Plasma neutron sources for fusion and beyond: 2025 research
7.5 Gyrotron technology spinoff beyond fusion: geothermal drilling, other
7.5.1 Principle of operation
7.5.2 Geothermal drilling, material processing, other
7.5.3 Recent research
7.5.4 Gyrotron materials and designs
7.6 High temperature superconductors beyond fusion
7.7 SHINE Technologies allied technologies then fusion power

Companies Mentioned

  • Acceleron
  • Airbus
  • Alpha Tech
  • Astral Systems
  • Avalanche Energy
  • Ballard Power Systems
  • Blue Laser Fusion
  • Commonwealth Fusion Systems
  • Deutello
  • Diamond Materials
  • DuPont
  • EURO Fusion
  • Ex Fusion
  • Faraday Factory
  • First Light Fusion
  • Focussed Energy
  • Fremelt AB
  • Fujikura
  • Furukawa Electric Energy
  • Fuse Energy Technology
  • FusionXInvest
  • Gauss Fusion
  • General Atomic
  • General Fusion
  • HB11
  • Helion Energy
  • Helical Fusion
  • Kairos Power
  • Kern Microtechnik
  • Kyoto Fusioneering
  • Kyoto Fusion Systems
  • Lawrenceville Plasma Physics
  • LightFab GmbH
  • Marvel Fusion
  • Matsusada
  • Miresso
  • ModuleWorks GmbH
  • NearStar
  • NK Labs.
  • Novatron
  • NtTao
  • OpenStar
  • Pacific Fusion
  • Plasma Fusion
  • Plasmatreat GmbH
  • Proxima Fusion
  • Pulsar Fusion
  • Realta Fusion
  • Renaissance Fusion
  • S&P Global
  • SHINE Technologies
  • StarTorus Fusion
  • Suprema
  • Thea Energy
  • Tokamak Energy
  • Tri Alpha Energy TAE Technologies
  • TypeOneEnergy
  • UKAEA
  • Xcimer Energy 
  • Zap Energy

Methodology

Research Inputs Include:

  • Appraisal of which targeted needs are genuine
  • Web, literature, databases, experience and patents
  • Close study of research pipeline
  • Appraisal of regional initiatives
  • Actitivies of standard bodies
  • Limitations of physics and chemistry
  • Interviews

Loading
LOADING...