This practical and interactive course will demystify the complex area of combined EU/US patent applications. The expert trainers will address the parallel - but substantially different - rules for drafting and prosecuting patents required by the Examiners and Boards of Appeal of the EPO and USPTO. They will highlight the risks and pitfalls to be aware of and explain how to avoid them or deal with them if challenged by the patent offices.
The comprehensive programme will ensure that you get to grips with the contrasting approaches of the EPO and USPTO and understand the experts’ techniques for drafting an application for, and responding to, rejections issued by the two offices.
During the practical exercises you will learn how to correct and modify a sample application to be filed with both the EPO and USPTO and practise developing effective arguments for the EPO and USPTO, taking into account hypothetical patent office rejections.
You will also have the opportunity to discuss your particular questions and concerns with the expert trainers, as well as share experiences with like-minded professionals.
Key topics to be covered include:
- The often unseen traps posed by differing EU and US requirements
- ‘Best practices’ for reconciling the EU and US requirements and drafting an application to:
- Maximise scope of protection
- Reduce objections
- Minimise costs and maximise flexibility
- Prosecution procedures
- EPO and USPTO approaches to rejections
- Responding to EPO and USPTO rejections, based on an optimised specification
- Limiting US prosecution history estoppel
- Practical session using worked examples to help embed the learning
Benefits of attending
By attending this course you will:
- Consider the similarities and differences between the EPO and USPTO
- Learn about the best practices for preparing to comply with European and US requirements
- Expand your knowledge on prosecution and appeal procedures
- Get to grips with EPO and US definitions of prior art and priority
- Understand inventive step (EPO) vs obviousness (US)
- Explore the arguments on non-technical (EPO) and subject matter (US)
Certifications:
- CPD: 12 hours for your records
- Certificate of completion
Agenda
Day 1
Review of the similarities and differences in the statutory systems of the EPO and USPTO
- Legal aspects
- Procedures
- Formalities
‘Best practices’ for preparing one specification to comply with the European and US requirements for:
- Priority
- Added subject matter/new matter
- Industrial application/utility
- Novelty
- Inventive step/non-obviousness
- Description and sufficient basis/enablement and written description
- Claim clarity and conciseness/‘distinct claiming’
- Limiting estoppel and implications of the AIA
EPO/US: Prosecution and appeal procedures
- Likely timelines and statutory deadlines
- EPO
- Euro-PCT
- USPTO
- Burdens of proof
- Use of provisional and non-provisional applications
- Objections and rejections
- Non-final and final Office Actions
- Interviews
- Patent Office appeals
- Judicial appeals
EPO/US definitions of prior art and priority
- EPO
- Article 54 definitions of ‘state of the art’
- US
- Definitions of ‘prior art’ for anticipation and obviousness
Day 2
EPO/US: Rejections and responses
- Inventive step (EPO) vs obviousness (USPTO)
- EPO/US: Strategies for persuading the Examiner and Board
Prosecution history estoppel in the US
- Estoppel variants
- Controlling the adverse impact of arguments to the USPTO
- Effect of representations made in corresponding, non-US applications
- Disclosure obligations after
- Therasense
Arguments on non-technical (EPO) and subject matter (US)
- Article 52(2), (3) exclusions - ‘Technical’
- Two hurdles
- Potential technical effect T26/86 Koch & Sterzel
- Computer program/signal claims
- Arguments to the USPTO after Alice
- Abstract vs structural limitations
- USPTO ‘examination instructions’
Worked examples
- Delegates will be invited to analyse and modify sample applications suitable for the EPO and USPTO
- Delegates will be asked to develop effective arguments for the EPO and USPTO with respect to a series of hypothetical office actions
Plenary session
- Delegates and speakers will discuss the worked examples with the aim of optimising specifications acceptable to both the EPO and USPTO
Speakers
Mr David Meldrum,
Patent Attorney ,
D Young & CoDavid has been in private practice since 1998 and joined D Young & Co in 2001 and became a partner in 2006.
David practises in a variety of engineering disciplines including computer hardware and software, electronics, optics, nanotechnology, medical devices, automotive engineering and registered designs. He is experienced in all aspects of patent procurement including drafting specifications, international filing programmes and patent prosecution, and in portfolio management and competitor monitoring.
He is a member of the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) and a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). David’s clients include multi-national corporations and SMEs based in the UK, Europe and worldwide and he regularly presents IP lectures for clients and associates. He is a contributor to the D Young & Co Patent Newsletter.
Mr Bradley Hulbert,
Founding Partner,McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP ,
Management ForumBradley J. Hulbert is a founding partner in McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, an 80-lawyer patent firm in Chicago. Mr. Hulbert has overseen the development of a diverse range of extensive, international patent portfolios and has worked as an adjunct professor of law at the Chicago-Kent Law School for more than 20 years.
Who Should Attend
This course has been specially designed for:
- Patent professionals and other executives who are responsible for patent applications that are filed in and prosecuted before both the European and US Patent Offices
- Managers overseeing and evaluating multinational patent prosecution
Location
ADDRESS
Rembrandt Hotel
11 Thurloe Pl,
Kensington
London
SW7 2RS
United Kingdom
DIRECTIONS
The Rembrandt Hotel is located at 11 Thurloe Place, London, SW7 2RS. The hotel’s location in central London couldn’t be better, whether you’re travelling for business or leisure. You’ll be right between two of London’s most fashionable areas – South Kensington and Knightsbridge – within walking distance of museums, theatres, Harrods and Hyde Park.
You can hop on the Tube at South Kensington and take the District, Circle or Piccadilly lines direct to the City of London, Heathrow Airport and all other areas of the city. Look out of your window and you may well see the Victoria and Albert Museum – it’s right across the street.
