+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

TKI for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Market by Molecule, Mechanism, Distribution Channel, End User - Global Forecast to 2030

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 192 Pages
  • May 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6079176
UP TO OFF until Dec 31st 2025
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

Setting the Stage for Evolving Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatment

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia is a myeloproliferative disorder fueled by the BCR-ABL fusion gene, accounting for roughly 15 to 20 percent of adult leukemias. Management of this disease has been dramatically reshaped over the past two decades by targeted therapies that transform patient prognosis. The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors turned CML from a rapidly fatal condition to a chronic, manageable illness with a focus on long-term quality of life. As therapeutic options expand, stakeholders must navigate an increasingly complex landscape of clinical efficacy, safety profiles, and patient preferences to deliver optimal care.

This executive summary distills critical findings from an in-depth analysis of the CML treatment arena, highlighting recent scientific breakthroughs and emerging commercial dynamics. It examines how shifts in drug approvals, intellectual property frameworks, and trade policies are influencing access and affordability. Through a systematic review of clinical data, regulatory milestones, and expert interviews, the report uncovers actionable insights to guide manufacturers, providers, and payers. By focusing on key segmentation criteria, regional trends, and competitive positioning, this summary equips decision-makers with a clear understanding of current drivers and potential inflection points.

Defining the New Paradigm in CML Therapeutics

The CML treatment environment is experiencing a profound paradigm shift as novel generation inhibitors enter the landscape and real-world evidence reshapes clinical guidelines. First-generation agents laid the foundation for targeted therapy, but second- and third-generation inhibitors now offer enhanced potency against resistant mutations. This evolution has prompted a reevaluation of sequencing strategies, with clinicians balancing efficacy against safety profiles to personalize interventions. Simultaneously, advances in molecular monitoring technologies are enabling more precise assessment of deep molecular responses, facilitating treatment de-escalation for select patient cohorts. These scientific innovations are redefining standards of care and creating new opportunities for differentiation across therapeutic portfolios.

Concurrently, the commercialization of generic and biosimilar tyrosine kinase inhibitors is catalyzing price competition, driving cost-effective alternatives into the supply chain. Payer models are adapting by designing outcome-based agreements and value-oriented reimbursement frameworks. Digital health platforms are further transforming patient management, offering remote monitoring and adherence support to optimize long-term outcomes. Emerging collaborations between pharmaceutical developers and technology providers are accelerating the integration of personalized diagnostics and telemedicine solutions. These transformative shifts underscore the necessity for stakeholders to adopt agile strategies aligned with evolving clinical practices and payer expectations, ensuring sustainable growth and improved patient access.

Examining the Ripple Effects of 2025 US Tariff Adjustments

The implementation of adjusted United States tariffs in 2025 is poised to exert a multifaceted influence on the CML therapeutics supply chain. Increased duties on imported active pharmaceutical ingredients may elevate manufacturing costs for both originator and generic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, influencing pricing negotiations and contract structures. Manufacturers are evaluating cost mitigation strategies, including onshore formulation capabilities and strategic sourcing agreements, to preserve margin stability. In parallel, customs clearance timelines are under increased scrutiny, with stakeholders prioritizing expedited processes to avoid penalties and ensure timely delivery of critical therapies. Regulatory dialogues are intensifying to clarify tariff classifications and seek potential exemptions for essential medications.

These tariff-related adjustments are likely to impact formulary decisions and reimbursement negotiations, with payers seeking to offset cost pressures through tighter product evaluations. Pharmaceutical companies engaged in the CML space may need to refine their commercial models, exploring tiered pricing schemes and innovative contracting mechanisms that align with evolving regulatory requirements. Early collaboration with regulatory authorities and payer bodies will be critical to anticipate policy changes and safeguard patient access. By proactively addressing the implications of the 2025 tariffs, stakeholders can maintain continuity of care and fortify their competitive positioning amid shifting trade landscapes.

Unveiling Treatment Pathways Through Market Segmentation Insights

Analysis by molecule reveals distinct adoption patterns across Bosutinib, Dasatinib, Imatinib, Nilotinib, and Ponatinib. Imatinib, the pioneering agent, remains a mainstay in first-line therapy thanks to its proven safety profile and extensive long-term data. In contrast, Dasatinib and Nilotinib have gained traction for their ability to drive deeper molecular responses, particularly in patients exhibiting suboptimal Imatinib exposure. Bosutinib, though less prevalent, offers an effective alternative for those intolerant to first- and second-generation inhibitors, while Ponatinib has established itself as the treatment of choice for patients harboring the T315I mutation, addressing a critical niche in the therapeutic spectrum.

When evaluated through the lens of mechanism, first-generation inhibitors continue to anchor many protocols due to their established clinical track record. Second-generation therapies differentiate themselves by targeting resistant clones and achieving accelerated molecular responses, driving competitive positioning. Third-generation compounds focus on overcoming gatekeeper mutations, fulfilling unmet needs within refractory populations and expanding the horizons of CML management. This structured progression underscores the strategic importance of pipeline diversification and optimized sequencing algorithms to sustain durable disease control.

Distribution channel dynamics highlight the pivotal role of hospital pharmacies in administering complex CML regimens under strict clinical oversight, whereas online pharmacies increasingly support maintenance dosing through digital platforms that enhance adherence and patient convenience. Retail pharmacies further bolster these channels by providing community-based prescription fulfillment and support services. From an end-user standpoint, specialized clinics manage initial diagnosis and therapy initiation, home care settings facilitate personalized monitoring in outpatient environments, and hospitals serve as essential hubs for treating advanced or high-risk presentations.

Unlocking Growth Potential Across Global Regions

The Americas region exhibits a dynamic CML therapeutics environment driven by robust innovation pipelines and progressive regulatory frameworks. In the United States, high adoption rates of second- and third-generation inhibitors are underpinned by comprehensive reimbursement structures and advanced molecular diagnostics. Latin American markets such as Brazil and Mexico are witnessing growing healthcare investments and rising awareness of personalized medicine, resulting in expanding access to established therapies. Moreover, cross-border collaborations and public-private partnerships are enhancing capacities for clinical trials and real-world evidence generation across the hemisphere, positioning the region as a critical locus for future growth.

Europe, the Middle East, and Africa present a heterogeneous landscape marked by varying reimbursement mechanisms and market maturity levels. Western European nations maintain strong uptake of novel inhibitors, supported by centralized healthcare systems and evidence-based prescribing guidelines. Select Middle Eastern markets are channeling capital into specialty care infrastructure to bolster treatment accessibility, while certain African countries are prioritizing supply chain resilience to secure uninterrupted delivery of generic tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Regulatory harmonization efforts within the European Union and regional blocs aim to streamline market entry pathways and foster collaborative research networks.

Asia-Pacific embodies significant expansion potential driven by a rising patient population and escalating healthcare expenditures. Japan leads in molecular diagnostics adoption and precision medicine integration, facilitating swift incorporation of next-generation therapies. China’s evolving regulatory framework is accelerating approvals for both originator and generic formulations, while India consolidates its status as a global manufacturing hub for cost-effective treatment options. Southeast Asian markets are upgrading oncology care pathways, with telemedicine and digital health innovations extending specialist support to remote communities and enhancing overall patient outcomes.

Spotlight on Leading Innovators Driving CML Therapy Advances

Global pharmaceutical leaders have reinforced their market positions through strategic acquisitions, substantial R&D investments, and proactive lifecycle management. Established CML portfolios are being extended via patent protection strategies and innovative dosing regimens designed to optimize patient outcomes. Collaborative ventures with emerging biotech firms are enabling the co-development of next-generation inhibitors and combination therapies, thereby enhancing pipeline resilience against patent expirations and fostering sustained value creation within a competitive therapeutic landscape.

Mid-sized biotechnology and specialty pharma companies are capitalizing on niche expertise to address resistant or intolerant patient subsets. Their focused clinical programs and targeted indications resonate with payers seeking tailored solutions for high-unmet-need populations. By forging regional alliances, these firms are optimizing distribution networks and strengthening market access strategies. This agility allows mid-tier players to respond swiftly to evolving clinical evidence and regulatory developments, securing formulary placement and enhancing competitive differentiation.

Emerging biotech ventures are injecting innovation into the CML space by exploring allosteric inhibitors, immunotherapeutic approaches, and alternative delivery modalities. Venture capital backing and strategic partnerships with major pharmaceutical entities are accelerating their progression from preclinical stages to proof-of-concept trials. Access to advanced manufacturing platforms and regulatory expertise through these alliances expedites clinical development timelines. As these startups achieve key milestones, they are positioned to disrupt conventional treatment paradigms and introduce novel therapeutic options.

Strategic Imperatives for Industry Leadership in CML Care

Industry stakeholders should prioritize broadening their therapeutic portfolios to encompass inhibitors across all mechanistic generations and resistance profiles. Investing in next-generation compounds that target refractory mutations will fortify development pipelines against competitive pressures. Equally important is maintaining a balanced mix of branded and generic offerings to serve diverse patient and payer segments with optimal cost-benefit considerations.

Cultivating alliances with diagnostic developers, contract manufacturing organizations, and digital health providers can streamline both drug development and patient engagement processes. Co-development agreements with technology innovators enable real-time adherence monitoring and remote patient support. Formalizing these partnerships early in the development lifecycle ensures seamless integration of complementary capabilities and accelerates market readiness.

To secure favorable reimbursement outcomes, companies must engage payers proactively by presenting robust real-world evidence and pharmacoeconomic data. Implementing risk-sharing agreements that align pricing with clinical outcomes can mitigate payer concerns and facilitate broader access. Tiered pricing strategies that reflect regional affordability thresholds will enhance market penetration, while comprehensive patient support programs will further differentiate brands and improve long-term adherence.

Building flexibility into commercial and supply chain operations is essential to navigate evolving trade policies and regulatory shifts. Organizations should diversify sourcing strategies, implement dynamic inventory management systems, and establish contingency plans for tariff adjustments or supply disruptions. Conducting regular scenario planning exercises will ensure operational resilience and guarantee continuous therapy availability for patients.

Rigorous Framework Underpinning the Research Approach

The research employed a comprehensive design that combined extensive secondary literature review with primary stakeholder engagement. Analysis of peer-reviewed publications, regulatory briefs, and clinical trial registries provided foundational context. Concurrently, primary interviews with hematology specialists, pharmacy directors, and policy experts enriched the dataset with frontline perspectives, ensuring a holistic understanding of both scientific developments and market dynamics.

Data collection integrated quantitative and qualitative sources to capture a multifaceted view of the CML landscape. Secondary datasets encompassed published safety and efficacy metrics, patent filings, and trade policy documents. Primary research involved structured interviews and surveys targeting clinicians, payers, and procurement professionals. All inputs were systematically aggregated in a centralized repository to support cross-regional comparisons and segmentation analyses.

Analytical rigor was maintained through triangulation techniques, cross-validating multiple data points to resolve discrepancies and validate emerging trends. Statistical evaluation of prescribing behaviors and pharmacoeconomic indicators was complemented by thematic coding of stakeholder interviews. Methodological transparency was upheld via detailed documentation of protocols, ensuring reproducibility and strengthening the credibility of derived insights for strategic decision-making in the CML therapeutic domain.

Synthesizing Insights to Inform Future Directions

The contemporary CML therapeutics ecosystem is defined by rapid scientific advancements, shifting trade policies, and evolving stakeholder expectations. Targeted therapies have revolutionized patient management, yet the influx of new inhibitors alongside generic entrants demands adaptive strategies from manufacturers, providers, and payers. Regional disparities in access highlight the critical need for tailored market approaches and dynamic reimbursement models. As competitive intensity rises, driven by pipeline expansion and digital transformation of patient support services, stakeholders must balance innovation with affordability to sustain both clinical and commercial success.

Looking ahead, seamless integration of breakthroughs in molecular targeting with agile operational frameworks will be vital. Anticipating policy transitions and emerging resistance patterns can inform proactive pipeline planning. Collaboration across the value chain-spanning biotech innovators, diagnostics specialists, payer organizations, and care providers-will streamline development cycles and broaden patient outreach. By leveraging comprehensive data insights and embracing resilient business models, industry participants can navigate uncertainty and capitalize on growth opportunities. Ultimately, a steadfast commitment to patient-centric innovation and strategic foresight will distinguish leaders in the dynamic CML landscape.

Market Segmentation & Coverage

This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-segmentations:
  • Molecule
    • Bosutinib
    • Dasatinib
    • Imatinib
    • Nilotinib
    • Ponatinib
  • Mechanism
    • First Generation
    • Second Generation
    • Third Generation
  • Distribution Channel
    • Hospital Pharmacies
    • Online Pharmacies
    • Retail Pharmacies
  • End User
    • Clinics
    • Home Care Settings
    • Hospitals
This research report categorizes to forecast the revenues and analyze trends in each of the following sub-regions:
  • Americas
    • United States
      • California
      • Texas
      • New York
      • Florida
      • Illinois
      • Pennsylvania
      • Ohio
    • Canada
    • Mexico
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
  • Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • United Kingdom
    • Germany
    • France
    • Russia
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Saudi Arabia
    • South Africa
    • Denmark
    • Netherlands
    • Qatar
    • Finland
    • Sweden
    • Nigeria
    • Egypt
    • Turkey
    • Israel
    • Norway
    • Poland
    • Switzerland
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • South Korea
    • Indonesia
    • Thailand
    • Philippines
    • Malaysia
    • Singapore
    • Vietnam
    • Taiwan
This research report categorizes to delves into recent significant developments and analyze trends in each of the following companies:
  • Novartis AG
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
  • Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited
  • Mylan N.V.
  • Cipla Limited
  • Natco Pharma Limited

This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Define: Research Objective
2.2. Determine: Research Design
2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
2.4. Collect: Data Source
2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
2.7. Publish: Research Report
2.8. Repeat: Report Update
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting
5. Market Dynamics
6. Market Insights
6.1. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
6.2. PESTLE Analysis
7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
8. TKI for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Market, by Molecule
8.1. Introduction
8.2. Bosutinib
8.3. Dasatinib
8.4. Imatinib
8.5. Nilotinib
8.6. Ponatinib
9. TKI for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Market, by Mechanism
9.1. Introduction
9.2. First Generation
9.3. Second Generation
9.4. Third Generation
10. TKI for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Market, by Distribution Channel
10.1. Introduction
10.2. Hospital Pharmacies
10.3. Online Pharmacies
10.4. Retail Pharmacies
11. TKI for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Market, by End User
11.1. Introduction
11.2. Clinics
11.3. Home Care Settings
11.4. Hospitals
12. Americas TKI for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Market
12.1. Introduction
12.2. United States
12.3. Canada
12.4. Mexico
12.5. Brazil
12.6. Argentina
13. Europe, Middle East & Africa TKI for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Market
13.1. Introduction
13.2. United Kingdom
13.3. Germany
13.4. France
13.5. Russia
13.6. Italy
13.7. Spain
13.8. United Arab Emirates
13.9. Saudi Arabia
13.10. South Africa
13.11. Denmark
13.12. Netherlands
13.13. Qatar
13.14. Finland
13.15. Sweden
13.16. Nigeria
13.17. Egypt
13.18. Turkey
13.19. Israel
13.20. Norway
13.21. Poland
13.22. Switzerland
14. Asia-Pacific TKI for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Market
14.1. Introduction
14.2. China
14.3. India
14.4. Japan
14.5. Australia
14.6. South Korea
14.7. Indonesia
14.8. Thailand
14.9. Philippines
14.10. Malaysia
14.11. Singapore
14.12. Vietnam
14.13. Taiwan
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
15.3. Competitive Analysis
15.3.1. Novartis AG
15.3.2. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
15.3.3. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
15.3.4. Pfizer Inc.
15.3.5. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
15.3.6. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
15.3.7. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited
15.3.8. Mylan N.V.
15.3.9. Cipla Limited
15.3.10. Natco Pharma Limited
16. ResearchAI
17. ResearchStatistics
18. ResearchContacts
19. ResearchArticles
20. Appendix
List of Figures
FIGURE 1. TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET MULTI-CURRENCY
FIGURE 2. TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET MULTI-LANGUAGE
FIGURE 3. TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET RESEARCH PROCESS
FIGURE 4. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 5. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 7. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 8. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 10. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 12. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 13. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 14. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 15. AMERICAS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 16. AMERICAS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 17. UNITED STATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 18. UNITED STATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 19. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 20. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 21. ASIA-PACIFIC TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
FIGURE 22. ASIA-PACIFIC TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 23. TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
FIGURE 24. TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024
List of Tables
TABLE 1. TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
TABLE 3. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 4. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 5. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 6. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 7. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY BOSUTINIB, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 8. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DASATINIB, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 9. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY IMATINIB, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 10. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY NILOTINIB, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 11. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY PONATINIB, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 12. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 13. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY FIRST GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 14. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY SECOND GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 15. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY THIRD GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 16. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 17. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITAL PHARMACIES, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 18. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE PHARMACIES, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 19. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL PHARMACIES, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 20. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 21. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY CLINICS, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 22. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY HOME CARE SETTINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 23. GLOBAL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITALS, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 24. AMERICAS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 25. AMERICAS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 26. AMERICAS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 27. AMERICAS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 28. AMERICAS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 29. UNITED STATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 30. UNITED STATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 31. UNITED STATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 32. UNITED STATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 33. UNITED STATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 34. CANADA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 35. CANADA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 36. CANADA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 37. CANADA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 38. MEXICO TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 39. MEXICO TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 40. MEXICO TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 41. MEXICO TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 42. BRAZIL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 43. BRAZIL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 44. BRAZIL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 45. BRAZIL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 46. ARGENTINA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 47. ARGENTINA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 48. ARGENTINA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 49. ARGENTINA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 50. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 51. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 52. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 53. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 54. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 55. UNITED KINGDOM TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 56. UNITED KINGDOM TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 57. UNITED KINGDOM TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 58. UNITED KINGDOM TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 59. GERMANY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 60. GERMANY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 61. GERMANY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 62. GERMANY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 63. FRANCE TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 64. FRANCE TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 65. FRANCE TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 66. FRANCE TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 67. RUSSIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 68. RUSSIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 69. RUSSIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 70. RUSSIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 71. ITALY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 72. ITALY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 73. ITALY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 74. ITALY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 75. SPAIN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 76. SPAIN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 77. SPAIN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 78. SPAIN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 79. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 80. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 81. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 82. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 83. SAUDI ARABIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 84. SAUDI ARABIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 85. SAUDI ARABIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 86. SAUDI ARABIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 87. SOUTH AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 88. SOUTH AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 89. SOUTH AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 90. SOUTH AFRICA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 91. DENMARK TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 92. DENMARK TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 93. DENMARK TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 94. DENMARK TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 95. NETHERLANDS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 96. NETHERLANDS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 97. NETHERLANDS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 98. NETHERLANDS TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 99. QATAR TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 100. QATAR TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 101. QATAR TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 102. QATAR TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 103. FINLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 104. FINLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 105. FINLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 106. FINLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 107. SWEDEN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 108. SWEDEN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 109. SWEDEN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 110. SWEDEN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 111. NIGERIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 112. NIGERIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 113. NIGERIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 114. NIGERIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 115. EGYPT TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 116. EGYPT TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 117. EGYPT TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 118. EGYPT TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 119. TURKEY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 120. TURKEY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 121. TURKEY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 122. TURKEY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 123. ISRAEL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 124. ISRAEL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 125. ISRAEL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 126. ISRAEL TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 127. NORWAY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 128. NORWAY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 129. NORWAY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 130. NORWAY TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 131. POLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 132. POLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 133. POLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 134. POLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 135. SWITZERLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 136. SWITZERLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 137. SWITZERLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 138. SWITZERLAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 139. ASIA-PACIFIC TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 140. ASIA-PACIFIC TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 141. ASIA-PACIFIC TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 142. ASIA-PACIFIC TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 143. ASIA-PACIFIC TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 144. CHINA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 145. CHINA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 146. CHINA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 147. CHINA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 148. INDIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 149. INDIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 150. INDIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 151. INDIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 152. JAPAN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 153. JAPAN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 154. JAPAN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 155. JAPAN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 156. AUSTRALIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 157. AUSTRALIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 158. AUSTRALIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 159. AUSTRALIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 160. SOUTH KOREA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 161. SOUTH KOREA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 162. SOUTH KOREA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 163. SOUTH KOREA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 164. INDONESIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 165. INDONESIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 166. INDONESIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 167. INDONESIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 168. THAILAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 169. THAILAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 170. THAILAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 171. THAILAND TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 172. PHILIPPINES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 173. PHILIPPINES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 174. PHILIPPINES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 175. PHILIPPINES TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 176. MALAYSIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 177. MALAYSIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 178. MALAYSIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 179. MALAYSIA TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 180. SINGAPORE TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 181. SINGAPORE TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 182. SINGAPORE TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 183. SINGAPORE TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 184. VIETNAM TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 185. VIETNAM TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 186. VIETNAM TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 187. VIETNAM TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 188. TAIWAN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 189. TAIWAN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY MECHANISM, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 190. TAIWAN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 191. TAIWAN TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 192. TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
TABLE 193. TKI FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this TKI for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia market report include:
  • Novartis AG
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
  • Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited
  • Mylan N.V.
  • Cipla Limited
  • Natco Pharma Limited

Methodology

Loading
LOADING...