+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market - Global Forecast 2026-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 183 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6082097
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market grew from USD 1.29 billion in 2025 to USD 1.38 billion in 2026. It is expected to continue growing at a CAGR of 7.68%, reaching USD 2.17 billion by 2032.

Setting the context for single stage double suction centrifugal pumps as infrastructure-critical assets shaped by efficiency, reliability, and procurement risk

Single stage double suction centrifugal pumps occupy a critical role wherever large volumes of liquid must be moved efficiently at moderate heads with dependable hydraulics. Their hallmark design-dual-sided impeller inlet-balances axial thrust, improves suction performance, and supports stable operation under variable flow conditions. These attributes make the configuration a foundational choice in municipal water distribution, raw water intake, circulating water duties in power facilities, and demanding HVAC and industrial utility services.

In today’s operating environment, pump selection is increasingly shaped by constraints that extend beyond the hydraulic curve. Energy efficiency expectations have tightened as operators aim to reduce total cost of ownership and meet sustainability targets, while reliability expectations have risen due to aging infrastructure and fewer maintenance resources. At the same time, procurement teams are navigating longer lead times for castings, motors, and controls, and engineering groups are integrating pumps into more digitalized, condition-based maintenance programs.

Against this backdrop, the market for single stage double suction centrifugal pumps is best understood through application-driven requirements and procurement realities. Buyers are prioritizing predictable lifecycle performance, verifiable efficiency, compatibility with variable speed operation, and serviceability that minimizes downtime. As a result, manufacturers and integrators are differentiating not only through product design, but also through configurability, aftermarket responsiveness, and documentation that supports faster approvals and commissioning.

How efficiency mandates, digital operations, and changing project delivery models are reshaping competition and buyer expectations worldwide

The competitive landscape is shifting from a product-centric model toward a lifecycle-centric one, driven by the intersection of energy policy, digital operations, and supply-chain uncertainty. Efficiency has become a strategic requirement rather than a technical preference, particularly in large installed bases where incremental improvements in hydraulic performance translate into meaningful reductions in energy consumption. Consequently, buyers are asking for clearer efficiency validation, tighter tolerances in hydraulic passages, and proven performance across a broader operating envelope.

Digital transformation is also reshaping expectations. Operators increasingly want pumps to fit into plant-wide monitoring architectures, which elevates the importance of sensor readiness, vibration and temperature monitoring provisions, and compatibility with modern drives and control platforms. This shift favors suppliers that can deliver integrated packages-pump, motor, variable frequency drive, and instrumentation-along with commissioning support and data structures that maintenance teams can use.

In parallel, materials and manufacturing choices are evolving. There is renewed focus on corrosion and erosion resistance as water sources diversify and as industrial processes push more aggressive fluids and higher solids content into circulation. Manufacturers are refining casting quality controls, exploring improved wear ring designs, and providing more options for coatings and metallurgy to extend mean time between repairs.

Finally, project execution models are changing. The expansion of design-build and EPC contracting has concentrated purchasing influence, increasing the value of standardized platforms and fast configuration. Suppliers that can shorten submittal cycles, deliver clear compliance documentation, and maintain regional service footprints are gaining an advantage. This is not merely a sales shift; it is a structural change in how pumps are specified, qualified, and supported over decades of operation.

Understanding the ripple effects of 2025 U.S. tariffs on sourcing, lead times, total package cost, and standardization for large pump programs

The introduction and escalation of United States tariffs in 2025 has added a new layer of complexity to sourcing strategies for pumps, motors, cast components, and related accessories. While tariff details vary by product classification and country of origin, the practical outcome for many buyers has been higher landed cost volatility and a renewed emphasis on supply-chain transparency. Procurement teams are responding by tightening origin verification, requesting more detailed bills of materials, and reassessing the risk of last-minute substitutions.

For manufacturers and assemblers that rely on imported castings or subcomponents, tariffs have amplified the incentive to diversify upstream suppliers and, where feasible, localize machining and final assembly. Even when the pump itself is domestically assembled, exposure can remain through imported motors, drives, bearings, or specialized metallurgy. As a result, total package pricing has become more sensitive to component sourcing than in prior cycles.

The tariff environment is also influencing lead times and contracting behavior. Buyers are increasingly seeking price-validity windows, indexed escalation clauses, or alternate-approved configurations that can be activated if costs or availability change. In engineered-to-order applications, this has pushed stakeholders to lock technical requirements earlier, because late-stage specification changes can cascade into requalification and new sourcing decisions under shifting duty rates.

Over time, the cumulative impact is likely to favor suppliers with flexible manufacturing footprints, robust compliance processes, and the ability to offer functionally equivalent alternatives without sacrificing performance or maintainability. End users benefit when tariff-aware sourcing is paired with disciplined standardization, ensuring that supply disruptions do not fragment the installed base or complicate spare parts strategies.

Segmentation-led demand patterns reveal how application duty, configuration choices, materials, and procurement routes shape buying criteria and product fit

Demand behavior for single stage double suction centrifugal pumps varies meaningfully when viewed through end-use application, capacity and head requirements, driver and control choices, mounting orientation, and material or configuration preferences. In municipal and regional water systems, selection tends to emphasize hydraulic stability, cavitation margin, and long-term serviceability, particularly for large suction/discharge sizes and continuous-duty profiles. In contrast, industrial utilities and process-adjacent services often prioritize robustness under variable water quality, tolerance for solids or corrosive constituents, and maintenance access within constrained plant layouts.

Purchase decisions also diverge based on how the pump is integrated into the system. Applications that demand flexible operation across daily or seasonal load swings are increasingly pairing these pumps with variable speed drives, which shifts evaluation criteria toward efficiency at partial load, control response, and motor thermal behavior. Where fixed-speed operation remains common, buyers often focus more heavily on minimizing vibration, ensuring stable operation near best efficiency point, and simplifying operator training through standardized platforms.

Configuration choices further separate buyer priorities. Horizontally split casing designs continue to be favored in many mission-critical installations due to maintainability and reduced downtime during overhauls, while vertical or specialized arrangements can be preferred where footprint constraints or suction conditions drive the layout. Material selection, including cast iron, ductile iron, and higher alloy options, is increasingly tied to water chemistry, chlorination practices, and abrasion risk rather than a default standard.

Finally, the way projects are procured shapes segmentation dynamics. In engineered projects managed by consultants or EPCs, compliance with specification language, documentation quality, and factory testing provisions can be decisive. In replacement and retrofit contexts, dimensional interchangeability, delivery speed, and the ability to match existing piping and foundation conditions become primary. Across these segmentation dimensions, the most consistent differentiator is the buyer’s emphasis on lifecycle simplicity-reducing the number of unique pump models, seals, bearings, and spares while maintaining performance across diverse duty points.

Regional contrasts in infrastructure maturity, efficiency regulation, and service readiness explain where adoption accelerates and what buyers demand most

Regional dynamics for single stage double suction centrifugal pumps reflect the maturity of water infrastructure, industrial investment cycles, regulatory pressure, and the depth of local manufacturing and service networks. In the Americas, operators balance modernization of aging municipal assets with resilience priorities, which elevates interest in efficient retrofits, standardized platforms, and strong aftermarket coverage. Tariff considerations and domestic content requirements are increasingly influencing sourcing decisions, encouraging closer alignment between engineering, procurement, and service teams.

Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, energy efficiency directives and water scarcity challenges shape a different set of priorities. European buyers tend to scrutinize efficiency documentation, noise and vibration compliance, and lifecycle environmental impact, while Middle Eastern projects frequently emphasize large-scale water conveyance, desalination-related transfer duties, and robust materials suited for challenging water chemistry. In parts of Africa, the diversity of infrastructure maturity levels drives demand for durable, serviceable designs supported by reliable parts availability and training.

In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, industrial expansion, and ongoing investment in water and wastewater capacity sustain broad-based demand, while intense competition pushes suppliers toward value-engineered configurations that still meet reliability expectations. Manufacturing ecosystems and localized supply chains can support shorter lead times, but buyers increasingly seek global-quality assurance and consistent documentation, especially for critical utilities and export-oriented industrial facilities.

Across all regions, the strongest growth in adoption of advanced monitoring and variable speed operation tends to follow the availability of skilled service partners and the prevalence of energy-management programs. Consequently, suppliers with regional application engineering expertise and responsive service infrastructure often outperform those competing primarily on initial equipment cost.

Competitive positioning hinges on platform reliability, packaged-system execution, aftermarket depth, and supply-chain resilience beyond product specifications

Competition among key companies centers on a mix of hydraulic performance, platform standardization, service reach, and the ability to support engineered specifications without elongating project timelines. Leading suppliers differentiate through proven double suction hydraulics, disciplined quality control in castings and machining, and the availability of horizontally split case designs that reduce maintenance downtime. Many also emphasize modularity, enabling multiple impeller trims, seal options, and bearing arrangements to be configured from a common casing family.

Another major axis of differentiation is packaged solutions capability. Companies that can provide an integrated scope-pump, motor, drive, baseplate, coupling, guards, and instrumentation-reduce interface risk and accelerate commissioning. This is especially valuable in municipal and power-related applications where schedule certainty and acceptance testing are tightly managed. Factory testing capacity, documentation completeness, and rapid response to technical submittals often influence awards as much as the pump’s headline efficiency.

Aftermarket strength is increasingly decisive. Firms with established regional service centers, field technicians, and parts logistics can offer outage planning support, condition assessment, and refurbishment programs that extend asset life. Additionally, companies investing in digital services-such as vibration analytics, predictive maintenance toolkits, and remote support-are better positioned to align with operators transitioning from reactive maintenance to reliability-centered practices.

Finally, supplier resilience has become part of the brand equation. Buyers are favoring companies that demonstrate redundant sourcing for critical components, transparent compliance practices, and the ability to offer tariff-aware alternatives without compromising interchangeability or warranty coverage. In this environment, the “best” company is often the one that can consistently execute across engineering, manufacturing, delivery, and lifecycle support rather than excel in only one dimension.

Practical moves leaders can take now to reduce lifecycle cost, improve uptime, and de-risk sourcing through standardization and smarter contracting

Industry leaders can strengthen outcomes by treating pump selection as a lifecycle program rather than a one-time procurement. Standardizing on a limited set of casing families and interchangeable components reduces spares inventory, training burden, and maintenance variability across sites. In parallel, tightening internal specification templates to reflect current best practices-such as provisions for variable speed readiness, instrumentation ports, and factory test requirements-helps prevent late-stage redesigns and shortens approval cycles.

To manage cost volatility and availability risk, leaders should formalize tariff-aware sourcing strategies. This includes qualifying alternate component origins in advance, requiring transparent origin documentation for major subassemblies, and negotiating commercial terms that address duty changes and lead-time extensions. Where project schedules are critical, dual-sourcing or framework agreements can provide flexibility without sacrificing technical consistency.

Operationally, organizations can capture significant reliability gains by aligning pump selection with a condition-based maintenance approach. Specifying provisions for vibration monitoring, bearing temperature measurement, and seal health indicators supports early fault detection and more predictable outage planning. Additionally, insisting on clear acceptance criteria for performance testing and vibration limits reduces commissioning risk and improves long-term stability.

Finally, leaders should elevate the role of serviceability in design decisions. Horizontally split casing access, seal standardization, and bearing cartridge strategies can materially reduce mean time to repair. When combined with service partner commitments for response time, parts stocking, and refurbishment pathways, these choices translate into higher uptime and lower total disruption, which increasingly matters as utilities and industrial plants operate with leaner maintenance teams.

A decision-oriented methodology combining stakeholder interviews, technical document validation, and triangulation to ensure reliable, usable insights

The research methodology integrates structured primary engagement with rigorous secondary validation to ensure insights are decision-ready for engineers, procurement leaders, and executives. Primary inputs are developed through interviews and technical discussions with stakeholders across the value chain, including manufacturers, distributors, system integrators, EPC participants, and end users who operate and maintain double suction pump fleets. These engagements focus on specification trends, procurement constraints, failure modes, service practices, and shifting buyer requirements.

Secondary research consolidates publicly available technical documentation, regulatory and policy materials, trade and customs guidance, corporate disclosures, product catalogs, and standards-related references relevant to pump design, efficiency practices, and industrial compliance. This step establishes a baseline for product positioning, manufacturing footprints, and technology adoption patterns.

Triangulation is used to reconcile differing perspectives and reduce bias. Claims regarding technology shifts, sourcing changes, and regional drivers are cross-checked across multiple independent inputs, with attention to how conclusions vary by application context. When conflicts arise, follow-up validation is conducted to clarify assumptions, such as differences between new-build and replacement markets or between packaged and bare-shaft purchasing models.

Finally, findings are organized into a decision framework that links segmentation-specific needs to practical selection and sourcing considerations. The objective is to provide clear, defensible insights that help stakeholders compare options, anticipate constraints, and align engineering choices with long-term operational goals.

Bringing the insights together: why lifecycle-focused selection and resilient sourcing now define success for double suction pump programs

Single stage double suction centrifugal pumps remain a cornerstone technology for high-flow water and utility services, but the context in which they are specified and purchased has changed. Efficiency expectations, digital monitoring practices, and reliability requirements are rising simultaneously, while supply chains face new pressures from tariffs and component availability. These forces are pushing buyers toward standardization, packaged solutions, and stronger lifecycle support.

At the same time, segmentation differences matter. Application duty profiles, configuration constraints, driver and control approaches, and material considerations all influence what “best fit” looks like in practice. Regionally, infrastructure maturity, regulatory environments, and service readiness shape adoption patterns and determine which supplier capabilities translate into the lowest operational risk.

Organizations that act decisively-by tightening specifications, qualifying alternate sourcing paths, and building maintenance-friendly fleets-will be better positioned to control downtime and protect budgets. In an environment where reliability and procurement resilience are strategic, informed pump decisions become a durable competitive advantage.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
2.2.1. Primary Research
2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
5. Market Insights
5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Type
8.1. Horizontal
8.2. Vertical
9. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Impeller Type
9.1. Closed
9.2. Open
9.3. Semi-Open
10. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Material
10.1. Alloy Steel
10.2. Cast Iron
10.3. Stainless Steel
11. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Pressure Range
11.1. High
11.2. Low
11.3. Medium
12. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Flow Rate
12.1. High
12.2. Low
12.3. Medium
13. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Application
13.1. HVAC & Building
13.2. Industrial
13.3. Marine
13.4. Oil & Gas
13.5. Power Generation
13.6. Water Supply & Treatment
14. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by End User
14.1. Chemicals & Petrochemical
14.2. Marine
14.3. Oil & Gas
14.4. Power Generation
14.5. Water & Wastewater
15. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Sales Channel
15.1. Aftermarket
15.2. OEM
16. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Region
16.1. Americas
16.1.1. North America
16.1.2. Latin America
16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
16.2.1. Europe
16.2.2. Middle East
16.2.3. Africa
16.3. Asia-Pacific
17. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Group
17.1. ASEAN
17.2. GCC
17.3. European Union
17.4. BRICS
17.5. G7
17.6. NATO
18. Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market, by Country
18.1. United States
18.2. Canada
18.3. Mexico
18.4. Brazil
18.5. United Kingdom
18.6. Germany
18.7. France
18.8. Russia
18.9. Italy
18.10. Spain
18.11. China
18.12. India
18.13. Japan
18.14. Australia
18.15. South Korea
19. United States Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market
20. China Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump Market
21. Competitive Landscape
21.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
21.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
21.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
21.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
21.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
21.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
21.5. Dalian Huanyou Pump Industry Co., Ltd.
21.6. Düchting Pumpen GmbH & Co. KG
21.7. Ebara Corporation
21.8. Flowserve Corporation
21.9. Fujian Nanfang Pump Co., Ltd.
21.10. Grundfos Holding A/S
21.11. Guangdong Lingxiao Pump Industry Co., Ltd.
21.12. ITT Inc.
21.13. KSB SE & Co. KGaA
21.14. Liancheng Group Co., Ltd.
21.15. Pentair plc
21.16. Ruhrpumpen Group
21.17. Shanghai Kaiquan Pump Group Co., Ltd.
21.18. Shimge Pump Industry Group Co., Ltd.
21.19. SPX Flow, Inc.
21.20. Sulzer Ltd.
21.21. Torishima Pump Mfg. Co., Ltd.
21.22. Wilo SE
21.23. Xylem Inc.
21.24. Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Co., Ltd.
List of Figures
FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 12. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 13. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 14. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 15. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 16. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
List of Tables
TABLE 1. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 2. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 3. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HORIZONTAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 4. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HORIZONTAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 5. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HORIZONTAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 6. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 7. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 8. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 9. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 10. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CLOSED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 11. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CLOSED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 12. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CLOSED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 13. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 14. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 15. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 16. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-OPEN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 17. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-OPEN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 18. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-OPEN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 19. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 20. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY ALLOY STEEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 21. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY ALLOY STEEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 22. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY ALLOY STEEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 23. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CAST IRON, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 24. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CAST IRON, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 25. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CAST IRON, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 26. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 27. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 28. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 29. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 30. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 31. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 32. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 33. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 34. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 35. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 36. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 37. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 38. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 39. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 40. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 41. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 42. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HIGH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 43. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 44. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 45. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY LOW, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 46. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 47. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 48. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 49. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 50. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HVAC & BUILDING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 51. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HVAC & BUILDING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 52. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY HVAC & BUILDING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 53. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 54. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 55. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 56. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 57. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 58. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 59. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 60. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 61. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 62. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 63. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 64. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 65. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER SUPPLY & TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 66. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER SUPPLY & TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 67. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER SUPPLY & TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 68. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 69. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICALS & PETROCHEMICAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 70. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICALS & PETROCHEMICAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 71. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICALS & PETROCHEMICAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 72. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 73. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 74. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MARINE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 75. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 76. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 77. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 78. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 79. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 80. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 81. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER & WASTEWATER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 82. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER & WASTEWATER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 83. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY WATER & WASTEWATER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 84. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 85. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 86. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 87. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 88. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 89. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 90. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 91. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 92. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 93. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 94. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 95. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 96. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 97. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 98. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 99. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 100. AMERICAS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 101. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 102. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 103. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 104. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 105. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 106. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 107. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 108. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 109. NORTH AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 110. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 111. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 112. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 113. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 114. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 115. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 116. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 117. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 118. LATIN AMERICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 119. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 120. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 121. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 122. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 123. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 124. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 125. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 126. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 127. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 128. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 129. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 130. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 131. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 132. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 133. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 134. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 135. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 136. EUROPE SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 137. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 138. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 139. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 140. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 141. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 142. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 143. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 144. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 145. MIDDLE EAST SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 146. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 147. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 148. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 149. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 150. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 151. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 152. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 153. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 154. AFRICA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 155. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 156. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 157. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 158. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 159. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 160. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 161. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 162. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 163. ASIA-PACIFIC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 164. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 165. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 166. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 167. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 168. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 169. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 170. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 171. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 172. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 173. ASEAN SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 174. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 175. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 176. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 177. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 178. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 179. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 180. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 181. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 182. GCC SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 183. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 184. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 185. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 186. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 187. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 188. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 189. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 190. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 191. EUROPEAN UNION SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 192. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 193. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 194. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 195. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 196. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 197. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 198. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 199. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 200. BRICS SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 201. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 202. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 203. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 204. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 205. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 206. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 207. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 208. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 209. G7 SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 210. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 211. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 212. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 213. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 214. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 215. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 216. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 217. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 218. NATO SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 219. GLOBAL SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 220. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 221. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 222. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 223. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 224. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 225. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 226. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 227. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 228. UNITED STATES SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 229. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 230. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 231. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY IMPELLER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 232. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 233. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY PRESSURE RANGE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 234. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY FLOW RATE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 235. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 236. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 237. CHINA SINGLE STAGE DOUBLE SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMP MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Single Stage Double Suction Centrifugal Pump market report include:
  • Dalian Huanyou Pump Industry Co., Ltd.
  • Düchting Pumpen GmbH & Co. KG
  • Ebara Corporation
  • Flowserve Corporation
  • Fujian Nanfang Pump Co., Ltd.
  • Grundfos Holding A/S
  • Guangdong Lingxiao Pump Industry Co., Ltd.
  • ITT Inc.
  • KSB SE & Co. KGaA
  • Liancheng Group Co., Ltd.
  • Pentair plc
  • Ruhrpumpen Group
  • Shanghai Kaiquan Pump Group Co., Ltd.
  • Shimge Pump Industry Group Co., Ltd.
  • SPX Flow, Inc.
  • Sulzer Ltd.
  • Torishima Pump Mfg. Co., Ltd.
  • Wilo SE
  • Xylem Inc.
  • Zhejiang Dayuan Pumps Co., Ltd.

Table Information