+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market - Global Forecast 2026-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 189 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6084980
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market grew from USD 685.37 million in 2025 to USD 736.69 million in 2026. It is expected to continue growing at a CAGR of 6.87%, reaching USD 1.09 billion by 2032.

Why self-operated regulating valves are becoming strategic assets for reliability, energy performance, and simplified control in modern facilities

Self-operated regulating valves occupy a critical middle ground in flow control: they deliver automatic regulation without external power, controllers, or instrument air, yet they can still provide stable downstream pressure or temperature management when properly selected and tuned. In practical terms, these valves convert upstream energy into controlled mechanical action through diaphragms, springs, bellows, and balanced trims. That simplicity is exactly why they remain embedded across utility services, process skids, building services, and remote installations where reliability and ease of maintenance are as important as precision.

At the same time, procurement teams and engineers are asking more of the category than “set it and forget it.” Operating envelopes are shifting as plants pursue energy efficiency, decarbonization, and higher uptime. Fluids are getting more complex, from high-purity gases to aggressive chemical media and high-temperature steam. Compliance expectations are rising across pressure equipment directives, emissions management, and documentation requirements. Consequently, the modern buying conversation is less about whether self-operated regulation is viable and more about which configurations, materials, and validation evidence best fit each duty.

This executive summary frames the self-operated regulating valve landscape through the lens of what is changing and why it matters. It connects technology trends to procurement constraints, highlights how tariff policy reshapes sourcing strategies, and clarifies where demand drivers and competitive pressures concentrate. The goal is to enable decision-makers to specify, source, and position self-operated regulating valves with fewer surprises and stronger alignment between engineering intent and commercial outcomes.

From commodity regulators to engineered reliability solutions as buyers demand validation, documentation, and resilience under real operating variability

The landscape is undergoing a decisive shift from component-centric purchasing to application-validated solutions. End users increasingly expect suppliers to provide performance assurance tied to operating variability, including inlet pressure excursions, wide turndown, two-phase risk, and noise constraints. As a result, product differentiation is moving toward engineered trims, better diaphragm and seal technologies, and clearer sizing guidance that anticipates real-world instability such as hunting, chattering, and sensitivity to upstream disturbances.

In parallel, digitalization is changing expectations even for inherently mechanical products. While self-operated regulating valves do not require external power, buyers now value optional add-ons such as position indicators, limit switches, or simple condition-monitoring accessories that support maintenance routines and auditability. Documentation has become a competitive lever as well: traceability packages, material certificates, and standardized test records reduce friction in regulated environments and accelerate qualification.

Sustainability and energy efficiency are also reshaping selection criteria. In steam and hot-water networks, tight control reduces wasted energy and mitigates thermal stress, while improved seat integrity limits losses that accumulate across distributed systems. Additionally, low-leakage expectations and broader attention to fugitive emissions are driving greater scrutiny of stem sealing, packing design, and body-joint integrity-especially where volatile organic compounds or hazardous gases are present.

Finally, supply-chain resilience is influencing both design and sourcing. Standardized platforms that share trims, diaphragms, and actuator components across sizes are favored because they simplify spares and shorten lead times. Buyers are also diversifying approved vendor lists, qualifying alternate materials where acceptable, and asking for clearer country-of-origin transparency. Taken together, these shifts are transforming self-operated regulating valves from “commodity regulators” into engineered reliability tools whose value is proven through application fit, documentation quality, and lifecycle support.

How United States tariff conditions in 2025 reshape landed cost, documentation burden, and supply-chain design for self-operated regulators

United States tariff dynamics in 2025 reinforce a procurement environment where total landed cost and compliance burden can change faster than technical specifications. For self-operated regulating valves, the practical impact is most visible in upstream inputs such as castings, forgings, stainless and specialty alloys, springs, and precision-machined trims, as well as in finished valve assemblies imported from tariff-exposed manufacturing bases. Even when a specific valve category is not directly targeted, cascading effects through metal surcharges and subcomponent tariffs can alter supplier pricing and availability.

A key consequence is the re-optimization of supply chains toward tariff-aware sourcing and assembly strategies. Manufacturers with flexible footprints can shift machining, final assembly, or testing to reduce exposure, while still maintaining consistent quality systems. Distributors and integrators, meanwhile, are adapting by increasing inventory buffers for high-velocity configurations and by negotiating longer-term pricing frameworks that reduce volatility for project-driven demand. However, this approach introduces working-capital considerations and raises the importance of demand planning accuracy.

Tariffs also intensify the documentation and classification workload. Correct harmonized tariff coding, country-of-origin substantiation, and clear bills of material become essential to avoid delays and unexpected charges. Many industrial buyers are responding by tightening supplier qualification to include trade compliance capability, not just technical performance. In regulated industries, where traceability and inspection are already rigorous, added customs complexity can become a schedule risk that rivals technical lead time.

Over the next procurement cycles, tariff pressure is likely to accelerate two behaviors. First, buyers will increasingly favor platforms with interchangeable internals and regionally available spares to limit the impact of cross-border delays. Second, supplier selection will tilt toward those that can offer transparent cost drivers, multiple logistics routes, and stable after-sales support within North America. In this environment, engineering and supply-chain teams benefit from collaborating earlier to lock specifications that allow alternates without compromising safety or performance.

Segmentation dynamics show how valve type, function, materials, end-use demands, and buying channels reshape selection criteria and value drivers

Key segmentation patterns reveal that buying behavior changes materially depending on valve type, actuation mechanism, material selection, end-use environment, and channel expectations, which in turn shape how suppliers should position performance claims. Across direct-acting and pilot-operated designs, decision-makers tend to trade simplicity for control stability as operating pressures rise or as flow variability increases. Direct-acting regulators are often preferred where robustness and minimal maintenance outweigh tight regulation, whereas pilot-operated solutions gain favor when users need improved accuracy, better response under changing loads, or wider operating ranges.

When viewed through function, pressure-reducing duties remain central, but back-pressure and relief-oriented applications increasingly appear in integrated skid packages and protection schemes where compactness and self-sufficiency are valued. Temperature-regulating configurations, typically paired with thermal elements, remain important in process heating and building hydronics because they can stabilize downstream conditions without complex control loops, especially in remote or cost-sensitive installations.

Material and trim choices create another strong segmentation axis. Brass and bronze variants remain relevant for certain utility and building-service duties where corrosion risk is manageable and cost sensitivity is high, while cast iron and ductile iron bodies maintain a role in water and steam networks that balance durability with economics. Stainless steels and specialty alloys are prioritized in chemically aggressive media, hygienic environments, or high-temperature duties, where users demand compatibility assurance, reduced contamination risk, and longer service intervals. Buyers increasingly ask for clarity on elastomer and diaphragm compatibility, not just the body material, because seal performance often governs real-world reliability.

End-use segmentation further differentiates requirements. Oil and gas and broader energy applications emphasize pressure containment, robustness, and predictable failure modes, while chemical and petrochemical sites focus on corrosion resistance and documentation depth. Water and wastewater users value ease of service and tolerance to debris, whereas power and steam-heavy facilities scrutinize noise, erosion, and long-term stability under cycling. In HVAC and building services, standardization, contractor familiarity, and fast availability heavily influence selection, even when performance requirements are moderate.

Finally, distribution pathways shape expectations for packaging and support. Engineering, procurement, and construction workflows typically require submittal-ready documentation and configuration control, while maintenance-driven purchasing favors rapid cross-referencing and drop-in replacements. As these segmentation dimensions intersect, suppliers that provide clear selection guidance, configurable platforms, and application-specific validation tend to earn preference over generic catalogs.

Regional buying priorities diverge across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific as compliance, infrastructure maturity, and service ecosystems shape demand

Regional dynamics illustrate how industrial mix, regulatory expectations, and infrastructure priorities influence what “good” looks like for a self-operated regulating valve. In the Americas, buyers often prioritize delivery reliability, service coverage, and clear compliance documentation, with strong demand tied to energy infrastructure, chemical processing, water networks, and commercial building services. Project schedules and maintenance uptime expectations drive preference for suppliers that can support configuration control, local testing capabilities, and readily available spares.

Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, selection tends to reflect a broad spread of operating conditions, from mature industrial bases and strict conformity requirements to large-scale energy and water projects in harsh environments. European buyers frequently emphasize environmental performance, product documentation, and conformity processes, while parts of the Middle East place heavy weight on robustness under heat, sand, and demanding duty cycles. In Africa, lifecycle serviceability, training, and the practicality of maintenance routines can become central differentiators, particularly where supply chains are elongated and specialized technicians are scarce.

In Asia-Pacific, manufacturing density and rapid infrastructure development sustain diverse demand, spanning high-volume building services to advanced semiconductor, pharmaceutical, and specialty chemical operations. This region often shows strong momentum toward standardization and scalability, with buyers seeking consistent platforms across multiple facilities and strong local support for commissioning and after-sales service. At the same time, competitive intensity can be high, pushing suppliers to defend value through proven reliability, documented performance, and fast responsiveness.

Across all regions, the common thread is a rising preference for suppliers that can bridge engineering rigor with local execution. Regional compliance nuances, differing installation practices, and varying maintenance cultures mean that the winning approach is rarely one-size-fits-all. Suppliers that align product configurations and support models to regional realities are better positioned to reduce friction from specification to startup.

Competitive advantage concentrates among companies that combine application engineering, documentation excellence, modular platforms, and resilient fulfillment

Competition in self-operated regulating valves is shaped less by brand recognition alone and more by the ability to deliver stable performance across varied duties while minimizing ownership friction. Leading companies typically differentiate through breadth of portfolio, depth of engineering support, and the availability of standardized platforms that can be configured quickly. In many bids, responsiveness during sizing and selection-providing clear guidance on inlet conditions, noise expectations, and stability margins-directly influences shortlisting.

Another consistent differentiator is the strength of quality systems and documentation practices. Buyers in regulated or safety-critical environments reward suppliers that can provide traceability, repeatable testing protocols, and well-structured submittals. This advantage compounds when suppliers also offer training, commissioning support, and service networks that keep regulators functioning correctly over time, especially in steam systems and pressure management stations where improper setup can erode performance.

Product innovation is increasingly practical rather than flashy. Companies that improve diaphragm longevity, reduce sensitivity to upstream turbulence, and offer trims that better resist erosion or cavitation can win in applications where instability and wear historically drove frequent interventions. Additionally, suppliers that can provide modular repair kits, standardized spare parts, and clear maintenance instructions reduce downtime and lower the perceived risk of adopting new configurations.

Finally, commercial strength increasingly depends on supply assurance. Firms with resilient sourcing, multiple manufacturing pathways, and transparent lead times are better positioned when tariffs, logistics disruptions, or sudden project acceleration strains availability. In this environment, the most competitive players combine application credibility with dependable fulfillment-helping customers standardize without sacrificing fit-for-purpose performance.

Strategic actions for leaders: standardize specifications, harden supply chains, prove stability, and reduce lifecycle friction through serviceable designs

Industry leaders can strengthen outcomes by treating self-operated regulating valves as part of an engineered control and reliability strategy rather than a line-item component. Start by standardizing specification templates that capture the conditions most likely to cause instability, including upstream pressure variability, minimum and maximum flow, temperature extremes, particulate risk, and noise constraints. When those inputs are consistently gathered, teams can select between direct-acting and pilot-operated approaches with fewer field surprises.

Next, build a tariff- and disruption-aware sourcing playbook. Qualify alternates in advance for the most common sizes and materials, and define acceptable equivalency rules for trims, elastomers, and test standards. Pair this with a documentation checklist that includes country-of-origin clarity, material certifications, and test records, so procurement can compare offers on more than price while avoiding customs or compliance delays.

Operationally, reduce lifecycle cost through maintenance-friendly standardization. Consolidate around a smaller number of service kits and shared internals where feasible, and align stocking policies to the criticality of pressure control points. For steam and hot-water networks, incorporate periodic performance verification into routine maintenance to catch drift, fouling, or diaphragm fatigue before it escalates into energy waste or unplanned downtime.

Commercial teams should translate technical value into measurable risk reduction. Position offerings around stability, reduced intervention frequency, and commissioning predictability, supported by application notes and case-based validation. In parallel, invest in faster sizing support and clearer selection tools, because decision velocity increasingly determines who gets specified early in projects.

Finally, align product development with the realities of modern installations. Improving resistance to cycling, simplifying field adjustment without sacrificing lockout integrity, and enhancing compatibility information for seals and diaphragms will address common failure modes. Leaders who integrate these actions will be better equipped to win specifications and sustain long-term customer trust.

Methodology built on technical grounding, stakeholder validation, and triangulation to connect valve performance realities with procurement and compliance needs

The research methodology integrates primary and secondary approaches to produce a grounded view of self-operated regulating valves across applications, regions, and competitive contexts. The work begins with structured secondary review of technical standards, regulatory frameworks, trade and customs considerations, and publicly available product documentation to establish how requirements and offerings are defined in the market. This step also includes mapping of typical applications and failure modes to ensure the analysis reflects how regulators perform in operational settings.

Primary research then validates assumptions through interviews and structured conversations with stakeholders across the ecosystem, including manufacturers, distributors, engineering and maintenance professionals, and end users. These interactions focus on selection criteria, common commissioning issues, maintenance realities, documentation expectations, and the practical impact of supply disruption and tariff-related cost changes. Insights from these discussions are used to refine segmentation logic and to identify where product differentiation is most meaningful.

The analysis phase applies triangulation to reconcile varying perspectives and reduce bias. Findings are cross-checked across multiple stakeholder inputs, compared against technical constraints, and reviewed for internal consistency across applications and regions. Special attention is paid to avoiding overgeneralization, recognizing that performance perceptions often vary by duty, media, and installation practice.

Finally, the report production process emphasizes clarity and usability. Terminology is normalized so engineering and procurement teams can align, and the narrative is built to connect technical characteristics with sourcing, compliance, and operational implications. This methodology is designed to help decision-makers apply insights directly to specification, qualification, and portfolio planning activities.

Self-operated regulation remains indispensable, but winning approaches now hinge on validated application fit, lifecycle support, and resilient sourcing discipline

Self-operated regulating valves remain essential because they solve a fundamental problem: maintaining controlled conditions with minimal infrastructure, high reliability, and straightforward maintenance. Yet the category is not standing still. Buyers are demanding better stability under variable conditions, clearer documentation for compliance and qualification, and more resilient sourcing that can withstand tariff and logistics volatility.

As the landscape evolves, differentiation increasingly rests on application fit and lifecycle support rather than on basic availability. The most successful strategies align valve type and configuration to the duty profile, select materials and sealing elements with a deeper understanding of media compatibility, and integrate serviceability into standardization decisions. Regional realities further reinforce that execution-local support, conformity processes, and maintenance culture-can be as important as the product itself.

Ultimately, organizations that treat self-operated regulation as a reliability and energy-performance lever will be positioned to reduce downtime, improve commissioning outcomes, and strengthen procurement predictability. The decisions made at specification and vendor-qualification stages will continue to shape operational performance long after installation, making disciplined selection and supplier alignment a sustained advantage.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
2.2.1. Primary Research
2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
5. Market Insights
5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market, by Valve Type
8.1. Ball Valve
8.2. Butterfly Valve
8.3. Diaphragm Valve
8.4. Gate Valve
8.5. Globe Valve
9. Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market, by End Use
9.1. Chemical And Petrochemical
9.2. Food And Beverage
9.3. Oil And Gas
9.4. Pharmaceuticals
9.5. Power Generation
9.6. Water And Wastewater
10. Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market, by Actuation
10.1. Electric
10.2. Hydraulic
10.3. Manual
10.4. Pneumatic
11. Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market, by Material
11.1. Alloy Steel
11.2. Bronze
11.3. Carbon Steel
11.4. Cast Iron
11.5. Stainless Steel
12. Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market, by Nominal Size
12.1. 2-12 Inch
12.2. Above 12 Inch
12.3. Less Than 2 Inch
13. Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. United States Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market
17. China Self-Operated Regulating Valve Market
18. Competitive Landscape
18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
18.5. Baker Hughes Company
18.6. Bürkert GmbH & Co. KG
18.7. CIRCOR International, Inc.
18.8. Danfoss A/S
18.9. Emerson Electric Co.
18.10. Festo AG & Co. KG
18.11. Flowserve Corporation
18.12. Honeywell International Inc.
18.13. IMI plc
18.14. KITZ Corporation
18.15. KSB SE & Co. KGaA
18.16. Parker-Hannifin Corporation
18.17. Regport Technology Pvt. Ltd.
18.18. Rotork Plc
18.19. Samson AG
18.20. Schneider Electric SE
18.21. Siemens AG
18.22. SMC Corporation
18.23. Spirax-Sarco Engineering plc
18.24. The Curtiss-Wright Corporation
18.25. The Weir Group PLC
18.26. VAG Holding GmbH
18.27. Valmet Corporation
18.28. Velan Inc.
18.29. Zhejiang Lasen Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.
List of Figures
FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 13. CHINA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
List of Tables
TABLE 1. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 2. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 3. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY BALL VALVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 4. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY BALL VALVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 5. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY BALL VALVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 6. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY BUTTERFLY VALVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 7. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY BUTTERFLY VALVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 8. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY BUTTERFLY VALVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 9. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY DIAPHRAGM VALVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 10. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY DIAPHRAGM VALVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 11. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY DIAPHRAGM VALVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 12. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY GATE VALVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 13. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY GATE VALVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 14. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY GATE VALVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 15. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY GLOBE VALVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 16. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY GLOBE VALVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 17. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY GLOBE VALVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 18. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 19. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL AND PETROCHEMICAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 20. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL AND PETROCHEMICAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 21. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL AND PETROCHEMICAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 22. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD AND BEVERAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 23. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD AND BEVERAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 24. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD AND BEVERAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 25. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY OIL AND GAS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 26. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY OIL AND GAS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 27. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY OIL AND GAS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 28. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 29. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 30. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY PHARMACEUTICALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 31. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 32. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 33. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 34. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY WATER AND WASTEWATER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 35. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY WATER AND WASTEWATER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 36. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY WATER AND WASTEWATER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 37. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 38. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 39. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 40. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 41. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY HYDRAULIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 42. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY HYDRAULIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 43. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY HYDRAULIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 44. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 45. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 46. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MANUAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 47. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY PNEUMATIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 48. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY PNEUMATIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 49. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY PNEUMATIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 50. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 51. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ALLOY STEEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 52. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ALLOY STEEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 53. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ALLOY STEEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 54. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY BRONZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 55. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY BRONZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 56. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY BRONZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 57. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY CARBON STEEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 58. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY CARBON STEEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 59. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY CARBON STEEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 60. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY CAST IRON, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 61. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY CAST IRON, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 62. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY CAST IRON, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 63. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 64. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 65. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 66. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 67. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY 2-12 INCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 68. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY 2-12 INCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 69. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY 2-12 INCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 70. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ABOVE 12 INCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 71. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ABOVE 12 INCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 72. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ABOVE 12 INCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 73. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY LESS THAN 2 INCH, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 74. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY LESS THAN 2 INCH, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 75. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY LESS THAN 2 INCH, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 76. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 77. AMERICAS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 78. AMERICAS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 79. AMERICAS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 80. AMERICAS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 81. AMERICAS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 82. AMERICAS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 83. NORTH AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 86. NORTH AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 87. NORTH AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 88. NORTH AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 90. LATIN AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 91. LATIN AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 94. LATIN AMERICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 95. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 96. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 97. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 98. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 99. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 101. EUROPE SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 102. EUROPE SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 103. EUROPE SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 104. EUROPE SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 105. EUROPE SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 106. EUROPE SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 107. MIDDLE EAST SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 108. MIDDLE EAST SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 109. MIDDLE EAST SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 110. MIDDLE EAST SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 111. MIDDLE EAST SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 112. MIDDLE EAST SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 113. AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 114. AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 115. AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 116. AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 117. AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 118. AFRICA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 119. ASIA-PACIFIC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 120. ASIA-PACIFIC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 121. ASIA-PACIFIC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 122. ASIA-PACIFIC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 123. ASIA-PACIFIC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 124. ASIA-PACIFIC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 125. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 126. ASEAN SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 127. ASEAN SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 128. ASEAN SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 129. ASEAN SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 130. ASEAN SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 131. ASEAN SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 132. GCC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 133. GCC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 134. GCC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 135. GCC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 136. GCC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 137. GCC SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 138. EUROPEAN UNION SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 139. EUROPEAN UNION SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 140. EUROPEAN UNION SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 141. EUROPEAN UNION SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 142. EUROPEAN UNION SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 143. EUROPEAN UNION SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 144. BRICS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 145. BRICS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 146. BRICS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 147. BRICS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 148. BRICS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 149. BRICS SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 150. G7 SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 151. G7 SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 152. G7 SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 153. G7 SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 154. G7 SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 155. G7 SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 156. NATO SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 157. NATO SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 158. NATO SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 159. NATO SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 160. NATO SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 161. NATO SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 162. GLOBAL SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 163. UNITED STATES SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 164. UNITED STATES SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 165. UNITED STATES SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 166. UNITED STATES SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 167. UNITED STATES SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 168. UNITED STATES SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 169. CHINA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 170. CHINA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY VALVE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 171. CHINA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 172. CHINA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY ACTUATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 173. CHINA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 174. CHINA SELF-OPERATED REGULATING VALVE MARKET SIZE, BY NOMINAL SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Self-Operated Regulating Valve market report include:
  • Baker Hughes Company
  • Bürkert GmbH & Co. KG
  • CIRCOR International, Inc.
  • Danfoss A/S
  • Emerson Electric Co.
  • Festo AG & Co. KG
  • Flowserve Corporation
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • IMI plc
  • KITZ Corporation
  • KSB SE & Co. KGaA
  • Parker‑Hannifin Corporation
  • Regport Technology Pvt. Ltd.
  • Rotork Plc
  • Samson AG
  • Schneider Electric SE
  • Siemens AG
  • SMC Corporation
  • Spirax-Sarco Engineering plc
  • The Curtiss-Wright Corporation
  • The Weir Group PLC
  • VAG Holding GmbH
  • Valmet Corporation
  • Velan Inc.
  • Zhejiang Lasen Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.

Table Information