+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Nasal Polyposis Drug Pipeline Analysis Report 2025

  • PDF Icon

    Drug Pipelines

  • 100 Pages
  • May 2025
  • Region: Global
  • Expert Market Research
  • ID: 6092261
Nasal polyposis affects approximately 2.7% of adults, with prevalence increasing with age and peaking in individuals aged 50 years and older. It remains rare in children and adolescents. In The United States, nasal Polyposis are estimated to affect 1% to 4% of the general population. Despite existing treatment options, there remains a significant unmet clinical need for more effective and targeted therapies. This growing demand is driving the development of upcoming nasal polyposis drugs, particularly innovative biologic therapies, which aim to offer improved symptom control, reduced recurrence rates, and better quality of life for patients.

Key Takeaways 
  • The nasal polyposis drug pipeline is robust and evolving, reflecting a clear shift from conventional anti-inflammatory treatments to targeted, biologic-based therapies.
  • Current candidates in development span multiple drug classes, including monoclonal antibodies (e.g., anti-IL-4Rα, anti-IL-5, anti-IgE), small molecules, immunomodulators, peptides, and RNA-based agents.
  • New therapies are likely to offer more personalized, longer-lasting, and disease-modifying treatment options, particularly for patients with severe or treatment-resistant nasal polyposis.
Report Coverage 
The Nasal Polyposis Drug Pipeline Analysis Report 2025 provides an in-depth overview of recent advancements and ongoing clinical trials aimed at improving nasal Polyposis treatment and prevention. The report explores the development of novel therapies for nasal polyposis, including next-generation biologics, immunomodulators, and targeted treatments aimed at improving immune response and managing disease progression. It also evaluates innovative treatment strategies, industry collaborations, and regulatory advancements, highlighting efforts to accelerate the development of safe and effective therapies for the management and potential eradication of nasal polyposis.

Nasal Polyposis Drug Pipeline Outlook 
The nasal polyposis drug pipeline is experiencing significant momentum, driven by the growing understanding of Type 2 inflammation and its role in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Traditional treatments such as intranasal corticosteroids and oral therapies offer symptomatic relief but often fail to address underlying inflammation or prevent recurrence. This limitation has created a substantial unmet need, prompting the development of targeted biologic therapies, particularly monoclonal antibodies like anti-IL-4Rα, anti-IL-5, and anti-IgE agents. Several of these biologics, including dupilumab and benralizumab, are either approved or in advanced clinical trials, offering a more personalized and disease-modifying approach for patients with moderate to severe nasal polyposis.

In parallel, innovative delivery methods and emerging drug classes such as peptides, immunomodulators, and RNA-based therapies are enriching the early-stage pipeline. Companies like Optinose are enhancing the efficacy of existing molecules through device-based delivery systems, while others, particularly in China, are developing alternative biologics to increase treatment accessibility. Looking ahead, the nasal polyposis therapeutic landscape is poised for transformation, with a shift toward long-acting, targeted, and potentially curative treatments. As more biologics receive approval and combination strategies evolve, the future outlook is promising for both patients and stakeholders in this rapidly evolving field.
Nasal Polyposis - Pipeline Drug Profiles 
Recent developments in treating nasal polyposis have introduced several promising drugs currently in clinical trials, reflecting significant advancements in the field. 

Drug:

OPN-375

Optinose US Inc. is conducting a Phase 3 clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of OPN-375 (186 μg, administered twice daily) in adolescents aged 12-17 with bilateral nasal polyposis. This 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aims to enroll approximately 120 participants. The therapy utilizes an innovative intranasal delivery system designed to improve drug deposition and effectiveness in reducing nasal congestion and polyp burden. Study completion is expected by March 2026.

Drug:

TQC2731

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. is sponsoring a Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of TQC2731, an injectable candidate for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The double-blind, placebo-controlled study began in December 2023, with approximately 80 participants. The trial is scheduled for completion by September 2025, aiming to establish TQC2731’s potential as a novel therapeutic option in this indication.

Drug:

TRL1068

Trellis Bioscience LLC is advancing TRL1068, a monoclonal antibody, through a Phase 1 clinical trial for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. TRL1068 targets and eliminates bacterial biofilms, thereby enhancing the efficacy of concurrent antibiotic therapy. This early-stage study, involving around 12 participants, began in January 2024 and is expected to conclude by January 2025, focusing on safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.

Drug Pipeline Therapeutic Assessment 
This section of the report covers the analysis of nasal polyposis based on various segmentations such as: 

Analysis by Route of Administration

Oral Administration

Oral therapies, such as leukotriene receptor antagonists (e.g., montelukast) and emerging small molecules, offer ease of use and good patient compliance. However, their effectiveness in nasal polyposis is often limited, especially in moderate-to-severe cases. New oral agents in development are focusing on anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, but systemic exposure and potential side effects remain concerns. While oral drugs may play a supportive or adjunctive role, they are unlikely to replace biologics in more advanced or refractory disease.

Parenteral Administration (Injectable)

Parenteral drugs, particularly subcutaneous monoclonal antibodies, are at the forefront of the nasal polyposis treatment pipeline. Agents like dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, and others are administered via injection and provide targeted inhibition of key immune pathways (e.g., IL-4, IL-5, IgE). These therapies are particularly effective in patients with severe, recurrent, or eosinophilic nasal polyposis, and are often used when other treatments fail. Due to their strong clinical efficacy and specificity, injectable biologics dominate the current and late-stage drug pipeline.

Others (Intranasal, Topical, Inhalational)

The "others" category mainly includes intranasal corticosteroids and topical peptide or small molecule therapies, which are commonly used in mild to moderate cases. These routes offer direct delivery to the site of inflammation with fewer systemic side effects. In the pipeline, newer intranasal formulations are being optimized for better mucosal penetration and longer duration of action. Some novel drug-device combinations (e.g., exhalation delivery systems) are also under development. While less invasive, their effectiveness may be limited in severe disease, making them more suitable for maintenance or combination therapy.

Analysis by Phase 
The report covers phase I, phase II, phase III, phase IV, and early phase drugs. The coverage includes an in-depth analysis of each drug across these phases. According to EMR analysis, phase II covers a major share of the total nasal polyposis clinical trials.

Preclinical Phase:

Laboratory and animal studies to assess safety and efficacy. 

1. Phase I:

Small-scale human trials focusing on safety and dosage. 

2. Phase II:

Larger trials to evaluate efficacy and side effects. 

3. Phase III:

Large-scale trials to confirm effectiveness, monitor side effects, and compare with standard treatments. 

4. Phase IV:

Post-marketing studies to gather more information on risks, benefits, and optimal use. 

Analysis by Drug Class

Small Molecules:

Small molecule therapies, such as corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists, have long been used to manage nasal polyposis by reducing inflammation and polyp size. In the current pipeline, new formulations aim to enhance efficacy, improve delivery, and reduce systemic side effects. However, these drugs often fall short in controlling severe or recurrent cases, which limits their future potential as standalone treatments. Nonetheless, they remain important in early-stage disease management and as adjuncts to advanced therapies.

Monoclonal Antibodies:

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are the most advanced and rapidly growing segment in the nasal polyposis drug pipeline. These biologics target specific inflammatory pathways, particularly those associated with Type 2 inflammation, such as IL-4, IL-5, and IgE. Approved drugs like dupilumab and omalizumab have already shown significant clinical benefits, driving further development of similar agents. With multiple mAbs in late-stage trials, this class holds promise for transforming treatment, especially in patients with severe, chronic, or treatment-resistant nasal polyposis.

Immunomodulators:

Immunomodulators are emerging as potential therapeutic options that aim to rebalance the immune system rather than broadly suppress it. In nasal polyposis, they may help control chronic inflammation and prevent recurrence when used alone or in combination with other therapies. While still under early investigation, these agents could provide safer, long-term alternatives, especially for patients who do not fully respond to current biologics or corticosteroids. Their role in the pipeline is growing as researchers explore more targeted immune pathways.

Peptides:

Peptide-based therapies are being investigated for their ability to selectively target inflammation and fibrosis in nasal polyposis. Their small size and high specificity offer advantages in drug delivery and reduced systemic toxicity. Most peptide drugs in the pipeline are in preclinical or early clinical stages and are being developed for topical use to enhance local action in the nasal passages. While still early in development, peptides may represent a novel, less invasive option for managing inflammation in patients with mild to moderate disease.

RNA-Based Therapies:

RNA-based therapies, including siRNA and antisense oligonucleotides, represent a cutting-edge approach in the nasal polyposis pipeline. These drugs are designed to silence specific genes involved in inflammatory pathways, offering high precision and the potential for disease-modifying effects. Although still in preclinical or exploratory clinical stages, RNA therapeutics hold great promise for future personalized treatment. Challenges related to delivery, stability, and manufacturing costs remain, but ongoing innovation may eventually bring these novel agents into clinical use.

Nasal Polyposis Clinical Trials Assessment- Competitive Dynamics 

AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca is a major player in respiratory and immunology therapeutics and has a growing focus on nasal polyposis through its biologic pipeline. One of its key assets is benralizumab (anti-IL-5Rα monoclonal antibody), already approved for severe eosinophilic asthma and currently under investigation for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Benralizumab works by depleting eosinophils, which are strongly implicated in nasal polyp formation and inflammation. AstraZeneca is conducting clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of benralizumab in reducing polyp burden and improving symptoms, particularly in patients with Type 2 inflammation. The company’s efforts aim to expand its biologic portfolio beyond asthma to include upper airway diseases, leveraging its strong expertise in immunology.

Optinose Inc.
Optinose is a specialty pharmaceutical company that focuses specifically on therapies for nasal and respiratory conditions. Its flagship product, Xhance® (fluticasone propionate), is an intranasal corticosteroid delivered via a novel exhalation delivery system (EDS). This technology enhances drug deposition in the deeper and hard-to-reach areas of the nasal cavity and sinuses, making it more effective for treating nasal polyps compared to traditional sprays. Xhance is already approved in the U.S. for nasal polyps and is being further explored in clinical trials for chronic sinusitis without polyps. Optinose’s unique approach combines drug reformulation with device innovation, making it a key contributor in non-biologic therapeutic strategies for nasal polyposis.

Keymed Biosciences Co., Ltd.
Keymed Biosciences is a Chinese biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative biologics, particularly monoclonal antibodies for immunologic and oncologic diseases. In the nasal polyposis space, the company is developing CM310, an anti-IL-4Rα monoclonal antibody, targeting the same pathway as dupilumab. CM310 is currently undergoing Phase III clinical trials for CRSwNP. By blocking the IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathways, CM310 aims to reduce Type 2 inflammation, shrink polyps, and improve nasal airflow and quality of life. If successful, it could provide a domestically developed alternative to global biologics like dupilumab in China and other markets. Keymed’s work reflects the rising innovation in biologics from Asia-Pacific companies.

Sunshine Guojian Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Sunshine Guojian, a subsidiary of 3SBio Inc., is another prominent Chinese biopharmaceutical company involved in the development of monoclonal antibodies. In the context of nasal polyposis, the company is advancing 3SB-706, a novel biologic targeting Type 2 inflammatory pathways, currently in Phase I/II clinical trials. While detailed mechanism of action is not publicly disclosed, it is believed to be similar in function to existing anti-IL-5 or IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors. Sunshine Guojian’s efforts represent China’s growing interest in targeting upper airway diseases with innovative biologic treatments, potentially contributing to a more competitive global landscape in nasal polyposis therapeutics.

Other key players in the market include Genrix Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Guangdong Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Insmed Incorporated, Eli Lilly and Company, Trellis Bioscience LLC, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Reasons To Purchase This Report 
The nasal Polyposis pipeline analysis report provides essential insights into the latest developments and future trends in the treatment of nasal Polyposis. It includes comprehensive evaluations of emerging therapies, an in-depth pipeline assessment, and a thorough competitive landscape analysis, empowering informed investment decisions and effective strategic planning.

Key Questions Answered in the Nasal Polyposis Pipeline Analysis Report 
  • What are the latest advancements in nasal polyposis therapies?
  • Which companies are leading the nasal polyposis drug pipeline?
  • What are the key drug classes in nasal polyposis treatment?
  • What are the regulatory trends influencing nasal polyposis drug development?
  • How do emerging therapies impact nasal polyposis patient outcomes?
  • What are the market drivers for nasal polyposis therapies?
  • What challenges do companies face in developing nasal polyposis drugs?
  • How do industry collaborations accelerate nasal polyposis drug development?
  • Which treatments are expected to emerge in the nasal polyposis pipeline?
  • What are the competitive dynamics in the nasal polyposis market?

Table of Contents

1 Preface
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Objectives of the Study
1.3 Research Methodology & Assumptions
2 Executive Summary
3 Overview of Nasal Polyposis
3.1 Signs and Symptoms
3.2 Causes
3.3 Risk Factors
3.4 Diagnosis
3.5 Treatment
4 Patient Profile: Nasal Polyposis
4.1 Patient Profile Overview
4.2 Patient Psychology and Emotional Impact Factors
4.3 Risk Assessment and Treatment Success Rate
5 Nasal Polyposis: Epidemiology Snapshot
5.1 Nasal Polyposis Incidence by Key Markets
5.2 Nasal Polyposis - Patients Seeking Treatment in Key Markets
6 Nasal Polyposis: Market Dynamics
6.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
6.2 SWOT Analysis
7 Nasal Polyposis: Key Facts Covered
7.1 Top Countries Contributing to Clinical Trials in Asia-Pacific
7.2 Top Countries Contributing to Clinical Trials in Europe
7.3 Top Countries Contributing to Clinical Trials in North America
7.4 Top Countries Contributing to Clinical Trials in Other Regions
8 Nasal Polyposis, Drug Pipeline Assessment
8.1 Assessment by Treatment Type
8.2 Assessment by Route of Administration
8.3 Assessment by Drug Class
9 EMR Drug Pipeline Comparative Analysis
9.1 List of Nasal Polyposis Pipeline Drugs
9.1.1 By Company
9.1.2 By Phase
9.1.3 By Indication
9.1.4 By Trial Status
9.1.5 By Funder Type
9.2 EMR Attribute Scoring Analysis of Pipeline Drugs (Top Drugs)
10 Nasal Polyposis Drug Pipeline - Late-Stage Products (Phase III and IV) (Top Drugs)
10.1 Comparative Analysis for Late-Stage Drugs
10.1.1 Study Type
10.1.2 Recruitment Status
10.1.3 Company
10.1.4 Funder Type
10.2 Product Level Analysis*
10.2.1 Biological: Benralizumab
10.2.1.1 Product Description
10.2.1.2 Trial ID
10.2.1.3 Sponsor Name
10.2.1.4 Study Type
10.2.1.5 Drug Class
10.2.1.6 Eligibility Criteria
10.2.1.7 Study Record Dates
10.2.1.7.1 First Submitted
10.2.1.7.2 First Posted
10.2.1.7.3 Last Update Posted
10.2.1.7.4 Last Verified
10.2.1.8 Indication
10.2.1.9 Study Design
10.2.1.10 Recruitment Status
10.2.1.11 Enrollment (Estimated)
10.2.1.12 Location Countries
10.2.1.13 Recent Results
10.2.2 Drug: OPN-375
10.2.3 Drug: GR1802
10.2.4 Drug: LY3650150
10.2.5 Other Drugs
11 Nasal Polyposis Drug Pipeline - Mid-Stage Products (Phase II) (Top Drugs)
11.1 Comparative Analysis for Mid-Stage Drugs
11.1.1 Study Type
11.1.2 Recruitment Status
11.1.3 Company
11.1.4 Funder Type
11.2 Product Level Analysis*
11.2.1 Biological: CM326
11.2.1.1 Product Description
11.2.1.2 Trial ID
11.2.1.3 Sponsor Name
11.2.1.4 Study Type
11.2.1.5 Drug Class
11.2.1.6 Eligibility Criteria
11.2.1.7 Study Record Dates
11.2.1.7.1 First Submitted
11.2.1.7.2 First Posted
11.2.1.7.3 Last Update Posted
11.2.1.7.4 Last Verified
11.2.1.8 Indication
11.2.1.9 Study Design
11.2.1.10 Recruitment Status
11.2.1.11 Enrollment (Estimated)
11.2.1.12 Location Countries
11.2.1.13 Recent Results
11.2.2 Drug: TQC2731
11.2.3 Drug: SHR-1905
11.2.4 Other Drugs
12 Nasal Polyposis Drug Pipeline - Early-Stage Products (Phase I) (Top Drugs)
12.1 Comparative Analysis for Early-Stage Drugs
12.1.1 Study Type
12.1.2 Recruitment Status
12.1.3 Company
12.1.4 Funder Type
12.2 Product Level Analysis*
12.2.1 Drug: TRL1068
12.2.1.1 Product Description
12.2.1.2 Trial ID
12.2.1.3 Sponsor Name
12.2.1.4 Study Type
12.2.1.5 Drug Class
12.2.1.6 Eligibility Criteria
12.2.1.7 Study Record Dates
12.2.1.7.1 First Submitted
12.2.1.7.2 First Posted
12.2.1.7.3 Last Update Posted
12.2.1.7.4 Last Verified
12.2.1.8 Indication
12.2.1.9 Study Design
12.2.1.10 Recruitment Status
12.2.1.11 Enrollment (Estimated)
12.2.1.12 Location Countries
12.2.2 Other Drugs
13 Nasal Polyposis Drug Pipeline - Preclinical and Discovery Stage Products (Top Drugs)
13.1 Comparative Analysis for Preclinical and Discovery Stage Drugs
13.1.1 Study Type
13.1.2 Recruitment Status
13.1.3 Company
13.1.4 Funder Type
13.2 Product Level Analysis*
13.2.1 Drug: Mepolizumab
13.2.1.1 Product Description
13.2.1.2 Trial ID
13.2.1.3 Sponsor Name
13.2.1.4 Study Type
13.2.1.5 Drug Class
13.2.1.6 Eligibility Criteria
13.2.1.7 Study Record Dates
13.2.1.7.1 First Submitted
13.2.1.7.2 First Posted
13.2.1.7.3 Last Update Posted
13.2.1.7.4 Last Verified
13.2.1.8 Indication
13.2.1.9 Study Design
13.2.1.10 Recruitment Status
13.2.1.11 Enrollment (Estimated)
13.2.1.12 Location Countries
13.2.2 Other Drugs
14 Nasal Polyposis, Key Drug Pipeline Companies
14.1 AstraZeneca
14.1.1 Company Snapshot
14.1.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.1.3 Financial Analysis
14.1.4 Recent News and Developments
14.2 Optinose Inc.
14.2.1 Company Snapshot
14.2.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.2.3 Financial Analysis
14.2.4 Recent News and Developments
14.3 Keymed Biosciences Co.Ltd.
14.3.1 Company Snapshot
14.3.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.3.3 Financial Analysis
14.3.4 Recent News and Developments
14.4 Sunshine Guojian Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
14.4.1 Company Snapshot
14.4.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.4.3 Financial Analysis
14.4.4 Recent News and Developments
14.5 Genrix Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
14.5.1 Company Snapshot
14.5.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.5.3 Financial Analysis
14.5.4 Recent News and Developments
14.6 Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.
14.6.1 Company Snapshot
14.6.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.6.3 Financial Analysis
14.6.4 Recent News and Developments
14.7 Guangdong Hengrui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
14.7.1 Company Snapshot
14.7.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.7.3 Financial Analysis
14.7.4 Recent News and Developments
14.8 Insmed Incorporated
14.8.1 Company Snapshot
14.8.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.8.3 Financial Analysis
14.8.4 Recent News and Developments
14.9 Eli Lilly and Company
14.9.1 Company Snapshot
14.9.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.9.3 Financial Analysis
14.9.4 Recent News and Developments
14.10 Trellis Bioscience LLC
14.10.1 Company Snapshot
14.10.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.10.3 Financial Analysis
14.10.4 Recent News and Developments
14.11 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
14.11.1 Company Snapshot
14.11.2 Pipeline Product Portfolio
14.11.3 Financial Analysis
14.11.4 Recent News and Developments
15 Regulatory Framework for Drug Approval, By Region16 Terminated or Suspended Pipeline Products

Methodology

Loading
LOADING...