+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Giant Cell Arteritis Epidemiology Forecast 2025-2034

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 150 Pages
  • May 2025
  • Region: Global
  • Expert Market Research
  • ID: 6092358
Giant cell arteritis, also known as temporal arteritis, is a type of vasculitis characterised by inflammation of medium and large-sized blood vessels, mainly affecting arteries in the head and neck. It is the most prevalent form of vasculitis in adults, particularly in individuals over the age of 50. The condition occurs with an estimated annual incidence ranging from 1 in 5,000 to 1 in 17,000 in this age group and is more commonly observed in populations of northern European descent.

Giant Cell Arteritis Epidemiology Forecast Report Coverage

The Giant Cell Arteritis Epidemiology Forecast Report 2025-2034 delivers a comprehensive analysis of the condition’s prevalence and associated demographic factors. It projects future incidence and prevalence trends across diverse population groups, considering key variables such as age, gender, and giant cell arteritis type. The report highlights changes in prevalence over time and offers data-driven forecasts based on influencing factors. Additionally, it provides an in-depth overview of the disease, along with historical and projected epidemiological data for eight key markets:

The United States, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Japan, and India.

Giant Cell Arteritis:

Disease Overview

Giant cell arteritis is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting large and medium-sized arteries, particularly in the head and neck. Most commonly seen in adults over 50, it can lead to serious complications such as vision loss if left untreated. Symptoms often include headache, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, and fatigue. The condition is more prevalent in northern European populations and is the most common form of vasculitis in older adults. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are crucial to prevent irreversible damage.

Epidemiology Overview

The epidemiology section for giant cell arteritis provides comprehensive insights into the patient population from historical data to current figures, along with future projections across the eight major global markets. The Research compiles both present and forecasted trends for giant cell arteritis through the evaluation of numerous studies. The report includes details on diagnosed patient populations, segmented by gender, age group, and other relevant categories.
  • As reported by the National Health Institute, the lifetime risk of giant cell arteritis is around 1% in women and 0.5% in men in The United States, with most cases occurring in those over 50 especially between ages 70 and 79.
  • A BMC study noted the incidence rate at 10 per 100,000 individuals aged 50 and above, based on the review of 107 studies out of 3,569 citations.
  • Further findings from a 2023 National Institute of Health cohort study revealed that 46% of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica were diagnosed with giant cell arteritis.
  • Additionally, a publication by Rheumatology Advisor affirmed the condition’s higher prevalence in women, being 2.5 times more likely compared to men, consistent with reported lifetime risks.

Giant Cell Arteritis:

Treatment Overview

Giant cell arteritis requires prompt treatment to prevent serious complications, particularly vision loss. Management typically begins with high-dose corticosteroids, followed by gradual tapering. In recent years, immunosuppressive therapies have emerged as important steroid-sparing options. Treatment is often tailored to disease severity and patient tolerance. Below are four commonly used therapies:

1. Corticosteroids

High-dose corticosteroids, such as prednisone, are the first-line treatment for giant cell arteritis. Immediate initiation is critical, especially when visual symptoms are present, to prevent irreversible vision loss. Treatment usually begins with a high dose, followed by a gradual taper over several months. Long-term corticosteroid use can lead to side effects such as osteoporosis, diabetes, and hypertension, requiring careful monitoring and supportive therapies. Despite the risks, corticosteroids are highly effective in rapidly controlling inflammation and alleviating symptoms, making them the cornerstone of initial therapy.

2. Tocilizumab

Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, is approved for the treatment of giant cell arteritis and is often used in patients who cannot tolerate prolonged corticosteroid therapy. It helps reduce inflammation and disease relapse while allowing for lower steroid doses. Administered via subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion, tocilizumab has demonstrated strong efficacy in maintaining remission. Potential side effects include increased infection risk and changes in liver enzyme levels. Tocilizumab is especially useful in long-term disease control and minimising steroid-related complications.

3. Methotrexate

Methotrexate is an immunosuppressive drug sometimes used as a steroid-sparing agent in patients with giant cell arteritis. It can help reduce the cumulative dose of corticosteroids and decrease the likelihood of relapse. Taken weekly by mouth or injection, methotrexate is generally well tolerated, though it requires regular blood tests to monitor liver function and blood counts. It is often chosen for patients with contraindications to biologics or those with relapsing disease. Supplementation with folic acid can mitigate side effects such as mouth ulcers and fatigue.

4. Aspirin

Low-dose aspirin may be used as an adjunctive therapy in patients with giant cell arteritis, particularly those at high risk of vascular complications such as stroke or vision loss. Aspirin’s antiplatelet effect helps reduce the risk of ischemic events by improving blood flow in inflamed arteries. Though not a primary treatment for inflammation, it can play a preventive role in thrombotic complications. However, aspirin must be used cautiously in patients with gastrointestinal or bleeding risks and should be prescribed based on individual risk profiles.

Giant Cell Arteritis:

Burden Analysis

Giant cell arteritis presents a significant burden, particularly among older adults, affecting quality of life through persistent headaches, jaw pain, visual disturbances, and systemic symptoms like fatigue and fever. If left untreated, the disease can lead to irreversible complications such as permanent vision loss and stroke. Long-term corticosteroid use, the primary treatment, often causes adverse effects including osteoporosis and diabetes, further impacting daily living. The condition also imposes a psychological toll due to anxiety over relapse or vision impairment. Overall, giant cell arteritis limits functional independence and increases healthcare utilisation, especially in ageing populations.

Key Epidemiology Trends

Giant cell arteritis continues to evolve in its epidemiological patterns, influenced by demographic shifts, improved diagnostics, and changes in clinical awareness. The following are five key trends shaping the current understanding of giant cell arteritis:

1. Ageing Population and Increased Incidence

As global life expectancy rises, there is a corresponding increase in the incidence of giant cell arteritis. This condition predominantly affects individuals over the age of 50, with the highest risk found in those over 70. The expanding elderly population has led to a growing number of cases worldwide, particularly in countries with advanced healthcare systems where people live longer.

2. Greater Female Predominance

Epidemiological data consistently show that giant cell arteritis is more prevalent in women than men. While the underlying reasons are still being investigated, hormonal and immunological differences are thought to contribute. This gender disparity has prompted increased awareness among clinicians to monitor older female patients more closely for early signs of the disease.

3. Geographic and Ethnic Variation

Giant cell arteritis exhibits notable geographic variation, being most common in individuals of northern European descent. Countries in Scandinavia, the United Kingdom, and North America report higher rates, while it remains relatively rare in Asian, African, and Latin American populations. Genetic susceptibility, along with environmental and lifestyle factors, may explain these differences.

4. Improved Diagnostic Tools and Awareness

Advancements in imaging techniques such as ultrasound and PET scans have enhanced the ability to detect giant cell arteritis early and more accurately. These improvements, combined with heightened clinical awareness, have contributed to better recognition and diagnosis. This has led to more timely treatment, reducing the risk of severe complications like vision loss.

5. Increased Recognition of Overlapping Conditions

There is growing recognition of the link between giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. Many patients present with symptoms of both conditions, and studies have shown that the co-occurrence is more common than previously understood. This association has influenced diagnostic protocols and encouraged clinicians to screen for both diseases when either is suspected.

Analysis By Region

The epidemiology of giant cell arteritis varies across countries and regions due to differences in healthcare infrastructure, socioeconomic factors, cultural attitudes towards pain, and access to pain management therapies. Understanding these variations is essential for developing targeted interventions and improving patient outcomes.

Key regions include:

  • The United States
  • Germany
  • France
  • Italy
  • Spain
  • The United Kingdom
  • Japan
  • India
These regions exhibit distinct epidemiological trends, reflecting the unique challenges and opportunities within their healthcare systems.

The prevalence of giant cell arteritis differs significantly across regions, with the highest rates observed in Northern Europe and among individuals of European ancestry. In contrast, lower prevalence is reported in areas such as Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Studies indicate that Scandinavian countries and populations of Scandinavian origin exhibit the greatest incidence. Conversely, the condition is less frequently diagnosed in Asian, African American, Arabic, and Japanese populations. Additionally, it is estimated that between 40% and 60% of individuals with giant cell arteritis also experience polymyalgia rheumatica, highlighting a strong clinical association between the two conditions.

Key Questions Answered

  • What are the key demographic factors influencing the prevalence of giant cell arteritis across different global regions?
  • How does the incidence of giant cell arteritis vary with age and gender in diverse populations?
  • What role do genetic and environmental factors play in the geographic distribution of giant cell arteritis?
  • How has the advancement in diagnostic imaging impacted the detection rates of giant cell arteritis?
  • What is the observed relationship between giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica in clinical populations?
  • How do lifestyle factors and comorbidities influence the risk of developing giant cell arteritis?
  • What are the trends in delayed diagnosis of giant cell arteritis, and how do they affect patient outcomes?
  • How does access to healthcare systems affect the reported prevalence and management of giant cell arteritis?
  • What is the impact of ethnicity on the clinical presentation and progression of giant cell arteritis?
  • How do regional variations in medical training and awareness influence the diagnosis rate of giant cell arteritis?

Scope of the Report

  • The report covers a detailed analysis of signs and symptoms, causes, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment options, and classification/types of giant cell arteritis based on several factors.
  • The giant cell arteritis epidemiology forecast report covers data for the eight major markets (the US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, Japan, and India)
  • The report helps to identify the patient population, the unmet needs of giant cell arteritis are highlighted along with an assessment of the disease's risk and burden.

Table of Contents

1 Preface
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Objectives of the Study
1.3 Research Methodology and Assumptions
2 Executive Summary
3 Giant Cell Arteritis Market Overview - 8 MM
3.1 Giant Cell Arteritis Market Historical Value (2018-2024)
3.2 Giant Cell Arteritis Market Forecast Value (2025-2034)
4 Giant Cell Arteritis Epidemiology Overview - 8 MM
4.1 Giant Cell Arteritis Epidemiology Scenario (2018-2024)
4.2 Giant Cell Arteritis Epidemiology Forecast (2025-2034)
5 Disease Overview
5.1 Signs and Symptoms
5.2 Causes
5.3 Risk Factors
5.4 Guidelines and Stages
5.5 Pathophysiology
5.6 Screening and Diagnosis
5.7 Types of Giant Cell Arteritis
6 Patient Profile
6.1 Patient Profile Overview
6.2 Patient Psychology and Emotional Impact Factors
7 Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast - 8 MM (218-2034)
7.1 Key Findings
7.2 Assumptions and Rationale
7.3 Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis
7.4 Type-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis
7.5 Gender-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis
7.6 Age-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis
8 Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast: United States (218-2034)
8.1 Assumptions and Rationale in the US
8.2 Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in the US
8.3 Type-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in the US
8.4 Gender-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in the US
8.5 Age-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in the US
9 Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast: United Kingdom (218-2034)
9.1 Assumptions and Rationale in United Kingdom
9.2 Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in United Kingdom
9.3 Type-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in United Kingdom
9.4 Gender-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in United Kingdom
9.5 Age-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in United Kingdom
10 Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast: Germany (218-2034)
10.1 Assumptions and Rationale in Germany
10.2 Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Germany
10.3 Type-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Germany
10.4 Gender-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Germany
10.5 Age-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Germany
11 Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast: France (218-2034)
11.1 Assumptions and Rationale in France
11.2 Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in France
11.3 Type-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in France
11.4 Gender-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in France
11.5 Age-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in France
12 Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast: Italy (218-2034)
12.1 Assumptions and Rationale in Italy
12.2 Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Italy
12.3 Type-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Italy
12.4 Gender-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Italy
12.5 Age-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Italy
13 Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast: Spain (218-2034)
13.1 Assumptions and Rationale in Spain
13.2 Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Spain
13.3 Type-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Spain
13.4 Gender-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Spain
13.5 Age-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Spain
14 Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast: Japan (218-2034)
14.1 Assumptions and Rationale in Japan
14.2 Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Japan
14.3 Type-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Japan
14.4 Gender-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Japan
14.5 Age-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in Japan
15 Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast: India (218-2034)
15.1 Assumptions and Rationale in India
15.2 Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in India
15.3 Type-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in India
15.4 Gender-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in India
15.5 Age-Specific Cases of Giant Cell Arteritis in India
16 Patient Journey17 Treatment Challenges and Unmet Needs18 Key Opinion Leaders (KOL) Insights

Methodology

Loading
LOADING...