+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Compressor Coupling Market - Global Forecast 2026-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 190 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6117774
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Compressor Coupling Market grew from USD 70.08 million in 2025 to USD 75.74 million in 2026. It is expected to continue growing at a CAGR of 7.87%, reaching USD 119.11 million by 2032.

Framing the role of compressor coupling solutions as a system-level enabler of reliability, vibration control, and lifecycle efficiency in modern industrial operations

Compressor coupling components play a pivotal role in ensuring rotational power is transmitted reliably between prime movers and compressors across a wide range of industrial applications. As process plants, utilities, and extraction operations push equipment to higher throughput and longer run times, the coupling serves as a linchpin of operational continuity, influencing uptime, vibration behavior, and the life of connected equipment. Engineers and procurement teams now view coupling selection not as an isolated specification but as a component of system-level performance optimization, where geometry, material selection, lubrication choice, and dynamic balancing intersect to reduce unplanned downtime and lifecycle cost.

Consequently, recent engineering attention has shifted toward coupling solutions that accommodate variable-speed drives, higher torque densities, and more aggressive environmental exposures. This evolution has amplified the importance of product testing, field validation, and cross-disciplinary collaboration between rotating equipment specialists and systems integrators. In parallel, regulatory and environmental expectations have encouraged designers to prioritize low-maintenance designs and lubricants with improved environmental profiles, which in turn affects reliability models and service strategies. These converging forces create a context in which coupling strategy must align with broader asset management goals, ensuring that component decisions support resilience, safety, and long-term operability across industrial installations.

Identifying the convergence of digital condition monitoring, advanced materials, and sustainability-driven design that is reshaping coupling performance expectations and procurement criteria

The landscape for compressor coupling is undergoing a series of transformative shifts shaped by technological innovations, materials science advances, and evolving operational expectations. Digital instrumentation and condition monitoring have migrated from optional upgrades to core capabilities, enabling predictive maintenance regimes that change how service intervals and component replacements are scheduled. As a consequence, coupling designs increasingly incorporate true-to-life instrumentation ports and dynamic balancing features to support remote diagnostics and reduce mean time to repair. These developments are driving more integrated engineering engagements between coupling suppliers and end users, which in turn accelerates iterative product improvements based on field data.

At the same time, materials and manufacturing advances have unlocked higher performance envelopes. Additive manufacturing and advanced alloys allow for complex geometries and weight reductions without compromising stiffness, while surface treatments and composite inserts extend fatigue life under cyclic loads. Sustainability targets and lubricant environmental regulations are pushing the industry toward lower-toxicity lubricants and grease formulations, affecting both product design and aftermarket service models. Electrification trends and variable-speed drive proliferation require couplings to accommodate broader speed ranges and torque pulsations, demanding refined torsional analysis and damping strategies. Cumulatively, these disruptive vectors are reshaping procurement criteria, elevating service offerings, and prompting suppliers to embed engineering services and digital analytics within their commercial propositions.

Explaining the cumulative operational and procurement consequences of tariff adjustments and how suppliers and buyers adapt sourcing, compliance, and logistics strategies

Trade policy decisions implemented through tariff adjustments have created a tangible set of operational and procurement consequences for compressor coupling supply chains. Tariffs that increase input costs for imported components and raw materials put upward pressure on component budgets, prompting procurement teams to reassess supplier mixes and contractual terms. In response, some original equipment manufacturers and suppliers have shifted purchasing toward domestic sources or relocated final assembly closer to key customers, a trend that alters lead-time dynamics and the structure of logistics networks. These sourcing adaptations can benefit local responsiveness but often require requalification of suppliers and revalidation of component performance under new manufacturing regimes.

Beyond direct cost implications, tariff-driven changes have amplified emphasis on supply chain transparency and compliance. Buyers and suppliers have invested in enhanced supplier audits, customs compliance capabilities, and tariff-engineering strategies to optimize tariff classifications and identify duty relief mechanisms where available. This has led contracting teams to renegotiate long-term agreements with clauses that address tariff volatility, while engineering groups pursue greater design adaptability so parts can accept alternate material or process sources without compromising safety. Additionally, firms are expanding their supplier portfolios across additional geographies to mitigate concentration risk and to maintain continuity of supply when trade measures shift unexpectedly. Together, these adjustments constitute a cumulative set of strategic responses that influence procurement lead times, total landed cost considerations, and the operational readiness of rotating equipment fleets.

Distilling actionable engineering and procurement implications across coupling types, end-user sectors, shaft sizes, lubrication strategies, and staged design choices

A rigorous segmentation-driven analysis reveals distinct performance expectations and procurement behaviors across types, end-use applications, shaft sizes, lubrication approaches, and design philosophies. Type differentiation spans Flexible Coupling, Fluid Coupling, and Rigid Coupling, with Fluid Coupling further differentiated into Hydrodynamic Coupling and Hydrostatic Coupling; each category brings unique dynamic characteristics and failure modes that determine suitability for specific duty cycles. For heavy-start, shock-prone drive trains, flexible designs often provide the torsional elasticity needed to protect bearings and seals, while rigid couplings are favored for high-precision alignment scenarios that demand minimal angular deflection. Fluid couplings, whether hydrodynamic or hydrostatic, deliver controlled torque transmission and damping for soft-start applications and are particularly prevalent where mechanical shock mitigation is critical.

End-user applications impose distinct technical requirements that shape specification and aftermarket dynamics. Chemical, Food & Beverage, Mining & Minerals, Oil & Gas, Power Generation, and Water & Wastewater Treatment sectors exhibit divergent priorities: corrosion resistance and hygienic materials dominate in food and chemical environments, abrasion resilience and oversized torque capacity are essential in mining and minerals, and continuous high-duty reliability directs choices in power generation and water treatment contexts. Shaft size classifications such as 50-100 Mm, Above 100 Mm, and Up To 50 Mm correlate closely with torque demands and balance considerations, influencing hub geometries and bore finishing processes. Lubrication regimes-Grease Lubricated versus Oil Lubricated-affect maintenance intervals, sealing strategies, and compatibility with ambient temperature ranges, which in turn shape service contracts and spare parts provisioning. Finally, design choices between Multi Stage and Single Stage configurations determine thermal behavior, axial load distribution, and the modularity of replacement parts. Synthesizing these segmentation dimensions enables more tailored engineering specifications and supports lifecycle strategies that align component selection with operational realities.

Interpreting how diverse regional industrial profiles and policy priorities in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape supplier strategies and service expectations

Regional dynamics continue to influence both demand patterns and supply-side behavior for compressor coupling solutions, driven by industrial mixes, regulatory frameworks, and levels of manufacturing sophistication. The Americas region demonstrates strong activity in extraction-oriented industries and power generation assets, which prioritizes rugged coupling designs, aftermarket support networks, and local serviceability. North American OEMs often emphasize compliance with regional safety standards and aftermarket parts availability, provoking suppliers to invest in localized inventories and field service capabilities that reduce downtime exposure for critical assets.

Europe, Middle East & Africa present a complex fabric of regulatory drivers, energy transition commitments, and industrial diversity that shape coupling preferences. Energy policy shifts and decarbonization initiatives in parts of Europe encourage designs compatible with electrification and variable-speed operation, while Middle Eastern oil and gas projects demand high-torque, corrosion-resistant solutions adapted to harsh environments. Africa’s infrastructure growth presents opportunities for simplified, robust designs and for suppliers that can combine technical support with financing models. In the Asia-Pacific region, a combination of large manufacturing bases, rapid industrial expansion, and significant equipment replacement cycles drives demand for both sophisticated fluid couplings and cost-optimized flexible units, with an accompanying emphasis on scalable production and supply chain agility. Across all regions, service networks and the ability to support commissioning, balancing, and condition monitoring remain decisive competitive differentiators.

Analyzing how leading suppliers combine engineering portfolios, service differentiation, and digital diagnostics to secure long-term enterprise customer relationships

Competitive dynamics among leading suppliers are increasingly defined by the combination of engineering depth, aftermarket service networks, and digital-enabled capabilities. Top-tier firms differentiate through comprehensive portfolios that span flexible, rigid, and fluid coupling technologies, backed by field engineering services and condition monitoring programs. Strategic partnerships with drive-train integrators and bearing manufacturers allow companies to deliver bundled solutions that simplify procurement and reduce integration risk for end users. Additionally, selective acquisitions and alliances have enabled some suppliers to expand metallurgical capabilities and to internalize advanced manufacturing processes, thereby shortening development cycles for application-specific components.

Service differentiation has emerged as a central axis of competition, with firms offering precision balancing, on-site refurbishment, and long-term maintenance contracts that embed predictive analytics. Investment in proprietary diagnostic tools and digital dashboards strengthens customer retention, as clients value visibility into vibration signatures and remaining useful life estimations. Firms that combine product modularity with flexible warranty and spare-parts programs tend to capture larger enterprise engagements, because they reduce the operational friction of multi-vendor asset pools. Ultimately, leadership in this space requires a balanced portfolio approach: robust core products, targeted innovation in materials and damping technologies, and a global aftermarket footprint that ensures rapid response and technical continuity.

Practical strategic and tactical recommendations for engineering, procurement, and aftermarket teams to enhance resilience, reduce downtime, and capture long-term value

Industry leaders should adopt a coordinated set of actions that align product engineering, procurement resilience, and aftermarket engagement to convert intelligence into sustained operational advantage. First, firms must prioritize design modularity that allows for rapid substitution of materials and components in response to supply chain disruptions or tariff-driven constraints; this reduces the need for costly requalification and shortens response time to operational contingencies. Second, investing in condition-based monitoring and integrating coupling diagnostics into plant asset management systems enables predictive maintenance regimes that reduce unplanned outages and lower lifecycle cost. These investments should be accompanied by training programs for field technicians to ensure reliable interpretation of analytic outputs and to accelerate corrective interventions.

Third, organizations should strengthen supplier networks by diversifying sourcing geographies and establishing strategic partnerships with key raw material and component providers. Incorporating contractual clauses that address tariff volatility and lead-time variability will provide commercial protection and planning certainty. Fourth, distinguish aftermarket offerings by packaging commissioning, dynamic balancing, and refurbishment services into subscription models that align incentives between supplier and operator. Finally, environmental and regulatory shifts require rethinking lubricant strategies and material selections to meet evolving compliance standards; coupling designs that support lower-toxicity lubricants and reduced maintenance footprints will be increasingly attractive to capital-intensive operators focused on sustainability targets. Collectively, these actions help companies maintain operational continuity while enhancing competitive positioning.

Outlining the multi-method research approach combining primary interviews, technical analysis, supplier documentation, and component-level failure mode assessments to ensure robust evidence

The research methodology underpinning these insights integrated multiple lines of evidence to ensure robust, verifiable conclusions while maintaining transparency about scope and limitations. Primary inputs included structured interviews with rotating equipment engineers, procurement leads, and aftermarket managers across a cross-section of end-user industries. These conversations provided direct visibility into specification trends, failure modes, and service expectations. Secondary technical literature and supplier specification sheets supplemented the qualitative inputs to validate performance characteristics and to map technological differentials among flexible, fluid, and rigid coupling classes.

Analytical techniques included component-level failure mode analysis, materials compatibility assessment, and supply chain mapping that traced critical raw material and subcomponent flows. Segmentation analysis aligned product characteristics with end-user requirements across shaft sizes, lubrication regimes, and staged design choices to uncover where technical trade-offs most significantly influence procurement decisions. Triangulation occurred through cross-referencing interview findings with supplier documentation and field-service case histories to minimize bias and to confirm recurring patterns. Finally, limitations are acknowledged where confidential commercial data restricts public disclosure, and recommendations are framed to be actionable within those bounds; readers are encouraged to seek direct engagement for bespoke analyses tied to specific operational assets.

Summarizing how technical, commercial, and policy drivers converge to make coupling strategy a cross-functional priority for operational resilience and lifecycle performance

The accumulated evidence underscores that compressor coupling strategy is no longer a purely mechanical selection but a multidisciplinary decision that affects reliability, procurement resilience, and long-term asset performance. Technological advances in monitoring, materials, and design are enabling coupling solutions that better integrate with modern rotating equipment architectures, while regulatory and trade environments have elevated the importance of adaptable sourcing and compliance-aware contracting. Suppliers that couple technical excellence with strong aftermarket capabilities and digital diagnostic tools are positioned to capture greater enterprise engagement, while operators that prioritize modularity, condition-based maintenance, and supplier diversification will reduce vulnerability to supply disruptions and policy shifts.

In conclusion, the decisions made today about coupling specification, supplier contracts, and service models will materially affect operational continuity and lifecycle costs for industrial fleets. Cross-functional coordination between engineering, procurement, and operations is essential to translate these insights into tangible performance gains. Industry players that act decisively to modernize coupling selection criteria, expand service offerings, and shore up supply chain resilience will secure tangible advantages in uptime, maintenance predictability, and total cost of ownership.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
2.2.1. Primary Research
2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
5. Market Insights
5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Compressor Coupling Market, by Type
8.1. Flexible Coupling
8.2. Fluid Coupling
8.2.1. Hydrodynamic Coupling
8.2.2. Hydrostatic Coupling
8.3. Rigid Coupling
9. Compressor Coupling Market, by Shaft Size
9.1. 50-100 Mm
9.2. Above 100 Mm
9.3. Up To 50 Mm
10. Compressor Coupling Market, by Lubrication Type
10.1. Grease Lubricated
10.2. Oil Lubricated
11. Compressor Coupling Market, by Design
11.1. Multi Stage
11.2. Single Stage
12. Compressor Coupling Market, by End User Application
12.1. Chemical
12.2. Food & Beverage
12.3. Mining & Minerals
12.4. Oil & Gas
12.5. Power Generation
12.6. Water & Wastewater Treatment
13. Compressor Coupling Market, by Region
13.1. Americas
13.1.1. North America
13.1.2. Latin America
13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
13.2.1. Europe
13.2.2. Middle East
13.2.3. Africa
13.3. Asia-Pacific
14. Compressor Coupling Market, by Group
14.1. ASEAN
14.2. GCC
14.3. European Union
14.4. BRICS
14.5. G7
14.6. NATO
15. Compressor Coupling Market, by Country
15.1. United States
15.2. Canada
15.3. Mexico
15.4. Brazil
15.5. United Kingdom
15.6. Germany
15.7. France
15.8. Russia
15.9. Italy
15.10. Spain
15.11. China
15.12. India
15.13. Japan
15.14. Australia
15.15. South Korea
16. United States Compressor Coupling Market
17. China Compressor Coupling Market
18. Competitive Landscape
18.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
18.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
18.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
18.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
18.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
18.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
18.5. ABB Ltd.
18.6. Adson Engineering Corporation
18.7. Amocon Enterprise
18.8. Atlas Copco AB
18.9. BOGE Kompressoren Otto Boge GmbH & Co. KG
18.10. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company LLC
18.11. ELGI Equipments Limited
18.12. Festo SE & Co. KG
18.13. Gardner Denver, Inc.
18.14. Ingersoll-Rand plc (or) Ingersoll Rand Inc.
18.15. Kaeser Kompressoren SE
18.16. Orion Couplings Pvt. Ltd.
18.17. REICH-Kupplungen GmbH
18.18. Rexnord Industries, LLC
18.19. Ringspann Power Transmission India Private Limited
18.20. SGF GmbH & Co. KG
18.21. Shakti Pulley Manufacturing Company
18.22. VULKAN Industries and Energy GmbH & Co. KG
List of Figures
FIGURE 1. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 2. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
FIGURE 3. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
FIGURE 4. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 5. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 7. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 8. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 10. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 12. UNITED STATES COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 13. CHINA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
List of Tables
TABLE 1. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 2. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 3. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLEXIBLE COUPLING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 4. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLEXIBLE COUPLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 5. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLEXIBLE COUPLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 6. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 7. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 8. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 9. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 10. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY HYDRODYNAMIC COUPLING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 11. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY HYDRODYNAMIC COUPLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 12. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY HYDRODYNAMIC COUPLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 13. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY HYDROSTATIC COUPLING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 14. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY HYDROSTATIC COUPLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 15. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY HYDROSTATIC COUPLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 16. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY RIGID COUPLING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 17. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY RIGID COUPLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 18. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY RIGID COUPLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 19. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 20. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY 50-100 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 21. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY 50-100 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 22. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY 50-100 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 23. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY ABOVE 100 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 24. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY ABOVE 100 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 25. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY ABOVE 100 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 26. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY UP TO 50 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 27. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY UP TO 50 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 28. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY UP TO 50 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 29. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 30. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY GREASE LUBRICATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 31. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY GREASE LUBRICATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 32. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY GREASE LUBRICATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 33. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY OIL LUBRICATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 34. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY OIL LUBRICATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 35. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY OIL LUBRICATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 36. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 37. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI STAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 38. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI STAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 39. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI STAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 40. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE STAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 41. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE STAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 42. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE STAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 43. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 44. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 45. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 46. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY CHEMICAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 47. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 48. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 49. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD & BEVERAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 50. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY MINING & MINERALS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 51. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY MINING & MINERALS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 52. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY MINING & MINERALS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 53. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 54. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 55. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY OIL & GAS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 56. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 57. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 58. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 59. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY WATER & WASTEWATER TREATMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 60. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY WATER & WASTEWATER TREATMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 61. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY WATER & WASTEWATER TREATMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 62. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 63. AMERICAS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 64. AMERICAS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 65. AMERICAS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 66. AMERICAS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 67. AMERICAS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 68. AMERICAS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 69. AMERICAS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 70. NORTH AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 71. NORTH AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 72. NORTH AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 73. NORTH AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 74. NORTH AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 75. NORTH AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 76. NORTH AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 77. LATIN AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 78. LATIN AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 79. LATIN AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 80. LATIN AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 81. LATIN AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 82. LATIN AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 83. LATIN AMERICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 84. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 85. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 86. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 87. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 88. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 89. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 90. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 91. EUROPE COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 92. EUROPE COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 93. EUROPE COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 94. EUROPE COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 95. EUROPE COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 96. EUROPE COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 97. EUROPE COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 98. MIDDLE EAST COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 99. MIDDLE EAST COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 100. MIDDLE EAST COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 101. MIDDLE EAST COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 102. MIDDLE EAST COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 103. MIDDLE EAST COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 104. MIDDLE EAST COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 105. AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 106. AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 107. AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 108. AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 109. AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 110. AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 111. AFRICA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 112. ASIA-PACIFIC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 113. ASIA-PACIFIC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 114. ASIA-PACIFIC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 115. ASIA-PACIFIC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 116. ASIA-PACIFIC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 117. ASIA-PACIFIC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 118. ASIA-PACIFIC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 119. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 120. ASEAN COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 121. ASEAN COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 122. ASEAN COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 123. ASEAN COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 124. ASEAN COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 125. ASEAN COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 126. ASEAN COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 127. GCC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 128. GCC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 129. GCC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 130. GCC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 131. GCC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 132. GCC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 133. GCC COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 134. EUROPEAN UNION COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 135. EUROPEAN UNION COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 136. EUROPEAN UNION COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 137. EUROPEAN UNION COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 138. EUROPEAN UNION COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 139. EUROPEAN UNION COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 140. EUROPEAN UNION COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 141. BRICS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 142. BRICS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 143. BRICS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 144. BRICS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 145. BRICS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 146. BRICS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 147. BRICS COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 148. G7 COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 149. G7 COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 150. G7 COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 151. G7 COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 152. G7 COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 153. G7 COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 154. G7 COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 155. NATO COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 156. NATO COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 157. NATO COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 158. NATO COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 159. NATO COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 160. NATO COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 161. NATO COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 162. GLOBAL COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 163. UNITED STATES COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 164. UNITED STATES COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 165. UNITED STATES COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 166. UNITED STATES COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 167. UNITED STATES COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 168. UNITED STATES COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 169. UNITED STATES COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 170. CHINA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 171. CHINA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 172. CHINA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY FLUID COUPLING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 173. CHINA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY SHAFT SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 174. CHINA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY LUBRICATION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 175. CHINA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY DESIGN, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 176. CHINA COMPRESSOR COUPLING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

Companies Mentioned

  • ABB Ltd.
  • Adson Engineering Corporation
  • Amocon Enterprise
  • Atlas Copco AB
  • BOGE Kompressoren Otto Boge GmbH & Co. KG
  • Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company LLC
  • ELGI Equipments Limited
  • Festo SE & Co. KG
  • Gardner Denver, Inc.
  • Ingersoll-Rand plc (or) Ingersoll Rand Inc.
  • Kaeser Kompressoren SE
  • Orion Couplings Pvt. Ltd.
  • REICH-Kupplungen GmbH
  • Rexnord Industries, LLC
  • Ringspann Power Transmission India Private Limited
  • SGF GmbH & Co. KG
  • Shakti Pulley Manufacturing Company
  • VULKAN Industries and Energy GmbH & Co. KG

Table Information