+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Trailer Air Spring Market - Global Forecast 2026-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 193 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 6124641
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The Trailer Air Spring Market grew from USD 1.94 billion in 2025 to USD 2.05 billion in 2026. It is expected to continue growing at a CAGR of 7.05%, reaching USD 3.13 billion by 2032.

Air-spring performance has become a strategic determinant of trailer uptime, safety, and lifecycle cost as freight operations intensify globally

Trailer air springs sit at the intersection of safety, durability, and operating economics for modern freight. As fleets push for higher utilization and tighter delivery windows, suspension performance is no longer a “nice to have” component decision; it is a system-level lever that influences cargo protection, driver comfort, tire wear, fuel efficiency through rolling behavior, and the stability that underpins braking and handling. At the same time, regulatory scrutiny around roadworthiness and maintenance discipline continues to rise, increasing the cost of downtime and the consequences of inconsistent suspension quality.

Against this backdrop, the Trailer Air Spring market is being shaped by two parallel pressures. First, the freight ecosystem is demanding higher reliability under harsher duty cycles, including heavier loads, longer routes, and more frequent temperature and road-condition swings. Second, procurement teams are being asked to reduce risk across supply, quality, and compliance, which places greater emphasis on validated performance, traceability, and service support across geographies.

This executive summary frames the market through the lens of adoption drivers, technology evolution, trade-policy impacts, segmentation dynamics, and regional operating realities. It emphasizes how manufacturers and suppliers can win by integrating engineering choices with commercial strategy, building resilience in sourcing, and aligning product development with where fleets are investing in uptime and total cost of ownership.

Technology, maintenance digitalization, and supply-chain resilience are reshaping trailer air spring competition from parts supply to performance systems

The industry’s competitive landscape is shifting from incremental product differentiation to systems thinking across suspension, axle integration, and serviceability. Product development is increasingly tied to measurable outcomes such as reduced vibration transmission, improved lateral stability, and predictable fatigue behavior across long duty cycles. As a result, design priorities are moving toward more consistent elastomer performance, improved bead-plate integrity, and mounting architectures that simplify installation while reducing misalignment-related failures.

In parallel, the digitalization of fleet maintenance is changing how air springs are specified and replaced. Fleets that have embraced condition-based maintenance and telematics-enabled inspection routines are pushing suppliers to provide clearer fitment information, stronger warranty discipline, and more standardized labeling that supports faster parts identification. This is also reinforcing the importance of packaging, documentation, and cross-reference accuracy in the aftermarket, where a single fitment error can cascade into unplanned downtime.

Manufacturing and supply chain practices are also undergoing a structural transition. Higher expectations for quality consistency are driving deeper process control, tighter incoming-material verification, and more deliberate supplier qualification for rubber compounds, reinforcement materials, and metal components. At the same time, volatility in logistics and trade policy has elevated the strategic value of dual sourcing, regionalized finishing operations, and inventory buffering for high-turn SKUs.

Finally, sustainability expectations are emerging less as a marketing theme and more as a procurement requirement. Large shippers and fleets are increasingly attentive to supplier environmental practices, responsible material sourcing, and waste reduction. While trailer air springs are not typically the first component cited in sustainability narratives, the move toward longer service life, reduced failure rates, and improved recyclability of materials is becoming a differentiator-especially when tied directly to reduced maintenance events and fewer replaced components across a fleet lifecycle.

United States tariff changes in 2025 elevate sourcing complexity, pushing the market toward origin diversification, regionalization, and tighter cost governance

United States tariff actions in 2025 introduce a renewed layer of complexity for trailer air spring sourcing strategies, particularly for buyers with exposure to imported components, subassemblies, or upstream materials used in elastomer and metal fabrication. Even when the final air spring is assembled domestically, pricing and lead times can be affected by duties applied to reinforcement textiles, specialty chemicals, steel stampings, or machined parts. Consequently, tariff impacts should be evaluated through the full bill of materials rather than only at the finished-goods classification level.

A key near-term effect is procurement uncertainty. Buyers often respond by accelerating purchase orders ahead of effective dates, negotiating temporary price holds, or shifting volumes to alternative origins. However, these actions can create secondary risks such as inventory imbalance, constrained warehouse capacity, and uneven quality if supplier qualification is rushed. For manufacturers, the challenge becomes maintaining service levels while preventing cost shocks from eroding competitiveness in bids tied to long-term fleet contracts.

Over the medium term, tariffs tend to reinforce “regionalization” behaviors. Suppliers with flexible manufacturing footprints may expand final assembly or finishing steps closer to demand centers to mitigate duty exposure, while still relying on global raw material networks. This can benefit buyers seeking more stable lead times, but it also increases the importance of verifying that localized operations maintain the same process capability, testing standards, and traceability as legacy plants.

Tariffs can also reshape the aftermarket. If price differentials widen between premium and value offerings, fleets may alter replacement behavior, choosing longer inspection intervals or delaying replacement until failure symptoms become more visible. This raises safety and downtime risks and can increase total cost of ownership. In response, stronger suppliers are likely to emphasize validated durability, clearer warranty terms, and service programs that help fleets justify proactive replacement based on lifecycle outcomes rather than upfront price.

Ultimately, the 2025 tariff environment rewards organizations that treat trade compliance, supplier diversification, and product standardization as integrated capabilities. Those that build a disciplined approach to origin management, dual-qualified parts, and transparent cost breakdowns will be better positioned to protect margins and maintain continuity of supply under shifting policy conditions.

Segmentation reveals distinct demand logics across product designs, trailer applications, and channels, with durability and fitment confidence driving choice

Segmentation patterns highlight that demand is not uniform; it is shaped by engineering constraints, service expectations, and how trailers are used across freight networks. By product type, rolling lobe designs continue to be preferred where ride quality and consistent pressure response are prioritized, while convoluted variants remain important in applications emphasizing load support robustness and packaging constraints. Sleeve configurations retain relevance in specific fitments where simplicity and cost sensitivity are decisive, though buyers increasingly scrutinize durability under repetitive articulation.

By end-use, original equipment demand is closely tied to trailer build cycles, platform standardization, and OEM preferences for validated suppliers that can support consistent quality at scale. In contrast, the aftermarket is driven by installed base realities and maintenance behavior, including replacement intervals, road conditions, and the availability of cross-referenced parts. The aftermarket also places a premium on fast fulfillment, broad SKU coverage, and clarity in installation guidance because service environments are time-constrained and error-intolerant.

By application, dry van utilization pushes requirements around stability and cargo protection during high-mileage operation, while refrigerated trailers add sensitivity to vibration management and durability under temperature variations. Flatbed and specialized platforms introduce different load distribution patterns and higher exposure to contaminants, making sealing integrity and material resilience more important. Tanker and other high-center-of-gravity configurations sharpen attention on lateral stability and predictable response under braking and cornering.

By sales channel, OEM supply relationships are typically anchored in long-term qualification, documented testing, and integrated logistics programs that reduce line stoppages. Distributor-led sales remain central to the aftermarket, where breadth of availability and rapid delivery drive preference, while direct-to-fleet models grow when suppliers can offer technical support, training, and account-level service structures. E-commerce continues to expand for standard replacement parts, yet professional buyers still favor channels that minimize fitment risk and provide accountable warranty handling.

By material and construction considerations, the market is increasingly attentive to elastomer formulation quality, reinforcement architecture, and corrosion protection for metal components. Buyers are also differentiating suppliers by consistency in curing processes, dimensional stability, and the ability to maintain performance across temperature extremes and variable road contamination. These segmentation dynamics collectively indicate that winning strategies are those that align product design and go-to-market execution with the distinct operational priorities embedded in each segment.

Regional realities - from compliance rigor to road severity - shape air spring requirements, making localized service models and logistics as critical as product design

Regional dynamics are defined by freight intensity, regulatory enforcement, road conditions, and the maturity of service ecosystems. In the Americas, fleet operators prioritize uptime and cost-per-mile discipline, which strengthens demand for reliable replacement parts and well-supported service networks. The operating environment also elevates the importance of consistent quality and warranty accountability, particularly for long-haul corridors where breakdown costs are amplified. Supplier strategies that emphasize distribution reach and rapid replenishment tend to resonate strongly.

In Europe, the market is shaped by stringent roadworthiness expectations, sophisticated trailer specifications, and a comparatively structured maintenance culture. Buyers often place more weight on documented compliance, standardized testing, and predictable lifecycle performance. Additionally, multi-country operations make cross-border parts availability and harmonized fitment standards especially valuable, encouraging suppliers to invest in pan-regional logistics capabilities and consistent part numbering systems.

Across the Middle East and Africa, operating conditions can be highly demanding, with heat, dust, and mixed road quality increasing wear stress. In such environments, robustness, material resilience, and protection against contamination become central purchasing criteria. Service availability can vary widely by sub-region, so suppliers that provide training, clearer installation instructions, and strong distributor partnerships can reduce failure risk and build loyalty.

In Asia-Pacific, growth in freight movement and manufacturing supply chains supports strong demand across both OEM and replacement needs, though preferences vary considerably by country. Cost competitiveness remains important, yet fleets and OEMs are increasingly attentive to consistent performance as trailer utilization rises and safety expectations tighten. This creates space for suppliers that can balance value with validated durability, while also navigating diverse regulatory and homologation requirements.

Taken together, regional insights indicate that the most effective go-to-market approaches adapt not only pricing and product mix but also service models, documentation rigor, and logistics design. Companies that treat regions as distinct operating systems-rather than as simple sales territories-are better positioned to win repeat business.

Company differentiation is accelerating through validated durability, portfolio breadth, manufacturing discipline, and service-led partnerships across OEM and aftermarket channels

Competitive positioning among leading companies increasingly hinges on the ability to deliver repeatable quality at scale while offering the commercial flexibility demanded by OEMs and fleets. Strong players differentiate through deep engineering expertise in elastomer formulation, reinforcement design, and fatigue performance, supported by rigorous validation routines that simulate real-world duty cycles. Equally important is the discipline of manufacturing execution, including process controls that reduce variability and improve batch-to-batch consistency.

Another defining area of differentiation is portfolio architecture. Companies with broad coverage across common trailer platforms can reduce procurement complexity for large fleets and distributors, especially when supported by robust cross-referencing tools and clear fitment documentation. This breadth becomes more valuable when customers are managing mixed trailer populations, multi-brand axle configurations, and varied suspension geometries across regions.

Commercial capability is also separating leaders from followers. The market rewards suppliers that can support OEM program timelines, provide dependable lead times, and maintain responsive technical support during design-in and troubleshooting. In the aftermarket, the ability to maintain high-fill rates, reduce order errors, and manage warranty claims efficiently strengthens customer trust. As tariffs and logistics volatility persist, companies with diversified manufacturing footprints and mature supplier ecosystems are often better equipped to stabilize availability.

Finally, collaboration across the value chain is becoming more prominent. Leading companies engage proactively with axle and suspension system partners, distributors, and fleet maintenance teams to improve installation outcomes and reduce total service events. This collaborative approach-anchored in training, documentation, and application engineering-turns air springs from a commodity component into a reliability program that customers can operationalize.

Leaders can win by engineering for lifecycle outcomes, fortifying tariff-ready supply chains, and elevating fitment confidence through channel-specific execution

Industry leaders should begin by hardening supply resilience without sacrificing quality. This means building dual-qualified sourcing for critical inputs, implementing origin transparency at the component level, and creating contingency plans that include regional finishing or assembly options when tariff exposure rises. At the same time, procurement should avoid treating air springs as purely price-driven items; a disciplined total-cost approach that accounts for downtime, replacement frequency, and warranty friction will produce better outcomes.

Next, leaders should align product strategy with measurable fleet outcomes. Engineering teams can prioritize failure-mode reduction by focusing on bead durability, reinforcement integrity, and contamination resistance, while commercial teams translate these improvements into service-life narratives backed by test protocols and installation best practices. When product advantages are expressed in operational terms-fewer roadside events, smoother ride behavior, reduced secondary wear-buyers can defend premium choices internally.

Companies should also professionalize fitment confidence as a growth lever. Improving cross-reference accuracy, part numbering consistency, packaging clarity, and installer guidance reduces returns and boosts distributor loyalty. For suppliers with the capability, offering training modules and quick diagnostic support can meaningfully lower misinstallation rates, which are a hidden driver of premature failures and customer dissatisfaction.

Additionally, organizations should tune go-to-market models by channel. OEM programs require disciplined program management, documentation, and change control, while aftermarket success depends on availability, speed, and simplicity. A single operating model rarely excels at both, so leaders often benefit from dedicated channel strategies with tailored inventory policies, customer service metrics, and pricing governance.

Finally, leaders should prepare for a more compliance-driven future. Strengthening traceability, standardizing test documentation, and tightening quality feedback loops will reduce risk as regulatory scrutiny and customer audit requirements increase. Companies that invest now in repeatable compliance workflows will be able to respond faster to customer demands and policy shifts, turning what could be a burden into a competitive advantage.

A triangulated methodology combining stakeholder interviews, technical documentation, and structured validation builds a practical view of the trailer air spring ecosystem

The research methodology integrates primary and secondary approaches to produce a decision-oriented view of the Trailer Air Spring landscape. The work begins with a structured mapping of the value chain, clarifying how raw materials, component fabrication, assembly practices, and distribution models influence product performance and availability. This foundation supports a consistent framework for evaluating product differentiation, channel dynamics, and regional operating realities.

Primary research is conducted through interviews and structured discussions with stakeholders spanning manufacturers, distributors, fleet maintenance leaders, and engineering practitioners. These conversations focus on purchase criteria, common failure modes, installation and service patterns, qualification expectations, and the practical effects of logistics and trade-policy shifts. Inputs are synthesized to identify consensus themes as well as points of divergence between OEM and aftermarket needs.

Secondary research complements these insights through the review of publicly available technical documentation, regulatory and trade publications, company materials, product catalogs, standards references, and industry news. This step helps validate terminology, understand compliance expectations, and track technology and manufacturing trends without relying on a single narrative source.

Analytical steps include triangulation across interview findings and documented materials, normalization of segment definitions to ensure comparability, and consistency checks to avoid overgeneralization across regions and applications. The result is a cohesive perspective that highlights practical implications for product strategy, sourcing decisions, and go-to-market planning, enabling readers to apply insights directly to operational and commercial priorities.

The market’s trajectory favors suppliers that combine durable engineering, resilient sourcing, and service-driven execution to protect fleet uptime under volatility

Trailer air springs are evolving from standard suspension components into strategic enablers of freight reliability. As fleets demand higher utilization and regulators maintain strong emphasis on roadworthiness, suspension performance and serviceability have become central to operational planning. The market’s direction is being shaped by technology refinement, more data-informed maintenance practices, and an intensified focus on supply continuity.

At the same time, shifting trade conditions-particularly the 2025 U.S. tariff environment-are pushing companies to rethink sourcing structures, origin exposure, and inventory strategies. Those pressures are reinforcing the importance of manufacturing discipline, documentation rigor, and channel execution that reduces fitment errors and prevents avoidable downtime.

Across segments and regions, the common thread is clear: customers reward suppliers that deliver consistent quality, predictable lifecycle behavior, and dependable availability. Companies that combine product engineering excellence with resilient operations and service-led relationships will be best positioned to compete as the landscape becomes more demanding and more differentiated.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Definition
1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.4. Years Considered for the Study
1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
1.6. Language Considered for the Study
1.7. Key Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Introduction
2.2. Research Design
2.2.1. Primary Research
2.2.2. Secondary Research
2.3. Research Framework
2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
2.4. Market Size Estimation
2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
2.5. Data Triangulation
2.6. Research Outcomes
2.7. Research Assumptions
2.8. Research Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Introduction
3.2. CXO Perspective
3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
3.8. Industry Roadmap
4. Market Overview
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
4.3. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.4. PESTLE Analysis
4.5. Market Outlook
4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy
5. Market Insights
5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
5.3. Opportunity Mapping
5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Trailer Air Spring Market, by Suspension Application
8.1. Bus
8.2. RV
8.2.1. Class A
8.2.2. Class B
8.2.3. Class C
8.3. Trailer
8.3.1. Dry Van
8.3.2. Flatbed
8.3.3. Reefer
8.3.4. Tanker
8.4. Truck
9. Trailer Air Spring Market, by Type
9.1. Bellows
9.2. Convoluted
9.3. Rolling Lobe
9.4. Sleeve
10. Trailer Air Spring Market, by Distribution Channel
10.1. Aftermarket
10.2. OEM
11. Trailer Air Spring Market, by End User
11.1. Fleet Operators
11.2. Owner Operators
11.3. Rental Companies
12. Trailer Air Spring Market, by Region
12.1. Americas
12.1.1. North America
12.1.2. Latin America
12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
12.2.1. Europe
12.2.2. Middle East
12.2.3. Africa
12.3. Asia-Pacific
13. Trailer Air Spring Market, by Group
13.1. ASEAN
13.2. GCC
13.3. European Union
13.4. BRICS
13.5. G7
13.6. NATO
14. Trailer Air Spring Market, by Country
14.1. United States
14.2. Canada
14.3. Mexico
14.4. Brazil
14.5. United Kingdom
14.6. Germany
14.7. France
14.8. Russia
14.9. Italy
14.10. Spain
14.11. China
14.12. India
14.13. Japan
14.14. Australia
14.15. South Korea
15. United States Trailer Air Spring Market
16. China Trailer Air Spring Market
17. Competitive Landscape
17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
17.5. Accuride Corporation
17.6. Air Lift Company
17.7. Conmet LLC
17.8. Continental AG
17.9. Dana Incorporated
17.10. DynAir Suspension Inc.
17.11. Firestone Industrial Products Company, LLC
17.12. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
17.13. Haldex AB
17.14. Hendrickson International, LLC
17.15. Hyundai WIA Corporation
17.16. Jost-Werke GmbH
17.17. Knorr-Bremse AG
17.18. Meritor, Inc.
17.19. Mubea Group
17.20. Ridewell Corporation
17.21. SAF-Holland S.A.
17.22. SAF-Intralog GmbH
17.23. Sumitomo Riko Company Limited
17.24. Trelleborg AB
17.25. Vibracoustic GmbH
17.26. Vibro-Acoustics, Inc.
17.27. Wabash National Corporation
17.28. WABCO Holdings Inc.
List of Figures
FIGURE 1. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 2. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
FIGURE 3. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
FIGURE 4. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 5. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 6. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 7. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 8. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 9. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 10. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
FIGURE 12. CHINA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
List of Tables
TABLE 1. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 2. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 3. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY BUS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 4. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY BUS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 5. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY BUS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 6. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 7. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 8. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 9. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 10. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CLASS A, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 11. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CLASS A, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 12. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CLASS A, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 13. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CLASS B, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 14. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CLASS B, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 15. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CLASS B, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 16. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CLASS C, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 17. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CLASS C, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 18. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CLASS C, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 19. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 20. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 21. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 22. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 23. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DRY VAN, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 24. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DRY VAN, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 25. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DRY VAN, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 26. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY FLATBED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 27. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY FLATBED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 28. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY FLATBED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 29. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY REEFER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 30. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY REEFER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 31. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY REEFER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 32. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TANKER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 33. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TANKER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 34. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TANKER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 35. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRUCK, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 36. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRUCK, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 37. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRUCK, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 38. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 39. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY BELLOWS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 40. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY BELLOWS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 41. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY BELLOWS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 42. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CONVOLUTED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 43. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CONVOLUTED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 44. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY CONVOLUTED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 45. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY ROLLING LOBE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 46. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY ROLLING LOBE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 47. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY ROLLING LOBE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 48. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SLEEVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 49. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SLEEVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 50. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SLEEVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 51. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 52. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 53. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 54. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY AFTERMARKET, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 55. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 56. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 57. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY OEM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 58. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 59. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY FLEET OPERATORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 60. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY FLEET OPERATORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 61. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY FLEET OPERATORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 62. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNER OPERATORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 63. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNER OPERATORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 64. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY OWNER OPERATORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 65. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RENTAL COMPANIES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 66. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RENTAL COMPANIES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 67. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RENTAL COMPANIES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 68. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 69. AMERICAS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 70. AMERICAS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 71. AMERICAS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 72. AMERICAS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 73. AMERICAS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 74. AMERICAS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 75. AMERICAS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 76. NORTH AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 77. NORTH AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 78. NORTH AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 79. NORTH AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 80. NORTH AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 81. NORTH AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 82. NORTH AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 83. LATIN AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 84. LATIN AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 85. LATIN AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 86. LATIN AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 87. LATIN AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 88. LATIN AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 90. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 91. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 92. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 93. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 94. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 95. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 96. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 97. EUROPE TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 98. EUROPE TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 99. EUROPE TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 100. EUROPE TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 101. EUROPE TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 102. EUROPE TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 103. EUROPE TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 104. MIDDLE EAST TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 105. MIDDLE EAST TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 106. MIDDLE EAST TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 107. MIDDLE EAST TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 108. MIDDLE EAST TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 109. MIDDLE EAST TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 110. MIDDLE EAST TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 111. AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 112. AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 113. AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 114. AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 115. AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 116. AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 117. AFRICA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 118. ASIA-PACIFIC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 119. ASIA-PACIFIC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 120. ASIA-PACIFIC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 121. ASIA-PACIFIC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 122. ASIA-PACIFIC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 123. ASIA-PACIFIC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 124. ASIA-PACIFIC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 125. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 126. ASEAN TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 127. ASEAN TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 128. ASEAN TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 129. ASEAN TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 130. ASEAN TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 131. ASEAN TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 132. ASEAN TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 133. GCC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 134. GCC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 135. GCC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 136. GCC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 137. GCC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 138. GCC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 139. GCC TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 140. EUROPEAN UNION TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 141. EUROPEAN UNION TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 142. EUROPEAN UNION TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 143. EUROPEAN UNION TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 144. EUROPEAN UNION TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 145. EUROPEAN UNION TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 146. EUROPEAN UNION TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 147. BRICS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 148. BRICS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 149. BRICS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 150. BRICS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 151. BRICS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 152. BRICS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 153. BRICS TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 154. G7 TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 155. G7 TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 156. G7 TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 157. G7 TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 158. G7 TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 159. G7 TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 160. G7 TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 161. NATO TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 162. NATO TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 163. NATO TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 164. NATO TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 165. NATO TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 166. NATO TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 167. NATO TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 168. GLOBAL TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 169. UNITED STATES TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 170. UNITED STATES TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 171. UNITED STATES TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 172. UNITED STATES TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 173. UNITED STATES TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 174. UNITED STATES TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 175. UNITED STATES TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 176. CHINA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 177. CHINA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY SUSPENSION APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 178. CHINA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY RV, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 179. CHINA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TRAILER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 180. CHINA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 181. CHINA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
TABLE 182. CHINA TRAILER AIR SPRING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

Companies Mentioned

The key companies profiled in this Trailer Air Spring market report include:
  • Accuride Corporation
  • Air Lift Company
  • Conmet LLC
  • Continental AG
  • Dana Incorporated
  • DynAir Suspension Inc.
  • Firestone Industrial Products Company, LLC
  • Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
  • Haldex AB
  • Hendrickson International, LLC
  • Hyundai WIA Corporation
  • Jost-Werke GmbH
  • Knorr-Bremse AG
  • Meritor, Inc.
  • Mubea Group
  • Ridewell Corporation
  • SAF-Holland S.A.
  • SAF-Intralog GmbH
  • Sumitomo Riko Company Limited
  • Trelleborg AB
  • Vibracoustic GmbH
  • Vibro-Acoustics, Inc.
  • Wabash National Corporation
  • WABCO Holdings Inc.

Table Information